Skip to main content
Download PDF

The role m6A RNA methylation is CNS development and glioma pathogenesis

Molecular Brain volume 14, Article number: 119 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Epigenetic abnormalities play a crucial role in many tumors, including glioma. RNA methylation occurs as an epigenetic modification similar to DNA methylation and histone modification. m6A methylation is the most common and most intensively studied RNA methylation, which can be found throughout the RNA life cycle and exert biological functions by affecting RNA metabolism. The m6A modification is primarily associated with three types of protease, which are encoded by the writer, eraser and reader genes, respectively. It has been shown that the m6A methylation has close connections with the occurrence and development of many tumors, including glioma. In this study, the concept and the research progress of m6A methylation are reviewed, especially the role of m6A methylation in glioma. Moreover, we will discuss how glioma is paving the way to the development of new therapeutic options based on the inhibition of m6A deposition.

Introduction

Glioma is the most common and most malignant primary intracranial tumor. It is featured by high heterogeneity, extremely poor prognosis, and unclarified molecular mechanism of occurrence and development [1]. It is generally believed that the primary pathogenesis of glioma covers activation of the important proto-oncogenes, inactivation of the tumor suppressor genes, and the dysregulation of the molecular network [2]. The regulation of glioma development at the molecular level has become one of the research priorities.

Epigenetic modification of genes has drawn considerable attention in the studies on tumor pathogenesis. Recently, it has been found that epigenetic abnormalities, including DNA methylation, covalent histone modification, and microRNA abnormalities, play an essential role in the development of tumors [3]. At present, methylation of some genes has been reported to be closely related to the occurrence and progression of glioma and also to the prognosis and chemoradiotherapeutic sensitivity in glioma patients. Promoter methylation of the O6−methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is mainly investigated in glioma. MGMT is a key DNA repair enzyme, which can reverse the DNA damage caused by the alkylating agents, thereby inducing the resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) and nitrosoureas. The expression level of MGMT is related to the level of promoter methylation [4]. Many studies have indicated that the MGMT expression is downregulated after promotor activation of MGMT, which in turn enhances the response to chemoradiotherapy. A consensus has been reached that the MGMT methylation is closely related to the prognosis, sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy, and treatment decision-making in glioma patients [4].

RNA methylation regulates gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. RNA methylation is considered as an epigenetic modification similar to DNA methylation and histone modification. Several types of RNA (including rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, mRNA and lncRNA) modification have been discovered [5], and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation is the most common one. m6A methylation is the most common type of RNA modification in eukaryotes. Since its first discovery in the 1970s, m6A methylation has been extensively studied in many species, including yeasts, Arabidopsis thaliana, fruit flies, mammals, and even in the RNA viruses [6,7,8]. In recent years, we have witnessed rapid progress in co-immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing technology, which allow for the identification and localization of the m6A methylation sites in mRNAs. These emerging technologies fuel deeper and more extensive researches. So far, m6A RNA methylation has been found to play important regulatory roles in tissue growth, circadian rhythm, DNA damage response, and gender determination. More importantly, m6A RNA methylation is closely associated with tumor occurrence, development, and treatment. m6A methylation has a close relationship with hematologic malignancies and regulates the proliferation and differentiation of normal hematopoietic cells and leukemia cells. This will further affect the sensitivity of leukemia cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, which is significant for the occurrence, development, and drug resistance of acute leukemia [9]. Besides hematologic malignancies, genetic alterations and abnormalities of the m6A regulators are also closely related to the malignant progression of many solid tumors, including breast cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hematologic malignancies, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer and glioma. Some studies have demonstrated that these abnormalities are closely related to the resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [10]. m6A methylation has been proved to be reversible, and reversing m6A methylation may be a potential approach for anti-tumor treatment. Some small-molecule inhibitors, such as inhibitors of the demethylase FTO, have been applied to treat tumors, implying the potential value of reversing m6A methylation in anti-tumor treatment [11]. Here, the concept of m6A methylation and its role in the nervous system are reviewed, especially its interaction with the occurrence of glioma, alongside the latest research progress.

