Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

The Rap activator Gef26 regulates synaptic growth and neuronal survival via inhibition of BMP signaling

Molecular Brain201710:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-017-0342-7

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 3 August 2017
  • Accepted: 12 December 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

In Drosophila, precise regulation of BMP signaling is essential for normal synaptic growth at the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) and neuronal survival in the adult brain. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying fine-tuning of BMP signaling in neurons remain poorly understood. We show that loss of the Drosophila PDZ guanine nucleotide exchange factor Gef26 significantly increases synaptic growth at the NMJ and enhances BMP signaling in motor neurons. We further show that Gef26 functions upstream of Rap1 in motor neurons to restrain synaptic growth. Synaptic overgrowth in gef26 or rap1 mutants requires BMP signaling, indicating that Gef26 and Rap1 regulate synaptic growth via inhibition of BMP signaling. We also show that Gef26 is involved in the endocytic downregulation of surface expression of the BMP receptors thickveins (Tkv) and wishful thinking (Wit). Finally, we demonstrate that loss of Gef26 also induces progressive brain neurodegeneration through Rap1- and BMP signaling-dependent mechanisms. Taken together, these results suggest that the Gef26-Rap1 signaling pathway regulates both synaptic growth and neuronal survival by controlling BMP signaling.

Keywords

  • Drosophila
  • Gef26
  • Synaptic growth
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Endocytic regulation of BMP signaling

Introduction

Transsynaptic retrograde signaling from postsynaptic cells controls the development and survival of presynaptic neurons [1–3]. At the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) ligand glass bottom boat (Gbb) is secreted from the postsynaptic muscle and acts as a key retrograde signal that promotes the expansion of synaptic arbors [4–7]. In motoneurons, the Gbb signal is processed by a tetrameric presynaptic complex containing the type II BMP receptor wishful thinking (Wit) and either of two type II BMP receptors, thickveins (Tkv) and saxophone (Sax). Upon Gbb binding, this receptor complex phosphorylates the R-Smad mothers against decapentaplegic (Mad). Phosphorylated Mad (P-Mad) translocates into the nucleus through its interaction with the co-Smad Medea to regulate transcription of target genes [8]. Mutations disrupting this canonical BMP signaling pathway, including gbb, wit, tkv, sax, and mad, all display NMJ undergrowth and defective basal transmission [4–7]. In sharp contrast, genetic conditions to elevate presynaptic BMP signaling cause NMJ overgrowth with excessive formation of small “satellite” boutons [9–12], which bud off the main axis of the motor axon terminal. Based on these findings, it has been proposed that the level of BMP signaling is instructive for the regulation of NMJ synapse growth [10]. Subsequent work on the Drosophila brain has begun to reveal the importance of precise regulation of BMP signaling in the maintenance of adult neurons. It has been demonstrated that, in addition to synaptic overgrowth, elevation of BMP signaling induces abnormal brain neurodegeneration in the adult fly [9].

Drosophila NMJ studies have identified various endocytic proteins as negative regulators of BMP-dependent synaptic growth. For example, loss of two endocytosis regulators, Dap160/intersectin and endophilin, leads to an increase in synaptic P-Mad levels and NMJ overgrowth with excessive satellite bouton formation [10, 13]. In addition, a similar phenotype is also induced by loss of spichthyin (Spict), Spartin, and endosomal maturation defective (Ema), all of which are involved in endolysosomal trafficking of BMP receptors [9, 11, 14]. Importantly, these endocytic genes are shown to functionally interact with BMP signaling pathway components at the NMJ [9–11, 14]. These findings imply that endocytosis and subsequent lysosomal degradation of BMP receptors are important mechanisms involved in attenuating Gbb-induced signaling at the NMJ.

In a genetic screen for mutations that affect synaptic morphology at the Drosophila NMJ, we identified the gef26 gene, which encodes a PDZ guanine nucleotide exchange factor (PDZ-GEF) for the small GTPase Rap1. Gef26 was originally known to control the development of various organs primarily by regulating cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and integrin-dependent cell-matrix interactions [15–19]. Here, we report a novel role for the Gef26-Rap1 pathway in the regulation of BMP-dependent synaptic growth and neuronal survival. Null mutations in the gef26 or rap1 gene cause NMJ overgrowth characterized by excessive satellite bouton formation, recapitulating the phenotype induced by elevated BMP signaling. Genetic interactions between gef26, rap1, and components of the BMP pathway suggest that Gef26 acts through Rap1 to restrain BMP-dependent synaptic growth at the NMJ. Importantly, Gef26 promotes endocytic downregulation of surface expression of the BMP receptors Tkv and Wit. Finally, our genetic data indicate that regulation of BMP signaling by the Gef26-Rap1 pathway is critical for neuronal survival in the adult brain.

Results

Drosophila gef26 is required presynaptically for normal synaptic growth

To identify genes involved in the regulation of synaptic development, we performed an anatomical screen on 1500 independent EP insertion lines [20, 21]. We inspected third instar larval NMJs using the axonal membrane marker anti-HRP. In this screen, we isolated an insertion (G3533) localized in the first intron of the Drosophila gef26 gene (CG9491). These mutants displayed NMJ overgrowth with an excessive formation of small “satellite” boutons (data not shown), which protrude from parental boutons located at primary axon terminal arbors.

To determine the null phenotype of gef26 at the NMJ, we utilized the transheterozygous combination of gef26 6 , a previously reported null allele [19, 22], and the Df(2 L)BSC5 deficiency (henceforth referred to as Df) to delete the gef26 locus. A significant synaptic overgrowth phenotype was observed at every glutamatergic type-I NMJ in gef26 6 /Df third instar larvae. To quantify the gef26 phenotype, we measured overall bouton number and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 and NMJ 4 from abdominal segment 2 (Fig. 1a, b; Additional file 1: Table S1). Compared with wild-type controls (w 1118 ), bouton number normalized to muscle surface area in gef26 6 /Df larvae was increased by 24% at NMJ 6/7 and by 51% at NMJ 4. At the same time, satellite bouton number in gef26 6 /Df was increased by 39% at NMJ 6/7 and by 219% at NMJ 4. Comparable synaptic growth defects were observed in larvae homozygous for gef26 6 (Fig. 1a, b).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Loss of presynaptic gef26 function leads to synaptic overgrowth at the NMJ. a Confocal images of anti-HRP-labeled NMJs 6/7 (left) and NMJs 4 (right) in wild-type (w 1118 ) and gef26 6 /Df third-instar larvae. gef26 mutant NMJs have increased numbers of total and satellite boutons compared with wild type. Arrowheads mark satellite boutons. Scale bars, 20 μm. b Quantification of total bouton number normalized to muscle surface area and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 and NMJ 4 in wild-type, gef26 6 /gef26 6 , gef26 6 /Df, C155-GAL4/+; gef26 6 /Df; UAS-gef26/+ (Gef26 rescue-pre), and gef26 6 /Df; BG57-GAL4/UAS-gef26 (Gef26 rescue-post) third-instar larvae. The number of NMJs analyzed is indicated in each bar. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All comparisons are made with wild-type (*P < 0.001)

To determine whether gef26 function is required pre- or postsynaptically for normal synaptic growth regulation, we expressed a gef26 cDNA transgene (UAS-gef26) in gef26 6 /Df mutants under the control of tissue-specific GAL4 drivers. Expression of UAS-gef26 using a neuronal driver (C155-GAL4) fully rescued the NMJ growth defect of gef26 mutants (Fig. 1b). In contrast, expression of UAS-gef26 in all somatic muscles using the BG57-GAL4 driver failed to rescue the NMJ growth defect (Fig. 1b), suggesting that Gef26 functions presynaptically to restrain synaptic growth at the NMJ.

