Skip to main content

Structural plasticity of the hippocampus in response to estrogens in female rodents


It is well established that estrogens affect neuroplasticity in a number of brain regions. In particular, estrogens modulate and mediate spine and synapse formation as well as neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation. In this review, we discuss current research exploring the effects of estrogens on dendritic spine plasticity and neurogenesis with a focus on the modulating factors of sex, age, and pregnancy. Hormone levels, including those of estrogens, fluctuate widely across the lifespan from early life to puberty, through adulthood and into old age, as well as with pregnancy and parturition. Dendritic spine formation and modulation are altered both by rapid (likely non-genomic) and classical (genomic) actions of estrogens and have been suggested to play a role in the effects of estrogens on learning and memory. Neurogenesis in the hippocampus is influenced by age, the estrous cycle, pregnancy, and parity in female rodents. Furthermore, sex differences exist in hippocampal cellular and molecular responses to estrogens and are briefly discussed throughout. Understanding how structural plasticity in the hippocampus is affected by estrogens and how these effects can influence function and be influenced by other factors, such as experience and sex, is critical and can inform future treatments in conditions involving the hippocampus.


Numerous investigations in animals and humans have found sex differences in brain and behaviour [1]. While the underlying impetus of these differences is complex and multi-faceted, differences in sex steroid hormones, particularly estrogens, appear to be of clinical and experimental importance [2]. The manifestation, occurrence, and/or severity of brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), autism spectrum disorders, depression, and schizophrenia show differences between the sexes [3,4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, many of these same disorders show sex differences in severity of hippocampus-dependent cognitive symptoms, with greater severity in females with AD [6] and depression [8,9,10,11], but greater severity in males with schizophrenia [7]. Cognitive disturbances are likely influenced by disruption to synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and other regions. These differences are influenced, in part, by estrogens in women, but less is known on whether estrogens may impact these disorders in men [12,13,14]. In middle-aged and aged women, treatment with exogenous 17β-estradiol – the most bioactive, abundant, and widely expressed of the circulating estrogens in most mammals [15] – may reduce the risk of AD [16], lessen the severity of symptoms of depression [17] or schizophrenia [18], and improve cognition in postmenopausal women [19, 20]. Understanding how estrogens can influence the brain and behaviour is crucial to the development of sex-targeted treatments for brain diseases.

The hippocampus is a brain structure with profound structural and functional plasticity evident across the lifespan in humans and rodents. The integrity of the hippocampus is implicated in learning and memory, anxiety, and stress regulation (e.g. [21, 22]). Furthermore, the hippocampus is implicated in disease states that result in cognitive dysfunction and synaptic function that exhibit sex differences (e.g. autism [5, 23]), schizophrenia [24], depression [25,26,27], suggesting studying the influence of hormones on hippocampus may inform development of targeted and sex-specific treatments and therapies [5, 28,29,30].

Within the hippocampus, changes in dendritic spine number, length, type, and shape may affect neurotransmission and, subsequently, behaviour through modulation of synapses in predominantly glutamatergic neurons. Neurogenesis – the process of proliferation, migration, differentiation, and survival to maturity of novel neurons – allows for new neurons to be integrated into hippocampal networks and modify hippocampal function [31] (Fig. 1c). Both dendritic spine changes [32,33,34] and neurogenesis [31, 35] exhibit sex differences, respond to estrogens, and allow the hippocampus to maintain plasticity throughout adulthood. Understanding how sex and/or estrogens can affect structural plasticity of the hippocampus is crucial to understanding the functional outcomes of these modifications and to potential future treatments for disorders with hippocampal dysfunction (such as AD, depression, and schizophrenia). Beyond the differences between the sexes, circulating levels of estrogens in females vary by age and reproductive status [36], during pregnancy and parturition [37], and long after reproductive experience [38]. As a result, effects of exogenous estrogens (e.g. from hormone therapies) may also be modulated by these factors but are not always taken into account in the literature.

