Open Access

Effects of PI3Kβ overexpression in the hippocampus on synaptic plasticity and spatial learning

  • Jun-Hyeok Choi1,
  • Pojeong Park2,
  • Gi-Chul Baek1,
  • Su-Eon Sim2,
  • SukJae Joshua Kang2,
  • Yeseul Lee2,
  • Seo-Hee Ahn2,
  • Chae-Seok Lim1,
  • Yong-Seok Lee3,
  • Graham L Collingridge4 and
  • Bong-Kiun Kaang1, 2Email author
Molecular Brain20147:78

DOI: 10.1186/s13041-014-0078-6

Received: 15 September 2014

Accepted: 23 October 2014

Published: 6 November 2014

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a family of phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) plays pivotal roles in the brain; in particular, we previously reported that knockout of the β isoform of PI3K (PI3Kβ) in mice impaired synaptic plasticity and reduced behavioral flexibility. To further examine the role of PI3Kβ in synaptic plasticity and hippocampus-dependent behavioral tasks we overexpressed p110β, the catalytic subunit of PI3Kβ, in the hippocampal CA1 region. We found that the overexpression of p110β impairs NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression (LTD) and hippocampus-dependent spatial learning in the Morris water maze (MWM) task. In contrast, long-term potentiation (LTP) and contextual fear memory were not affected by p110β overexpression. These results, together with the previous knockout study, suggest that a critical level of PI3Kβ in the hippocampus is required for successful induction of LTD and normal learning.

Introduction

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) are involved in various biological processes such as growth, proliferation and differentiation of cells [1],[2]. PI3Ks produce various phosphorylated phosphoinositides, including PtdIns3P, PtdIns(3,4)P2, PtdIns(3,5)P2, and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3; all of which function in membrane trafficking and signal transduction [3],[4]. The PI3K family is grouped into three classes, I, II and III, according to their structures and substrates. The class I PI3Ks are further divided into IA and IB classes based on the similarities of their sequences. PI3Kβ, the sole member of class IB, is a heterodimer of the p110β catalytic subunit and either p101 or p84 regulatory subunits, which are encoded by separate genes [1]. Unlike other types of PI3Ks, which have a widespread tissue distribution, PI3Kβ is exclusively expressed in the immune system, the cardiovascular system, and the central nervous system [2]. The roles of PI3Kβ have primarily been studied in the field of immunology where it was first identified in the study of polyoma viruses [3].

Although mounting evidence has revealed that the members of PI3K family are required for learning and memory [4]-[8], the isoform-specific roles of PI3Ks are still largely undetermined. Recently, we found that PI3Kβ knockout mice (pi3kcg-/-) had a selective impairment in NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-dependent LTD and reversal learning in the Morris water maze (MWM) task [9]. To investigate the function of PI3Kβ in more detail, we have now used a gain-of-function approach by overexpressing PI3Kβ and have studied hippocampus-dependent learning and synaptic plasticity. We found that NMDAR-LTD, but not NMDAR-LTP, was impaired in slices prepared from mice in which PI3Kβ had been overexpressed in the hippocampus. Moreover, performance in a spatial learning task was reduced by PI3Kβ overexpression, while contextual fear memory was not affected. Our findings further support a role of PI3Kβ in some, but not all, forms of hippocampus-dependent synaptic plasticity and spatial learning.

Materials and methods

AAV production and stereotactic viral injection

All adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) were produced with AAV2/1 serotyped vectors and packaged using HEK293T cells. Viral titers were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (Prism 7300, Applied Biosystems, USA) with intercalater SYBR green (TAKARA, Japan).

All surgical procedures were conducted in sterile conditions and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Seoul National University. Wild-type C57BL/6 male mice (8 weeks of age) were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine and arranged in a stereotactic frame (Stoelting Co. USA). The hippocampal CA1 region (AP: -1.8 mm, ML: α1.5 mm, DV: -1.7 mm) was targeted, and equivalent amounts of AAVs (3.5 × 109 particles in 1 μl for flag-p110β and tdTomato) were delivered bilaterally using a 10-μl syringe pump (30 gauge, Hamilton Co., USA) at a rate of 6.0 μl/h. After an additional 10 min of diffusion time, the needle was withdrawn and the scalp was sutured with black silk. AAV vectors were then expressed for 2 weeks.

