- Open Access
Basic mechanisms for recognition and transport of synaptic cargos
© Schlager and Hoogenraad; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 30 June 2009
- Accepted: 4 August 2009
- Published: 4 August 2009
Synaptic cargo trafficking is essential for synapse formation, function and plasticity. In order to transport synaptic cargo, such as synaptic vesicle precursors, mitochondria, neurotransmitter receptors and signaling proteins to their site of action, neurons make use of molecular motor proteins. These motors operate on the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton and are highly regulated so that different cargos can be transported to distinct synaptic specializations at both pre- and post-synaptic sites. How synaptic cargos achieve specificity, directionality and timing of transport is a developing area of investigation. Recent studies demonstrate that the docking of motors to their cargos is a key control point. Moreover, precise spatial and temporal regulation of motor-cargo interactions is important for transport specificity and cargo recruitment. Local signaling pathways - Ca2+ influx, CaMKII signaling and Rab GTPase activity - regulate motor activity and cargo release at synaptic locations. We discuss here how different motors recognize their synaptic cargo and how motor-cargo interactions are regulated by neuronal activity.
- AMPA Receptor
- Dendritic Spine
- Motor Protein
- Myosin Versus
- Cargo Transport
Neurons are highly polarized cells with distinct membrane domains, including a single extended axon and multiple dendritic processes which contain thousands of individual synapses. Synapses are composed of a presynaptic terminal, a synaptic cleft, and a postsynaptic specialization and are the structures through which neurons communicate [1, 2]. Presynaptic boutons transmit signals by releasing neurotransmitters from synaptic vesicles and postsynaptic sites receive information using neurotransmitter receptors. Most excitatory glutamate receptors, such as N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptors are located at dendritic spines, whereas inhibitory glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs) are mainly located at the shaft of dendrites. Recent studies have identified the molecular components of synapses, particularly by using proteomic strategies and have revealed that the specification of synaptic function, e.g. excitatory or inhibitory, at both pre- and post-synapses is achieved via the recruitment and assembly of distinct receptors and their associated proteins [1, 3–6]. The assembly requires selective localization or stabilization of receptors at synaptic membranes , as well as the highly coordinated intracellular transport of synapse-associated proteins . In Drosophila, selective synaptic cargo transport has been shown to be essential for synapse formation at the neuromuscular junction while axon outgrowth and guidance were unaffected .
Motors and adaptors for transport of synaptic cargos
NMDA Receptor (NR2B)
AMPA Receptor (GluR1/GluA1)
AMPA Receptor (GluR2/GluA2)
Glycine Receptor (GlyR)
Reelin Receptor (APOER2)
Trk Receptor (TrkB)
Synaptic Vesicle Precursor (SVP)
Piccolo-Bassoon Transport Vesicle (PTV)
PSD-93, PSD-95, S-SCAM,
RNA Particle (RNP)
In this review we focus on the basic principles of synaptic cargo transport. We discuss how different motors of the kinesin, dynein and myosin families recognize their cargo and how motor-cargo interactions are regulated. Not covered in this review are detailed descriptions of the different motor protein families [12, 18] and specific pathways in neuronal trafficking , but we will discuss briefly the current knowledge of general cargo transport mechanisms [10, 19, 20]. Other excellent reviews cover the role of cytoskeletal organization in cargo trafficking [21, 22], receptor trafficking through lateral diffusion in the plasma membrane [23, 24], transport mechanisms during neuronal polarization  and discuss the relationship between trafficking and neurodegenerative disease [26, 27]. We aim to give an overview of the molecular trafficking mechanisms important for the delivery and removal of synaptic proteins. Studying the basic machinery for recognition and transport of synaptic cargos might help us to understand fundamental operational principles of synapse formation, function and plasticity.
Basic mechanisms regulating motor protein transport
Microtubule organization in neurons
In neurons, the microtubule cytoskeleton is organized differently in dendrites and axons. Dendritic microtubules have mixed polarity i.e. plus-ends can face either away from or towards the cell body, whereas the microtubules in the axon have a uniform polarity with all plus-ends facing outwards [36, 37] (Figure 1). Recently, by imaging microtubules using fluorescently tagged α-tubulin and microtubule plus-end binding proteins it was demonstrated that neuronal microtubules are very dynamic and regularly enter dendritic spines [38, 39]. Microtubules grow with their plus-ends directed towards the spine and are able to repeatedly enter the same spine  (Figure 1). In contrast, microtubule nucleation within spines and subsequent polymerization into the dendrite shaft has not been observed. Therefore, polarized growth of microtubules into spines could facilitate delivery of synaptic cargo directly to the postsynaptic site (Figure 1). Although microtubule-dependent cargo transport in dendritic spines has not been directly visualized yet, it will be interesting to investigate whether the translocation of excitatory postsynaptic proteins or other cellular components, such as organelles and RNA particles (RNPs), rely on microtubule based transport [40–43] (Table 1). On the other hand, several studies directly demonstrate the importance of the actin-based transport mechanisms at excitatory synapses. Myosin V, for example, mediates RNP translocation into dendritic spines , is required for the spine localization of smooth endoplasmic reticulum at Purkinje cell synapses  and transports AMPA receptor containing recycling endosomes during synaptic potentiation [45, 46].
Post-translational modification of microtubules
One way to directly influence synaptic cargo transport is to generate functional diversity by modifying the cytoskeleton. Motor proteins recognize these spatial cues and establish specific synaptic cargo trafficking routes. It has recently been demonstrated that post-translational modification (PTM) of microtubules can alter their stability and motor protein binding characteristics . Microtubules can acquire a variety of evolutionarily conserved PTMs including polyglutamylation, polyglycylation, detyrosination, acetylation, phosphorylation and palmitoylation . In most cases, modifying enzymes act preferentially on tubulin subunits already incorporated into microtubules. It is tempting to speculate that, due to the specific organization of microtubules in neurons, microtubule PTM is of even greater importance than in non-neuronal cells. Recently, it was found that polyglutamylation targets kinesin-3 family member KIF1A motors  and tyrosination recruits kinesin-1 family member KIF5 motor proteins . Now, it will be critical to identify the forward and reverse enzymes responsible for the various modifications of neuronal microtubules.
Regulation of motor protein activity
The motor domains responsible for motility and force generation are connected by a stalk to the tail domain, which directly or indirectly binds to their cargo . Another possible mode of transport regulation is direct modulation of motor protein activity. Tremendous progress has been made in the mechanistic understanding of molecular motors - both in force generation and directional movement [12, 32, 51, 52]. For instance, a recent study shows that the specific structure of dynein, with six AAA+ ATPase domains, a linker and a microtubule binding stalk, explain the characteristic dynein stepping pattern . The stepping behavior of kinesin was shown to be regulated by intramolecular strain, allowing the kinesin motor to maintain its plus-end directed movement and also coordinate the two motor domains . Moreover, several studies demonstrate that myosin and kinesin motors can fold back on themselves in order to regulate their own motor activity . In the absence of bound cargo, the tail domain interacts with the motor domain and inhibits its activity [55, 56]. Furthermore, motor accessory proteins such as dynactin have been shown to increase the processivity of dynein and kinesin-2 [57–59].