Chemical structure of RNA m6A methylation

RNA m6A methylation is regulated by the methyltransferase complex, which consists of methyltransferase-like protein 3 (METTL3), methyltransferase-like protein 14 (METTL14), and Wilms tumor 1-associated protein (WTAP). Among them, METTL3 binds to S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) and catalyzes m6A methylation. METTL14 primarily serves as the platform for substrate binding. WTAP is responsible for recruiting the METTL3/METTL14 complexes into the nuclei, where they catalyze methylation [12]. The complex, composed of METTL3, METTL14 and WTAP, is also known as a writer. Methylation catalyzed by the writer can be reversed by the eraser (e.g., fat mass and obesity-associated protein) and AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5). The methylated mRNAs, which can be recognized by several RNA-binding proteins (e.g., YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2 and HNRNPC) to fulfill the biological functions, are also known as the readers [13, 14]. In the presence of methyltransferase, a nitrogenous base (specifically referring to adenylic acid) undergoes methylation at the nitrogen-6 position, which is known as m6A methylation.

m6A methylation in the nervous system

The sequencing results showed that during embryogenesis, the level of RNA m6A modification increases significantly [15,16,17,18]. As compared with other organs or tissues, the overall level of m6A in the brain is considerably higher. This indicates the potential neurobiological functions fulfilled by m6A modification in the nervous system, which deserves further investigation [19,20,21,22,23].

A large number of studies have shown that mRNA m6A modification may influence the self-renewal and differentiation of the neural stem cells [24,25,26]. Inactivation of Mettl3 in mouse and human embryonic stem cells leads to a reduction of m6A levels, thereby interfering with transition of the neurons from self-renewal to differentiation. Mettl3 knockout can lead to early embryonic death and damage to the formation of mature neurons in the embryoid bodies [18, 27]. Mettl14 and Mettl3 are known to be involved in neurogenesis by regulating the cell cycle progression of the cortical neural stem cells [28]. SMAD2/3 proteins can bind to the METTL3-METTL14-WTAP complexes to promote differentiation of the embryonic stem cells into the endoderm cells [29]. The Ythdf2-mediated mRNA clearance through m6A plays a regulatory role in the neurodevelopment of mice. The deficiency of embryonic Ythdf2 severely influences the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells [30]. The above evidence demonstrates that m6A promotes the proliferation of neural stem cells and prevents premature differentiation of cells, thereby ensuring the reserve of the neural stem cells (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Role of m6A in normal brain development [24–37]

Full size image

mRNA m6A modification may play a role in learning and memory by regulating the physiological and stress-coping behaviors of the mammalian brains and enhancing fading memories [31,32,33,34]. mRNA m6A modification plays a crucial part in the death of dopaminergic neurons. It is a newly discovered element in the gene regulatory network specific to the mouse brains [16, 35]. Extensive and dynamic m6A methylation has been reported in the developing mouse brains. RNA m6A methylation is controlled precisely in both temporal and spatial terms and is involved in the regulation of the brain development of mice after birth [36, 37] (Fig. 1).

m6A roles in glioma

Several studies have revealed the role of m6A in glioblastoma (GBM). The m6A level in the glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) considerably affects the growth, self-renewal, and development of tumors. The m6A methylation is expected to become the new target for the treatment of GBM (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Role of m6A in glioma pathogenesis [38–56]

Full size image

METTL3 and METTL14 in glioma

METTL3, also known as MT-A70, is the first m6A methylase ever reported [38]. METTL14 is a heterodimer which belongs to the MT-A70 family and is homologous to METTL3. It has been reported that METTL14 knockdown(KD) in Hela cells decreased the level of m6A methylation. This finding demonstrates that METTL14 is an important component of the m6A methyltransferase complex [12]. Some studies have shown that METLL3 is a subunit with catalytic activity, while METTL14 is responsible for recognizing substrate. METLL3 and METTL14 form a stable methyltransferase complex at a 1:1 ratio, which catalyzes m6A modification of the target RNA [39].

