Slice exp | Cont | 30″ NMDA | 1′ NMDA | 2′ NMDA | 3′ NMDA |
1 | 0 (17) | 0 (20) | 6 (16) | 461 (18) | |
2 | 0 (20) | 5 (20) | 55 (20) | 289 (18) | 688 (17) |
Mean ± SEM | 0 | 2.5 ± 2.5 | 31 ± 25 | 375 ± 86 | |
Cells exp | Cont | | | 2′ NMDA | |
3 | 0 (20) | | | 25 (20) | |
4 | 0 (20) | | | 0 (20) | |
5 | 0 (16) | | | 10 (20) | |
Mean ± SEM | 0 | | | 12 ± 7 | |
- Statistical analysis by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test:
- For slice culture experiments, 3′ NMDA is highly significant over other conditions (P < 0.0001 vs. cont, 30″NMDA, 1′NMDA; P < 0.005 vs. 2′ NMDA). 2′ NMDA is highly significant over other conditions (P < 0.0001 vs. cont; P < 0.0005 vs. 30′ NMDA, 1′ NMDA). Not significant among all other multiple comparisons including cont, 30″ NMDA and 1′ NMDA
- For dissociated cell culture experiments, not significant between control and 2′NMDA
- (n) number of somas examined