Regulation of bidirectional transport
Another intriguing aspect of transport regulation lies in the use of multiple motors by a single cargo (Figure 1). Various synaptic cargos were shown to move bidirectionally along the microtubule network and some can even switch between actin and microtubules (Table 1). Several models have been proposed to explain bidirectional transport. The "tug-of-war" and "coordination" models both describe a situation where different types of motors are simultaneously bound to one cargo . In the "tug-of-war" model, motors of both minus-end and plus-end directionality will create a force that is decisive for the direction of cargo transport. The back and forth movement of synaptic cargo can be explained by motor loss or changes in activities of motors, causing the opposing motors to take the lead . The "coordination" model predicts that when one motor is actively engaged on the microtubule, the opposing motor is turned off. Here, disruption of one set of motors causes transport defects in both directions . Both transport machineries are most likely controlled by large regulatory complexes present on the cargo, consisting of Rab GTPases, scaffolding and signaling proteins [10, 20]. In this way, signaling proteins can turn one of the motors "on" and the opposing motor "off" and thus coordinate the activity of both motors. It was known from in vitro studies that cargos that contain multiple motors were able to move further and faster than cargos which engaged only one motor [62, 63]. However, a recent study using Drosophila embryos showed that one cargo that engages multiple motors in fact does not travel faster nor does it travel a greater distance . These data suggest that in vivo regulation of motor proteins requires additional factors, possibly in the form of motor-adaptor complexes on moving cargo.
The most direct mechanism of membrane association is attachment to the phospholipid bilayer. Myosin I motors that possess a basic tail domain bind to acidic phospholipids  and kinesin-3 family members bind to lipids via their pleckstrin homology domain in the tail region . Dynein cannot directly bind to protein-free liposomes, it requires dynactin and spectrin to link to acidic phospholipids in the membrane [59, 67].
Motor proteins can interact with receptors or integral membrane proteins on membrane cargo vesicles. Kinectin is a membrane protein in the endoplasmic reticulum and was the first proposed KIF5 receptor to anchor motors on cargo membranes [68, 69]. KIF5 has been suggested to bind directly to amyloid precursor protein (APP), a transmembrane protein of which proteolytic fragments give rise to amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients , although some other studies were unable to find evidence for a direct interaction . In photoreceptor cells, the light chain of dynein, Tctex-1, directly binds to the G-protein coupled receptor rhodopsin . Rhodopsin mutations responsible for retinitis pigmentosa inhibit the interaction with dynein. Tctex-1 also interacts with neurotrophin Trk receptors, suggesting that the dynein motor complex is responsible for retrograde transport of Trk receptors . Consistently, real-time imaging revealed that dynein is required for rapid transport of internalized, activated Trk receptors from axon terminals to the cell bodies .
Synaptic cargos engage multiple types of motors for both actin and microtubule based transport. There is strong evidence that the cooperation of multiple motors on a single cargo is important to regulate cargo transport . Communication between different types of motor on a cargo is most easily envisaged if motors are in direct physical contact. Myosin V and KIF5 have been shown to bind directly and enhance each other's processivity [75, 76]. This motor-motor interaction may represent a mechanism by which the transition of vesicles from microtubules to actin filaments is regulated. Moreover, physical interactions between dynein and kinesin motor proteins have also been reported - direct binding between cytoplasmic dynein and KIF5  and Xenopus kinesin-2 associated protein (XKAP) and dynactin has been described . Motor-motor associations may also be a mechanism to coordinate anterograde and retrograde cargo movements along microtubules.
Motor-signaling protein binding
Motor proteins can also attach to cargo through binding of signaling proteins and associated components. Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) interacting proteins (JIPs) are of key importance for axonal cargo trafficking  - in Drosophila, JIP mutants cause aberrant accumulation of axonal cargos, closely resembling the phenotype of kinesin-1/KIF5 mutants. JIP functions as an adaptor protein by binding directly to kinesin light chain and carries Reelin receptor ApoER2-containing vesicles . Moreover, activation of the JNK signaling pathway triggers cargo release .
Both KIF5 and dynein are the primary motors for mitochondria trafficking in Drosophila motor axons . The Miro GTPases have recently been demonstrated to anchor in the outer mitochondrial membrane and regulate mitochondrial transport and synaptic function . Mitochondria coated with Miro recruit KIF5 through the association with Milton/TRAK proteins . In flies, loss of Miro and Milton function display similar phenotypes - abnormal clustering of mitochondria in the cell body and impaired synaptic function at the neuromuscular junction [84, 85].
Motor-scaffold protein binding
Synaptic scaffolds are multifunctional proteins with several protein-protein interaction modules [1, 3, 7]. Several studies demonstrate that scaffolding proteins bind directly to motors and function as motor-cargo linkers [10, 86, 87]. The motor-cargo complex on glutamate receptor-containing vesicles consists of glutamate receptor subunits, scaffolding proteins and kinesin motors [88, 89]. The NMDA receptor NR2B subunit interacts with KIF17 through a scaffolding protein complex that consists of Lin7 (also known as MALS/Velis), Lin2 (CASK) and Lin10 (Mint1). Consistently, NR2B and KIF17 have been localized on the same vesicle and move within the dendritic shaft . A similar motor-cargo model can be made for AMPA receptor transport - AMPA receptor subunits GluA2/3 (also named GluR2/3) interact with KIF5 through the multiple PDZ-domain containing scaffolding protein GRIP/ABP . Interestingly, GRIP can also bind to KIF1A through GRIP interacting protein liprin-α , suggesting that different microtubule-dependent motors are involved in AMPA receptor cargo transport. Moreover, GRIP contains up to seven PDZ domains and might transport many other interacting proteins, such as EphB receptors, their ephrin ligands and transmembrane protein Fraser syndrome 1 (FRAS1). Recently, GRIP has been implicated in dendrite morphogenesis by serving as an adaptor protein for EphB receptors . Synaptic scaffolding protein GKAP interacts with dynein light chain  and PSD-95 and related PDZ domain containing scaffolding proteins associate with KIF1Bα, however their function as a motor-cargo adaptors has not been shown directly  (Table 1). However, PDZ domain containing protein SAP102 has been implicated in NMDA receptor trafficking .