Additional evidence for a presynaptic requirement for Gef26 was provided by assessment of the effect of RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of Gef26 expression. Neuronal expression of a dsRNA-fragment of gef26 (UAS-gef26 RNAi ) using C155-GAL4 increased both bouton number and satellite bouton number and mimicked the gef26 loss-of-function mutation, whereas muscular expression of the same dsRNA using BG57-GAL4 had no effect (Additional file 2: Figure S1a, b; Additional file 3: Table S2). This result supports the notion that Gef26 acts in presynaptic neurons to restrain synaptic growth at the NMJ.

We further characterized satellite boutons at gef26 mutant NMJs using several synaptic markers. Satellite boutons contained the active zone antigen NC82 and the synaptic vesicle marker cysteine-string protein (CSP) (Additional file 2: Figure S1c, d). In addition, satellite boutons were found to recruit the subsynaptic reticulum (SSR) marker discs-large (Dlg). Finally, NC82 in satellite boutons was nicely juxtaposed to the essential glutamate receptor subunit GluRIIC (Additional file 2: Figure S1e, f). Thus, satellite boutons in gef26 mutants display the anatomical hallmarks of functional synapses.

Gef26 acts through Rap1 to regulate synaptic growth

Since Gef26 acts via Rap1 to mediate various developmental processes [15–17, 19, 22], we decided to investigate whether Rap1 is the major target for Gef26 in the regulation of synaptic growth. We began by investigating whether loss of rap1 produces NMJ phenotypes similar to those caused by gef26 loss-of-function mutations. For this purpose, we analyzed NMJ morphology in third instar larvae homozygous for the rap1 MI11950 allele (hereafter referred to as rap1 M ) harboring a Minos element within the rap1 gene. Compared with wild-type controls, both overall bouton number and satellite bouton number in rap1 M mutants were significantly increased (Fig. 2a, b; Additional file 4: Table S3). To confirm the requirement for rap1 in the proper regulation of synaptic growth, we also examined NMJ morphology in third instar larvae expressing rap1 dsRNA (UAS-rap1 RNAi ) under the control of C155-GAL4. This genetic manipulation significantly increased overall bouton number and satellite bouton number (Additional file 5: Figure S2a, b; Additional file 6: Table S4). In contrast, muscular expression of UAS-rap1 RNAi did not noticeably alter NMJ morphology (Additional file 5: Figure S2a, b; Additional file 6: Table S4). Thus, loss of presynaptic rap1 produces gef26-like phenotypes at the NMJ.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

gef26 interacts genetically with rap1 at the NMJ. a Confocal images of anti-HRP-labeled NMJ 6/7 in wild-type and rap1 M /rap1 M third-instar larvae. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Quantification of total bouton number normalized to muscle surface area and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 in wild-type, rap1 M /rap1 M , gef26 6 /+, rap1 M /+, gef26 6 /+; rap1 M /+, C155-GAL4/+, C155-GAL4/+; UAS-Myc-rap1 CA /+, gef26 6 /Df, and C155-GAL4/+; gef26 6 /Df; UAS-Myc-rap1 CA /+ backgrounds. The number of NMJs analyzed is indicated in each bar. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All comparisons are made with wild-type (*P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.05)

Next, we assayed the transheterozygous interaction between gef26 and rap1 during synaptic growth. Heterozygous gef26 6 /+ or rap1 M /+ larvae displayed normal NMJ morphology. However, overall bouton number and satellite bouton number were both significantly increased in transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; rap1 M /+ larvae compared with single gef26 6 /+ or rap1 M /+ heterozygotes (Fig. 2b). This type of genetic interaction suggests that Gef26 and Rap1 function in the same pathway.

Finally, we explored the epistatic relationship between gef26 and rap1. Neuronal overexpression of dominant-active Rap1-Q63E (UAS-rap1 CA ) using C155-GAL4 produced an NMJ undergrowth phenotype with fewer synaptic boutons (Fig. 2b). Importantly, neuronal overexpression of UAS-rap1 CA was able to induce a similar phenotype even in the gef26 6 /Df background (Fig. 2b), indicating that the overactivity of Rap1 completely suppresses the synaptic overgrowth in gef26 mutants. These results suggest that Gef26 acts upstream of Rap1 to restrain synaptic growth at the NMJ.

Gef26 and Rap1 regulate synaptic growth via inhibition of BMP signaling

Previous studies have identified Gbb as a key retrograde signal that stimulates synaptic growth at the NMJ [4–7, 23]. Consistently, elevation of BMP signaling, which can be achieved by either presynaptic overexpression of a dominantly active Tkv receptor or loss of the inhibitory Smad Daughters against decapentaplegic (Dad), causes synaptic overgrowth with excessive satellite bouton formation [9, 10], recapitulating phenotypes exhibited by gef26 or rap1 mutants. Therefore, we wondered whether Gef26 and Rap1 might regulate synaptic growth by inhibiting BMP signaling. To test this possibility, we first examined the transheterozygous interaction between gef26 or rap1 and dad at the NMJ. Like gef26 6 /+ and rap1 M /+ larvae, heterozygous dad J1E4 /+ larvae displayed normal NMJ morphology (Fig. 3a, b; Additional file 7: Table S5). In contrast, both overall bouton number and satellite bouton number were significantly increased in transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; dad J1E4 /+ and rap1 M ,+/+,dad J1E4 larvae compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 3a, b), suggesting a functional link between Gef26/Rap1 and the BMP signaling pathway during synaptic growth.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Gef26 and Rap1 inhibit BMP signaling to restrain synaptic growth. a-d gef26/rap1 interacts with BMP signaling pathway components. a and b Transheterozygous interactions between gef26 or rap1 and dad. a Confocal images of anti-HRP-labeled NMJ 6/7 in gef26 6 /+, dad J1E4 /+, and gef26 6 /+; dad J1E4 /+ third-instar larvae. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Quantification of total bouton number and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 in the following genotypes: wild-type, gef26 6 /+, rap1 M /+, dad J1E4 /+, gef26 6 /+; dad J1E4 /+, and rap1 M , +/+,dadJ1E4. c and d Synaptic overgrowth in gef26 and rap1 depends on BMP signaling. c Confocal images of anti-HRP-labeled NMJ 6/7 in gef26 6 /Df, tkv 7 ,gef26 6 /+,Df, rap1 M /rap1 M , and tkv 7 /+; rap1 M /rap1 M third-instar larvae. Scale bar, 20 μm. d Quantification of total bouton number and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 in the following genotypes: wild-type, gef26 6 /Df, tkv 7 /+, tkv 7 ,gef26 6 /+,Df, tkv 1 /tkv 7 , tkv 7 ,gef26 6 /tkv 1 ,Df, rap1 M /rap1 M , and tkv 7 /+; rap1 M /rap1 M . Note that synaptic overgrowth in gef26 and rap1 mutants is significantly suppressed by loss of one copy of tkv. e and f Levels of pMad are increased in gef26 and rap1 mutants. e Confocal images of NMJ 6/7 and ventral nerve cord (VNC) labeled with anti-P-Mad and anti-HRP or anti-Elav in wild-type and gef26 6 /Df third-instar larvae. Scale bars, 5 μm. f Quantification of the ratio of the average levels of P-Mad to HRP or Elav. Genotypes include wild-type, gef26 6 /Df, rap1 M /rap1 M , and C155-GAL4/+; gef26 6 /Df; UAS-gef26/+ (Gef26 rescue-pre). The number of NMJs or VNCs analyzed is indicated in each bar. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All comparisons are made with wild-type unless otherwise indicated (*P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.05; n.s., not significant)