Qi Cui et al. [40] showed that the KD of METTL3 and METTL14, the m6A methyltransferases, induced upregulation of the proto-oncogenes (e.g., ADAM19, EPHA3, and KLF4) and downregulation of the tumor suppressor genes (e.g., CDKN2A, BRCA2 and TP53I11), the astrocyte marker GFAP and neuronal marker TUBB3 were also downregulated, thereby promoting self-renewal, and tumorigenesis of GSCs. Then Gene ontology analysis revealed that METTL3 or METTL14 KD regulated the expression of genes involved in important biological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and DNA damage response. In contrast, overexpression of METTL3 caused an upregulation of m6A. A high level of m6A further led to a reduction in the migration and proliferation capacities of the cells, thus inhibiting tumor growth. In their study, mRNA m6A methylation acted as a therapeutic target in GBM. Besides, another study showed that the clinical invasiveness of GBM was correlated with the high expression of METTL3. METTL3 maintained its carcinogenic effect by regulating NMD (Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay), the splicing factor, and the alternative splicing switch in GBM [41]. A study from India found the essential role of METTL3-mediated m6A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. RNA immunoprecipitation studies identified SOX2 as a bonafide m6A target of METTL3 and the m6A modification of SOX2 mRNA by METTL3 enhanced its stability. The recruitment of Human antigen R (HuR) to m6A-modified RNA is essential for SOX2 mRNA stabilization by METTL3. METTL3 silenced GSCs showed enhanced sensitivity to γ-irradiation and reduced DNA repair as evidenced from the accumulation of γ-H2AX. Exogenous overexpression of 3′UTR-less SOX2 in METTL3 silenced GSCs showed efficient DNA repair and also resulted in the significant rescue of neurosphere formation from METTL3 silencing induced radiosensitivity. Thus METTL3 was proposed as a potential molecular target for GBM treatment [42]. Some researchers believed that m6A methylation in GSCs was primarily mediated by METTL3. The silencing of METTL3 might lead to an abnormal increase in alternative splicing events. It was presumed that the m6A reader protein played a crucial role in the functional stability of RNA. METTL3 altered the A-to-I and C-to-U RNA editing events by regulating the RNA-editing enzymes ADAR and APOBEC3A. Similar to the protein-encoding genes, m6A-marked lincRNA (long intergenic non-coding RNA) showed METTL3-dependent overexpression. METTL3 played a crucial role in multiple steps of RNA processing and successfully coordinated the execution of the carcinogenic pathway in GSCs [43]. A study based on in silico analyses of the sequencing data obtained in one GSC line silenced for METTL3, they showed that m6A methylation was strongly impaired in METTL3 KD cells, thus confirming the primary importance of this enzyme for global m6A RNA methylation in GSCs. The KD of METTL3 produced a widespread downregulation of protein coding gene expression, in particular of those genes whose mRNAs contained METTL3-mediated m6A sites. In addition, a number of other GSC transcription factors were repressed upon METTL3 deprivation, even if their mRNAs were not affected by m6A methylation, indicating, again, that the METTL3 tumoral role in GSCs may go beyond the pool of mRNAs directly affected by its enzymatic activity [43]. The above studies prove that m6A methylation of mRNA is closely related to the self-renewal of GSCs and the occurrence of GBM.

WTAP in glioma

WATP is an indispensable protein for m6A methylation [44]. Ping et al. [45] demonstrated that WTAP helped coordinate the localization of METTL3-METTL14 heterodimer to the nuclear speckles, thereby promoting m6A methylation. In Sorci et al.’ study [46], either the KDor overexpression of METTL3 led to an overexpression of the WTAP gene. This indicated that the METTL3 gene expression played an important role in the homeostatic regulation of WTAP protein. However, their results showed that in the absence of METTL3, an upregulation of WTAP alone was insufficient to promote cancer cell proliferation. The above data indicate that the carcinogenic effect of WTAP is closely related to the m6A methyltransferase complex. Then the next question is, "Is WTAP related to the occurrence and development of cancers?" Xi et al. [47] found that WTAP was overexpressed in GBM. WTAP enhanced the proliferation, migration, invasion and tumorigenicity of GSCs in heterografts by mediating the phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and AKT. Besides, WTAP is also involved in the regulation of the expressions of some genes related to cancer cell movements, such as chemotactic ligand 2 (CCL2), chemotactic ligand 3 (CCL3), matrix metallopeptidase 3 (MMP3), lysyl oxidase-like protein 1 (LOXL1), hyaluronan synthase 1 (HAS1), and thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) [48]. Overexpression of WTAP is an independent adverse prognostic factor related to age and WHO staging. It usually predicts poor overall survival in GBM patients [47]. Therefore, WTAP may be a prognostic marker in GBM.