Fig. 1

Hippocampal regions, strata, and neurogenesis. a Diagram of the major divisions of the hippocampus. Red box shows region depicted in B. Yellow box shows region depicted in C. b Image of Golgi-Cox stained hippocampal CA1 neurons from OVX female mouse, captured using 10x objective. Stratum oriens ~40-60% the length of basal dendrite. Stratum radiatum ~30-50% the length of the apical dendrite. Lacunosum-moleculare ~80-100% the length of the apical dendrite. c Diagram depicting the stages of adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. DG, dentate gyrus; SO, stratum oriens; SR, stratum radiatum; LM, (stratum) lacunosum-moleculare

Estrogens and estrogen receptors: A short primer

Estrogens can act on estrogen receptors (ERs) within the region to elicit changes in structure and function. ERα, ERβ, and the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) are found in multiple areas of the brain, including the hippocampus, and are expressed in varying densities in both sexes [15, 39,40,41]. All three receptors are found in the dorsal and ventral horns of the hippocampus and within the CA1, CA2, CA3, and dentate gyrus, and are located in the nucleus and at extranuclear sites such as the dendrites [39, 40]. It should be noted that estrogens can be secreted from the ovaries in females and from adipose tissue in both sexes [42], whereas androgens are secreted from testes in males and from adipose tissue and adrenal cortex in both sexes [43]. However, it is also important to note that estrogens can be synthesized de novo from cholesterol in both sexes in the brain or be converted from testosterone via aromatase [42].

The majority of neuroendocrine research has explored the effects of 17β-estradiol because it is the most bioactive of the endogenous estrogens in pre-menopausal women [44]. To the best of our knowledge, contributions of estrone and estriol to the formation and modulation of dendritic spines have not been investigated, though these estrogens may be neuroprotective in certain disease and neurological states (e.g. [45,46,47,48,49]). While estrone and estriol are less bioactive than estradiol, their effects on dendritic spines require future investigation, especially with regards to pregnancy (when circulating estriol levels increase greatly as a result of placental production [50]) and post-menopause (when 17β-estradiol levels decline more so than estrone levels leading to estrone becoming the most abundant of the estrogens [51]), periods in which hippocampal dendritic spine numbers are increased [52, 53] and decreased (typically investigated via ovariectomy) [32, 54,55,56], respectively. It should further be mentioned that this review does not cover the effects of phytoestrogens (weak estrogens found in plants) or endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol-A on dendritic spine density or neurogenesis; however, there is emerging evidence that phytoestrogens may affect these types of hippocampal plasticity [57,58,59,60,61,62,63].

In this review, we will discuss how estrogens can affect structural plasticity of the hippocampus, dendritic spine morphology and neurogenesis, with the mediating and modulating factors of sex, age, parity, and pregnancy in females.

Estrogens and dendritic spines

Dendritic spines are small, membranous protrusions from the dendrites of neurons. These structures express many different receptors on their surface and serve as the primary recipients of excitatory synaptic input in the mammalian central nervous system as 90% of excitatory synapses occur on dendritic spines [64, 65]. The plasticity of dendritic spines has been suggested to play a role in motivation, memory, and learning [32, 66]; particularly, the growth of novel spines and morphological changes of pre-existing spines can mediate long-term memory formation [67]. Regional differences exist in dendritic spine density (i.e. the number of spines per unit length of dendrite), from highly spiny regions such as the hippocampus and cortex to spine sparse regions such as the hypothalamus [32]. Within the hippocampus, spine changes in response to effectors (activity, drugs, surgery, compounds, etc.) can vary dependent on region of the hippocampus (e.g. dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1). For instance, orchidectomy in male rats increases dendritic arborization (the degree of branching of the dendrites) in CA3 pyramidal neurons with no effect on the CA1 dendritic arbor [68]. These subregional differences can also be sex specific. For example, an acute stressor in male rats increased apical CA1 dendritic spine density but decreased it in proestrous females [69]. Thus, it is important to keep in mind that there are likely to be regional and sex differences in response to factors such as sex hormones.

Dendritic spines fall into subtypes based predominantly on shape, from stubby, mushroom-shaped mature spines to long, thin, immature spines lacking any sort of synaptic terminal enlargement [70, 71]. Although perhaps too simplistic, it has been suggested that thin spines are the “learning” spines while mushroom spines are the “memory” spines [72, 73]. In this model, thin, learning spines are amenable to experience-induced modifications that lead to the formation of new memories. These experience-induced modifications drive the maturation of thin spines into the more stable mushroom and stubby spines that hold synapses. Unfortunately, many studies investigate the density of dendritic spines but fail to report on spine shape (e.g. [74,75,76,77,78]). There is some debate on the functional significance of these two measures, that is, whether spine number is as important to behaviour as the maturation of spines. It is also hotly contested and debated what the best method of visualization and categorization of spines should entail [72, 73].

