Exp | Cont | 30″ K+ | 1′ K+ | 2′ K+ | 3′ K+ | 5′ K+ | K+ + 1′ rec | K+ + 2′ rec | K+ + 5′ rec | K+ + 10′ rec | K+ + 1 h rec |
---|
1 | 0 (23) | 14 (21) | | 241 (22) | | 659 (17) | | | | | |
2 | 0 (21) | | | | 376 (21) | | | | | | |
3 | 0 (14) | | | | 167 (21) | | 305 (21) | | 20 (15) | | |
4 | 0 (22) | | | | 327 (22) | | | | | 0 (27) | 0 (24) |
5 | 0 (19) | | 10 (21) | | | | | 85 (13) | | | |
6 | 0 (21) | | 57 (23) | | | | 55 (20) | | 0 (17) | | |
Mean ± SEM | 0 | 27 ± 15 | 278 ± 46 | | 7 ± 7 | |
- Statistical analysis by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test: data points from 30″ and 1′ K+, 2–3′ K+, and 5–10′ recovery were pooled, respectively (mean values of each listed in the last row). 2–3′K+ is highly significant over other conditions (P < 0.0001 vs. cont, 30′-1′K+, 5–10′ rec). Not significant among all other multiple comparisons including cont, 30′-1′K+ and 5–10′ rec
- (n) number of somas examined
- rec recovery in control medium