Motor-Rab GTPase binding
Motor proteins also make use of small Rab GTPases, often with the help of Rab effector molecules, to attach to their cargo. Several secretory and endosomal Rab proteins have been shown to bind to specific motors [96–103] (Table 1). Recently, it was shown that Rab3 effector DENN/MADD is an important linker between KIF1Bβ/KIF1A motors and Rab3-containing synaptic vesicle precursors . Surprisingly, the number of synaptic vesicles is not reduced in quadruple Rab3A-D knockout mice , suggesting that redundant synaptic vesicle trafficking mechanisms are present. Recently, Rab6 was shown to regulate transport and targeting of secretory vesicles . Rab6 binds the dynein/dynactin motor complex through its effector protein Bicaudal-D (BICD) and regulates microtubule-minus end directed transport [92, 107, 108]. Moreover, recycling endosome GTPase Rab11 was shown to interact with myosin Vb and regulate AMPA receptor trafficking [45, 109]. Myosin Vb binds to Rab11 through its effector Rab11-family interacting protein 2 (Rab11-FIP2) allowing the transport of AMPAR containing recycling endosomes into the dendritic spine .
Synaptic cargo trafficking regulated at the level of motor-cargo binding
Regulation of membrane trafficking is tightly correlated with the docking of motor proteins to specific cargo. It is crucial to understand how cargo trafficking is regulated at early transport events, during motor-cargo binding and motor activation and late transport events including cargo release and retention at the final destination. Several signaling pathways have been found that influence synaptic cargo movement and distribution, such as phosphorylation-dependent signaling [110–113]. Here we focus on the recent studies demonstrating how motor-cargo interactions are regulated by neuronal activity.
Ca2+ levels regulate motor-cargo binding
One way to control intracellular trafficking is to regulate motor-cargo interactions by responding to changes in local ionic concentrations. Activation of NMDA receptors causes a rapid influx of Ca2+ in dendritic spines . A recent study shows that Myosin Vb is a "Ca2+ sensor" for actin-based postsynaptic AMPA receptor trafficking . Increased Ca2+ levels lead to unfolding of Myosin Vb motors and allows for binding to Rab11-FIP2 adaptors on recycling endosomes [115, 116] (Figure 2B). The association of myosin Vb with Rab11-FIP2 recruits AMPA receptor containing recycling endosomes into spines. Thus, elevated Ca2+ levels in spines promote actin-based postsynaptic trafficking. On the other hand, Ca2+ influx reduces mitochondrial motility . Recent studies suggest that the mitochondrial Miro-Milton adaptor complex is essential for the Ca2+-dependent regulation of mitochondria trafficking . Elevated Ca2+ levels permit Miro to interact directly with the motor domain of KIF5 (Figure 2B). The interesting aspect of this model is that KIF5 remains associated with mitochondria regardless of whether they are moving or stationary. In the "moving" state, KIF5 is bound to mitochondria by binding to Milton, which in turn interacts with Miro on the mitochondrial surface. In the "stationary" state, in presence of high Ca2+ levels, the KIF5 motor domain interacts directly with Miro and prevents microtubule interactions. Both findings imply the existence of "Ca2+ sensors" that detect neuronal activity stimuli and convert Ca2+ influx into mechanisms regulating cargo trafficking.
CaMKII signaling regulates motor-cargo binding
Ca2+ influx also triggers synaptic signaling cascades [119, 120]. A key player in this process is calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), a calcium-activated serine/threonine kinase that is present at synaptic terminals. Recent findings link CaMKII activity with regulated motor-cargo binding. For instance, CaMKII has been shown to phosphorylate KIF17, which induces the dissociation of the Mint1 scaffolding protein complex and release of NMDA receptor-containing cargo near the postsynaptic membrane  (Figure 2C). In this way, regulated CaMKII activity provides an attractive mechanism for targeting NMDA receptor complexes to active synapses where the kinase is switched "on". CaMKII has also been shown to modulate myosin V - cargo binding in Xenopus melanophores . It will be interesting to test whether myosin V is important for NMDA receptor-containing vesicle transport. Another recent study shows that CaMKII controls the trafficking of leukocyte common antigen-related (LAR) family of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (Figure 2C) . LAR associates with KIF1A via the adaptor protein liprin-α1 [91, 123, 124]. Interestingly, liprin-α1 is degraded in response to CaMKII phosphorylation and additionally regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system . At synapses where CAMKII is active, LAR-liprin-α1 containing vesicles would be "unloaded" due to CaMKII-mediated degradation of liprin-α1. An attractive idea is that the regulated degradation of cargo-adaptors or motor proteins is a general molecular mechanism for directed motor trafficking.
Rab GTPases regulate motor-cargo binding
Rab proteins are molecular switches which cycle between a GDP-bound and a GTP-bound state and represent the inactive and active states, respectively . Activation of Rab GTPases is mediated by predominantly membrane-associated Rab guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEFs, inactivation of Rabs is a consequence of their intrinsic capacity to hydrolyse GTP. However, this activity is low and requires stimulation by Rab GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). An additional level of regulation exists through guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs), which prevent activation of GTPases by blocking their interaction with GEFs and effector proteins. Recent studies show that motor-cargo interactions are controlled by regulated Rab GTPase activity.
Collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2) is crucial for axon formation in hippocampal neurons and functions as a motor-adaptor protein to link KIF5 to neurotrophin Trk receptors . CRMP-2 forms a complex with Rab27 and its effector Slp1, associates with the cytoplasmic region of TrkB and regulates anterograde transport of TrkB . Interestingly, the direct binding of TrkB to Slp1 is dependent on the GTPase activity of Rab27. The binding between Slp1 and GTP-bound Rab27 might be regulated by a Rab27 GAP mediated block of Rab inactivation (Figure 2D). On the other hand it is possible that Rab27 specific GDIs and GEFs regulate the recruitment to TrkB-containing vesicles. Another study shows that the nucleotide-bound Rab3 regulates trafficking of KIF1Bβ/KIF1A-positive synaptic vesicle precursors through the interaction with its effector protein DENN/MADD . GTP-Rab3 is more effectively transported than GDP-Rab3 in axons and Rab3 activity can regulate the interaction between KIF1Bβ/KIF1A-DENN/MADD and Rab3-containing synaptic vesicle precursors (Figure 2D). It will be interesting to find signaling pathways leading to the regulation of Rab3 GTPase activity. Interestingly, DENN/MADD has been shown to function as a GEF for Rab3 . Identifying GEFs and GAPs for specific Rabs will be a major future challenge to understand how Rab GTPases regulate motor-cargo binding and transport specificity.