Histology, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence imaging

The mice were kept under isoflurane anesthesia and transcardially perfused with pre-chilled 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Brains were fixed again in 4% PFA at 4°C overnight and then dehydrated in 30% sucrose-PBS solution at 4°C for 2 days. Coronal brain slices were prepared (30 μm for flag-p110β, 50 μm for tdTomato) by cryosectioning (Leica Ltd., Germany), 50-μm sections for tdTomato were mounted on a slide glass with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Lab, USA), and 30-βm sections for flag-p110β were stored in 50% glycerol in PBS at -20°C.

Flag-p110β was detected with anti-Flag antibody (Sigma, USA, Cat# F7425, 1:1,000) and goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 IgG (Invitrogen, USA, Cat# A11008, 1:500). Fluorescent mages were acquired using an IX51 inverted fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Japan).

Electrophysiology

Hippocampal slice preparation

Transverse hippocampal slices (400 μm) were prepared from C57BL/6 mice aged 12 weeks (24 days after AAV infusion). The animals were anaesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated for the removal of the brain. Brains were then placed in ice-chilled artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF, 124 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 mM Glucose, 1 mM CaCl2, aerated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). The hippocampus was removed from the brain while maintained in the cold ice solution and sliced using a VT1000 slicer (Leica Ltd., Germany). Hippocampal slices were transferred to ACSF containing 2 mM MgSO4 and 2 mM CaCl2, where they were allowed to recover at 32°C for 30 min and then maintained at 28°C before recordings were conducted.

Slice electrophysiology

Extracellular recordings were performed in an interface chamber (Campden Instrument Ltd., UK) maintained at 32°C. ACSF (124 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 10 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2, aerated as above) was perfused continuously at a rate of 2 ml/min. Standard extracellular recordings were performed in the CA1 region of the hippocampal slices to measure the slope of evoked field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs). Responses were obtained using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, US) and digitized with a Digidata 1322A A/D board at a sampling rate of 10 kHz. Recordings were monitored and analyzed using WinLTP (WinLTP Ltd. (winltp.com, and The University of Bristol, UK).

Synaptic plasticity

A bipolar stimulating electrode was placed in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region. Baseline responses at a frequency of 0.033 Hz were obtained using a stimulus intensity (between 5 to 20 μA; 0.1 ms pulse width) that evoked responses of approximately 40% of the maximum fEPSP value. Following a stable baseline period of at least 20 min, LTP and LTD were investigated by delivering high-frequency stimulation (100 Hz, 1 s) and low-frequency stimulation (1 Hz, 15 min), respectively. In terms of depotentiation experiments, LTP was induced using three trains of theta burst stimulations (consisting of five pulses at 100 Hz and repeated five times at 5 Hz), with a 10 s inter-train interval. After 30 min of LTP induction, low-frequency stimulation (2 Hz, 10 min) was given to depotentiate the responses.

Statistical analysis

All experimental procedures were performed in a blind fashion. The data are presented as the mean α SEM, and statistical significance was determined using Student s t-test, and the level of significance was set at *p <0.05 and **p <0.01. To compare the level of synaptic plasticity between the groups, the average of fEPSP responses obtained from the last 5 min period was used.

Western immunoblotting

For western immunoblotting, we injected flag-p110β or tdTomato expressing AAV, together with GFP expressing AAV in the CA1 region of 3 weeks-old C57BL/6 male mice. 2 weeks after injection, CA1 regions expressing green fluorescence were dissected and recovered in ACSF maintained at 32°C for 2 h. CA1 mini slices were treated with NMDA (20 μM) for 3 min to induce chemical LTP and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Slices were homogenized using a dounce homogenizer with lysis buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.5) containing both protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Samples were analyzed by western blotting using the following antibodies: anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (Cell Signaling) and anit-p38 MAPK (Cell Signaling).

Behavioral experiment

Male C57BL/6 mice were housed two or four per cage and maintained on a 12/12 h light dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum.

Open field test

The mice were exposed to the open field box, a square opaque white box (40 × 40 ×40 cm), for 10 min under dim light. Locomotor activity was monitored and analyzed with EthoVision 3.1 (Noldus, Netherlands).

Elevated plus maze task

The elevated plus maze was made of white Plexiglas and consisted of two opposing open arms and two closed arms. All arms were 150 × 5 cm (length × width) and closed arms were enclosed with 20-cm walls. The maze was placed 30 cm above the floor. Mice were placed in the center of the maze and tracked for 5 min by EthoVision 3.1 (Noldus, Netherlands).