ALKBH5 and FTO in glioma

ALKBH5 is a Fe2+- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent non-heme oxygenase and the second discovered demethylase. ALKBH5 is a member of the AIkB family. Unlike other AIkB, ALK⁃BH5 only displayed a demethylation ability on m6A in the single-stranded RNA/DNA [49]. ALKBH5, in the presence of the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), increased the stability of NANONGmRNA and upregulated its expression by decreasing the m6A methylation in NANONG. Consequently, the conversion from breast cancer cells to tumor stem cells was induced for the use in the research. This finding provides a new pathway to the research on tumor stem cells [50]. Alkbh5 was highly expressed in the whole brain during the embryonic stage, and then declined dramatically during the postnatal and adult stages. In line with the result of Alkbh5, FTO protein levels also showed an age-dependent reduction in the mouse brain [51]. Zhang et al. [52] found that ALKBH5 was overexpressed in the GSCs. Inhibiting ALKBH5 significantly decreased the tumorsphere formation frequency of recurrent GBM-derived GSC11, GSC17 and GSC23 and reduced the expression of Nestin as well as SOX2, Nanog, Oct4, the core transcription factors that endow tumor cells with self-renewal ability, confirming the impact of ALKBH5 on GSC self-renewal. In GSC11, GSC17, and GSC23 cells, loss of ALKBH5 inhibited cell growth and decreased DNA replication. However, depletion of ALKBH5 had no effect on the growth of SW1783 non-CSC glioma cells. KD of ALKBH5 in GSCs increased the proportions of cells in G0/G1 phase whereas decreased the proportions of cells in S and G2/M phase. Collectively, these results suggest that ALKBH5 critically regulates GSC proliferation. In addition, KD of ALKBH5 in GSCs displayed extended survival with a lower rate of tumor formation. In a word, Inhibiting ALKBH5 would decrease the self-renewal and proliferation of GSCs and tumorigenesis. ALKBH5 demethylates FOXM1 nascent transcripts (FOXM1 is a key transcriptional factor in cell cycle regulation and is also crucial for the self-renewal of GSCs and tumorigenesis). ALKBH5 binds to 3'UTR to upregulate FOXM1 expression. FOXM1-AS, as a nuclear lncRNA (antisense nuclear lncRNA), can further promote the interaction between the FOXM1 nascent transcripts and ALKBH5, thereby accelerating this process. FOXM1-AS knockout also disrupts FOXM1 expression and self-renewal of GSC. After depleting ALKBH5 or FOXM1-AS, inducing FOXM1 expression is a salvage against the growth of GSCs, which further proved the critical role of ALKBH5 in the occurrence of GBM [52] (Table 1).

Table 1 Role of m6A in glioma pathogenesis
Full size table

FTO is a member of the Fe2+ and α-ketoglutarate-dependent ALKB family [53]. The FTO gene is localized to chromosome 16q12.2 and is widely expressed at different stages of human development. It is mainly responsible for regulating the speed of fat consumption, promoting overall metabolic rate, and ensuring the energy balance of the body [53]. In 2001, a team led by Prof. He Chuan at the Chicago University confirmed for the first time that in the modification of either DNA or RNA, the FTO protein is a very important demethylase. Its role in the m6A methylation of RNA is non-negligible [11]. This report marked the new era of research on m6A. According to Rui Su [54, 55], FTO as a direct target of R-2HG(R-2-hydroxyglutarate is a co-metabolite resulting from the high level of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) mutants) and a main mediator of R-2HG-induced anti-tumor effects. R-2HG binds directly to FTO protein and inhibits its m6A demethylase activity, resulting in a significant increase of global m6A abundance in R-2HG-sensitive cells, and the effects of R-2HG is FTO-dependent. MYC is a direct and functionally essential target of FTO, and R-2HG treatment or FTO KD increases m6A level on MYC mRNA, leading to mRNA decay and MYC down-regulation, and thereby suppression of MYC signaling. FTO transcription is controlled by CEBPA, and CEBPA mRNA is a direct target of FTO and is positively regulated by FTO in an m6A-dependent manner, so that there is a positive reciprocal regulation between FTO and CEBPA; as a result, R-2HG treatment can indirectly downregulate expression of both CEBPA and FTO through the FTO/m6A/MYC/CEBPA pathway. Marek Bartosovic et al. [56] presented a comprehensive transcriptome-wide analysis of RNA demethylation and uncovered FTO as a potent regulator of nuclear mRNA processing events such as alternative splicing and 3′ end mRNA processing. They showed that FTO binds preferentially to pre-mRNAs in intronic regions, in the proximity of alternatively spliced (AS) exons and poly(A) sites. FTO KD results in substantial changes in pre-mRNA splicing with prevalence of exon skipping events. The alternative splicing effects of FTO KD anti-correlate with METTL3 KD suggesting the involvement of m6A. Besides, deletion of intronic region that contains m6A-linked DRACH (D = A, G or U; R = A or G; H = A, U or C) motifs partially rescues the FTO KD phenotype in a reporter system. It has revealed for the first time the dynamic connection between FTO RNA binding and demethylation activity that influences several mRNA processing events.

Conclusions

Malignant progression and high recurrence rate render gliomas the most lethal type of primary brain tumor [57,58,59]. Epigenetics is one of the research hotspot in recent years. m6A is the most intensively studied epigenetic modification, featured by dynamics and reversibility. mRNA m6A methylation has a widespread impact on the nervous system. It plays important roles in the self-renewal of neural stem cells, learning and memory, brain development, synaptic growth, and glioma proliferation. Inhibiting the expressions of m6A methyltransferase METTL3 or METTL14 can reduce the m6A level and promote the tumor formation ability of GSCs in vivo. On the contrary, the overexpression of METTL3 or the use of FTO inhibitor MA2 (a US Food and Drug Administration approved nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) suppresses GSC growth and self-renewal [40]. Both WTAP and ALKBH5 can promote the proliferation and self-renewal of GSCs and tumorigenesis. These important findings open a new era of the targeted treatment of GBM.

Although the role of mRNA m6A methylation in cancers has been increasingly understood in recent years, some significant challenges remain unresolved and questions unanswered. A large number of studies have indicated that the m6A regulators and the relevant pathways can be used as therapeutic targets. However, there is still a lack of clinical trials with large sample size, and many side effects are not yet clarified. Whether the m6A level and its regulators can be used as the potential diagnostic and prognostic markers of tumors depends on their specificity and sensitivity. Further investigations are required in this respect.

Surprisingly, a recent study showed that 13 major regulators of RNA m6A methylation were differentially expressed in gliomas with different clinicopathological features. On this basis, a risk signal was derived from the seven regulators of RNA m6A methylation. This signal was not only an independent prognostic marker but also a predictor of the clinicopathological features of glioma. This study systematically proved that the regulators of RNA m6A methylation were important participants in the malignant progression of gliomas, which may be used in prognostic stratification and the development of therapeutic strategies [60].

At present, RNA m6A methylation is believed to play a vital role in the occurrence and development of GBM. In the future, more research is needed to clarify the mechanism of m6A methylation to understand its complex regulatory network and to explore its molecular biological mechanism in tumor occurrence and development. RNA m6A methylation offers new hope for the precise, targeted therapy of GBM.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

MGMT:

Methyltransferase

TMZ:

Temozolomide

METTL3:

Methyltransferase-like protein 3

WTAP:

Wilms tumor 1-associated protein

SAM:

S-adenosyl methionine

ALKBH5:

AlkB homolog 5

GBM:

Glioblastoma

GSCs:

Glioblastoma stem cells

NMD:

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

lincRNA:

Long intergenic non-coding RNA

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

CCL2:

Chemotactic ligand 2

CCL3:

Chemotactic ligand 3

MMP3:

Matrix metallopeptidase 3

LOXL1:

Lysyl oxidase-like protein 1

HAS1:

Hyaluronan synthase 1

THBS1:

Thrombospondin-1

KD:

Knockdown

References

  1. Dong Z, Cui H. The emerging roles of RNA modifications in glioblastoma. Cancers. 2020;12(3):736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bian S, Repic M, Guo Z, Kavirayani A, Burkard T, Bagley JA, Krauditsch C, Knoblich JA. Genetically engineered cerebral organoids model brain tumor formation. Nat Methods. 2018;15(8):631–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Taby R, Issa JP. Cancer epigenetics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(6):376–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell EH, Zhang P, Fisher BJ, Macdonald DR, McElroy JP, Lesser GJ, Fleming J, Chakraborty AR, Liu Z, Becker AP, et al. Association of MGMT promoter methylation status with survival outcomes in patients with high-risk glioma treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide: an analysis from the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0424 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(10):1405–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boccaletto P, Machnicka MA, Purta E, Piatkowski P, Baginski B, Wirecki TK, de Crécy-Lagard V, Ross R, Limbach PA, Kotter A, et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D303-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams JM, Cory S. Modified nucleosides and bizarre 5′-termini in mouse myeloma mRNA. Nature. 1975;255(5503):28–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Desrosiers R, Friderici K, Rottman F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1974;71(10):3971–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lavi S, Shatkin AJ. Methylated simian virus 40-specific RNA from nuclei and cytoplasm of infected BSC-1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72(6):2012–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ianniello Z, Paiardini A, Fatica A. N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A): a promising new molecular target in acute myeloid leukemia. Front Oncol. 2019;9:251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu ZX, Li LM, Sun HL, Liu SM. Link between m6A modification and cancers. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, Dai Q, Zheng G, Yang Y, Yi C, Lindahl T, Pan T, Yang YG, et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(12):885–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, Jia G, Yu M, Lu Z, Deng X, et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(2):93–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer KD, Jaffrey SR. The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(5):313–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer KD, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, Osenberg S, Cesarkas K, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Kupiec M, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang M, Lv H, Zhang W, Ma C, He X, Zhao S, Zhang ZW, Zeng YX, Song S, Niu Y, et al. Region-specific RNA m(6)A methylation represents a new layer of control in the gene regulatory network in the mouse brain. Open Biol. 2017;7(9):170166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noack F, Calegari F. Epitranscriptomics: a new regulatory mechanism of brain development and function. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Batista PJ, Molinie B, Wang J, Qu K, Zhang J, Li L, Bouley DM, Lujan E, Haddad B, Daneshvar K, et al. m(6)A RNA modification controls cell fate transition in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(6):707–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J, Harada BT, He C. Regulation of gene expression by N(6)-methyladenosine in cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29(6):487–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maity A, Das B. N6-methyladenosine modification in mRNA: machinery, function and implications for health and diseases. FEBS J. 2016;283(9):1607–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nainar S, Marshall PR, Tyler CR, Spitale RC, Bredy TW. Evolving insights into RNA modifications and their functional diversity in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19(10):1292–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Widagdo J, Anggono V. The m6A-epitranscriptomic signature in neurobiology: from neurodevelopment to brain plasticity. J Neurochem. 2018;147(2):137–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Engel M, Chen A. The emerging role of mRNA methylation in normal and pathological behavior. Genes Brain Behav. 2018;17(3):e12428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao B, Christian KM, He C, Jin P, Ming GL, Song H. Epigenetic mechanisms in neurogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(9):537–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou H, Wang B, Sun H, Xu X, Wang Y. Epigenetic regulations in neural stem cells and neurological diseases. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:6087143.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Boles NC, Temple S. Epimetronomics: m6A marks the tempo of corticogenesis. Neuron. 