Fig. 2From: Systemic injection of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist mecamylamine affects licking, eyelid size, and locomotor and autonomic activities but not temporal prediction in male miceLicking responses in early and late stages of training in the head-fixed temporal conditioning task. A Example of the performance of a mouse in early session of the training (session 2; N = 1, 250 trials). B Example of the performance of a mouse in late session of the training (session 10; N = 1, 250 trials). Top: Raster plot of licking responses in a session. The vertical axis indicates the number of trials, and the horizontal axis indicates the time from the reward delivery. Bottom: Histogram of the licking responses in a session. The vertical axis indicates the licks per second and the horizontal axis indicates the time from the reward delivery. C Summary of the performance of mice in early session of the training (session 2; N = 6, 250 trials each). “Anticipatory” indicates anticipatory licking. “Con” indicates consummatory licking. D Summary of the performance of mice in late session of the training (session 10; N = 6, 250 trials each). “Anticipatory” indicates anticipatory licking. “Con” indicates consummatory licking. E Comparison of the performance between early and late sessions of the training. Left: Comparison of the performance of anticipatory licking between early and late sessions of the training (N = 6, 250 trials each, **p < 0.01). Right: Comparison of the performance of anticipatory licking between early and late sessions of the training (N = 6, 250 trials each, “n.s.” indicates not significant). Error bars indicate standard error of the meanBack to article page