It has been known for decades that changes in circulating estrogens alter dendritic spine density in various brain regions in female rodents [52, 79,80,81,82,83], including the hippocampus [54, 55] (Table 1). Across the 4-5 day estrous cycle of the rat, apical CA1 dendritic spine density fluctuates by approximately 30%, with the highest densities coinciding with phases of high circulating estrogens [32, 55]. Ovariectomy (OVX) decreases the density of apical CA1 dendritic spines [54]. This can be reversed by treatment with exogenous estradiol benzoate (EB) [84]. The effect of estradiol, both EB and 17β-estradiol (which metabolizes more rapidly than EB [85]), to increase dendritic spines in apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons was observed within 24 hours, peaked at 2-3 days, and then gradually declined over the next 7 days [85]. Progesterone treatment, given subsequent to estradiol, served to rapidly increase spine density between 2-6 hours following treatment in OVX rats [85]. Dendritic spine density fell rapidly to baseline levels thereafter [85]. These findings indicate that ovarian hormones can modulate dendritic spine density. Intriguingly, there are reported differences in hippocampal volume across the menstrual cycle in women, with menses phase associated with lower volume than the preovulatory surge [86,87,88]; but see [89] an effect that is echoed across the estrous cycle in mice [90]. It is tempting to speculate that changes in spines may contribute to these alterations in volume but more studies need to be conducted. Of interest, functional activation patterns are also altered across the estrous cycle in rodents [91], and with menstrual cycle [88, 92, 93] and exogenous estradiol [94] in women, suggesting that ovarian hormones modulate brain activity. Altered activation and volume changes across the menstrual cycle in women could be caused by the modulation of spine and synapse dynamics, dendritic architecture, and/or neurogenesis in the hippocampus.

Table 1 Summary of the effects of estrogens on hippocampal dendritic spine density

In addition to the influence of estrogens in females, dendritic spines in the CA1 region also fluctuate in males with hormones. Interestingly, long-term changes in dendritic spine density in this region is driven by testosterone [95], but not by aromatization of testosterone to estradiol [96]. Similarly, androgens, but not estrogens, also upregulate neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult males [97, 98], as reviewed in a latter section (Estrogens and neurogenesis). Gonadectomized male rats have reduced CA1 dendritic spine density when compared with intact males, which is recovered by testosterone propionate or dihydrotestosterone treatment, but not 17β-estradiol, for 2 days [95, 99]. Testosterone or dihydrotestosterone rapidly (within 2h) increased in CA1 pyramidal neuron dendritic spine density in ex vivo hippocampal slices from adult male rats [100]. Similarly, in ex vivo hippocampal slices from adult male rats, a 2h bath in 17β-estradiol (1nM) increased dendritic spine density in the strata oriens, radiatum, and lacunosum-moleculare of the CA1 [101, 102]. In male rats, both testosterone and 17β-estradiol in vivo also rapidly increased dendritic spine density in the CA1 region, but not in the dentate gyrus, 30 minutes or 2 hours following treatment [103]. Collectively, these findings suggest that estrogens increase dendritic spines in males only via rapid mechanisms of action, whereas androgens increase spines both rapidly and long-term. Differences between long-term and rapid effects of steroid hormones, especially estrogens, have been of increasing interest in recent years [33, 34, 104,105,106].

Acute, exogenous 17β-estradiol or EB substantially (i.e. as much as 50%) increases dendritic spine and synapse density in both rapid and longer timeframes in the CA1 region of the hippocampus of female rodents [74,75,76,77,78, 84, 101,102,103, 107]. Woolley and McEwen [84] initially found that losses in dendritic spine density following OVX in female rats can be overcome through two 10μg subcutaneous injections of estradiol benzoate (EB; given 24h apart) when evaluated 48h following the second injection. More rapid effects of estrogens have since been observed. Within 4.5h of 17β-estradiol treatment in OVX female rats (45μg/kg; a dose previously found to enhance visual and place memory [108]), spine synapse density in the CA1 was significantly increased [107]. Within 30 minutes, either 17β-estradiol (45 or 60μg/kg) or 17α-estradiol (15 or 45μg/kg) increased spine synapse density in the same model [107]. In OVX female mice, a single subcutaneous injection of 17β-estradiol (1.5, 2, or 3μg/kg) increased dendritic spine density in CA1 stratum radiatum, but not lacunosum-moleculare within 40 minutes [75] (see Fig. 1 for hippocampal subregions). Treatment of 17β-estradiol directly into the hippocampus of female mice (30 minutes or 2h following 5μg/hemisphere) [78] or to ex vivo hippocampal slices from female mice (50nM for 20-30 minutes, equivalent to the intrahippocampal dose that facilitated social recognition, object recognition, and object placement in a separate set of mice in the same study [6.81pg/hemisphere]) [76] rapidly increased CA1 dendritic spine density. It is important to note here that the contribution of these novel spines to behaviour is unknown. Experiments utilizing in vivo estrogen administration almost exclusively (one exception is [109]) used behaviourally naïve animals. Whether these spines are utilized in behaviour or are modulated by behaviour remains, as of yet, to be determined. While estrogens affect a number of behaviours [105, 110, 111], the next section will focus on their effects on hippocampus-dependent learning and memory.