2017;96(4):718–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yatabe R, Onodera T, Toko K. Fabrication of surface plasmon resonance sensor surface with control of the non-specific adsorption and affinity for the detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene using an antifouling copolymer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014;2:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoon KJ, Vissers C, Ming GL, Song H. Epigenetics and epitranscriptomics in temporal patterning of cortical neural progenitor competence. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(6):1901–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bertero A, Brown S, Madrigal P, Osnato A, Ortmann D, Yiangou L, Kadiwala J, Hubner NC, de Los Mozos IR, Sadée C, et al. The SMAD2/3 interactome reveals that TGFβ controls m(6)A mRNA methylation in pluripotency. Nature. 2018;555(7695):256–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li M, Zhao X, Wang W, Shi H, Pan Q, Lu Z, Perez SP, Suganthan R, He C, Bjørås M, et al. Ythdf2-mediated m(6)A mRNA clearance modulates neural development in mice. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Leighton LJ, Ke K, Zajaczkowski EL, Edmunds J, Spitale RC, Bredy TW. Experience-dependent neural plasticity, learning, and memory in the era of epitranscriptomics. Genes Brain Behav. 2018;17(3):e12426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoon KJ, Ming GL, Song H. Epitranscriptomes in the adult mammalian brain: dynamic changes regulate behavior. Neuron. 2018;99(2):243–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jung Y, Goldman D. Role of RNA modifications in brain and behavior. Genes Brain Behav. 2018;17(3):e12444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Krüttner S, Caroni P. m(6)A-epitranscriptome modulates memory strength. Cell Res. 2019;29(1):4–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen X, Yu C, Guo M, Zheng X, Ali S, Huang H, Zhang L, Wang S, Huang Y, Qie S, et al. Down-regulation of m6A mRNA methylation is involved in dopaminergic neuronal death. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10(5):2355–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma C, Chang M, Lv H, Zhang ZW, Zhang W, He X, Wu G, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Wang D, et al. RNA m(6)A methylation participates in regulation of postnatal development of the mouse cerebellum. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Frye M, Harada BT, Behm M, He C. RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science (New York, NY). 2018;361(6409):1346–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bujnicki JM, Feder M, Radlinska M, Blumenthal RM. Structure prediction and phylogenetic analysis of a functionally diverse family of proteins homologous to the MT-A70 subunit of the human mRNA:m(6)A methyltransferase. J Mol Evol. 2002;55(4):431–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang X, Huang J, Zou T, Yin P. Human m(6)A writers: two subunits, 2 roles. RNA Biol. 2017;14(3):300–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cui Q, Shi H, Ye P, Li L, Qu Q, Sun G, Sun G, Lu Z, Huang Y, Yang CG, et al. m(6)A RNA methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Rep. 2017;18(11):2622–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Li F, Yi Y, Miao Y, Long W, Long T, Chen S, Cheng W, Zou C, Zheng Y, Wu X, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modulates nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79(22):5785–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Visvanathan A, Patil V, Arora A, Hegde AS, Arivazhagan A, Santosh V, Somasundaram K. Essential role of METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance. Oncogene. 2018;37(4):522–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Visvanathan A, Patil V, Abdulla S, Hoheisel JD, Somasundaram K. N6-methyladenosine landscape of glioma stem-like cells: METTL3 is essential for the expression of actively transcribed genes and sustenance of the oncogenic signaling. Genes. 2019;10(2):141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz S, Mumbach MR, Jovanovic M, Wang T, Maciag K, Bushkin GG, Mertins P, Ter-Ovanesyan D, Habib N, Cacchiarelli D, et al. Perturbation of m6A writers reveals two distinct classes of mRNA methylation at internal and 5′ sites. Cell Rep. 2014;8(1):284–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ping XL, Sun BF, Wang L, Xiao W, Yang X, Wang WJ, Adhikari S, Shi Y, Lv Y, Chen YS, et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014;24(2):177–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sorci M, Ianniello Z, Cruciani S, Larivera S, Ginistrelli LC, Capuano E, Marchioni M, Fazi F, Fatica A. METTL3 regulates WTAP protein homeostasis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(8):796.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Xi Z, Xue Y, Zheng J, Liu X, Ma J, Liu Y. WTAP expression predicts poor prognosis in malignant glioma patients. J Mol Neurosci. 2016;60(2):131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jin DI, Lee SW, Han ME, Kim HJ, Seo SA, Hur GY, Jung S, Kim BS, Oh SO. Expression and roles of Wilms’ tumor 1-associating protein in glioblastoma. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(12):2102–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tong J, Flavell RA, Li HB. RNA m(6)A modification and its function in diseases. Front Med. 2018;12(4):481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang C, Samanta D, Lu H, Bullen JW, Zhang H, Chen I, He X, Semenza GL. Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m6A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(14):E2047-2056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Du T, Li G, Yang J, Ma K. RNA demethylase Alkbh5 is widely expressed in neurons and decreased during brain development. Brain Res Bull. 2020;163:150–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang S, Zhao BS, Zhou A, Lin K, Zheng S, Lu Z, Chen Y, Sulman EP, Xie K, Bögler O, et al. m(6)A demethylase ALKBH5 maintains tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells by sustaining FOXM1 expression and cell proliferation program. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(4):591-606.e596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Gerken T, Girard CA, Tung YC, Webby CJ, Saudek V, Hewitson KS, Yeo GS, McDonough MA, Cunliffe S, McNeill LA, et al. The obesity-associated FTO gene encodes a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nucleic acid demethylase. Science (New York, NY). 2007;318(5855):1469–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Su R, Dong L, Li C, Nachtergaele S, Wunderlich M, Qing Y, Deng X, Wang Y, Weng X, Hu C, et al. R-2HG exhibits anti-tumor activity by targeting FTO/m(6)A/MYC/CEBPA signaling. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):90-105.e123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Deng X, Su R, Weng H, Huang H, Li Z, Chen J. RNA N(6)-methyladenosine modification in cancers: current status and perspectives. Cell Res. 2018;28(5):507–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Bartosovic M, Molares HC, Gregorova P, Hrossova D, Kudla G, Vanacova S. N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO targets pre-mRNAs and regulates alternative splicing and 3′-end processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(19):11356–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Chai R, Zhang K, Wang K, Li G, Huang R, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Chen J. A novel gene signature based on five glioblastoma stem-like cell relevant genes predicts the survival of primary glioblastoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(3):439–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chai RC, Zhang KN, Liu YQ, Wu F, Zhao Z, Wang KY, Jiang T, Wang YZ. Combinations of four or more CpGs methylation present equivalent predictive value for MGMT expression and temozolomide therapeutic prognosis in gliomas. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25(3):314–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jiang T, Nam DH, Ram Z, Poon WS, Wang J, Boldbaatar D, Mao Y, Ma W, Mao Q, You Y, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult diffuse gliomas. Cancer Lett. 2021;499:60–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chai RC, Wu F, Wang QX, Zhang S, Zhang KN, Liu YQ, Zhao Z, Jiang T, Wang YZ, Kang CS. m(6)A RNA methylation regulators contribute to malignant progression and have clinical prognostic impact in gliomas. Aging. 2019;11(4):1204–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502147), Zhejiang Medical Science and Technology Project (2017KY260, 2018KY292, 2019RC127, 2018KY291), Zhejiang Provincial National Science Foundation of China (LY21H160007, Y21H160038, Q18H290002, LQ20H290001), the Youth Scientific Innovation Foundation of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (QN201902), and the third term “new medical talents of Zhejiang province project.”

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ting Pan, Fan Wu and Liwen Li contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of the Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China

    Ting Pan, Fan Wu, Shiyan Wu & Fang Zhou

  2. Department of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, People’s Republic of China

    Ting Pan, Shiyan Wu, Fang Zhou & Ping Zhang

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, People’s Republic of China

    Liwen Li, Caixing Sun & Liang Xia

  4. Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer, Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310022, People’s Republic of China

    Liwen Li, Caixing Sun & Liang Xia

Authors
  1. Ting Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liwen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shiyan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Caixing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Liang Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PT and WF conceived the idea. ZF and WSY collected the literature. PT, WF, LLW drafted and polished up the manuscript. SCX, XL and ZP provided a critical review of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping Zhang, Caixing Sun or Liang Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, T., Wu, F., Li, L. et al. The role m6A RNA methylation is CNS development and glioma pathogenesis. Mol Brain 14, 119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00831-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00831-5

Keywords

Molecular Brain

ISSN: 1756-6606