Morris Water Maze (MWM) task

The water maze was a circular opaque grey tank, 140 cm in diameter, 100 cm in height, filled with water containing small amount of white paint to hide the platform (22 ~ 23°C) to a depth of 30 cm. The maze was surrounded by four distinct visual cues, and all procedures were performed under dim light. A circular, 10 cm in diameter, Perspex platform was positioned in the middle of the virtual quadrant (distance of 35 cm from the edge and 35 cm to the center of the maze) and submerged approximately 1.5 cm below the surface of the water. Each training session consisted of four 60-s trials with four different starting points that were randomly selected and equally distributed among the four quadrants. The mice underwent one training session per day. When the mice reached the platform, they were allowed to remain on the platform for 20 s and then transferred to a holding-cage for 60 s. If a mouse failed to locate the platform within 60 s, it was manually guided to the platform. For the probe test, on day 6, the mice were allowed 60 s of free-swimming without the platform. All experiments were recorded and tracked using Ethovision 3.1 (Noldus, Netherlands).

Contextual fear conditioning

Contextual fear memory was measured in a standard chamber (Freeze Frame, Coulbourn) after 4 days of handling. The mice were placed in the fear chamber for 5 min. After 2 min, the mice were given three consecutive foot shocks (2 s, 0.24 mA, 1 min intervals). After 24 h, the mice were again placed in the same chamber for memory retrieval.

Results

Electrophysiological properties of p110β overexpressed hippocampal slices

p110β or control red fluorescent protein, tdTomato, was delivered to the hippocampal CA1 region by AAV vector, driven by a CaMKIIμ promoter for neuron-specific expression. Flag-tagged p110β as well as the tdTomato were expressed in both the soma and the dendrites of the CA1 neurons (Figure 1A).
Figure 1

NMDAR-LTD and depotentiation are inhibited by p110β Overexpression in the hippocampal CA1 Area. (A) Representative images of Flag-tagged p110β or tdTomato expression in the mouse hippocampal CA1 area. (Blue: DAPI, Green: Flag-p110β, Red: tdTomato, imaged 50 days after AAV injection). Scale bar represents 500 μm. (B, C) Input/output relationship was unaltered in p110β-overexpressed mice (green symbols) compared to control group (tdTomato; red symbols). The stimulation intensity was varied by 3 μA increments, and the insets indicate representative traces (averages of 4 successive sweeps; scale bars: 0.5 mV, 10 ms in this and the following panels). (D) Paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) in p110β mice was unaffected; the measured inter-stimulus intervals were 20, 50, 100 and 200 ms. (E) Excessive p110β had no effect on LTP induced by a brief tetanus (100 Hz, 1 s). Typical traces are obtained at the times indicated by a (light trace) and b (thick trace). (F) NMDAR-LTD induced by LFS (1 Hz, 15 min) was impaired in p110β mice (p <0.01, Student s t-test). (G) Depotentiation induced by LFS (2 Hz, 10 min) was reduced in p110β mice (p <0.01, Student s t-test).

We first investigated the effects of p110β overexpression on electrophysiological properties in the CA1 region of hippocampus. Analysis of basal synaptic transmission showed no significant difference in input/output relationships in PI3Kβ overexpressed slices compared to the control group (PI3Kβ overexpressed: n = 9, 6 animals; control: n = 11, 7 animals, Figure 1B, C). Paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) was also unaffected, indicating normal presynaptic release probability (PI3Kβ overexpressed: n = 9, 6 animals; control: n = 11, 7 animals, Figure 1D). Taken together, these results indicate that basal synaptic transmission was not changed by p110β overexpression in the hippocampal Schaffer collateral (SC)-CA1 synapses.

