- Open Access
Neuronal representation of audio-place associations in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats
© Wang et al. 2015
Received: 17 January 2015
Accepted: 11 September 2015
Published: 22 September 2015
Stimulus-place associative task requires humans or animals to associate or map different stimuli with different locations. It is know that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in rats, also termed prelimbic cortex (PrL), is important for performing stimulus-place associations. However, little is known about how mPFC neurons encode stimulus-palce associations. To address this, the present study trained rats on an audio-place associative task, whereby the animals were required to associate two different tones with entering two different arms in a Y-shaped maze. Reversible inactivation of the mPFC by local infusion of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol severely impaired the performance of rats on the associative task, again indicating an important role of mPFC in the task performance. Single-unit recording showed that a group of mPFC neurons (40/275, 14.5 %) fired preferentially for the audio-place associations, providing the first electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of mPFC cells in representing audio-place associations.
The most significant difference in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) between rodents and primates is that, while the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) in monkeys has obvious granular layer (known as layer IV), the medial PFC (mPFC) in rodents, also termed prelimbic cortex (PrL), has no obvious granular layer. Despite of such difference, it has been documented that, the rodent mPFC is a cortical area similar to the monkey dlPFC in terms of connections and functions [1–3].
It is known that the dlPFC in monkeys plays a vital role in associative tasks [4–7]. For example, PFC lesions or inactivation disrupted the establishment of arbitrary associations between visual stimuli and behavioral choices [4, 6]. Electrophysiological studies showed that dlPFC neurons are involved in representing the response category of instruction cue in an associative task , and encoding the specific associations between sensory stimuli and behavioral choices [5, 7].
Stimulus-place associative task requires individuals to associate different stimuli with different spatial locations. For example, if stimulus A is presented, reward is conditional on selecting location A, and if stimulus B is presented, reward is conditional on selecting location B. Previous studies showed that the mPFC in rats is important for the task performance of stimulus-place associations . However, it is unknown whether and how mPFC cells represent stimulus-place associations.
mPFC inactivation impairs the task performance
mPFC neurons encode audio-place associations
In order to explore the neuronal correlates of audio-place associations in the mPFC, single unit activities were recorded when rats performed the associative task. The arbitrary spatial choice task and audio-reward control task were introduced to help identify the functional significance of task-related activity.
Sequential appearance of firing preference
Preference indices in correct vs. incorrect trials
The present study shows that neurons in the mPFC are involved in encoding audio-place associations, supporting the function of mPFC in binding external stimuli with spatial locations [9, 11]. Previous study showed that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is crucial for object-in-place associational discrimination . For instance, lesions to the mPFC by local infusion of NMDA severely impaired the performance of rats on an object-in-place task. While control rats spent significantly more time exploring a pair of objects that were in different locations compared with the other pair of objects that were in the same locations, rats with mPFC lesion spent almost equal time exploring the two pairs of objects, indicating mPFC involvement in stimulus-place binding .
Importance of the mPFC for audio-place associations
Muscimol inactivation has been widely used to explore functional importance of cortical or subcortical structures [12, 13]. In the present study, reversible inactivation of the mPFC by muscimol severely impaired the performance of rats on the audio-place association task. Analysis of errors revealed that, the win-stay and change-shift strategies were impaired upon intra-mPFC infusion of muscimol, suggesting that the ability to implement the associative rules was affected. This result is well consistent with previous studies showing the essential role of the mPFC in object-place associative tasks [9, 11].
However, because of the non-specific effects of muscimol, it was also possible that muscimol affected the task performance via effects on other functional aspects of the cortex. Indeed, we found that the lose-shift performance was impaired upon muscimol inactivation of the mPFC. The animals showed a tendency to repeat previously-emitted errors, suggesting a deficit in error-correcting ability. This result is well consistent with previous studies in both monkeys and rats, where inactivation of the dlPFC and the mPFC destroyed the error-correcting ability in performance of behavioral tasks [6, 14].
Representation by mPFC cells of audio-place associations
The ability to integrate information about sensory stimuli and spatial locations is vital for performing the audio-place associative task. Sensory and spatial information are initially processed in largely separate sub-regions of the brain. The mPFC is probably a part of neural networks representing stimulus-place associations. The present study successfully identified cells in the mPFC which encoded specific combinations of the auditory cues and the side arms of the Y-shaped maze. We found that not only pyramidal cells but also interneurons were involved in encoding audio-place associations, although the number of the association-related interneurons was much smaller than that of the pyramidal cells. This was because that the diameter of the electrodes was relative large and it was less possible to encounter interneurons than pyramidal cells. However, it is reasonable to speculate that, both pyramidal cells and interneurons are equally important for encoding audio-place associations, because brain function execution requires local circuits formed by pyramidal cells and interneurons.
The representation of the audio-place associations by the preferential cells could be dissociated from that of the motor performances (running movements) or the physical characteristics of the auditory tones, because there was no differential firing for these cells during the arbitrary spatial choice task performance, where the same motor performances were required, nor during the audio-reward control task performance, where the same tones were presented.
Comparison between the preference indices of the mPFC cells in correct and error trials further revealed the representation of the audio-place associations by the preferential cells. The preference index in error trials was significantly different from that in correct trials. In other words, once a cell did not properly show the association-representing activity, an incorrect response was to be emitted.
We failed to encounter cells with sustained differential firing during the tone-presentation. Most of the cells showed a transient differential discharge. ROC analysis revealed that, the differential discharge appeared sequentially, suggesting that the mPFC cells may carry on audio-place associational information sequentially for information flow among cells.
Mulder et al. reported that mPFC neurons are involved in encoding visuo-reinforcer associations . One may argue that, the preferential cells in the present study were encoding audio-reward instead of audio-place associations. This was not the case, as these cells demonstrated no differential firing in the audio-reward control task.
In summary, the present study provides the evidence that, 1) the mPFC is essential for rats to perform the audio-place associative task, and 2) mPFC cells represent the associations between the auditory stimuli and spatial locations in the task. For future study, the local and trans-cortical circuits underlying audio-place mapping should be addressed, using multi-channel recording technique and optogenetic approaches.
Materials and methods
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (200–250 g) were purchased from the Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center, Chinese Academy of Science, China. They were housed one per cage under constant temperature (23 ± 1 °C) with a 12/12-h light/dark cycle. Food and water was available ad libitum. Surgery was executed after habituation of 7 days to the laboratory vivarium. All experimental protocols were in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals issued by National Institutes of Health (USA, 1996), and were approved and monitored by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experiments at the Institute of Neurobiology, Fudan University (Shanghai, China).
Behavioral training was conducted in an automated Y-maze in a room which was moderately illuminated and was rich in extra-maze visual cues. The Y-maze was made up of opaque plastic board, and consisted of one start box (length: 70 cm; width: 15 cm; height: 20 cm) and two side arms (length: 40 cm; width: 15 cm; height: 20 cm). The maze was placed 70 cm above the floor. The start box and side arms each had a retractable door at the entrance. In addition, there was a nozzle at the terminal of each side arm for delivery of water as reward. Infrared light emitting diodes (LEDs) were installed inside the maze and used for detecting the location of rats and recording the time stamp of behavioral events. The maze apparatus was automatically controlled and monitored by a personal computer.
Audio-place associative task
The audio-place associative task required the rats to associate two tones (8 or 1 kHz; 1000 ms) with two location choices, namely, entering the left arm when the high pitch (8 kHz tone) was presented, or entering the right arm when the low pitch (1 kHz tone) was given (Fig. 1a).
To start a trial, a rat was placed in the start box. The rat came to the front of the start-box door and one of the two tones was presented. Upon the termination of the auditory cue, the start-box door was opened, and the rat chose to enter one of two side arms. If the animal entered a correct side arm, it could get water reward (50 μL) at the terminal of the arm. And if the animal entered an incorrect side arm, no water reward was delivered and a feedback auditory signal (300 Hz; 500 ms) was presented. Then, the animal returned to the start box and the start-box door was closed immediately. The two auditory cues were presented in a semi-randomized order.
Arbitrary spatial choice task
Arbitrary spatial choice task was modified from the audio-place associative task, by replacing the auditory cues with a period of silence (1000 ms), that is, no tone was presented. To perform the task, rats were required to visit the two side arms arbitrarily, without the guidance of auditory cues. This task was used as a control task to test whether mPFC cells would show a response to movement-related factors.
Audio-reward control task
The apparatus for the audio-reward control task was modified from the Y-maze, by blocking the entrance of the two side arms, and resetting a water-delivery nozzle at the intersection of the side arms (Fig. 1b). To start a trial, a rat was placed in the start box. The rat came to the front of the start-box door, and one of the two tones, as used in the audio-place associative task, was presented. Upon the termination of the auditory cue, the start-box door was opened, and the rat went straightway to the intersection, where water reward (50 μL) was delivered regardless of the high- or low-pitch had been presented. This task was used as a control task to test if mPFC cells would show a differential response to physical characteristics of the auditory tones.
Before training, rats were handled by the experimenter 10 min per day for one week. Then, the rats were fully deprived of water for two days in order to induce motivation for task performance. Later, the rats were acclimated to the Y-maze and were trained to perform the audio-place associative task. Each daily session consisted of 150 trials. An error-correction procedure was introduced, that is, if the rats made an incorrect choice, the same auditory cue was presented again to give the rats a chance to adjust behavioral choice. Performance with a correct rate of >80 % in two consecutive daily sessions was considered as the criteria for learning.
Usually, it took 2–3 weeks for rats to learn the task. On training days, the rats were awarded with water during training, and given additional water after training, so that each animal could get a total of 30 mL water each day. For example, if a rat was reward 20 mL water during training, it was given additional 10 mL water after the training session.
After the rats learned the audio-place associative task, one group of them were used for behavioral experiments with mPFC inactivation, and the other group were further trained on the arbitrary spatial choice task and the audio-reward control task, and thereafter used for electrophysiological experiments (Fig. 1c).
Implantation of guide cannula for drug administration
Rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg, i.p.) and restrained in a stereotaxic frame (Narishige SN-2, Japan). Then, the rats were bilaterally implanted with stainless steel guide cannula (23 gauge, 8 mm length). The tip of the guide cannula was placed at 3.5 mm anterior to bregma, 0.5 mm lateral to midline suture, and 2 mm ventral to skull surface. These stereotaxic coordinates were based on the Paxinos and Watson . The guide cannulas were anchored to the skull with stainless steel screws and dental cement. A stylus was inserted into the guide cannulas to prevent clogging and reduce the risk of infection. Rats were allowed to recover for 7 days with free access to food and water before behavioral experiments.
Implantation of microelectrode array for spike recording
Microelectrode array was consisted of 16 microelectrodes (Formvar-insulated nichrome wires, 35 μm in diameter) in a 2 × 8 configuration with 200 μm between electrodes, and was drivable by turning the screw of microelectrode array. Immediately prior to implantation, these electrode wires were freshly cut with surgical scissor to reduce the impedance to 0.5 ~ 1 MΩ (measured at 500 Hz).
For implantation of microelectrode array, rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg, i.p.) and mounted on the stereotaxic frame. Microelectrode array was implanted in the left mPFC (2.5 ~ 4.5 mm anterior to bregma, 0.3 ~ 0.8 mm lateral to midline suture, and 2.0 mm ventral to brain surface). The array was anchored to the skull with stainless steel screws and dental cement. A stylus was inserted into the connector of the array to prevent clogging. Rats were allowed to recover for 7 days with free access to food and water before behavioral training. For recordings of spike activities, the array was lowered in steps of 80 μm every session throughout the recording experiments.
In order to assess the importance of the mPFC for the audio-place associative task performance, we locally infused the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol (Sigma, Missouri, USA) into the mPFC to reversibly inactivate this cortical region. For muscimol infusion, rats were gently held. The stylus was removed from the guide cannula, and an injection needle (30 gauge, 10 mm length) was inserted into the guide cannula. The tip of the injection needle was 2 mm lower than that of the guide cannula. Muscimol solution (1 μg/μL) or saline was bilaterally infused into the mPFC (0.5 μl each side) at a rate of 0.25 μl/min. Bilateral infusions were performed simultaneously. The injection needle remained in the guide cannula for additional 3 min after the infusion was completed. Behavioral test was conducted 15 min later.
Recording of neuronal discharge
After recovery from the surgery for implantation of microelectrode array, rats received training on the audio-place associative task, arbitrary spatial choice task, and audio-reward control task sequentially. Neuronal activities were recorded using neural signal acquiring system (Cyberkinetics, USA). Unit signals were amplified 5000×, band-pass filtered between 500 Hz and 7.5 kHz and digitized at 30 kHz. The time stamp of the task events were integrated with the spike data on line. Raw data were stored in a computer for off-line analysis. The microelectrode array was advanced in an 80-μm step after a daily recording session, until the tips of the electrodes reached the depth of 4.0 mm below the cortical surface.
mPFC inactivation experiment
Rats usually made three types of error when performing the audio-place associative task: they repeated incorrect choice on repeat trial (Lose-shift failure), or they did not repeat correct choice on repeat trial (Win-stay failure), where the auditory cue was the same as in the previous trial, or they did not change choice on change trial, where the auditory cue was changed from the previous trial (Change-shift failure). Correct rate of performance (percentage of correct trials), percentage of error, and reaction time were statistically compared between the muscimol and saline groups, using Student’s t-test. Significant level was set at 0.05. Data in the text and figures are expressed as means ± SEM (standard error of mean).
Single units were isolated offline with the offline sorter (Plexon Inc., Dallas, TX) using principal components analysis and a template-matching algorithm. Waveforms with inter-spike interval of <2.0 ms were excluded. Cells were selected for analysis if they reached the following criteria: 1) signal-to-noise ratio was larger than 3:1; 2) spiking activity was stable during a whole recording session; and 3) inter-trial baseline firing was stable during performance of the three tasks. The period of cue presentation was the vital time window for the rats to execute audio-place associations. Thus, electrophysiological analysis focused particularly on this time window.
A cell was taken as a preferential cell if it showed a change in firing in the audio-place associative task but not in the arbitrary spatial choice task and the audio-reward control task. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was assessed using rank-sum test. All statistical analysis was conducted using Matlab software (Mathworks, USA).
To characterize the time course of preference for the audio-place associations, we compared firing activity during the cue presentation, using the sliding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis . The ROC analysis was performed over the window of the tone presentation (100 ms bin, 10 ms step). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was taken as a quantitative measure for testing how well a cell preferred for the audio-place associations.
While AUROC of 0.5 indicated no preference, AUROC of 1.0 represented a perfect preference for the audio-place associations, with AUROC of 0.65 as the threshold of preference. The criterion value (0.65) was determined by calculating the 99th percentile of AUROC during the baseline period. The 2-s period before cue presentation was used as a baseline period. Preference latency was defined as the time where AUROC exceed 0.65 for the first time in three consecutive sliding bins.
Where, Activityhigh-pitch was the firing activity in response to the high pitch, and Activitylow-pitch was the firing activity to the low pitch in the task. The PI ranged from +1.0 (complete preference for the ‘high-pitch vs. left-arm’ association) to −1.0 (complete preference for the ‘low-pitch vs. right-arm’ association). PI of 0 indicated no preference for the audio-place associations.
Rats were anesthetized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (80 mg/kg, i.p.) and transcardially perfused with 0.9 % saline solution, followed by 10 % formalin. After decapitation, the brains were removed and submerged into sucrose solutions ranging from 10, 20 to 30 % concentration until sank to the bottom. Then, the brains were cut into 40 μm sections with a freezing microtome (Leica, Germany). The brain sections were mounted on gelatin-coated glass slides and stained with neutral red for histological examination.
This work was supported by grants to B.-M.L. from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271171 and 30990263). The technical assistance of Kai-jing Xu is gratefully acknowledged.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Seamans JK, Lapish CC, Durstewitz D. Comparing the prefrontal cortex of rats and primates: insights from electrophysiology. Neurotox Res. 2008;14(2–3):249–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uylings HB, Groenewegen HJ, Kolb B. Do rats have a prefrontal cortex? Behav Brain Res. 2003;146(1–2):3–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoover WB, Vertes RP. Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat. Brain Struct Funct. 2007;212(2):149–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bussey TJ, Wise SP, Murray EA. The role of ventral and orbital prefrontal cortex in conditional visuomotor learning and strategy use in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behav Neurosci. 2001;115(5):971–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pasupathy A, Miller EK. Different time courses of learning-related activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. Nature. 2005;433(7028):873–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang M, Zhang H, Li BM. Deficit in conditional visuomotor learning by local infusion of bicuculline into the ventral prefrontal cortex in monkeys. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12(10):3787–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asaad WF, Rainer G, Miller EK. Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning. Neuron. 1998;21(6):1399–407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukushi T, Sawaguchi T. Neural representation of response category and motor parameters in monkey prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2005;164(4):472–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barker GR, Bird F, Alexander V, Warburton EC. Recognition memory for objects, place, and temporal order: a disconnection analysis of the role of the medial prefrontal cortex and perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27(11):2948–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartho P, Hirase H, Monconduit L, Zugaro M, Harris KD, Buzsaki G. Characterization of neocortical principal cells and interneurons by network interactions and extracellular features. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(1):600–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee I, Shin JY. Medial prefrontal cortex is selectively involved in response selection using visual context in the background. Learn Mem. 2012;19(6):247–50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu F, Zheng XL, Li BM. The anterior cingulate cortex is involved in retrieval of long-term/long-lasting but not short-term memory for step-through inhibitory avoidance in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2009;460(2):175–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bravo-Rivera C, Roman-Ortiz C, Brignoni-Perez E, Sotres-Bayon F, Quirk GJ. Neural structures mediating expression and extinction of platform-mediated avoidance. J Neurosci. 2014;34(29):9736–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang ST, Shi Y, Wang Q, Peng JY, Li BM. Neuronal representation of working memory in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats. Mol Brain. 2014;7:61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mulder AB, Nordquist RE, Orgut O, Pennartz CM. Learning-related changes in response patterns of prefrontal neurons during instrumental conditioning. Behav Brain Res. 2003;146(1–2):77–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic; 1986.Google Scholar
- Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1966.Google Scholar