During the last decade a number of factors have been identified that interact with specific motor proteins. Biochemical and proteomics approaches and high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screens have identified more than 100 proteins that bind to kinesin-1/KIF5 in mammals, flies and worms . Most of these proteins act as cargo molecules themselves, function as motor-adaptor proteins (scaffolding proteins, Rab GTPases, signaling proteins) or are regulators of motor activity. It is becoming increasingly clear that motor-adaptor-cargo interactions play a key role in identifying synaptic cargos and regulating synaptic cargo trafficking. As such, these complexes function as important regulators of synaptic structure and function.
Synaptic cargos often move bidirectionally in neurons, employing both plus-end and minus-end directed motors along microtubules, and can even switch between actin and microtubule tracks. It is very likely that transport of cargo to synaptic sites is controlled by the cooperation of several types of motor proteins for both actin and microtubule based transport. For example, multiple motor proteins contribute to the transport of AMPA receptors, each binding directly or indirectly to the AMPA receptor protein complex (Table 1) - GluA1 binds to myosin V, GluA1 interacts with myosin VI (via SAP-97), GluA2 binds to KIF5 (via GRIP) and GluA2 interacts with KIF1A (via GRIP-liprin-α) [46, 88, 91, 130]. The same holds true for other receptors, such as glycine receptors [131, 132] and Trk receptors [73, 127, 133], synaptic vesicle precursors [66, 91, 104, 134], piccolo-bassoon transport vesicles [135–137] and mitochondria [82, 83, 138–140] (Table 1). If these motors are all attached to a single synaptic cargo simultaneously, transport can easily be adjusted or even reversed by regulating the activity of the different motors. This mechanism is likely to be much quicker than assembling a new set of motors on a moving synaptic cargo, and also allows synaptic transport to be quickly altered depending on local ion concentrations and other synaptic signaling mechanisms. It even makes it possible to precisely tune transport in such a way that synaptic cargos can seamlessly switch from microtubules to actin. This might be crucial for positioning synaptic cargos at their specific place of action - microtubule dependent motors deliver synaptic cargo to the entrance of synaptic sites and myosin motors facilitate the transport into synapses. Interestingly, by imaging super-ecliptic pHluorin-tagged AMPA receptors, GluA1 insertions were seen at the extrasynaptic surfaces [141, 142]. If so, synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors may require an additional trafficking step involving lateral diffusion from extrasynaptic pools to synaptic sites . Similar three-step mechanisms may be responsible for the delivery of other synaptic components at both pre- and postsynaptic sites. The cooperation between different motor proteins in synaptic cargo transport raises entirely new questions about motor protein regulation and synaptic cargo docking. Identification of new motor-adaptor-cargo regulators will increase our understanding of transport regulation. Since adaptor proteins play a crucial role in the transport of synaptic cargo, they can serve as excellent starting points to identify other components of the machinery.
One major challenge is to visualize synaptic cargo transport along single microtubule tracks. This is important since dendrites do not have a uniform microtubule orientation and many microtubules are aligned anti-parallel to each other (Figure 1). In this way, minus- and plus-end directed motors move towards both ends of a dendrite. As a consequence, visualizing synaptic cargo trafficking alone does not identify the motor driving cargo motility. The unique microtubule organization in dendrites raises additional questions about the coordination of directed postsynaptic cargo trafficking. To better understand cargo trafficking in dendrites, more knowledge is needed on dendritic microtubule organization as well as novel approaches to visualize synaptic cargo transport. Recent studies started to address the role of dynamic microtubule organization in dendrites , investigate the influence of neuronal activity on microtubule PTM  and study the effect of long-term microtubule stabilization on neuronal polarity . The spatial and temporal arrangement of transport complexes and the underlying cytoskeleton is likely to be important to understand how multiple motors can regulate specific synaptic cargo transport and delivery.
M.A.S is a PhD student in the lab of C.C.H. He graduated with a B.Sc and M.Sc in Biology from Leiden University, The Netherlands, and a M.Sc in Neuroscience from Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. C.C.H is an Associate Professor at the Erasmus Medical Center in Department of Neuroscience. He has been a postdoctoral fellow in the lab of Morgan Sheng at the Picower Center for Learning and Memory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. He graduated with a B.Sc in Biochemistry from the Hogeschool Rotterdam in The Netherlands, followed by a M.Sc in Biology from Utrecht University, The Netherlands, and a Ph.D in Molecular and Cellular Biology from Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
We thank members of the Hoogenraad lab for their comments on the manuscript. C.C.H is supported by The Prinses Beatrix Fonds, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-ALW and NWO-ECHO), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw-VIDI, ZonMw-TOP), Human Frontier Science Program Career Development Award (HFSP-CDA) and European Science Foundation (European Young Investigators (EURYI) Award).
- Sheng M, Hoogenraad CC: The postsynaptic architecture of excitatory synapses: a more quantitative view. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007, 76: 823-847. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bourne JN, Harris KM: Balancing structure and function at hippocampal dendritic spines. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008, 31: 47-67. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125646.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacob TC, Moss SJ, Jurd R: GABA(A) receptor trafficking and its role in the dynamic modulation of neuronal inhibition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008, 9: 331-343. 10.1038/nrn2370.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kneussel M, Loebrich S: Trafficking and synaptic anchoring of ionotropic inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors. Biol Cell. 2007, 99: 297-309. 10.1042/BC20060120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Margeta MA, Shen K, Grill B: Building a synapse: lessons on synaptic specificity and presynaptic assembly from the nematode C. elegans. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008, 18: 69-76. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.04.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ziv NE, Garner CC: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of presynaptic assembly. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004, 5: 385-399. 10.1038/nrn1370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim E, Sheng M: PDZ domain proteins of synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004, 5: 771-781. 10.1038/nrn1517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirokawa N, Takemura R: Molecular motors and mechanisms of directional transport in neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005, 6: 201-214. 10.1038/nrn1624.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein AY, Wang X, Schwarz TL: Axonal transport and the delivery of pre-synaptic components. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008, 18: 495-503. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.10.003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karcher RL, Deacon SW, Gelfand VI: Motor-cargo interactions: the key to transport specificity. Trends Cell Biol. 2002, 12: 21-27. 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02184-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miki H, Okada Y, Hirokawa N: Analysis of the kinesin superfamily: insights into structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15: 467-476. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.07.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vale RD: The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell. 2003, 112: 467-480. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00111-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirokawa N, Noda Y: Intracellular transport and kinesin superfamily proteins, KIFs: structure, function, and dynamics. Physiol Rev. 2008, 88: 1089-1118. 10.1152/physrev.00023.2007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy MJ, Ehlers MD: Organelles and trafficking machinery for postsynaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006, 29: 325-362. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112808.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shepherd JD, Huganir RL: The cell biology of synaptic plasticity: AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007, 23: 613-643. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sudhof TC: Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature. 2008, 455: 903-911. 10.1038/nature07456.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lau CG, Zukin RS: NMDA receptor trafficking in synaptic plasticity and neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007, 8: 413-426. 10.1038/nrn2153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schliwa M, Woehlke G: Molecular motors. Nature. 2003, 422: 759-765. 10.1038/nature01601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gross SP, Vershinin M, Shubeita GT: Cargo transport: two motors are sometimes better than one. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: R478-486. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welte MA: Bidirectional transport along microtubules. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: R525-537. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conde C, Caceres A: Microtubule assembly, organization and dynamics in axons and dendrites. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009, 10: 319-332. 10.1038/nrn2631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dent EW, Gertler FB: Cytoskeletal dynamics and transport in growth cone motility and axon guidance. Neuron. 2003, 40: 209-227. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00633-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renner M, Specht CG, Triller A: Molecular dynamics of postsynaptic receptors and scaffold proteins. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008, 18: 532-540. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choquet D, Triller A: The role of receptor diffusion in the organization of the postsynaptic membrane. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003, 4: 251-265. 10.1038/nrn1077.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Witte H, Bradke F: The role of the cytoskeleton during neuronal polarization. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008, 18: 479-487. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chevalier-Larsen E, Holzbaur EL: Axonal transport and neurodegenerative disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1762: 1094-1108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duncan JE, Goldstein LS: The genetics of axonal transport and axonal transport disorders. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2: e124-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020124.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akhmanova A, Steinmetz MO: Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 9: 309-322. 10.1038/nrm2369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tada T, Sheng M: Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine morphogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006, 16: 95-101. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.12.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ethell IM, Pasquale EB: Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine development and remodeling. Prog Neurobiol. 2005, 75: 161-205. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.02.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hook P, Vallee RB: The dynein family at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2006, 119: 4369-4371. 10.1242/jcs.03176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koonce MP, Samso M: Of rings and levers: the dynein motor comes of age. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14: 612-619. 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.09.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desnos C, Huet S, Darchen F: 'Should I stay or should I go?': myosin V function in organelle trafficking. Biol Cell. 2007, 99: 411-423. 10.1042/BC20070021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshimura A, Fujii R, Watanabe Y, Okabe S, Fukui K, Takumi T: Myosin-Va facilitates the accumulation of mRNA/protein complex in dendritic spines. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: 2345-2351. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bridgman PC: Myosin-dependent transport in neurons. J Neurobiol. 2004, 58: 164-174. 10.1002/neu.10320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baas PW, Deitch JS, Black MM, Banker GA: Polarity orientation of microtubules in hippocampal neurons: uniformity in the axon and nonuniformity in the dendrite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 8335-8339. 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8335.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaworski J, Hoogenraad CC, Akhmanova A: Microtubule plus-end tracking proteins in differentiated mammalian cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008, 40: 619-637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu X, Viesselmann C, Nam S, Merriam E, Dent EW: Activity-dependent dynamic microtubule invasion of dendritic spines. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 13094-13105. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3074-08.2008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaworski J, Kapitein LC, Gouveia SM, Dortland BR, Wulf PS, Grigoriev I, Camera P, Spangler SA, Di Stefano P, Demmers J, Krugers H, Defilippi P, Akhmanova A, Hoogenraad CC: Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2009, 61: 85-100. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bassell GJ, Warren ST: Fragile X syndrome: loss of local mRNA regulation alters synaptic development and function. Neuron. 2008, 60: 201-214. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanai Y, Dohmae N, Hirokawa N: Kinesin transports RNA: isolation and characterization of an RNA-transporting granule. Neuron. 2004, 43: 513-525. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ling SC, Fahrner PS, Greenough WT, Gelfand VI: Transport of Drosophila fragile X mental retardation protein-containing ribonucleoprotein granules by kinesin-1 and cytoplasmic dynein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 17428-17433. 10.1073/pnas.0408114101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davidovic L, Jaglin XH, Lepagnol-Bestel AM, Tremblay S, Simonneau M, Bardoni B, Khandjian EW: The fragile X mental retardation protein is a molecular adaptor between the neurospecific KIF3C kinesin and dendritic RNA granules. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16: 3047-3058. 10.1093/hmg/ddm263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyata M, Finch EA, Khiroug L, Hashimoto K, Hayasaka S, Oda SI, Inouye M, Takagishi Y, Augustine GJ, Kano M: Local calcium release in dendritic spines required for long-term synaptic depression. Neuron. 2000, 28: 233-244. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00099-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Edwards JG, Riley N, Provance DW, Karcher R, Li XD, Davison IG, Ikebe M, Mercer JA, Kauer JA, Ehlers MD: Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell. 2008, 135: 535-548. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Correia SS, Bassani S, Brown TC, Lise MF, Backos DS, El-Husseini A, Passafaro M, Esteban JA: Motor protein-dependent transport of AMPA receptors into spines during long-term potentiation. Nat Neurosci. 2008, 11: 457-466. 10.1038/nn2063.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westermann S, Weber K: Post-translational modifications regulate microtubule function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 4: 938-947. 10.1038/nrm1260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verhey KJ, Gaertig J: The tubulin code. Cell Cycle. 2007, 6: 2152-2160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikegami K, Heier RL, Taruishi M, Takagi H, Mukai M, Shimma S, Taira S, Hatanaka K, Morone N, Yao I, Campbell PK, Yuasa S, Janke C, Macgregor GR, Setou M: Loss of alpha-tubulin polyglutamylation in ROSA22 mice is associated with abnormal targeting of KIF1A and modulated synaptic function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 3213-3218. 