We next examined whether synaptic overgrowth in gef26 or rap1 mutants depends on BMP signaling. Heterozygosity for the BMP receptor gene tkv (tkv 7 /+), which had no effect on NMJ morphology in a wild-type background, suppressed synaptic overgrowth in gef26 6 /Df or rap1 M /rap1 M mutants (Fig. 3c, d; Additional file 7: Table S5). Moreover, removal of both copies of tkv (tkv 1 /tkv 7 ) in the gef26 6 /Df background caused a synaptic undergrowth phenotype, which was similar to that of tkv 1 /tkv 7 mutants (Fig. 3c, d). Thus, BMP signaling is necessary for synaptic overgrowth in gef26 or rap1 mutants.

Finally, we directly tested the role of Gef26/Rap1 in inhibiting BMP signaling by assaying P-Mad levels in gef26 and rap1 mutants. P-Mad accumulation at NMJ synapses and in the nuclei of ventral nerve cord (VNC) motoneurons was significantly increased in gef26 6 /Df or rap1 M /rap1 M larvae compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 3e, f). Neuronal expression of UAS-gef26 in gef26 6 /Df mutants was capable of reversing the increase of P-Mad in motoneurons (Fig. 3f), establishing the roles of Gef26 and Rap1 as negative regulators of BMP signaling. These results support a model in which Gef26 and Rap1 restrain synaptic growth by inhibiting BMP signaling.

Gef26 and Rap1 control BMP-dependent synaptic growth by regulating Drosophila fragile X mental retardation 1 (dfmr1) expression and microtubule stability

At the Drosophila NMJ, BMP signaling has been shown to repress the expression of the dfmr1 gene [9]. The dfmr1 product (dFMRP) in turn negatively regulates the expression of the microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B) Futsch [24], which promotes synaptic growth by stabilizing synaptic microtubules [25]. Therefore, we hypothesized that Gef26/Rap1 might control synaptic growth by regulating microtubule stability via the dFMRP-Futsch pathway. To test the involvement of dFMRP in Gef26/Rap1-dependent regulation of synaptic growth, we first examined the transheterozygous interaction between gef26 or rap1 and dfmr1 at the NMJ. Total bouton number and satellite bouton number were significantly higher in transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; dfmr1 Δ50M /+ and rap1 M , +/+,dfmr1 Δ50M larvae than in wild-type controls, although the single heterozygotes displayed normal synaptic growth (Fig. 4a, b; Additional file 8: Table S6). In a subsequent experiment, we directly tested whether loss of Gef26 or Rap1 alters dfmr1 expression. Levels of dfmr1 mRNA were significantly lower in gef26 and rap1 mutants than in wild-type controls, as demonstrated by quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 4c). Given the roles of Gef26 and Rap1 in inhibiting BMP signaling, these results imply that Gef26/Rap1 restrains synaptic growth by relieving BMP-dependent repression of dfmr1 transcription.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Altered dfmr1 expression and microtubule stability cause synaptic overgrowth in gef26 and rap1 mutants. a and b Transheterozygous interactions between gef26 or rap1 and dfmr1. a Confocal images of anti-HRP-labeled NMJ 6/7 in wild-type, gef26 6 /+, dfmr1 Δ50M /+, and gef26 6 /+; dfmr1 Δ50M /+ third-instar larvae. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Quantification of total bouton number and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 in the following genotypes: wild-type, gef26 6 /+, rap1 M /+, dfmr1 Δ50M /+, gef26 6 /+; dfmr1 Δ50M /+, and rap1 M ,+/+,dfmr1 Δ50M . c Quantification of dfmr1 RNA levels using quantitative real-time PCR in the CNS of wild-type, gef26 6 /Df, and rap1 M /rap1 M third-instar larvae. rp49 was used as an internal control. d and e Levels of synaptic Futsch are increased in gef26 and rap1 mutants. d Confocal images of anti-Futsch and anti-HRP staining from NMJ 6/7 of wild-type, gef26 6 /Df, and rap1 M /rap1 M third-instar larvae. Arrowheads indicate Futsch-positive terminal loops. Scale bar, 5 μm. e Quantification of the ratio of the average anti-Futsch to anti-HRP staining intensities. f and g Synaptic overgrowth in gef26 and rap1 mutants is suppressed by vinblastine administration. f Confocal images of NMJ 6/7 immunostained with anti-HRP are shown for gef26 6 /Df mutants raised in the absence (-VB) or presence (+VB) of 1 μM vinblastine. Scale bar, 20 μm. g Quantification of total bouton number and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 in the indicated genotypes. The number of NMJs analyzed is indicated in each bar. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All comparisons are made with wild-type unless otherwise indicated (*P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.05; n.s., not significant)

Next, we investigated whether gef26 and rap1 mutants affect synaptic Futsch levels. In wild-type NMJs, Futsch was detected as a filamentous bundle occupying the center of the presynaptic terminals. However, Futsch staining was fainter or not detectable in newly formed or terminal boutons. Futsch immunoreactivity was significantly increased in gef26 and rap1 mutant axons compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 4d, e). In addition, the number of terminal boutons with Futsch immunoreactivity (visualized as a looped or punctate structure) was significantly higher in gef26 6 /Df or rap1 M /rap1 M mutants (Fig. 4d, arrowheads). These results indicate that Gef26 and Rap1 function to limit presynaptic Futsch level.