We then probed the role of p110β overexpression with regards to activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. The amount of LTP induced by a brief tetanus (100 Hz, 1 s) was not significantly different between the p110β overexpression group and the control group (PI3Kβ overexpressed: n = 11, 127 α 6% of baseline, 6 animals; control: n = 12, 123 α 4% of baseline, 6 animals, Figure 1E). On the other hand, LTD was barely induced by repetitive low-frequency stimulations (LFS, 1 Hz, 15 min) in the p110β overexpressed slices compared to the tdTomato expressed control group (Figure 1F). Field EPSP slope measured 1 hr after LTD induction for the p110β and control group was 96 α 5% (n = 10, 7 animals) and 77 α 4% of baseline (n = 12, 8 animals), respectively (Student s t-test, p <0.01). Moreover, we identified that the reversal of LTP (i.e., depotentiation) by a train of LFS (2 Hz, 10 min) was reduced in the p110β overexpression group (n = 10, 7 animals, 127 α 6 of pre-LTP baseline) in contrast to the control group (n = 12, 8 animals, 85 α 11% of baseline), indicating synapses become less plastic following p110β overexpression (Student s t-test, p <0.01, Figure 1G).

Molecular mechanisms of impaired NMDAR-LTD in p110β-overexpressed hippocampal slices

We next examined the effect of p110β overexpression on the downstream pathway involved in NMDAR-LTD. p38 MAPK is known to be involved in NMDAR-LTD through Rap1 signaling pathway and active Rap1 directly binds to p110β [10]-[12]. In our previous study, we found that p110β deletion reduced the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK induced by chemical LTD [9]. We performed similar chemical LTD experiments with tdTomato- or p110β-overexpressing hippocampal slices. We first confirmed that p110β overexpression itself did not affect the basal phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK (n = 5, Figure 2A, B). The phosphorylation of p38 MAPK (p-p38) was significantly increased in response to the chemical LTD induction in the tdTomato-expressing group (Figure 2A, C). However, the increase in p38 MAPK phosphorylation associated with chemical LTD was impaired in p110β-overexpressing group (Figure 2A, D). These results support the finding that NMDAR-LTD is impaired by p110β overexpression and suggest that this might be due to impairment in p38 MAPK signaling.
Figure 2

Impaired induction of p38 MAPK phosphorylation by chemical LTD in p110β-overexpressed hippocampal CA1 region. (A) Representative phospho/total p38 MAPK western blot from tdTomato- or p110β-overexpressed slices after chemical LTD induction (NMDA treatment). (B) Normalized basal phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK from tdTomato- or p110β-overexpressed slices. (C) Normalized phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK from tdTomato-overexpressed slices after chemical LTD induction (n = 5, p <0.05, paired Student s t-test). (D) Normalized phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK from p110β-overexpressed slices, after chemical LTD induction (n = 5, NS, paired Student s t-test).

Effect of p110β overexpression in the hippocampal CA1 region on anxiety and locomotor activity

Next, we examined the effect of p110β overexpression on basal behavioral tasks. We performed a series of behavioral experiments where basal anxiety and locomotion were measured. In the elevated plus maze (EPM) test, which is a well-established method to assess anxiety level in rodents, the p110β-overexpressed group exhibited a similar level of anxiety compared to the control group (there was a tendency to be more anxious in the p110β-overexpressed group without any statistical significance; Figure 3A). In addition, the anxiety level and the locomotive activity of the p110β overexpressed group were similar to those of the control group in the open field test (OFT) (Figure 3B, C), indicating that the exogenous expression of p110β does not affect basal rodent behaviors such as anxiety and locomotion.
Figure 3

Effect of p110β overexpression on basal anxiety and locomotion. (A) Basal anxiety levels of p110β-or tdTomato-overexpressed mice in the elevated plus maze (EPM) test (Flag-p110β, n = 12; tdTomato, n = 9, tested at 2 weeks after AAV injection). (B) Basal locomotive activity in the open field (OFT) test (Flag-p110β, n = 14; tdTomato, n = 12, tested at 15 days after AAV injection). (C) Total distance moved (cm) during 100 s in the OFT.

Effect of p110β overexpression on hippocampus-dependent learning tasks

We next investigated the effect of p110β overexpression on hippocampus-dependent learning tasks. Our previous study showed that without pre-exposure to the context in contextual fear conditioning, the freezing level was reduced in pi3kcg-/- mice [9]. Furthermore, in the reversal learning session of the Morris Water Maze (MWM) task, time spent in the old-target quadrant where the platform was located during the initial training sessions was increased in pi3kcg-/- mice [9]. These results suggested that PI3Kβ plays a critical role in hippocampus-dependent learning tasks. Therefore, we wanted to determine whether contextual fear memory and spatial learning were affected by p110β overexpression. We performed contextual fear conditioning and MWM test with the same protocols used in the previous study [9]. In the contextual fear memory test, the p110β-overexpressed group showed equivalent freezing levels compared to the control group (Figure 4A), suggesting that p110β overexpression in the hippocampus did not enhance or impair fear memory formation. However, spatial learning in the MWM test was significantly disrupted by overexpression of p110β (Figure 4B). In addition, the p110β overexpression group exhibited a tendency to spend less time in the target quadrant and fewer number of platform crossings during the probe test on day 6, suggesting that p110β overexpression has a negative impact on spatial memory (Figure 4C, D).
Figure 4