10.1073/pnas.0611547104.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konishi Y, Setou M: Tubulin tyrosination navigates the kinesin-1 motor domain to axons. Nat Neurosci. 2009, 12: 559-567. 10.1038/nn.2314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hackney DD: Biochemistry. Processive motor movement. Science. 2007, 316: 58-59. 10.1126/science.1141549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Block SM: Kinesin motor mechanics: binding, stepping, tracking, gating, and limping. Biophys J. 2007, 92: 2986-2995. 10.1529/biophysj.106.100677.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts AJ, Numata N, Walker ML, Kato YS, Malkova B, Kon T, Ohkura R, Arisaka F, Knight PJ, Sutoh K, Burgess SA: AAA+ Ring and linker swing mechanism in the dynein motor. Cell. 2009, 136: 485-495. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.049.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yildiz A, Tomishige M, Gennerich A, Vale RD: Intramolecular strain coordinates kinesin stepping behavior along microtubules. Cell. 2008, 134: 1030-1041. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.018.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coy DL, Hancock WO, Wagenbach M, Howard J: Kinesin's tail domain is an inhibitory regulator of the motor domain. Nat Cell Biol. 1999, 1: 288-292. 10.1038/13001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thirumurugan K, Sakamoto T, Hammer JA, Sellers JR, Knight PJ: The cargo-binding domain regulates structure and activity of myosin 5. Nature. 2006, 442: 212-215. 10.1038/nature04865.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- King SJ, Schroer TA: Dynactin increases the processivity of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. Nat Cell Biol. 2000, 2: 20-24. 10.1038/71338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berezuk MA, Schroer TA: Dynactin enhances the processivity of kinesin-2. Traffic. 2007, 8: 124-129. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00517.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroer TA: Dynactin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004, 20: 759-779. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.094623.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller MJ, Klumpp S, Lipowsky R: Tug-of-war as a cooperative mechanism for bidirectional cargo transport by molecular motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 4609-4614. 10.1073/pnas.0706825105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gross SP, Welte MA, Block SM, Wieschaus EF: Coordination of opposite-polarity microtubule motors. J Cell Biol. 2002, 156: 715-724. 10.1083/jcb.200109047.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mallik R, Petrov D, Lex SA, King SJ, Gross SP: Building complexity: an in vitro study of cytoplasmic dynein with in vivo implications. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: 2075-2085. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vershinin M, Carter BC, Razafsky DS, King SJ, Gross SP: Multiple-motor based transport and its regulation by Tau. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 87-92. 10.1073/pnas.0607919104.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shubeita GT, Tran SL, Xu J, Vershinin M, Cermelli S, Cotton SL, Welte MA, Gross SP: Consequences of motor copy number on the intracellular transport of kinesin-1-driven lipid droplets. Cell. 2008, 135: 1098-1107. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.021.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang N, Lin T, Ostap EM: Dynamics of myo1c (myosin-ibeta) lipid binding and dissociation. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 42763-42768. 10.1074/jbc.M206388200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klopfenstein DR, Tomishige M, Stuurman N, Vale RD: Role of phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate organization in membrane transport by the Unc104 kinesin motor. Cell. 2002, 109: 347-358. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00708-0.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muresan V, Stankewich MC, Steffen W, Morrow JS, Holzbaur EL, Schnapp BJ: Dynactin-dependent, dynein-driven vesicle transport in the absence of membrane proteins: a role for spectrin and acidic phospholipids. Mol Cell. 2001, 7: 173-183. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00165-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plitz T, Pfeffer K: Intact lysosome transport and phagosome function despite kinectin deficiency. Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 21: 6044-6055. 10.1128/MCB.21.17.6044-6055.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toyoshima I, Yu H, Steuer ER, Sheetz MP: Kinectin, a major kinesin-binding protein on ER. J Cell Biol. 1992, 118: 1121-1131. 10.1083/jcb.118.5.1121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamal A, Stokin GB, Yang Z, Xia CH, Goldstein LS: Axonal transport of amyloid precursor protein is mediated by direct binding to the kinesin light chain subunit of kinesin-I. Neuron. 2000, 28: 449-459. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00124-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lazarov O, Morfini GA, Lee EB, Farah MH, Szodorai A, DeBoer SR, Koliatsos VE, Kins S, Lee VM, Wong PC, Price DL, Brady ST, Sisodia SS: Axonal transport, amyloid precursor protein, kinesin-1, and the processing apparatus: revisited. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 2386-2395. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3089-04.2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tai AW, Chuang JZ, Bode C, Wolfrum U, Sung CH: Rhodopsin's carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic tail acts as a membrane receptor for cytoplasmic dynein by binding to the dynein light chain Tctex-1. Cell. 1999, 97: 877-887. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80800-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yano H, Lee FS, Kong H, Chuang J, Arevalo J, Perez P, Sung C, Chao MV: Association of Trk neurotrophin receptors with components of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: RC125-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heerssen HM, Pazyra MF, Segal RA: Dynein motors transport activated Trks to promote survival of target-dependent neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7: 596-604. 10.1038/nn1242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ali MY, Lu H, Bookwalter CS, Warshaw DM, Trybus KM: Myosin V and Kinesin act as tethers to enhance each others' processivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 4691-4696. 10.1073/pnas.0711531105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang JD, Brady ST, Richards BW, Stenolen D, Resau JH, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA: Direct interaction of microtubule- and actin-based transport motors. Nature. 1999, 397: 267-270. 10.1038/16722.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ligon LA, Tokito M, Finklestein JM, Grossman FE, Holzbaur EL: A direct interaction between cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin I may coordinate motor activity. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 19201-19208. 10.1074/jbc.M313472200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deacon SW, Serpinskaya AS, Vaughan PS, Lopez Fanarraga M, Vernos I, Vaughan KT, Gelfand VI: Dynactin is required for bidirectional organelle transport. J Cell Biol. 2003, 160: 297-301. 10.1083/jcb.200210066.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koushika SP: "JIP"ing along the axon: the complex roles of JIPs in axonal transport. Bioessays. 2008, 30: 10-14. 10.1002/bies.20695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verhey KJ, Meyer D, Deehan R, Blenis J, Schnapp BJ, Rapoport TA, Margolis B: Cargo of kinesin identified as JIP scaffolding proteins and associated signaling molecules. J Cell Biol. 2001, 152: 959-970. 10.1083/jcb.152.5.959.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horiuchi D, Collins CA, Bhat P, Barkus RV, Diantonio A, Saxton WM: Control of a kinesin-cargo linkage mechanism by JNK pathway kinases. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 1313-1317. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.062.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pilling AD, Horiuchi D, Lively CM, Saxton WM: Kinesin-1 and Dynein are the primary motors for fast transport of mitochondria in Drosophila motor axons. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 2057-2068. 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0526.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glater EE, Megeath LJ, Stowers RS, Schwarz TL: Axonal transport of mitochondria requires milton to recruit kinesin heavy chain and is light chain independent. J Cell Biol. 2006, 173: 545-557. 10.1083/jcb.200601067.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo X, Macleod GT, Wellington A, Hu F, Panchumarthi S, Schoenfield M, Marin L, Charlton MP, Atwood HL, Zinsmaier KE: The GTPase dMiro is required for axonal transport of mitochondria to Drosophila synapses. Neuron. 2005, 47: 379-393. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stowers RS, Megeath LJ, Gorska-Andrzejak J, Meinertzhagen IA, Schwarz TL: Axonal transport of mitochondria to synapses depends on milton, a novel Drosophila protein. Neuron. 2002, 36: 1063-1077. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01094-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kneussel M: Postsynaptic scaffold proteins at non-synaptic sites. The role of postsynaptic scaffold proteins in motor-protein-receptor complexes. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6: 22-27. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400319.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klopfenstein DR, Vale RD, Rogers SL: Motor protein receptors: moonlighting on other jobs. Cell. 2000, 103: 537-540. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00144-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Setou M, Seog DH, Tanaka Y, Kanai Y, Takei Y, Kawagishi M, Hirokawa N: Glutamate-receptor-interacting protein GRIP1 directly steers kinesin to dendrites. Nature. 2002, 417: 83-87. 10.1038/nature743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Setou M, Nakagawa T, Seog DH, Hirokawa N: Kinesin superfamily motor protein KIF17 and mLin-10 in NMDA receptor-containing vesicle transport. Science. 2000, 288: 1796-1802. 10.1126/science.288.5472.1796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guillaud L, Setou M, Hirokawa N: KIF17 dynamics and regulation of NR2B trafficking in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2003, 23: 131-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shin H, Wyszynski M, Huh KH, Valtschanoff JG, Lee JR, Ko J, Streuli M, Weinberg RJ, Sheng M, Kim E: Association of the kinesin motor KIF1A with the multimodular protein liprin-alpha. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 11393-11401. 10.1074/jbc.M211874200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoogenraad CC, Wulf P, Schiefermeier N, Stepanova T, Galjart N, Small JV, Grosveld F, de Zeeuw CI, Akhmanova A: Bicaudal D induces selective dynein-mediated microtubule minus end-directed transport. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 6004-6015. 10.1093/emboj/cdg592.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naisbitt S, Valtschanoff J, Allison DW, Sala C, Kim E, Craig AM, Weinberg RJ, Sheng M: Interaction of the postsynaptic density-95/guanylate kinase domain-associated protein complex with a light chain of myosin-V and dynein. J Neurosci. 2000, 20: 4524-4534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mok H, Shin H, Kim S, Lee JR, Yoon J, Kim E: Association of the kinesin superfamily motor protein KIF1Balpha with postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95), synapse-associated protein-97, and synaptic scaffolding molecule PSD-95/discs large/zona occludens-1 proteins. J Neurosci. 2002, 22: 5253-5258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sans N, Wang PY, Du Q, Petralia RS, Wang YX, Nakka S, Blumer JB, Macara IG, Wenthold RJ: mPins modulates PSD-95 and SAP102 trafficking and influences NMDA receptor surface expression. Nat Cell Biol. 2005, 7: 1179-1190. 10.1038/ncb1325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jordens I, Marsman M, Kuijl C, Neefjes J: Rab proteins, connecting transport and vesicle fusion. Traffic. 2005, 6: 1070-1077. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00336.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoepfner S, Severin F, Cabezas A, Habermann B, Runge A, Gillooly D, Stenmark H, Zerial M: Modulation of receptor recycling and degradation by the endosomal kinesin KIF16B. Cell. 2005, 121: 437-450. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pal A, Severin F, Lommer B, Shevchenko A, Zerial M: Huntingtin-HAP40 complex is a novel Rab5 effector that regulates early endosome motility and is up-regulated in Huntington's disease. J Cell Biol. 2006, 172: 605-618. 10.1083/jcb.200509091.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imamura T, Huang J, Usui I, Satoh H, Bever J, Olefsky JM: Insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation involves protein kinase C-lambda-mediated functional coupling between Rab4 and the motor protein kinesin. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 4892-4900. 10.1128/MCB.23.14.4892-4900.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bielli A, Thornqvist PO, Hendrick AG, Finn R, Fitzgerald K, McCaffrey MW: The small GTPase Rab4A interacts with the central region of cytoplasmic dynein light intermediate chain-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 281: 1141-1153. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jordens I, Fernandez-Borja M, Marsman M, Dusseljee S, Janssen L, Calafat J, Janssen H, Wubbolts R, Neefjes J: The Rab7 effector protein RILP controls lysosomal transport by inducing the recruitment of dynein-dynactin motors. Curr Biol. 2001, 11: 1680-1685. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00531-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cantalupo G, Alifano P, Roberti V, Bruni CB, Bucci C: Rab-interacting lysosomal protein (RILP): the Rab7 effector required for transport to lysosomes. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 683-693. 10.1093/emboj/20.4.683.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seabra MC, Coudrier E: Rab GTPases and myosin motors in organelle motility. Traffic. 2004, 5: 393-399. 10.1111/j.1398-9219.2004.00190.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niwa S, Tanaka Y, Hirokawa N: KIF1Bbeta- and KIF1A-mediated axonal transport of presynaptic regulator Rab3 occurs in a GTP-dependent manner through DENN/MADD. Nat Cell Biol. 2008, 10: 1269-1279. 10.1038/ncb1785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schluter OM, Schmitz F, Jahn R, Rosenmund C, Sudhof TC: A complete genetic analysis of neuronal Rab3 function. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 6629-6637. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1610-04.2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grigoriev I, Splinter D, Keijzer N, Wulf PS, Demmers J, Ohtsuka T, Modesti M, Maly IV, Grosveld F, Hoogenraad CC, Akhmanova A: Rab6 regulates transport and targeting of exocytotic carriers. Dev Cell. 2007, 13: 305-314. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matanis T, Akhmanova A, Wulf P, Del Nery E, Weide T, Stepanova T, Galjart N, Grosveld F, Goud B, De Zeeuw CI, Barnekow A, Hoogenraad CC: Bicaudal-D regulates COPI-independent Golgi-ER transport by recruiting the dynein-dynactin motor complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 986-992. 10.1038/ncb891.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoogenraad CC, Akhmanova A, Howell SA, Dortland BR, De Zeeuw CI, Willemsen R, Visser P, Grosveld F, Galjart N: Mammalian Golgi-associated Bicaudal-D2 functions in the dynein-dynactin pathway by interacting with these complexes. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 4041-4054. 10.1093/emboj/20.15.4041.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park M, Penick EC, Edwards JG, Kauer JA, Ehlers MD: Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science. 2004, 305: 1972-1975. 10.1126/science.1102026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toda H, Mochizuki H, Flores R, Josowitz R, Krasieva TB, Lamorte VJ, Suzuki E, Gindhart JG, Furukubo-Tokunaga K, Tomoda T: UNC-51/ATG1 kinase regulates axonal transport by mediating motor-cargo assembly. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 3292-3307. 10.1101/gad.1734608.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yeh TY, Peretti D, Chuang JZ, Rodriguez-Boulan E, Sung CH: Regulatory dissociation of Tctex-1 light chain from dynein complex is essential for the apical delivery of rhodopsin. Traffic. 2006, 7: 1495-1502. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00482.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rong J, Li S, Sheng G, Wu M, Coblitz B, Li M, Fu H, Li XJ: 14-3-3 protein interacts with Huntingtin-associated protein 1 and regulates its trafficking. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 4748-4756. 10.1074/jbc.M609057200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorner C, Ullrich A, Haring HU, Lammers R: The kinesin-like motor protein KIF1C occurs in intact cells as a dimer and associates with proteins of the 14-3-3 family. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 33654-33660. 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong RO, Ghosh A: Activity-dependent regulation of dendritic growth and patterning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002, 3: 803-812. 10.1038/nrn941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hales CM, Vaerman JP, Goldenring JR: Rab11 family interacting protein 2 associates with Myosin Vb and regulates plasma membrane recycling. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 50415-50421. 10.1074/jbc.M209270200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krementsov DN, Krementsova EB, Trybus KM: Myosin V: regulation by calcium, calmodulin, and the tail domain. J Cell Biol. 2004, 164: 877-886. 10.1083/jcb.200310065.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang DT, Honick AS, Reynolds IJ: Mitochondrial trafficking to synapses in cultured primary cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 7035-7045. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1012-06.2006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Schwarz TL: The mechanism of Ca2+ -dependent regulation of kinesin-mediated mitochondrial motility. Cell. 2009, 136: 163-174. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.046.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheng M, Kim MJ: Postsynaptic signaling and plasticity mechanisms. Science. 2002, 298: 776-780. 10.1126/science.1075333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy MB, Beale HC, Carlisle HJ, Washburn LR: Integration of biochemical signalling in spines. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005, 6: 423-434. 10.1038/nrn1685.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karcher RL, Roland JT, Zappacosta F, Huddleston MJ, Annan RS, Carr SA, Gelfand VI: Cell cycle regulation of myosin-V by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Science. 2001, 293: 1317-1320. 10.1126/science.1061086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoogenraad CC, Feliu-Mojer MI, Spangler SA, Milstein AD, Dunah AW, Hung AY, Sheng M: Liprinalpha1 degradation by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II regulates LAR receptor tyrosine phosphatase distribution and dendrite development. Dev Cell. 2007, 12: 587-602. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.02.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spangler SA, Hoogenraad CC: Liprin-alpha proteins: scaffold molecules for synapse maturation. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007, 35: 1278-1282. 10.1042/BST0351278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller KE, DeProto J, Kaufmann N, Patel BN, Duckworth A, Van Vactor D: Direct observation demonstrates that Liprin-alpha is required for trafficking of synaptic vesicles. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: 684-689. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.061.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfeffer S, Aivazian D: Targeting Rab GTPases to distinct membrane compartments. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 5: 886-896. 10.1038/nrm1500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arimura N, Kaibuchi K: Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007, 8: 194-205. 10.1038/nrn2056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arimura N, Kimura T, Nakamuta S, Taya S, Funahashi Y, Hattori A, Shimada A, Menager C, Kawabata S, Fujii K, Iwamatsu A, Segal RA, Fukuda M, Kaibuchi K: Anterograde transport of TrkB in axons is mediated by direct interaction with Slp1 and Rab27. Dev Cell. 2009, 16: 675-686. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.03.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M, Mizoguchi A, Hirata Y, Ishizaki H, Kaneko K, Miyoshi J, Takai Y: A GDP/GTP exchange protein for the Rab3 small G protein family up-regulates a postdocking step of synaptic exocytosis in central synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 14536-14541. 10.1073/pnas.212511399.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gindhart JG: Towards an understanding of kinesin-1 dependent transport pathways through the study of protein-protein interactions. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006, 5: 74-86. 10.1093/bfgp/ell002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu H, Nash JE, Zamorano P, Garner CC: Interaction of SAP97 with minus-end-directed actin motor myosin VI. Implications for AMPA receptor trafficking. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 30928-30934. 10.1074/jbc.M203735200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuhrmann JC, Kins S, Rostaing P, El Far O, Kirsch J, Sheng M, Triller A, Betz H, Kneussel M: Gephyrin interacts with Dynein light chains 1 and 2, components of motor protein complexes. J Neurosci. 2002, 22: 5393-5402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maas C, Belgardt D, Lee HK, Heisler FF, Lappe-Siefke C, Magiera MM, van Dijk J, Hausrat TJ, Janke C, Kneussel M: Synaptic activation modifies microtubules underlying transport of postsynaptic cargo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 8731-8736. 10.1073/pnas.0812391106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yano H, Ninan I, Zhang H, Milner TA, Arancio O, Chao MV: BDNF-mediated neurotransmission relies upon a myosin VI motor complex. Nat Neurosci. 2006, 9: 1009-1018. 10.1038/nn1730.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prekeris R, Terrian DM: Brain myosin V is a synaptic vesicle-associated motor protein: evidence for a Ca2+-dependent interaction with the synaptobrevin-synaptophysin complex. J Cell Biol. 1997, 137: 1589-1601. 10.1083/jcb.137.7.1589.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fejtova A, Davydova D, Bischof F, Lazarevic V, Altrock WD, Romorini S, Schone C, Zuschratter W, Kreutz MR, Garner CC, Ziv NE, Gundelfinger ED: Dynein light chain regulates axonal trafficking and synaptic levels of Bassoon. J Cell Biol. 2009, 185: 341-355. 10.1083/jcb.200807155.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cai Q, Pan PY, Sheng ZH: Syntabulin-kinesin-1 family member 5B-mediated axonal transport contributes to activity-dependent presynaptic assembly. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 7284-7296. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0731-07.2007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diefenbach RJ, Diefenbach E, Douglas MW, Cunningham AL: The heavy chain of conventional kinesin interacts with the SNARE proteins SNAP25 and SNAP23. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 14906-14915. 10.1021/bi026417u.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horiuchi D, Barkus RV, Pilling AD, Gassman A, Saxton WM: APLIP1, a kinesin binding JIP-1/JNK scaffold protein, influences the axonal transport of both vesicles and mitochondria in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: 2137-2141. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.047.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cai Q, Gerwin C, Sheng ZH: Syntabulin-mediated anterograde transport of mitochondria along neuronal processes. J Cell Biol. 2005, 170: 959-969. 10.1083/jcb.200506042.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russo GJ, Louie K, Wellington A, Macleod GT, Hu F, Panchumarthi S, Zinsmaier KE: Drosophila Miro is required for both anterograde and retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 5443-5455. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5417-08.2009.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin DT, Makino Y, Sharma K, Hayashi T, Neve R, Takamiya K, Huganir RL: Regulation of AMPA receptor extrasynaptic insertion by 4.1N, phosphorylation and palmitoylation. Nat Neurosci. 2009, 12: 879-887. 10.1038/nn.2351.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petrini EM, Lu J, Cognet L, Lounis B, Ehlers MD, Choquet D: Endocytic Trafficking and Recycling Maintain a Pool of Mobile Surface AMPA Receptors Required for Synaptic Potentiation. Neuron. 2009, 63: 92-105. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.025.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomis-Ruth S, Wierenga CJ, Bradke F: Plasticity of polarization: changing dendrites into axons in neurons integrated in neuronal circuits. Curr Biol. 2008, 18: 992-1000. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.