Futsch reliably labels microtubules in presynaptic motor terminals [25]. Therefore, the above results suggest the involvement of microtubule stability in Gef26/Rap1-mediated regulation of synaptic growth. To directly test this possibility, we assayed the extent of synaptic growth in gef26 and rap1 mutants fed vinblastine, a microtubule-severing drug [26]. When vinblastine was fed at a low concentration (1 μM) that did not affect synaptic growth, it completely suppressed the synaptic overgrowth phenotype of gef26 6 /Df or rap1 M /rap1 M larvae (Fig. 4f, g; Additional file 8: Table S6). These results support the idea that Gef26/Rap1 controls synaptic growth by regulating microtubule stability via the Futsch pathway.

Gef26 regulates the endocytic internalization of the BMP receptors Tkv and Wit

We next attempted to determine how Gef26 attenuates BMP signaling. Mutations disrupting endocytosis, including endophilin (endo) and dap160, increase presynaptic P-Mad levels at the NMJ along with simultaneous synaptic overgrowth and the formation of excessive satellite boutons [10, 13, 27], suggesting that endocytosis of surface BMP receptors is an important mechanism to inhibit BMP-dependent synaptic growth. Since a similar phenotype was observed in gef26 mutants, we wondered if Gef26 regulates BMP signaling through endocytosis. To test this possibility, we first investigated genetic interactions between gef26 and mutations in endocytic genes. In heterozygous gef26 6 /+, endoA Δ4 /+, and dap160 Δ1 /+ larvae, total bouton number and satellite bouton number were at wild-type levels (Fig. 5a, b; Additional file 9: Table S7). In sharp contrast, both parameters were significantly increased in transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; endoA Δ4 /+, or gef26 6 /dap160 Δ1 larvae (Fig. 5a, b), raising the possibility that Gef26 regulates BMP-dependent synaptic growth through an endocytic mechanism. It has been proposed that Dap160 interacts with the endosomal protein Nervous wreck (Nwk) to negatively regulate synaptic growth [10, 28]. However, total bouton number and satellite bouton number were normal in transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; nwk 2 /+ larvae (Fig. 5b), suggesting that Gef26 and Nwk regulate BMP signaling through distinct pathways.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Gef26 regulates endocytic internalization and surface expression of BMP receptors. a and b gef26 interacts with endocytic mutations during synaptic growth. a Confocal images of anti-HRP-labeled NMJ 6/7 in endoA Δ4 /+, dap160 Δ1 /+, gef26 6 /+; endoA Δ4 /+, and gef26 6 /dap160 Δ1 third-instar larvae. Scale bar, 20 μm. b Quantification of total bouton number and satellite bouton number at NMJ 6/7 in the following genotypes: wild-type, gef26 6 /+, endoA Δ4 /+, dap160 Δ1 /+, nwk 2 /+, gef26 6 /+; endoA Δ4 /+, gef26 6 /dap160 Δ1 , and gef26 6 /+; nwk 2 /+. c-e Gef26 is required for endocytic internalization of surface BMP receptors. BG2-c2 cells were transfected with pAc-Myc-tkv-Flag or pAc-Myc-wit-Flag in the absence (control) and presence of gef26 dsRNA. Live control and Gef26-depleted cells were prelabeled with anti-Myc (green) at 4 °C, followed by incubation at 25 °C for 10 min to allow internalization of the labeled surface receptors. After fixation and permeabilization, cells were sequentially stained with anti-Flag (red) and fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies. c Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis to confirm knockdown efficiency of Gef26. d Single confocal sections through the middle of control and gef26-knockdown cells are shown for the green channel only. Scale bar, 5 μm. e Quantification of the number of intracellular Myc-positive puncta per cell. Only cells with similar Flag signal (red) intensities were analyzed. f and g Steady-state levels of surface Tkv are increased at the NMJ of gef26 mutants. f Representative confocal images of NMJ 6/7 in C155-GAL4/+; UAS-Myc-tkv/+ and C155-GAL4/+; gef26 6 /Df; UAS-Myc-tkv/+ larvae. NMJ preparations were sequentially stained with anti-Myc (red) and anti-HRP (green) under nonpermeant and permeant conditions. Scale bar, 5 μm. g Quantification of the ratio of surface Myc-Tkv to HRP fluorescence intensities. h and i Transgenic expression of Myc-Tkv in neurons is not altered by loss of Gef26. h Western blot of central nervous system (CNS) extracts from C155-GAL4/+; UAS-Myc-tkv/+ and C155-GAL4/+; gef26 6 /Df; UAS-Myc-tkv/+ larvae. The blot was probed with anti-Myc and anti-β-actin. i Quantitative analysis of three independent blots by densitometric measurements. For each sample, the band intensity of Myc-Tkv was normalized to that of β-actin. The number of NMJs (b), cells (e), or synaptic boutons (g) analyzed is indicated in each bar. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.001

We then examined the impact of gef26 knockdown on the endocytic internalization of BMP receptors in neuronal BG2-c2 cells. We transiently transfected a Myc-Tkv-Flag or Myc-Wit-Flag construct into control or gef26-knockdown cells (Fig. 5c) and prelabeled the cells with an anti-Myc antibody at 4 °C. We then initiated endocytosis by incubating the cells at 25 °C for 10 min and visualized the internalization of the labeled surface receptors by Myc staining. Total Myc-Tkv-Flag or Myc-Wit-Flag was also monitored by staining for the intracellular Flag-tag after cellular permeabilization. In controls cells, we observed several Myc-Tkv-Flag- or Myc-Wit-Flag-positive intracellular puncta (Fig. 5d; data not shown). Importantly, when examined in only cells with similar fluorescence intensities of Flag staining, the number of intracellular Myc-Tkv-Flag- or Myc-Wit-Flag-positive puncta per cell was dramatically reduced in gef26-knockdown cells (Fig. 5d, e), suggesting that Gef26 is required for the endocytic internalization of BMP receptors.

Next, we determined the impact of gef26 loss-of-function on the levels of surface Tkv at the NMJ. To do this, we expressed UAS-Myc-tkv in wild-type and gef26 mutants using C155-GAL4. Surface Myc-Tkv and total HRP were measured by sequential staining with anti-Myc and anti-HRP antibodies under nonpermeant and permeant conditions, respectively. The ratio of Myc-Tkv signal to HRP signal intensity was significantly increased in gef26 compared with wild-type NMJs (Fig. 5f, g). Levels of Myc-Tkv expression were not significantly different between wild-type and gef26 6 /Df animals (Fig. 5h, i). These data support a role for Gef26 in endocytic internalization of the Tkv receptor.

Given the role of Gef26 in BMP receptor internalization, we examined whether synaptic vesicle endocytosis is affected in gef26 mutant NMJs. We stimulated third instar fillets with 90 mM K+ in the presence of the styryl dye FM1–43FX. During a 1-min labeling period, dye uptake into synaptic boutons was not significantly different between wild-type and gef26 6 /Df mutant animals (Additional file 10: Figure S3a, b). This result indicates that loss of Gef26 does not grossly affect endocytosis at the presynaptic terminal of the NMJ.