Spatial learning in the Morris Water Maze (MWM) Task was reduced in p110β-β-β-. (A) Contextual fear memory of p110β- or tdTomato-expressed mice (Flag-p110β, n = 14; tdTomato, n = 12). (B) Average escape time traveled to the hidden platform (mean α sem) in the MWM test (flag-p110β, n = 14; tdTomato, n = 12, F = 8.25, **p <0.01, repeated measures two-way ANOVA). (C) The average percentage of time spent in the target quadrant (TQ, *p <0.05, repeated measures two-way ANOVA), the opposite quadrant (OQ) and two adjacent quadrants (AQ) during the probe trial given on day 6 of the MWM task. (D) Total number of crossings of the location of the platform (**p <0.01, Student s t-test) during the probe trials.

Discussion

We investigated the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of PI3Kβ overexpression in the hippocampal CA1 region of mice. Our previous experiments with Pik3cg-/- mice demonstrated that PI3Kβ was critically involved in NMDA receptor-dependent LTD (NMDAR-LTD) and reversal learning in the MWM [9]. To further elucidate the role of PI3Kβ in synaptic plasticity and learning, we used an AAV-mediated genetic delivery of p110β, a catalytic subunit of PI3Kβ, to the hippocampal CA1 neurons.

We found that the overexpression of p110β in the CA1 region disrupted NMDAR-LTD and depotentiation of potentiated synapses and that this effect was associated with a reduced phosphorylation level of p38 MAPK in response to LTD induction. In contrast, LTP in the p110β overexpression group was normal. Hippocampus-dependent spatial memory in the Morris water maze (MWM) task was also impaired. The finding that a similar impairment in NMDAR-LTD results from either p110β knockout or overexpression indicates that an appropriate level of p110β is required for normal LTD. This idea is further supported by the similar effects on p38 MAPK phosphorylation by the knockout and overexpression of p110β. It is possible that p110β is necessary for p38 MAPK activation, while overexpressing p110β results in saturation or compensation of the pathway leading to similar impairment of p38 MAPK activation. Overexpression of p110β additionally impaired depotentiation which also involves p38 MAPK signaling [13]. However, since a similar impairment of p38 MAPK activation in Pik3cg-/- mice was not associated with disruption of depotentiation, the impaired depotentiation in p110β overexpressing slices is likely due to disruption of an additional signaling pathway specifically involved in depotentiation. Further studies are required to establish the underlying mechanisms.

A significant amount of evidence has indicated that hippocampal LTD contributes to learning and memory [14]-[19]. Various genetic and pharmacological studies have shown that animals having impaired LTD show various behavioral phenotypes, some showing similar impairment in water maze task as the present study [16],[18]. There seems to be differential role of each pathways required for LTD in various behaviors, and these behavioral phenotypes cannot be simply classified as a general result of LTD impairment. Both p110β knockout and overexpression resulted in LTD impairment while these two opposite manipulations resulted in different behavioral phenotypes. Spatial learning during initial training in Pik3cg-/- mice was intact but reversal learning was impaired [9]. In contrast, p110β-overexpressed mice showed impairment in spatial learning during initial training. These results indicate that p110β is multi-functional, required for spatial learning and reversal of the initial spatial memory in different ways. The role of hippocampal depotentiation in learning and memory is less clearly established. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that impaired depotentiation might be involved in the spatial learning deficit in the p110β-overexpressing mice.

