Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress and α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons and postmortem brain tissue

  • Yoichi Imaizumi1,

    Affiliated with

    • Yohei Okada1, 2,

      Affiliated with

      • Wado Akamatsu1,

        Affiliated with

        • Masato Koike3,

          Affiliated with

          • Naoko Kuzumaki1,

            Affiliated with

            • Hideki Hayakawa4,

              Affiliated with

              • Tomoko Nihira4,

                Affiliated with

                • Tetsuro Kobayashi5,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Manabu Ohyama5,

                    Affiliated with

                    • Shigeto Sato6,

                      Affiliated with

                      • Masashi Takanashi6,

                        Affiliated with

                        • Manabu Funayama6, 7,

                          Affiliated with

                          • Akiyoshi Hirayama8,

                            Affiliated with

                            • Tomoyoshi Soga8,

                              Affiliated with

                              • Takako Hishiki9,

                                Affiliated with

                                • Makoto Suematsu9,

                                  Affiliated with

                                  • Takuya Yagi10,

                                    Affiliated with

                                    • Daisuke Ito10,

                                      Affiliated with

                                      • Arifumi Kosakai10,

                                        Affiliated with

                                        • Kozo Hayashi11,

                                          Affiliated with

                                          • Masanobu Shouji11,

                                            Affiliated with

                                            • Atsushi Nakanishi11,

                                              Affiliated with

                                              • Norihiro Suzuki10,

                                                Affiliated with

                                                • Yoshikuni Mizuno12,

                                                  Affiliated with

                                                  • Noboru Mizushima13,

                                                    Affiliated with

                                                    • Masayuki Amagai5,

                                                      Affiliated with

                                                      • Yasuo Uchiyama3,

                                                        Affiliated with

                                                        • Hideki Mochizuki4, 14,

                                                          Affiliated with

                                                          • Nobutaka Hattori6, 7 and

                                                            Affiliated with

                                                            • Hideyuki Okano1Email author

                                                              Affiliated with

                                                              Molecular Brain20125:35

                                                              DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-5-35

                                                              Received: 19 September 2012

                                                              Accepted: 2 October 2012

                                                              Published: 6 October 2012



                                                              Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN). The familial form of PD, PARK2, is caused by mutations in the parkin gene. parkin-knockout mouse models show some abnormalities, but they do not fully recapitulate the pathophysiology of human PARK2.


                                                              Here, we generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from two PARK2 patients. PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons showed increased oxidative stress and enhanced activity of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway. iPSC-derived neurons, but not fibroblasts or iPSCs, exhibited abnormal mitochondrial morphology and impaired mitochondrial homeostasis. Although PARK2 patients rarely exhibit Lewy body (LB) formation with an accumulation of α-synuclein, α-synuclein accumulation was observed in the postmortem brain of one of the donor patients. This accumulation was also seen in the iPSC-derived neurons in the same patient.


                                                              Thus, pathogenic changes in the brain of a PARK2 patient were recapitulated using iPSC technology. These novel findings reveal mechanistic insights into the onset of PARK2 and identify novel targets for drug screening and potential modified therapies for PD.


                                                              Induced pluripotent stem cells Parkinson’s disease Parkin Oxidative stress Mitochondria α-synuclein


                                                              Parkin is a causative gene of autosomal recessive juvenile Parkinson’s disease (PARK2). It encodes a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in mitochondrial homeostasis [15]. Parkin deficiency is thought to result in aberrant ubiquitination and compromised mitochondrial integrity, leading to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. Several PARK2 mouse models exist, but they do not replicate all of the pathogenic changes seen in human PARK2 neurons; thus, these models do not fully account for the molecular mechanisms of PD [69]. A recent report demonstrated that there is a defect in dopamine (DA) utilization in PARK2 induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons [10]. However, it is not known whether neuronal homeostasis is disrupted in PARK2 patients. Furthermore, studies have yet to demonstrate whether the phenotype of PD-specific iPSC-derived neurons recapitulates the in vivo phenotype of the corresponding cell donor. To address these questions, we generated iPSCs from two PARK2 patients (PA and PB) [11]. In PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons, but not PARK2 fibroblasts or iPSCs, abnormal mitochondrial morphology and aberrant tubulovesicular structures adjacent to the Golgi were observed, as was increased oxidative stress. Although α-synuclein accumulation and Lewy body (LB) formation are very rare in PARK2 patients [1, 12, 13], we observed pathological changes and prominent LB formation, including the accumulation of α-synuclein, in postmortem brain tissue from one of the donor patients (PA). However, we obtained autopsied brain tissue from the father of donor PB, who carried the same parkin deletion as PB, and observed no evidence of LB formation or α-synuclein-positive cells. Consistent with these observations in postmortem brain tissue, increased α-synuclein accumulation was clearly observed in PA iPSC-derived neurons in vitro, but not in PB iPCS-derived neurons. These results are the first demonstration of pathogenic changes in the brain of a PARK2 patient that were recapitulated using iPSC technology. Our findings also provide mechanistic insights into PARK2 pathophysiology.

                                                              Results & discussion

                                                              Generation of PARK2 iPSCs

                                                              iPSCs were generated from dermal fibroblasts isolated from two PARK2 patients carrying parkin mutations and two control subjects using retroviruses carrying Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc to reprogram the cells as previously described [14, 15]. The PARK2 patients were a 71-year-old female (PA) with a homozygous deletion of parkin exons 2–4 and a 50-year-old male (PB) with a homozygous deletion of exons 6 and 7 (Table  1 and Additional file 1A and B). Patient PA died 1 year after enrollment in the study at the age of 72. A previously-established human iPSC clone from control subject A, 201B7 (B7), was also used [15]. In addition, the following human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-like iPSC clones were selected for detailed analysis: three controls (B7 and YA9 from control A, and WD39 from control B), three from patient PA (PA1, PA9 and PA22), and four from patient PB (PB1, PB2, PB18 and PB20) (Figure  1A and Additional file 2A and B).
                                                              Table 1

                                                              PA and PB patient information


                                                              PA patient

                                                              PB patient





                                                              72 y/o

                                                              50 y/o




                                                              Age of onset

                                                              62 y/o

                                                              28 y/o

                                                              Mutation of parkin

                                                              Exon 2–4 homozygous deletions

                                                              Exon 6, 7 homozygous deletions

                                                              Figure 1

                                                              Generation of PARK2 iPSCs. (A) iPSCs derived from control and PARK2 subjects, embryoid bodies (EBs), neurospheres (NSs), and neurons. Left three rows: iPSCs from Control A (YA9), Control B (WD39), PA (PA9), and PB (PB2) were immunopositive for the pluripotency markers Oct4 (green) and Nanog (red). Right three rows: Differentiation of iPSCs into tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive (red) neurons via EB and NS formation. Scale bars: Phase contrast, 400 μm; Nanog and Oct4 immunostaining, 100 μm; EBs, 25 μm; NSs, 50 μm; neurons, 10 μm. (B) Deletion of exons 2–4 in clones PA1, 9 and 22; and of exons 6 and 7 in clones PB1, 2, 18, and 20 was confirmed. (C) Exons 2–4 were deleted in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) from PA and in PA1 iPSC lines. Exons 6 and 7 were deleted in HDFs from PB and PB1 iPSC lines. (D) Copy number profiles of whole chromosomes in PARK2 HDFs and iPSCs were assessed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarray analysis; there was no evidence that genomic aberrations were introduced during the process of establishing PARK2 iPSCs.

                                                              The PARK2 iPSCs expressed pluripotent hESC markers (Figure  1A and Additional file 2A-C) and formed teratomas containing all three germ layers (Additional file 2D). All of the retroviral transgenes were silenced in each clone (Additional file 2E). The iPSCs derived from PA and PB retained the corresponding homozygous parkin deletions and exhibited genomic stability (Figure  1B-D; Additional file 3A and B; and Table  1). All of the clones differentiated into neurons, including tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive neurons, through a process of embryoid body and neurosphere formation (Figure  1A). Thus, all of the lines were successfully reprogrammed into a pluripotent state and were suitable for further analysis.

                                                              Increased oxidative stress accompanied by activation of the Nrf2 pathway in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons

                                                              Because increased levels of oxidative stress have been documented in other PD models [7, 10, 16, 17], we examined oxidative metabolism in the iPSC clones by measuring the cellular levels of reduced glutathione (GSH). GSH reacts with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and is catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase [18]. Consistent with previous results from patient-derived cells [16], the levels of GSH in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurospheres were significantly lower than those in control iPSC-derived neurospheres (Figure  2A). We also examined ROS production using 2’, 7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescin (DCF) fluorescence to measure the levels of intracellular oxidants. The DCF fluorescence intensity in the PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons was significantly higher than that in control iPSC-derived neurons (Figure  2B and C), which indicated an increased level of oxidative stress. A recent study showed that, in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons, monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A and -B levels and oxidative stress levels are increased, as is spontaneous DA release [10]. Here, we found no significant differences in MAO-A and -B expression levels between PARK2 and control neurons (Additional file 4A and B).
                                                              Figure 2

                                                              Increased oxidative stress accompanied by activation of the Nrf2 pathway in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons. (A) GSH levels were significantly reduced in PARK2 (PA1, 9 and 22, and PB2, 18 and 20) iPSC-derived neurospheres compared with those in control A (YA9) and B (WD39) neurospheres. (B, C) DCF fluorescence intensity in PARK2 (PA1, 9 and 22, and PB2 and 20) iPSC-derived neurons was significantly higher than that in control A (B7) and B (WD39) neurons. (D, E) Immunoblot analysis of Nrf2 and NQO1 levels in iPSC-derived neurons from PA and PB. Expression of Nrf2 and NQO1 in PARK2 (PA9 and PB2) iPSC-derived neurons was significantly higher than that in control A (YA9) and B (WD39) neurons. Relative protein abundance was normalized to β-actin. ** indicates P < 0.01 (Mann–Whitney U-test). Data represent the mean and SEM of at least three experiments for each group.

                                                              The Nrf2 pathway plays a cytoprotective role under conditions of ROS accumulation. Recent studies show that activation of the Nrf2 pathway reduces oxidative stress and provides partial protection from MPTP-mediated neurotoxicity [19]. Elevated Nrf2 expression was observed in the postmortem brain of a PD patient [20]. These data suggest a putative link between the Nrf2 pathway and PD, and prompted a closer investigation of this signaling pathway in control and PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons [1921]. The expression of Nrf2 pathway proteins, such as Nrf2 and NADH quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), was significantly increased in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons (Figure  2D and E). These data are in line with previous reports [1921], and suggest that the Nrf2 cytoprotective pathway may be activated in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons to prevent further damage from oxidative stress. Taken together, these data demonstrated an increased level of oxidative stress accompanied by activation of the Nrf2 pathway in PARK2 neurons.

                                                              Abnormal mitochondrial morphology and impaired mitochondrial turnover in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons

                                                              Increased oxidative stress (which affects anti-oxidant defense systems) and mitochondrial dysfunction are implicated in the pathogenesis of PD [1, 13, 2123]. Furthermore, ROS accumulation causes both oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in the substantia nigra (SN) of parkin-deficient mice [7]. However, the exact mechanism of mitochondrial pathogenesis associated with PARK2 is controversial. For example, while Drosophila parkin mutants show abnormal mitochondrial morphology, parkin-knockout mice do not [7, 24]. In addition, while a greater degree of mitochondrial branching is observed in fibroblasts derived from PARK2 patients, the detailed morphology of the mitochondria in these cells has not been characterized [25]. To investigate these mitochondrial abnormalities in more depth, we performed a detailed morphological analysis of mitochondria in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons using electron microscopy. Mitochondria in PARK2 neurons from both patients showed a highly electron-dense matrix and swollen mitochondrial cristae within the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) (Figure  3A, black arrowheads). The perikaryal volume density of the abnormal mitochondria was significantly increased in PA and PB iPSC-derived neurons relative to control clones (Figure  3B). Furthermore, the density of normal mitochondria decreased (Figure  3B). Importantly, both abnormal and normal mitochondria were observed in PARK2 neurons (Figure  3A, white arrowheads). Abnormal mitochondria were observed in 87.8% of iPSC-derived neurons from PA, and 79.5% of iPSC-derived neurons from PB. These data indicated that abnormal mitochondrial morphology was a feature of most PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons from these patients. In addition, abnormal tubulovesicular structures were observed adjacent to the Golgi cisternae in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons (Figure  3A). These abnormal mitochondrial and tubulovesicular structures were not observed in PARK2 fibroblasts or in undifferentiated iPSCs (Additional file 5A and B). These histological abnormalities represent novel PARK2-related neuronal pathologies.
                                                              Figure 3

                                                              Dysregulation of mitochondrial homeostasis in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons. (A) Electron micrographs of control A (B7), control B (WD39) and PARK2 (PA9 and PB2) iPSC-derived neurons. Boxed areas are shown in the enlarged images to the right. Control mitochondria showed a characteristically long, cylindrical profile with well-organized cristae, and the electron density of the matrix was relatively low (white arrowheads). By contrast, increased electron density of the matrix was evident in PARK2 mitochondria (black arrowheads), and the cristae often appeared swollen. As shown in PB2, some of the neurons contained both morphologically intact (white arrowheads) and abnormal (black arrowheads) mitochondria. Furthermore, abnormal tubulovesicular structures (asterisks) were observed adjacent to the Golgi cisternae (G). (B) The relative perikaryal volume of the abnormal mitochondria was significantly increased, and that of the normal mitochondria was decreased, in PARK2 neurons compared with control neurons. (C) Double labeling for the IMM marker, ComplexIII coreI (CIII-Core I; magenta) and βIII-tubulin (green) of control A (B7), control B (WD39) and PARK2 (PA9 and PB2) iPSC-derived neurons. The volume of the IMM area was reduced in control neurons treated with CCCP, but not in PARK2 neurons treated with CCCP. Administration of Baf A1 rescued the CCCP-induced phenotype in control neurons. (D) The CCCP/DMSO ratio in control A (B7 and YA9) and B (WD39) neurons was reduced after CCCP treatment. This reduction was not observed in PARK2 (PA1, 9 and 22, and PB2 and 20) iPSC-derived neurons (black bars indicate CCCP/DMSO ratio; white bars indicate Baf A1+CCCP/Baf A1 ratio). ** indicates P < 0.01 compared with the control; ¶¶ indicates P < 0.01 when comparing the black and white bars (Mann–Whitney U-test). At least three experiments were performed for each group, with 5–36 cells quantified per experiment. Scale bars: a, 1 μm; c, 10 μm. Error bars represent the SEM. N.D., not detected.

                                                              PARKIN is involved in the mitochondrial fission/fusion system and is recruited to depolarized mitochondria to promote mitophagy [5, 2629]. In iPSC-derived neurons containing a mutation in PINK1 (a protein kinase upstream of PARKIN), PARKIN is not recruited appropriately to mitochondria [30]. We hypothesized that PARKIN-deficient human neurons would show aberrant removal of depolarized mitochondria. To examine the turnover of damaged mitochondria, we treated iPSC-derived neurons with carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazine (CCCP), which triggers the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and results in the removal of damaged mitochondria. The intensity of TMRE, a mitochondrial membrane potential-dependent dye, clearly decreased in both control and PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons treated with CCCP, which indicated a reduced mitochondrial membrane potential in both sets of neurons (Additional file 6). To determine the extent to which the damaged mitochondria were eliminated, we measured the area of the IMM after CCCP treatment. Compared with untreated cells, there was a dramatic loss of IMM area in the treated control neurons, but not in the treated PARK2 neurons (Figure  3C, left four columns; Figure  3D, black bars). To assess whether lysosomes were involved in the CCCP-induced elimination of mitochondria, we treated cells with Bafilomycin (Baf) A1, an inhibitor of the vacuolar type H(+)-ATPase. Baf A1 attenuated the CCCP-dependent reduction in the IMM area in control neurons (Figure  3C, right four columns; Figure  3D, white bars). To confirm that the abnormal turnover of damaged mitochondria was characteristic of neuronal cells, PARK2 fibroblasts and undifferentiated iPSCs were treated with CCCP. CCCP-treated PARK2 fibroblasts and undifferentiated iPSCs exhibited the same mitochondrial dynamics as CCCP-treated control cells (Additional file 5C-E). Together, these data indicated aberrant degradation of mitochondria damaged by CCCP treatment in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons.

                                                              These results support a recently proposed working model for PD, in which damaged mitochondria accumulate due to a disruption in PARKIN-mediated mitochondrial quality control [28]. The electron microscopy data, which showed a mixture of abnormal and normal mitochondria, indicated that PARKIN-mediated mitochondrial quality control is compromised, even in young PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons. In these cells, residual normal mitochondria may have compensated for the damaged ones. Thus, while our findings suggest that the PARKIN-dependent mechanisms that regulate mitochondrial homeostasis are disrupted in PARK2 cells, further detailed analyses are required to fully understand the mechanism underlying this disruption and the implications for PD.

                                                              Patient-specific accumulation of α-synuclein in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons and its correlation with LB formation

                                                              LBs are pathological neuronal inclusions composed principally of α-synuclein. They are typically associated with PD and certain forms of dementia [1, 13, 31]. Although LBs are generally thought to be absent from PARK2 patients [1, 13, 31], rare cases of LB formation in the brains of PARK2 patients have been reported recently [12, 32, 33]. The PARKIN protein co-localizes with LBs in some patients with sporadic PD [34], and a functional interaction between PARKIN and α-synuclein is indicated by both in vitro and in vivo findings [3537]. These results suggest that PARKIN-pathway may contribute to LB formation in PD patients.

                                                              We were able to conduct a histopathological analysis of postmortem brain tissue from patient PA. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the SN revealed low levels of brown-black melanin pigment compared with healthy SN tissue (Figure  4A and A’). Surprisingly, LBs accumulated in the SN and other areas of the brain in patient PA (Figure  4B and Table  2). Furthermore, α-synuclein and pα-synuclein immunoreactive puncta and neurites were observed in the areas where LBs were present (Figure  4B). TH/pα-synuclein double-positive neurons were also detected in the SN (Figure  4C). Of note, α-synuclein-positive/TH-negative or pα-synuclein-positive/TH-negative neurons in the SN and other areas of the brain tissue from patient PA’s brain were observed (Table  2). These data suggested that α-synuclein accumulated not only in TH+ neurons, but also in other types of neurons. Postmortem tissue from the brain of the father of patient PB was also examined. The father carried a homozygous deletion of exons 6 and 7 of the parkin gene (Figure  1B, Additional file 1B and 7A), similar to patient PB. There was no evidence of LBs or α-synuclein-positive neurons in the autopsied brain tissue of the father (Figure  4D). Thus, since the genetic background of patient PB and his father are likely to be very close (Additional file 1B and 7A), these results are probably reflective of a specific phenotype of patient PB, which was different from that in patient PA (Figure  4A-D).
                                                              Figure 4

                                                              Accumulation of LBs in the postmortem brain of patient PA. (AC) Immunohistochemical staining of postmortem brain tissue from patient PA. (A) Low magnification image of a midbrain section stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). (A’) High magnification image of the boxed area. Melanin levels were reduced in most of the substantia nigra (SN). (B) (Left) High magnification image of a midbrain section stained with H&E showing the presence of Lewy bodies (LBs) in the SN. (Middle and Right) α-synuclein-positive and pα-synuclein-positive cells in the SN. (C) Confocal microscopy image of a TH (green) and pα-synuclein (red) double-positive SN neuron and a projected merged image: pα-synuclein accumulated in the TH-positive neuron. (D) Melanin levels were reduced in most of the SN. No LBs or α-synuclein-positive neurons were observed in postmortem brain tissue from the father of patient PB. Scale bars: A, 1000 μm; A’, 350 μm; B, C, 50 μm; D, 100 μm.

                                                              Table 2

                                                              LB type pathology in PA patient’s postmortem brain

                                                              Brain area

                                                              LB type pathology

                                                              Brainstem lesion







                                                              Basal forebrain/Limbic

















                                                              IX-X, motor cranial nerves IX-X; LC, Locus Coeruleus; SN, Substantia Nigra; nbM, nucleus basal of Meynert; Amy, Amygdala; Ent, Entorhinal cortex; T, Temporal lobe; F, Frontal lobe; P, Parietal lobe.

                                                              To determine whether iPSC-derived neurons recapitulated the in vivo phenotypes of the corresponding cell donors, we next examined α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons. To rule out the possibility that α-synuclein expression in undifferentiated PARK2 iPSCs was increased by multiplication of the SNCA gene, genomic aberrations acquired during the process of iPSC establishment, or by repeated passage of the cells, the SNCA gene copy number in iPSCs was quantified by genomic qPCR. A comparison with control iPSCs showed that iPSCs from both PA and PB carried the normal number of SNCA gene copies (Additional file 8A). Moreover, immunostaining for α-synuclein did not reveal any increase or decrease in α-synuclein protein levels in PARK2 iPSCs (Additional file 8B). As a control for LB formation, we generated iPSC-derived neurons from a 106-year-old woman (designated Cent1-8), since previous work suggested that aging is a predisposing factor for LB formation in PD patients [31, 38]. Since α-synuclein was also expressed in non-neural cells, triple labeling for α-synuclein, βIII-tubulin, and TH was performed to ensure that only neurons were examined (Figure  5A, asterisks). The proportion of α-synuclein-positive iPSC-derived neurons that were also positive for βIII-tubulin from PB was similar to that in the controls (including Cent1-8); however, the proportion was significantly higher in PA. These results were consistent with the in vivo phenotypes of the cell donors based on analysis of postmortem brain tissue (1629, 357, 805, 3747, and 4330 iPSC-derived βIII-tubulin+ neurons in control A, control B, Cent1-8, PA and PB respectively; Figure  5A-C, arrows and arrowheads). Thus, the increase in α-synuclein expression levels seen in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons cannot be attributed solely to the effects of aging, but associated with the disease phenotype.
                                                              Figure 5

                                                              α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons. (AC) Triple labeling for α-synuclein (red), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH; cyan), and βIII-tubulin (green) along with Hoechst (blue) staining of control A (B7), control B (WD39), Cent1-8, and PARK2 (PA9 and PB20) iPSC-derived neurons. (A) Arrows indicate α-synuclein+/TH+/βIII-tubulin+ neurons; arrowheads indicate α-synuclein+/TH-/βIII-tubulin+ neurons. Note the presence of α-synuclein+/TH-/βIII-tubulin- non-neural cells (asterisks). (B) High magnification confocal projection image of an α-synuclein (magenta)/βIII-tubulin (green) double-positive PA9 iPSC-derived neuron. (C) The proportion of α-synuclein+/βIII-tubulin+ neurons relative to βIII-tubulin-positive neurons was significantly higher in PA (PA1, 9 and 22) iPSC-derived neurons than in control A (B7 and YA9), control B (WD39) and Cent1-8 iPSC-derived neurons. Scale bars: A, 50 μm; C, 5 μm. ** indicates P < 0.01; * and ¶ indicate P < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney U-test). Data represent the mean and SEM of at least three experiments for each group.

                                                              The obvious LB-formation was observed in the postmortem brain of PA patient, who showed a late onset at 61 years, corresponding to the enhanced α-synuclein accumulation in the iPSC-derived neurons from the same patient. Thus, it is likely that early-stage LB formation was recapitulated in vitro in iPSC-derived neurons. Furthermore, the present findings are consistent with recent work by several groups, which suggest that the age of onset of PARK2 in patients with LB formation (41 on average) is later than in patients without LB formation (below 40) [12, 32, 33]. The earlier onset in patient PB (at 28 years) than in PA (at 61 years) would be consistent with the finding of lower α-synuclein accumulation in PB iPSC-derived neurons compared with PA iPSC-derived neurons. On the other hand, and in contrast to the observations of brain tissue from PA, analysis of brain tissue from the father of patient PB, in whom the onset of PD was 39 years of age, revealed no evidence of LB formation (Figure  4D). Importantly, PA iPSC-derived neurons showed significantly more α-synuclein accumulation than PB iPSC-derived neurons (Figure  5A and C). These results suggest that the extent of α-synuclein accumulation is an important factor in LB formation. Then, how can we explain the difference of α-synuclein accumulation between PA and PB patients-derived neuronal cells? It is possible that PA is a rare example of PARK2 complicated by sporadic PD. Although both PA and PB iPSCs showed a normal SNCA gene copy number, it is possible that PA-derived cells acquired an unknown gene mutation relating to LB formation. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that other factors may affect LB formation in PARK2 patients. Further analyses will be required to identify these putative factors. Although iPSC clones from sporadic and familial PD patients were recently established [17, 30, 3942], this report is the first to demonstrate that the phenotype of PD-specific iPSC-derived neurons replicates the in vivo phenotype seen in postmortem brain tissue from the corresponding cell donor.


                                                              In summary, dysfunctional neuronal homeostasis (characterized by increased oxidative stress and activation of the Nrf2 pathway), impaired mitochondrial function, and increased α-synuclein accumulation were observed in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons. These results indicate that PARK2-associated phenotypes may appear soon after, or possibly even before, the onset of PARK2. Detailed analyses of PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons, particularly mature neurons, to determine the time course of LB accumulation and synaptic dysfunction will be of great interest. Such analyses will further our understanding of the pathogenesis of PARK2 as well as sporadic PD. The ultimate goal is the development and application of novel preventative therapies for PD.

                                                              Materials & methods

                                                              Isolation of human skin fibroblasts and generation of iPSCs

                                                              For control A, human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) from the facial dermis of a 36-year-old Caucasian female (Cell Applications Inc.) were used to establish iPSCs (201B7; Passage 20–29, YA9; Passage 15–24). The 201B7 iPSCs were kindly provided by Dr. Yamanaka [15]. A skin-punch biopsy from a healthy 16-year-old Japanese female obtained after written informed consent (Keio University School of Medicine) was used to generate the control B iPSCs (WD39; Passage 8–17). PA iPSCs (PA1, 9, and 22; Passage 10–19) and PB iPSCs (PB1, 2, 18, and 20; Passage 8–17) were generated from a 71-year-old Japanese female patient and a 50-year-old Japanese male patient, respectively, using the same methods used to generate control B iPSCs. The maintenance of HDFs, lentiviral production, retroviral production, infection, stem cell culture and characterization, and teratoma formation were performed as described previously [14, 15]. All of the experimental procedures for skin biopsy and iPS production were approved by the Keio University School of Medicine Ethics committee (Approval Number: 20-16-18) and Juntendo University School of Medicine Ethics committee (Approval Number: 2012068). hESCs (KhES-1; Passage 29–38 (kindly provided by Dr. Norio Nakatsuji) were cultured on feeder cells in iPS culture media [43].

                                                              In vitro differentiation of human iPSCs

                                                              Neural differentiation of iPSCs was performed as previously described [44] with slight modifications (Okada et al., manuscript in preparation). Briefly, iPSC colonies were detached from feeder layers and cultured in suspension as EBs for about 30 days in bacteriological dishes. EBs were then enzymatically dissociated into single cells and the dissociated cells cultured in suspension in serum-free media (MHM) [44] for 10 to 14 days to allow the formation of neurospheres. Neurospheres were passaged repeatedly by dissociation into single cells followed by culture in the same manner. Typically, neurospheres between passages 3 and 8 were used for analysis. For terminal differentiation, dissociated or undissociated neurospheres were allowed to adhere to poly-L-ornithine- and fibronectin-coated coverslips and cultured for 10 days.

                                                              Immunocytochemical analysis of iPSCs and neurons

                                                              For immunocytochemical analysis, cells were fixed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min at room temperature (RT). The cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining using antibodies to the following proteins: β-III-tubulin (1:1000, Sigma), NANOG (1:100, ReproCELL), OCT3/4 (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), SSEA-4 (1:200, Millipore), TRA-1-60 (1:200, Millipore), TH (1:100, Millipore), α-synuclein (1:500, Invitrogen), pα-synuclein (1:1000, Wako), cleaved-Caspase3 (1:500, Cell Signaling) and ComplexIII (C-III)-core I (1:200, Invitrogen). Cells were washed with PBS after incubation with the primary antibody, followed by incubation with an Alexa Fluor 488-, Alexa Fluor 555-, or Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500, Invitrogen). Images were obtained using Apotome (Zeiss) or LSM-710 confocal (Zeiss) microscopes.

                                                              PCR amplification of genomic DNA

                                                              Genomic DNA was purified from HDFs and iPSCs using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen). The PCR conditions used have been previously described [2, 42].

                                                              Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR

                                                              RNA isolation and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR were performed as previously described [44]. The amount of cDNA was normalized to β-actin mRNA. Real-time RT-PCR was performed on a ABI PRISM Sequence detection System 7900HT (Applied BioSystems) using SYBR premix ExTaq (Takara). Primers for the detection of Oct4, the transgenes Oct4-tg, Sox2-tg, Klf4-tg and c-Myc-tg, and MAO-A, and -B have been previously described [10, 15].

                                                              Teratoma assay

                                                              To assess teratoma formation, iPSCs were injected into the testis of 8-week-old NOD/SCID mice (OYG International) as previously described [14]. Eight weeks after transplantation, tumors were dissected and fixed with 4% PFA in PBS. Paraffin-embedded tissue was sectioned and stained with H&E. Images were obtained using a BZ-9000 (Keyence) microscope.

                                                              CGH array

                                                              Genomic DNA was restricted, labeled, and purified using the Agilent Oligo CGH Microarray Kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Labeled genomic DNA was processed for hybridization on a 4x 180K microarray (Agilent Technologies). Processing was performed as instructed by the manufacturer. The genomic analysis was performed using Agilent Genomic Workbench ver. 6.0 software (Agilent Technologies).

                                                              Metabolism assays

                                                              Reduced GSH levels were measured according to the kit manufacturer’s protocol (GSH-Glo Glutathione Assay; Promega). Chymotrypsin-like proteasome activity was measured using a Cell-Based Proteasome-Glo Assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Briefly, neural cells (1.0 × 104) derived from neurospheres were seeded in triplicate into a white 96-well plate (Nunc). Prepared reagent (100 μl) was added to each well. After incubation for 10 min at RT, luminescence intensity was recorded. ROS levels were determined by measuring DCFH-DA fluorescence (Invitrogen). Briefly, neurons were incubated with 5 μM DCFH-DA and Hoechst (1:2000) for 30 min at 37°C, after which they were washed with PBS and then incubated in differentiation media. Fluorescence was measured by an In Cell Analyzer 2000 system (GE Healthcare Biosciences).

                                                              Protein analysis

                                                              Differentiated neurons were harvested in MAPK lysis buffer containing proteinase inhibitor, and protein concentrations were measured by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). Samples were diluted to yield equivalent protein concentrations and then 4 μg was denatured by the addition of 4X sample buffer (Invitrogen) supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol followed by boiling. Samples (7 μl/lane) were loaded onto a 4–20% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gel. Membranes were incubated in blocking solution with the indicated primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Immunoreactive proteins were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies and then visualized by chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantification of band intensities was performed using an RAS4000 system. The primary antibodies used were anti-NQO1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-NRF2 (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and β-actin (1:5000, Cell Signaling).

                                                              CCCP and Baf A1 treatments

                                                              Neurons were cultured with 30 μM CCCP (Sigma-Aldrich) or DMSO, with or without 5 μM Baf A1 (Sigma-Aldrich), for 48 h. The cells were then fixed and stained for βIII-tubulin and C-III Core I, and counterstained with Hoechst. To quantify the IMM area of the neurons, the cytoplasmic area was extracted as shown in Figure 3C. The C-III Core I-positive signals within the extracted area were then converted to gray-scale and digitized. The IMM area was quantified from the digitized values using Image J software.

                                                              Tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE) staining

                                                              iPSC-derived neurons were incubated with 1nM TMRE (Invitrogen) for 15 min at 37°C and then observed under an Olympus IX81 microscope.

                                                              Electron microscopy

                                                              Cells were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde/2% PFA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) (pH7.2), post-fixed with 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.2), blocked and stained with a 2% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate, dehydrated with a graded series of ethanol, and then embedded in Epon 812 (TAAB). Coverslips were detached and the embedded samples were placed under a stereomicroscope to identify the cells of interest. Ultrathin sections were cut with a Leica UC6 or UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems) and then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Samples were observed with a Hitachi H7100 or HT7700 electron microscope.


                                                              Morphometric analysis was used to measure the volume density of mitochondria in the neuronal perikarya as previously described [45]. Briefly, electron micrographs of neurons (n = 20, 23, 41, and 44 for control A (B7), control B (WD39), PA9 and PB2, respectively) were obtained at a magnification of ×7000. After enlarging to three times the original magnification, point-counting was carried out to determine the volume density using a double-lattice test system with 1.5 cm spacing. Mitochondria were classified as normal, abnormal, or undetermined. The abnormal mitochondria were defined as those with irregularly arranged cristae, or with a high electron-dense matrix. The volume density (Vv) of each type of mitochondrion was expressed as percent volume according to the following formula: Vv = (Pi/Pt) × 100 (%), where Pi is the number of points falling on each mitochondrial structure and Pt is the number of points falling on the neuronal perikarya.

                                                              Immunohistochemical analysis of autopsied brain tissue

                                                              The ethical committee of the Kitasato University School of Medicine and Juntendo University School of Medicine reviewed and approved the protocol for analysis of autopsied brain tissue. Patients and control subjects were informed of the study and gave written informed consent. Brain tissue from patient PA was obtained following her death at age 72; brain tissue from the father of patient PB was obtained when he died at age 70 [46]. Tissue was fixed with 10% formalin and then embedded in paraffin. Midbrain sections (6 μm thick) were cut, deparaffinized with xylene, and then rehydrated in ethanol. After being boiled and treated with H2O2, sections were subjected to immunofluorescence staining with antibodies to the following proteins: α-synuclein (1:500, Invitrogen), pα-synuclein (1:1000, Wako), and TH (1:1000, Calbiochem). After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody (1:500; Vector Laboratories Inc.) at RT for 1 hr followed by incubation with an avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories Inc.) for 1 hr. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Wako Pure Chemical Industries) and nuclear fast red staining. For immunofluorescence, FITC-conjugated and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories) were used. Images were obtained using a BIOREVO (Keyence) and a confocal laser-scanning LSM710 (Zeiss) microscope.

                                                              Statistical analysis

                                                              Values represent the mean ± SEM. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate differences between groups. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.



                                                              We would like to thank S. Yamanaka (CiRA) for the 201B7 iPSCs; N. Nakatsuji (Kyoto University) for the KhES cells; N. Izawa, S. Banno, Y. Matsuzaki, M. Fujiwara, Y. Nagahata, N. Hirose (Keio University), C. Kishi (Tokyo Medical and Dental University), M. Ogino, S. Miyakawa, (Kitasato University) and G. Takata (GE Healthcare Biosciences) for technical assistance and suggestions. This work was supported by the Project for the Realization of Regenerative Medicine and Support for the Core Institutes for iPS cell research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) to H.O., Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO), Suematsu Gas Biology Project from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) to M.S., a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to W.A. and Y.O., the Keio Kanrinmaru Project and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas to Y.O., a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Comprehensive Brain Science Network) from the MEXT to Y. O. and Y. I., a Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Young Medical Scientists from Keio University and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows to Y.I., and a Grant-in-Aid for the Global COE Program at Keio University.

                                                              Authors’ Affiliations

                                                              Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine
                                                              Kanrinmaru Project, Keio University School of Medicine
                                                              Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine
                                                              Department of Neurology, Kitasato University School of Medicine
                                                              Department of Dermatology, Keio University School of Medicine
                                                              Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine
                                                              Research Institute for Diseases of Old Age, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University
                                                              Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University
                                                              Department of Biochemistry, Keio University School of Medicine
                                                              Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine
                                                              Advanced Science Research Laboratories, Pharmaceutical Research Division, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
                                                              Department of Neuro-Regenerative Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine
                                                              Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
                                                              Department of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine


                                                              1. Farrer MJ: Genetics of Parkinson disease: paradigm shifts and future prospects. Nature reviews 2006, 7:306–318.PubMed
                                                              2. Kitada T, Asakawa S, Hattori N, Matsumine H, Yamamura Y, Minoshima S, Yokochi M, Mizuno Y, Shimizu N: Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism. Nature 1998, 392:605–608.PubMedView Article
                                                              3. Shimura H, Hattori N, Kubo S, Mizuno Y, Asakawa S, Minoshima S, Shimizu N, Iwai K, Chiba T, Tanaka K, Suzuki T: Familial Parkinson disease gene product, parkin, is a ubiquitin-protein ligase. Nat Genet 2000, 25:302–305.PubMedView Article
                                                              4. Whitworth AJ, Pallanck LJ: The PINK1/Parkin pathway: a mitochondrial quality control system? J Bioenerg Biomembr 2009, 41:499–503.PubMedView Article
                                                              5. Youle RJ, Narendra DP: Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:9–14.PubMedView Article
                                                              6. Goldberg MS, Fleming SM, Palacino JJ, Cepeda C, Lam HA, Bhatnagar A, Meloni EG, Wu N, Ackerson LC, Klapstein GJ, et al.: Parkin-deficient mice exhibit nigrostriatal deficits but not loss of dopaminergic neurons. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:43628–43635.PubMedView Article
                                                              7. Palacino JJ, Sagi D, Goldberg MS, Krauss S, Motz C, Wacker M, Klose J, Shen J: Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in parkin-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:18614–18622.PubMedView Article
                                                              8. Perez FA, Palmiter RD: Parkin-deficient mice are not a robust model of parkinsonism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:2174–2179.PubMedView Article
                                                              9. Sato S, Chiba T, Nishiyama S, Kakiuchi T, Tsukada H, Hatano T, Fukuda T, Yasoshima Y, Kai N, Kobayashi K, et al.: Decline of striatal dopamine release in parkin-deficient mice shown by ex vivo autoradiography. J Neurosci Res 2006, 84:1350–1357.PubMedView Article
                                                              10. Jiang H, Ren Y, Yuen EY, Zhong P, Ghaedi M, Hu Z, Azabdaftari G, Nakaso K, Yan Z, Feng J: Parkin controls dopamine utilization in human midbrain dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 2012, 3:668.PubMedView Article
                                                              11. Mattis VB, Svendsen CN: Induced pluripotent stem cells: a new revolution for clinical neurology? Lancet Neurol 2011, 10:383–394.PubMedView Article
                                                              12. Farrer M, Chan P, Chen R, Tan L, Lincoln S, Hernandez D, Forno L, Gwinn-Hardy K, Petrucelli L, Hussey J, et al.: Lewy bodies and parkinsonism in families with parkin mutations. Ann Neurol 2001, 50:293–300.PubMedView Article
                                                              13. Savitt JM, Dawson VL, Dawson TM: Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: molecules to medicine. J Clin Invest 2006, 116:1744–1754.PubMedView Article
                                                              14. Ohta S, Imaizumi Y, Okada Y, Akamatsu W, Kuwahara R, Ohyama M, Amagai M, Matsuzaki Y, Yamanaka S, Okano H, Kawakami Y: Generation of human melanocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One 2011, 6:e16182.PubMedView Article
                                                              15. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131:861–872.PubMedView Article
                                                              16. Matigian N, Abrahamsen G, Sutharsan R, Cook AL, Vitale AM, Nouwens A, Bellette B, An J, Anderson M, Beckhouse AG, et al.: Disease-specific, neurosphere-derived cells as models for brain disorders. Dis Model Mech 2010, 3:785–798.PubMedView Article
                                                              17. Nguyen HN, Byers B, Cord B, Shcheglovitov A, Byrne J, Gujar P, Kee K, Schule B, Dolmetsch RE, Langston W, et al.: LRRK2 mutant iPSC-derived DA neurons demonstrate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:267–280.PubMedView Article
                                                              18. Sies H: Glutathione and its role in cellular functions. Free Radic Biol Med 1999, 27:916–921.PubMedView Article
                                                              19. Williamson TP, Johnson DA, Johnson JA: Activation of the Nrf2-ARE pathway by siRNA knockdown of Keap1 reduces oxidative stress and provides partial protection from MPTP-mediated neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology 2012, 33:272–279.PubMedView Article
                                                              20. Ramsey CP, Glass CA, Montgomery MB, Lindl KA, Ritson GP, Chia LA, Hamilton RL, Chu CT, Jordan-Sciutto KL: Expression of Nrf2 in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007, 66:75–85.PubMedView Article
                                                              21. Tufekci KU, Civi Bayin E, Genc S, Genc K: The Nrf2/ARE Pathway: a promising target to counteract mitochondrial dysfunction in parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis 2011, 2011:314082.PubMed
                                                              22. Fukae J, Mizuno Y, Hattori N: Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Mitochondrion 2007, 7:58–62.PubMedView Article
                                                              23. Schapira AH: Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998, 1366:225–233.PubMedView Article
                                                              24. Greene JC, Whitworth AJ, Kuo I, Andrews LA, Feany MB, Pallanck LJ: Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:4078–4083.PubMedView Article
                                                              25. Mortiboys H, Thomas KJ, Koopman WJ, Klaffke S, Abou-Sleiman P, Olpin S, Wood NW, Willems PH, Smeitink JA, Cookson MR, Bandmann O: Mitochondrial function and morphology are impaired in parkin-mutant fibroblasts. Ann Neurol 2008, 64:555–565.PubMedView Article
                                                              26. Matsuda N, Sato S, Shiba K, Okatsu K, Saisho K, Gautier CA, Sou YS, Saiki S, Kawajiri S, Sato F, et al.: PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol 2010, 189:211–221.PubMedView Article
                                                              27. Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ: Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J Cell Biol 2008, 183:795–803.PubMedView Article
                                                              28. Tanaka A: Parkin-mediated selective mitochondrial autophagy, mitophagy: Parkin purges damaged organelles from the vital mitochondrial network. FEBS Lett 2010, 584:1386–1392.PubMedView Article
                                                              29. Yoshii SR, Kishi C, Ishihara N, Mizushima N: Parkin mediates proteasome-dependent protein degradation and rupture of the outer mitochondrial membrane. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:19630–19640.PubMedView Article
                                                              30. Seibler P, Graziotto J, Jeong H, Simunovic F, Klein C, Krainc D: Mitochondrial Parkin recruitment is impaired in neurons derived from mutant PINK1 induced pluripotent stem cells. J Neurosci 2011, 31:5970–5976.PubMedView Article
                                                              31. Shults CW: Lewy bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:1661–1668.PubMedView Article
                                                              32. Pramstaller PP, Schlossmacher MG, Jacques TS, Scaravilli F, Eskelson C, Pepivani I, Hedrich K, Adel S, Gonzales-McNeal M, Hilker R, et al.: Lewy body Parkinson's disease in a large pedigree with 77 Parkin mutation carriers. Ann Neurol 2005, 58:411–422.PubMedView Article
                                                              33. Sasaki S, Shirata A, Yamane K, Iwata M: Parkin-positive autosomal recessive juvenile Parkinsonism with alpha-synuclein-positive inclusions. Neurology 2004, 63:678–682.PubMedView Article
                                                              34. Schlossmacher MG, Frosch MP, Gai WP, Medina M, Sharma N, Forno L, Ochiishi T, Shimura H, Sharon R, Hattori N, et al.: Parkin localizes to the Lewy bodies of Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Am J Pathol 2002, 160:1655–1667.PubMedView Article
                                                              35. Chung KK, Zhang Y, Lim KL, Tanaka Y, Huang H, Gao J, Ross CA, Dawson VL, Dawson TM: Parkin ubiquitinates the alpha-synuclein-interacting protein, synphilin-1: implications for Lewy-body formation in Parkinson disease. Nat Med 2001, 7:1144–1150.PubMedView Article
                                                              36. Petrucelli L, O'Farrell C, Lockhart PJ, Baptista M, Kehoe K, Vink L, Choi P, Wolozin B, Farrer M, Hardy J, Cookson MR: Parkin protects against the toxicity associated with mutant alpha-synuclein: proteasome dysfunction selectively affects catecholaminergic neurons. Neuron 2002, 36:1007–1019.PubMedView Article
                                                              37. Shimura H, Schlossmacher MG, Hattori N, Frosch MP, Trockenbacher A, Schneider R, Mizuno Y, Kosik KS, Selkoe DJ: Ubiquitination of a new form of alpha-synuclein by parkin from human brain: implications for Parkinson's disease. Science (New York, NY) 2001, 293:263–269.View Article
                                                              38. Yagi T, Kosakai A, Ito D, Okada Y, Akamatsu W, Nihei Y, Nabetani A, Ishikawa F, Arai Y, Hirose N, et al.: Establishment of induced pluripotent stem cells from centenarians for neurodegenerative disease research. PLoS One 2012, 7:e41572.PubMedView Article
                                                              39. Hargus G, Cooper O, Deleidi M, Levy A, Lee K, Marlow E, Yow A, Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Hallett PJ, et al.: Differentiated Parkinson patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells grow in the adult rodent brain and reduce motor asymmetry in Parkinsonian rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:15921–15926.PubMedView Article
                                                              40. Park IH, Arora N, Huo H, Maherali N, Ahfeldt T, Shimamura A, Lensch MW, Cowan C, Hochedlinger K, Daley GQ: Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell 2008.
                                                              41. Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Beard C, Gao Q, Bell GW, Cook EG, Hargus G, Blak A, Cooper O, Mitalipova M, et al.: Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 2009, 136:964–977.PubMedView Article
                                                              42. Devine MJ, Ryten M, Vodicka P, Thomson AJ, Burdon T, Houlden H, Cavaleri F, Nagano M, Drummond NJ, Taanman JW, et al.: Parkinson's disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the alpha-synuclein locus. Nat Commun 2011, 2:440.PubMedView Article
                                                              43. Suemori H, Yasuchika K, Hasegawa K, Fujioka T, Tsuneyoshi N, Nakatsuji N: Efficient establishment of human embryonic stem cell lines and long-term maintenance with stable karyotype by enzymatic bulk passage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 345:926–932.PubMedView Article
                                                              44. Okada Y, Matsumoto A, Shimazaki T, Enoki R, Koizumi A, Ishii S, Itoyama Y, Sobue G, Okano H: Spatiotemporal recapitulation of central nervous system development by murine embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem/progenitor cells. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2008, 26:3086–3098.View Article
                                                              45. Koike M, Shibata M, Waguri S, Yoshimura K, Tanida I, Kominami E, Gotow T, Peters C, von Figura K, Mizushima N, et al.: Participation of autophagy in storage of lysosomes in neurons from mouse models of neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinoses (Batten disease). Am J Pathol 2005, 167:1713–1728.PubMedView Article
                                                              46. Mitsui J, Takahashi Y, Goto J, Tomiyama H, Ishikawa S, Yoshino H, Minami N, Smith DI, Lesage S, Aburatani H, et al.: Mechanisms of genomic instabilities underlying two common fragile-site-associated loci, PARK2 and DMD, in germ cell and cancer cell lines. Am J Hum Genet 2010, 87:75–89.PubMedView Article

                                                              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.