Gef26/Rap1 regulation of BMP signaling is essential for neuronal survival in the adult brain

Overactivation of BMP signaling in the adult Drosophila brain induces age-dependent progressive motor dysfunction and neurodegeneration [9]. Since we established the role of Gef26 in downregulating BMP signaling at the NMJ, we investigated whether gef26 knockdown induces adult phenotypes similar to elevated BMP signaling. We first assayed the locomotor performance of C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ flies in a geotactic climbing assay. Compared with age-matched C155-GAL4/+ controls, 20-day-old C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ flies displayed a significantly reduced climbing response within 30 s (C155-GAL4/+: 16.56 ± 0.57 cm, C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+: 9.33 ± 0.11 cm, P < 0.001; Fig. 6a, b).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Loss of Gef26 induces motor dysfunction and progressive brain neurodegeneration in the adult fly. a and b Adult locomotor activity is impaired by neuron-specific Gef26 knockdown. a Distribution of the distance climbed by 20-day-old C155-GAL4/+ and C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ flies over a 30 s period. b Quantification of average climbing distance. c and d Neuron-specific Gef26 knockdown causes brain neurodegeneration in an age-dependent manner. c Frontal brain sections (5 μm) stained with H&E are shown for C155-GAL4/+ and C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ flies at 2 or 20 days of age. Note the presence of numerous vacuoles (arrowheads) in the brain of 20-day-old C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ flies. Scale bar, 20 μm. d Quantification of vacuoles with a diameter greater than 5 μm in C155-GAL4/+ and C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ brains at different ages. n > 10. e Confocal sections of 20-day-old C155-GAL4/+ and C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ brains stained with anti-caspase-3 (green), anti-Elav (red), and anti-Repo (blue). Anti-caspase-3 signals overlaps with the neuronal cell marker anti-Elav (arrowheads) but not with the glial cell marker anti-Repo. Scale bar, 20 μm. f Quantification of brain vacuolization in 20-day-old wild-type (n = 5), gef26 6 /+ (n = 5), rap1 M /+ (n = 6), gef26 6 /+; rap1 M /+ (n = 5), dad J1E4 /+ (n = 5), and gef26 6 /+; dad J1E4 /+ (n = 6) flies. g Model for Gef26/Rap1 regulation of BMP-dependent synaptic growth and neuronal survival

We then investigated whether knockdown of gef26 expression is associated with neurodegeneration by examining histological sections of adult brains. At 2 days after eclosion, C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ brains had normal anatomical and histological organization (Fig. 6c). However, aged C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ brains exhibited progressive vacuolization (Fig. 6c, arrowheads), which is a hallmark of neurodegeneration in the Drosophila brain [29]. Vacuolization progressed at a much slower rate in C155-GAL4/+ control brains (Fig. 6d). To further characterize neurodegeneration, we performed caspase-3 and TUNEL staining on 20-day-old brains. Caspase-3- or TUNEL-positive cells were detected in C155-GAL4/+; UAS-gef26 RNAi /+ brains, but not in C155-GAL4/+ control brains (Fig. 6e; Additional file 11: Figure S4a, b). In addition, TUNEL staining revealed that neuronal knockdown of gef26 induces cell death in an age-dependent, progressive manner (Additional file 11: Figure S4b). Importantly, anti-caspase-3 signals overlapped with the neuronal marker anti-Elav, but not with the glial marker anti-Repo (Fig. 6e, arrowheads). Together, these results indicate that Gef26 activity is essential for neuronal survival in the adult brain.

Finally, we investigated whether Gef26 collaborates with Rap1 and the BMP pathway to maintain normal locomotor ability and neuronal survival. To this end, we first examined transheterozygous combinations of gef26 and rap1 or dad with respect to locomotor dysfunction. At 20 days of age, transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; rap1 M /+ and gef26 6 /+; dad J1E4 /+ flies displayed mildly reduced climbing response compared with age-matched gef26 6 /+, rap1 M /+, or dad J1E4 /+ flies (data not shown). However, these transheterozygous flies at 30 days of age exhibited severely reduced climbing ability (Additional file 11: Figure S4c, d). We also examined transheterozygous interactions between gef26 and rap1 or dad with respect to brain neurodegeneration. At 20 days of age, heterozygous gef26 6 /+, rap1 M /+, or dad J1E4 /+ flies were not distinguishable from wild-type controls with respect to the total number of vacuoles (Fig. 6f). In sharp contrast, there was a significant vacuolization in the brains of transheterozygous gef26 6 /+; rap1 M /+ or gef26 6 /+; dad J1E4 /+ flies (Fig. 6f), supporting a functional link between Gef26, Rap1, and the BMP signaling pathway in the regulation of neuronal survival in the adult brain.

Discussion

In the mammalian nervous system, PDZ-GEF1 (also called RAPGEF2) and its downstream GTPase Rap1 play an important role in homeostatic synaptic plasticity by decreasing the density of dendritic spines [30], the primary postsynaptic compartment for excitatory synapses. However, the presynaptic function of these molecules has not been addressed. In this study, we identified the Drosophila homologs (Gef26 and Rap1, respectively) as new presynaptic regulators of BMP-dependent synaptic growth. First, gef26 and rap1 mutant NMJs display a distinctive phenotype of excessive satellite bouton formation, recapitulating synaptic defects induced by elevated BMP signaling [9, 10, 12]. Second, genetic epistasis analysis and several independent genetic experiments demonstrate that Gef26 acts upstream of Rap1 at presynaptic NMJ terminals. Third, synaptic overgrowth in gef26 and rap1 mutants depends on the level of BMP signaling. Fourth, gef26 and rap1 mutants show a significant increase in the level of P-Mad, the readout of BMP signaling. Fifth, Gef26 and Rap1 negatively regulate the stability of presynaptic microtubules via dFMRP, which is known to be a major target for BMP signaling in the regulation of synaptic growth [9]. Based on these data, we propose that the presynaptic GEF26-Rap1 pathway regulates synaptic growth by modulating microtubule stability via the BMP-dFMRP pathway.

How might Gef26 regulate BMP signaling? Increasing evidence suggests that endocytosis of surface BMP receptors is a key mechanism of signal attenuation at presynaptic NMJ terminals. In support of this notion, our data imply that Gef26 inhibits BMP signaling by regulating the endocytic internalization of its receptor(s). gef26 displays transheterozygous interactions with mutations disrupting endocytosis (i.e., dap160 and endoA) during synaptic growth. In addition, gef26 mutant NMJs show an increase in the level of surface Tkv, supporting the role of Gef26 in receptor endocytosis. Most directly, we show that Gef26 facilitates the endocytic internalization of the BMP receptors Tkv and Wit in cultured cells. These findings imply a model in which Gef26 attenuate BMP signaling through facilitating endocytosis of BMP receptors (Fig. 6g).

Elevated BMP signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), a group of neurodegenerative motor disorders. In mammalian cells, several HSP proteins, including NIPA1, Spastin, and Spartin, have been shown to inhibit BMP signaling [31]. At the Drosophila NMJ, the NIPA1 homologue Spichthyin (Spict) and Spartin also inhibit BMP signaling to restrain synaptic growth [9, 11]. Importantly, it has now been demonstrated that elevation of BMP signaling in adult spartin flies causes progressive neurodegeneration and locomotor dysfunction [9]. Consistent with these studies and the proposed role of Gef26 as an inhibitor of BMP signaling, depletion of gef26 in the adult fly induces neurodegeneration and locomotor function. Thus, the current study solidifies the notion that precise regulation of BMP signaling is critical for the maintenance of adult neurons. A future challenge will be to investigate whether PDZ-GEF1 and other human Gef26 homologues contribute to the maintenance of the human motor system and, if so, whether this neuroprotective role involves the regulation of retrograde BMP transsynaptic signaling.

A final point of interest is the mechanism of how the Gef26-Rap1 pathway facilitates BMP receptor endocytosis. In various experimental systems, Rap1 has been identified to regulate actin-driven cellular processes. For example, mammalian Rap1 promotes cell spreading by localizing the RacGEFs Vav2 and Tiam1 to sites of lamellipodia extension [32], which is driven by Rac-dependent actin polymerization. In addition, Dictyostelium Rap1 is also involved in chemotaxis by activating the Rac signaling pathway through RacGEF1 [33]. Since actin polymerization is known to provide mechanical forces required for multiple stages of endocytosis [34], it is tempting to speculate that Rap1 facilitates endocytosis by regulating actin polymerization through the RacGEF-Rac signaling pathway. Interestingly, the Rac signaling pathway has been implicated in the regulation of BMP-dependent synaptic growth at the Drosophila NMJ [35]. In future studies, it will be interesting to investigate the role of the Rac signaling pathway in Rap1-dependent endocytosis.

Methods

Drosophila stocks

Flies were maintained on standard medium at 25 °C. w 1118 was used as the wild-type control. gef26 6 was generously provided by S. Hou (National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA) [19], and nwk 2 was obtained from K. O’Connor-Giles (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA) [10]. Df(2 L)BSC5 (a deficiency of the gef26 locus), rap1 MI11950 , tkv 1 , tkv 7 , dad J1E4 , endoA Δ4 , and dap160 Δ1 were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center (Bloomington, IN, USA). Transgenic lines carrying UAS-gef26, UAS-Myc-rap1 CA , and UAS-Myc-tkv were generated in the w 1118 background using standard protocols. RNA interference (RNAi) lines PDZ-GEFKK102612 (referred to here as UAS-gef26 RNAi ) and Rap1KK107785 (UAS-rap1 RNAi1 ) were obtained from the Vienna Drosophila Resources Center (Vienna, Austria). Another RNAi line Rap1HMJ21898 (UAS-rap1 RNAi2 ) was obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center. Neural and muscle-specific expression of UAS transgenes was achieved using C155-GAL4 [36] and BG57-GAL4 [37], respectively.

Cell culture and transient transfection

Drosophila neuronal BG2-c2 cells were maintained at 25 °C in M3 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10 μg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), and penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were transfected in 12-well plates with 1 μg plasmid DNA in the presence or absence of 5 μg double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) using Cellfectin II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Molecular biology

Full-length cDNAs for gef26 and rap1 were obtained by reverse transcription PCR of total RNA extracted from Drosophila S2R+ cells and introduced into the pUAST or pUAST-Myc vector to generate UAS-gef26 and UAS-Myc-rap1. For UAS-Myc-rap1 CA , glutamine 63 was mutated to glutamate by overlapping PCR using UAS-Myc-rap1 (the template DNA) and the primers 5’-ATGGCCGTGAACTCCTCCGTACCC-3′ and 5’-TACGGAGGAGTTCACGGCCATGCG-3′ in combination with the BglII-Myc-linked primer 5’-GGGAGATCTGCCACCATGGAACAAAAACTCATCTCAGAAGAG-GATCTGATGCGTGAGTACAAAATC-3′ and the XbaI-linked primer 5’-GGGTCTAGATAGCAGAACACATAGGGAC-3′, respectively, and the assembled product was introduced into pUAST. For pAc-Myc-tkv-Flag, a full-length cDNA (clone ID: LD45557) for tkv (CG14026) was obtained from the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (Bloomington, IN, USA). The cDNA insert was PCR-amplified and then introduced into the pTOP Blunt V2 vector (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Myc and Flag epitope-tag sequences were introduced immediately downstream of the signal sequence and at the C-terminus of Tkv, respectively, by PCR-based mutagenesis. The resulting Myc-tkv-Flag insert was subcloned into the pAc5.1 vector. For pAc-Myc-wit-Flag, Flag epitope-tag sequence was introduced downstream of the wit sequence of pAc-Myc-wit [9] by PCR-based mutagenesis. The resulting Myc-wit-Flag fragment was re-introduced into the pAc5.1 vector.

To measure levels of dfmr1 expression, total RNA was extracted from the third instar brain and ventral ganglion using the TRIsure kit (Bioline, Taunton, MA, USA) and reverse transcribed using the SuperScript III cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR reactions were performed using SYBR Select Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System. The mean Ct of triplicate reactions was used to determine relative expression of dfmr1 using the 2-ΔΔCT method. Expression of rp49 was used as the internal control. The primers used were: dfmr1, 5’-GGATCAGAACATACCACGTG-3′ and 5’-CTGGCAGCTATCGTGGAGGCG-3′; and rp49, 5’-CACCAGTCGGATCGATATGC-3′ and 5’-CACGTTGTGCACCAGGAACT-3′.

For RNA interference (RNAi) experiments in BG2-c2 cells, gef26 dsRNA was produced by in vitro transcription of a DNA template containing T7 promoter sequences at both ends, as described previously [38]. The DNA template was produced by PCR from the UAS-gef26 vector using primers containing a T7 promotor sequence followed by gef26-specific sequences: 5’-GTGGCCGGCTCTACCAGT-3′ and 5’-TGGTACGCGAGTCGAACG-3′.

Western blot analysis

Larval CNS (the brain lobes and the ventral nerve cord) preparations were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors) and subjected to western blotting as described previously [20]. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-Myc (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and anti-β-actin (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich).

BMPR internalization assay

BG2-c2 cells were transfected with pAc-Myc-tkv-Flag or pAc-Myc-wit-Flag in the presence or absence of gef26 dsRNA. At 72 h post-transfection, live cells were incubated with an anti-Myc antibody (1:200, Cell Signaling) at 4 °C for 1 h to label Myc-Tkv-Flag or Myc-Wit-Flag proteins expressed on the cell surface, followed by incubation at 25 °C for 10 min to allow internalization of the labeled receptors. Cells were subsequently washed in an ice-cold acidic buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 0.2 M acetic acid, pH 4.0) for 15 min to remove any remaining bound anti-Myc antibody and fixed in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde for 10 min. Fixed cells were permeabilized in PBT-0.2 (PBS, 0.2% Triton X-100) for 10 min, blocked with PBS containing 1% BSA for 1 h, and sequentially incubated with a mouse anti-Flag primary antibody (1: 500, Sigma-Aldrich) and a FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) in PBS containing 1% BSA. Stained cells were mounted with SlowFade antifade medium (Invitrogen) and imaged with a LSM 800 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using a Plan Apo 63 × 1.4 NA oil objective. The number of intracellular Myc-positive puncta was measured in cells with similar fluorescence intensities of Flag staining.

Immunostaining of larval NMJs

Wandering third-instar larvae were dissected in Ca2+-free HL3 solution and fixed in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde for 20 min. Fixed larval fillets were washed with PBT-0.1 (PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100) and blocked with PBT-0.1 containing 0.2% BSA for 1 h. Samples were sequentially incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The following monoclonal antibodies from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB, Iowa City, IA, USA) were used as primary antibodies: anti-HRP (1:200), anti-Futsch (1:50), anti-CSP (1:300), anti-NC82 (1:50), and anti-Dlg (1:500). Additional primary antibodies used were anti-P-Mad/PS1 (1:500) [39], anti-GluRIIC (1:200) [40], anti-P-Mad (1:100, Cell Signaling), and anti-Myc (1:200, Cell Signaling). FITC- and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) were used at 1:200. Images were captured with an LSM 800 laser-scanning confocal microscope using a C Apo 40× W or Plan Apo 63 × 1.4 NA objective.

Quantification of bouton number and satellite bouton number was performed at NMJ 6/7 and NMJ 4 in abdominal segment 2, as previously described [20]. Bouton number was normalized to muscle surface area. Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaPlot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA). Comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA analysis with a post-hoc Turkey test. For comparison of only two samples, an unpaired Student’s t-test was used. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

FM1–43FX uptake assay

FM1–43FX dye uptake experiments were performed as described previously [9, 41]. Briefly, wandering third-instar larvae were dissected in Ca2+-free HL3 saline and then incubated in HL3 saline with 90 mM KCl, 5 mM CaCl2, and 4 μM FM1–43FX (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 1 min. FM1–43FX-loaded samples were vigorously washed with Ca2+-free HL3 saline for 10 min, and fixed in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde, and washed three times in PBS. Images were collected using a Plan Apo 40 × 0.90 NA water-immersion objective on FV300 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Histology, immunostaining, and TUNEL staining of adult brains

Heads from adult flies at 2, 10, 20, 30, and 40 days post-eclosion were fixed overnight in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C, embedded in paraffin, and subjected to serial 5-μm sectioning in a frontal orientation. Serial sections covering the entire brain were placed on a single slide and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using a standard protocol. Vacuoles larger than 5 μm were counted throughout the entire brain.

For immunostaining analysis, brains from 20-day-old flies were dissected in ice-cold PBS, and fixed overnight in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde at 4 °C. Fixed brains were subsequently permeabilized in PBT-0.3 (PBS, 0.3% Triton X-100) for 1 h and blocked with PBT-0.3 containing 5% BSA for 1 h. The brains were sequentially incubated with primary antibodies for 48 h at 4 °C and fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies for 24 h at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used in this study: anti-Elav (7E8A10, DSHB) at 1:10, anti-Repo (8D12, DSHB) at 1:10, and anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling) at 1:100. Antibody-stained brains were mounted in SlowFade antifade medium (Invitrogen). Fluorescent images were acquired with a LSM 800 laser-scanning confocal microscope using a C Apo 40× W objective.

TUNEL assays on paraffin sections of adult brains were performed using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Briefly, paraffin sections were dewaxed according to standard procedures. After washed with PBS, the sections were permeabilized in PBS containing 0.1% sodium citrate and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the samples were incubated with the TUNEL reaction mixture in a dark humid chamber for 1 h at 37 °C, prior to DAPI staining for 5 min at room temperature. TUNEL- and DAPI-positive cells were counted in three consecutive, middle frontal sections of adult brains.

Adult climbing test

Adult locomotor ability was assayed as described previously [9]. For each genotype tested, approximately 100 flies were collected within 1 day of eclosion; aged for 2, 10, 20, 30, and 40 days; and placed into a glass graduated cylinder. After 5 min of adaptation to their environment, flies were gently vortexed for 5 s. The distance climbed by individual flies in a 30 s period was measured. Climbing assays were repeated 3 times for each genotype, and the results were averaged.

Conclusions

In summary, our findings establish a novel role for the Gef26-Rap1 pathway in regulating BMP-dependent synaptic growth and neuronal survival. Regulation of surface expression of BMP receptors via endocytosis may represent an important underlying mechanism.

Abbreviations

BMP: 

Bone morphogenetic protein

CSP: 

Cysteine-string protein

dfmr1 : 

Drosophila fragile X mental retardation 1

Dlg: 

Discs-large

Gbb: 

Glass bottom boat

GEF: 

Guanine nucleotide exchange factor

NMJ: 

Neuromuscular junction

P-Mad: 

Phosphorylated Mad

Tkv: 

Thickveins

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Steve Hou and the Bloomington Stock Center for providing the fly strains used in this study.

Authors’ contribution

CSK, SHK, and SL designed the study. KH, MN, MJL, and YEK performed the experiments and analyzed the data. KH and SL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (No. 2017M3C7A1025368) and by the BK21+ program of the National Research Foundation of Korea.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article and its additional files.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea
(2)
Department of Cell & Developmental Biology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
(3)
Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 04763, South Korea
(4)
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, South Korea

References

  1. Marques G, Zhang B. Retrograde signaling that regulates synaptic development and function at the drosophila neuromuscular junction. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006;75:267–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Poon VY, Choi S, Park M. Growth factors in synaptic function. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2013;5:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Zweifel LS, Kuruvilla R, Ginty DD. Functions and mechanisms of retrograde neurotrophin signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:615–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aberle H, Haghighi AP, Fetter RD, McCabe BD, Magalhaes TR, Goodman CS. (2002) wishful thinking encodes a BMP type II receptor that regulates synaptic growth in drosophila. Neuron. 2002;33:545–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Marques G, Bao H, Haerry TE, Shimell MJ, Duchek P, Zhang B, et al. The drosophila BMP type II receptor wishful thinking regulates neuromuscular synapse morphology and function. Neuron. 2002;33:529–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McCabe BD, Marques G, Haghighi AP, Fetter RD, Crotty ML, Haerry TE, et al. The BMP homolog Gbb provides a retrograde signal that regulates synaptic growth at the drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron. 2003;39:241–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rawson JM, Lee M, Kennedy EL, Selleck SB. Drosophila neuromuscular synapse assembly and function require the TGF-beta type I receptor saxophone and the transcription factor mad. J Neurobiol. 2003;55:134–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Keshishian H, Kim YS. Orchestrating development and function: retrograde BMP signaling in the drosophila nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:143–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nahm M, Lee MJ, Parkinson W, Lee M, Kim H, Kim YJ, et al. Spartin regulates synaptic growth and neuronal survival by inhibiting BMP-mediated microtubule stabilization. Neuron. 2013;77:680–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. O'Connor-Giles KM, Ho LL, Ganetzky B. Nervous wreck interacts with thickveins and the endocytic machinery to attenuate retrograde BMP signaling during synaptic growth. Neuron. 2008;58:507–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang X, Shaw WR, Tsang HT, Reid E, O'Kane CJ. Drosophila spichthyin inhibits BMP signaling and regulates synaptic growth and axonal microtubules. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:177–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhao G, Wu Y, Du L, Li W, Xiong Y, Yao A, et al. Drosophila S6 Kinase like inhibits neuromuscular junction growth by downregulating the BMP receptor thickveins. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1004984.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickman DK, Lu Z, Meinertzhagen IA, Schwarz TL. Altered synaptic development and active zone spacing in endocytosis mutants. Curr Biol. 2006;16:591–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim S, Wairkar YP, Daniels RW, DiAntonio A. The novel endosomal membrane protein Ema interacts with the class C Vps-HOPS complex to promote endosomal maturation. J Cell Biol. 2010;188:717–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Boettner B, Van Aelst L. The rap GTPase activator drosophila PDZ-GEF regulates cell shape in epithelial migration and morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7966–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Huelsmann S, Hepper C, Marchese D, Knoll C, Reuter R. The PDZ-GEF dizzy regulates cell shape of migrating macrophages via Rap1 and integrins in the drosophila embryo. Development. 2006;133:2915–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee JH, Cho KS, Lee J, Kim D, Lee SB, Yoo J, et al. Drosophila PDZ-GEF, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rap1 GTPase, reveals a novel upstream regulatory mechanism in the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:7658–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Spahn P, Ott A, Reuter R. The PDZ-GEF protein dizzy regulates the establishment of adherens junctions required for ventral furrow formation in drosophila. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3801–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang H, Singh SR, Zheng Z, SW O, Chen X, Edwards K, et al. Rap-GEF signaling controls stem cell anchoring to their niche through regulating DE-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion in the drosophila testis. Dev Cell. 2006;10:117–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nahm M, Kim S, Paik SK, Lee M, Lee S, Lee ZH, et al. dCIP4 (drosophila Cdc42-interacting protein 4) restrains synaptic growth by inhibiting the secretion of the retrograde glass bottom boat signal. J Neurosci. 2010;30:8138–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nahm M, Long AA, Paik SK, Kim S, Bae YC, Broadie K, et al. The Cdc42-selective GAP rich regulates postsynaptic development and retrograde BMP transsynaptic signaling. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:661–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh SR, SW O, Liu W, Chen X, Zheng Z, Hou SX. Rap-GEF/rap signaling restricts the formation of supernumerary spermathecae in Drosophila Melanogaster. Develop Growth Differ. 2006;48:169–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sweeney ST, Davis GW. Unrestricted synaptic growth in spinster-a late endosomal protein implicated in TGF-beta-mediated synaptic growth regulation. Neuron. 2002;36:403–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang YQ, Bailey AM, Matthies HJ, Renden RB, Smith MA, Speese SD, et al. Drosophila Fragile X-related gene regulates the MAP1B homolog Futsch to control synaptic structure and function. Cell. 2001;107:591–603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Roos J, Hummel T, Ng N, Klambt C, Davis GW. Drosophila Futsch regulates synaptic microtubule organization and is necessary for synaptic growth. Neuron. 2000;26:371–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordan MA, Thrower D, Wilson L. Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. J Cell Sci. 1992;102(Pt 3):401–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marie B, Sweeney ST, Poskanzer KE, Roos J, Kelly RB, Davis GW. Dap160/intersectin scaffolds the periactive zone to achieve high-fidelity endocytosis and normal synaptic growth. Neuron. 2004;43:207–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodal AA, Motola-Barnes RN, Littleton JT. Nervous wreck and Cdc42 cooperate to regulate endocytic actin assembly during synaptic growth. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8316–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Muqit MM, Feany MB. Modelling neurodegenerative diseases in drosophila: a fruitful approach? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:237–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee KJ, Lee Y, Rozeboom A, Lee JY, Udagawa N, Hoe HS, et al. Requirement for Plk2 in orchestrated ras and rap signaling, homeostatic structural plasticity, and memory. Neuron. 2011;69:957–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsang HT, Edwards TL, Wang X, Connell JW, Davies RJ, Durrington HJ, et al. The hereditary spastic paraplegia proteins NIPA1, spastin and spartin are inhibitors of mammalian BMP signalling. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:3805–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Arthur WT, Quilliam LA, Cooper JA. Rap1 promotes cell spreading by localizing Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factors. J Cell Biol. 2004;167:111–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Mun H, Jeon TJ. Regulation of actin cytoskeleton by Rap1 binding to RacGEF1. Mol Cells. 2012;34:71–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Mooren OL, Galletta BJ, Cooper JA. Roles for actin assembly in endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:661–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ball RW, Warren-Paquin M, Tsurudome K, Liao EH, Elazzouzi F, Cavanagh C, et al. Retrograde BMP signaling controls synaptic growth at the NMJ by regulating trio expression in motor neurons. Neuron. 2010;66:536–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin DM, Goodman CS. Ectopic and increased expression of Fasciclin II alters motoneuron growth cone guidance. Neuron. 1994;13:507–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Budnik V, Koh YH, Guan B, Hartmann B, Hough C, Woods D, et al. Regulation of synapse structure and function by the drosophila tumor suppressor gene dlg. Neuron. 1996;17:627–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee S, Nahm M, Lee M, Kwon M, Kim E, Zadeh AD, et al. The F-actin-microtubule crosslinker shot is a platform for Krasavietz-mediated translational regulation of midline axon repulsion. Development. 2007;134:1767–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Persson U, Izumi H, Souchelnytskyi S, Itoh S, Grimsby S, Engstrom U, et al. The L45 loop in type I receptors for TGF-beta family members is a critical determinant in specifying Smad isoform activation. FEBS Lett. 1998;434:83–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A. Differential localization of glutamate receptor subunits at the drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1406–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Verstreken P, Ohyama T, Bellen HJ. FM 1-43 labeling of synaptic vesicle pools at the drosophila neuromuscular junction. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;440:349–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

Molecular Brain

ISSN: 1756-6606