In conclusion, our present findings have added further evidence to support a role for PI3Kβ in both NMDAR-LTD and hippocampus-dependent learning and memory.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (National Honor Scientist Program: 2012R1A3A1050385).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University
(2)
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University
(3)
Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University
(4)
Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol

References

  1. Fry MJ: Structure, regulation and function of phosphoinositide 3-kinases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994, 1226: 237-268. 10.1016/0925-4439(94)90036-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. R ckle T, Schwarz MK, Rommel C: PI3Kgamma inhibition: towards an aspirin of the 21st century β. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5: 903-918. 10.1038/nrd2145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Whitman M, Kaplan DR, Schaffhausen B, Cantley L, Roberts TM: Association of phosphatidylinositol kinase activity with polyoma middle-T competent for transformation. Nature. 1985, 315: 239-242. 10.1038/315239a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Opazo P, Watabe AM, Grant SGN, O Dell TJ: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulates the induction of long-term potentiation through extracellular signal-related kinase-independent mechanisms. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2003, 23: 3679-3688.Google Scholar
  5. Lin CH, Yeh SH, Lin CH, Lu KT, Leu TH, Chang WC, Gean PW: A role for the PI-3 kinase signaling pathway in fear conditioning and synaptic plasticity in the amygdala. Neuron. 2001, 31: 841-851. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00433-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hou L, Klann E: Activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway is required for metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent long-term depression. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2004, 24: 6352-6361. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0995-04.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Daw MI, Bortolotto ZA, Saulle E, Zaman S, Collingridge GL, Isaac JTR: Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase regulates synapse specificity of hippocampal long-term depression. Nat Neurosci. 2002, 5: 835-836. 10.1038/nn903.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen X, Garelick MG, Wang H, Lil V, Athos J, Storm DR: PI3 kinase signaling is required for retrieval and extinction of contextual memory. Nat Neurosci. 2005, 8: 925-931. 10.1038/nn1482.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim J-I, Lee H-R, Sim S, Baek J, Yu N-K, Choi J-H, Ko H-G, Lee Y-S, Park S-W, Kwak C, Ahn S-J, Choi SY, Kim H, Kim K-H, Backx PH, Bradley CA, Kim E, Jang D-J, Lee K, Kim SJ, Zhuo M, Collingridge GL, Kaang B-K: PI3Kβ is required for NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression and behavioral flexibility. Nat Neurosci. 2011, 14: 1447-1454. 10.1038/nn.2937.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhu JJ, Qin Y, Zhao M, Van Aelst L, Malinow R: Ras and Rap control AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity. Cell. 2002, 110: 443-455. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00897-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhu Y, Pak D, Qin Y, McCormack SG, Kim MJ, Baumgart JP, Velamoor V, Auberson YP, Osten P, van Aelst L, Sheng M, Zhu JJ: Rap2-JNK removes synaptic AMPA receptors during depotentiation. Neuron. 2005, 46: 905-916. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bos JL, de Rooij J, Reedquist KA: Rap1 signalling: adhering to new models. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 2: 369-377. 10.1038/35073073.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang Y-C, Huang C-C, Hsu K-S: A role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in adenosine A1receptor-mediated synaptic depotentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus.Mol Brain 2008, 1:13.,Google Scholar
  14. Kemp A, Manahan-Vaughan D: Hippocampal long-term depression: master or minion in declarative memory processesβ. Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30: 111-118. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Manahan-Vaughan D, Braunewell KH: Novelty acquisition is associated with induction of hippocampal long-term depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 8739-8744. 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8739.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ge Y, Dong Z, Bagot RC, Howland JG, Phillips AG, Wong TP, Wang YT: Hippocampal long-term depression is required for the consolidation of spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 16697-16702. 10.1073/pnas.1008200107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Etkin A, Alarc n JM, Weisberg SP, Touzani K, Huang YY, Nordheim A, Kandel ER: A role in learning for SRF: deletion in the adult forebrain disrupts LTD and the formation of an immediate memory of a novel context. Neuron. 2006, 50: 127-143. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Brigman JL, Wright T, Talani G, Prasad-Mulcare S, Jinde S, Seabold GK, Mathur P, Davis MI, Bock R, Gustin RM, Colbran RJ, Alvarez VA, Nakazawa K, Delpire E, Lovinger DM, Holmes A: Loss of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors in CA1 hippocampus and cortex impairs long-term depression, reduces dendritic spine density, and disrupts learning. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2010, 30: 4590-4600. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0640-10.2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicholls RE, Alarcon JM, Malleret G, Carroll RC, Grody M, Vronskaya S, Kandel ER: Transgenic mice lacking NMDAR-dependent LTD exhibit deficits in behavioral flexibility. Neuron. 2008, 58: 104-117. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Choi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement