Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of various VPS35 animal models studies

From: Altered striatal dopamine levels in Parkinson’s disease VPS35 D620N mutant transgenic aged mice

Paper

Impaired striatal dopamine release in homozygous Vps35 D620N knock-in mice (Ishizu et al. 2016)

Altered dopamine release and monoamine transporters in Vps35 p.D620N knock-in mice (Cataldi et al. 2018)

Parkinson’s disease-linked D620N VPS35 knockin mice manifest tau neuropathology and dopaminergic neurodegeneration (Chen et al. 2019)

Parkinson’s disease-linked mutations in VPS35 induce dopaminergic neurodegeneration (Tsika et al. 2014)

Parkinson’s disease genes VPS35 and EIF4G1 interact genetically and converge on α-synuclein (Dhungel et al. 2015)

Our study

Age

Aged, 17.5 months VPS35 and VPS35 D620N mice

Adult VPS35 and VPS D620N mice

Adult and aged, 3–24 months VPS35 and VPS35 D620N mice

VPS35 and VPS35 D620N virus injected into adult wildtype rat

VPS35 virus injected into adult α-synuclein mice

Aged, 20 months VPS35 D620N mice

Sex

Male and female

Male

Male and female

N.A

N.A

Male and female

Generation

Mouse (KI)

Mouse (KI)

Mouse (KI)

Virus injected rat

Virus injected mouse

Mouse (Tg)

Biochemistry results

Western blot

No change in DRP1, LC3-II, Cathepsin D, Tom20, VDAC1, MUL1, α-synuclein, Parkin, LAMP1, GM130, and EEA1

No change in TH

↑ VMAT2

↓ DAT in VPS35 D620NfemaleKI mice

No change in VPS35 and α-synuclein

No change in VPS35, Sortilin, SorLA, Cathepsin D, and TH in VPS35 and VPS35 D620N virus injected rats

N. A

No change in Drp1, LC3-II, Tom20, TH, DD2R, DAT, Mfn2, α-synuclein, and AT8 in VPS35 D620N Tg mice

Immuno-histochemical staining

N.A

↓ DAT integrated density

↓ DAT area in VPS35 D620N KI mice

↑ AT8

↑ Tau5

↑ MT1

↑ APP + spheroids

↑ degenerating neuritic processes in VPS35 D620N KI mice

↑ TUNEL assay = ↑ neuronal cell death

↓ neurite outgrowth

↑ neuronal vulnerability to cellular stress in VPS35 and VPS35 D620N virus injected rats

↑ NeuN

↓ α-synuclein

↓ GFAP

↓ neuroinflammation in VPS35 virus injected α-synuclein mice

N. A

HPLC

No change in DA, DOPAC, and HVA

No change in DA, DOPAC, and HVA

↑ (DOPAC + HVA)/DA ratio in VPS35 D620N

No change in DA, DOPAC, and HVA

N.A

N.A

↑ DA in VPS35 D620N Tg

No change in DOPAC, HVA, and (DOPAC + HVA)/DA ratio

Stereological analysis of TH + neurons

No significant difference observed

No significant difference observed

↓ in VPS35 D620N KI mice

↓ in VPS35 D620N injected rats

N.A

No significant difference observed

Behavior results

Open-field test: no difference

Open-field, rotarod, and cylinder test: no difference

Open-field, rotarod, and gait analyses: no difference

Cylinder test: no difference between control, VPS35, and VPS35 D620N

N.A

Open-field, rotarod, and elevated plus maze: no difference

  1. Differences in the results and methodologies are examined then compared with our study, particularly in terms of biochemistry results (western blot, immunohistochemical staining, HPLC, stereological analysis of TH + neurons) and behavior results