Estrogens in the hippocampus: Learning and memory

While a causal link between the physiological (e.g. increase in dendritic spine density) and behavioural (e.g. facilitation of short-term social recognition memory) has yet to be proven, many of these effects occur within similar timeframes. Estrogens rapidly increase synapse density both in vivo [107] and in vitro [112, 113], suggesting that pre-synaptic input (i.e. synaptic transmission to estrogen-treated neurons) may also be involved in the 17β-estradiol mediated changes (impairments or enhancements) in learning and memory that have been observed within the same rapid timeframe (e.g. [75, 76, 108, 114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122]). Learning and memory (see [123] for disambiguation of these terms) are not a singular process but are comprised of several steps including encoding, storage, and retrieval of information [72]. In brief, typically, learning is considered to be the acquisition or encoding of information to memory, whereas memory could be considered the storage and retrieval of information [123]. Memory can be divided into many different subtypes (e.g. episodic and semantic memory, declarative and non-declarative memory) and there are many reviews written on the subject (e.g. [124, 125]). One way we find it useful to categorize memory is working versus reference memory. Reference memory is considered long-term memory for events or stimuli that stay stable over time [126], whereas working memory can be defined as trial-unique information to guide prospective action [127, 128]. Reference memory relies more on the dorsal hippocampus [129, 130] while working memory relies more on the ventral hippocampus (and prefrontal cortex) [129,130,131,132]. Different tasks that rely on the integrity of the hippocampus can influence reference and working memory to different degrees and, not surprisingly, estrogens can have different influences on these different types of learning and memory. We illustrate a number of tasks mentioned in this review that are used to assess different forms of learning and memory in Fig. 2. It is important to note that there are different versions of the tasks shown in Fig. 2 and, thus, the descriptions are not exhaustive. A thorough discussion of different forms of memory and how the hippocampus may be involved is beyond the scope of this review, but we direct the readers to excellent reviews on this subject [133,134,135,136].

Fig. 2

Overview of behavioural tasks affected by estrogens and mentioned in this review. a Object recognition, b) social recognition, and c) object placement tasks take advantage of rodents’ innate preference for novelty. In each of task, a test rodent is presented with stimuli (typically two) to explore during training. Upon test, one stimulus is replaced with a novel stimulus (object/social recognition) or moved to a novel location. d In conditioned place preference, an animal is rewarded in one of two distinguishable contexts. A probe trial then explores the amount of time spent in the two contexts. e In the social transmission of food preferences, a “demonstrator” animal consumes a novel flavoured diet. They are then paired with an “observer” for an interaction period in which the observer will smell the novel flavoured diet on the demonstrator’s breath. When given a choice between the flavoured diet smelled on the demonstrator’s breath and another novel diet (both diets are novel to the observer), an animal with intact social learning will prefer the demonstrator’s diet. f In the win-shift version of the radial arm maze, rodents are placed in the maze and allowed to enter only a subset of the arms in order to receive rewards. Upon test phases, all arms are open, but rodents are only rewarded at the termini of formerly un-baited arms. Entries into previously baited arms are reference memory errors, whereas re-entry into arms entered during the test phase are working memory errors. Similarly, g) in the working/reference memory radial arm maze task, rodents are repeatedly rewarded in the same arms. Entries into never-baited arms are reference memory errors, whereas re-entries are working memory errors. h In the Morris water maze, an animal learns to swim to a hidden platform to escape. Probe trials then evaluate the amount of time the animal spends swimming in the quadrant previously containing the platform

Crucially, 17β-estradiol given during consolidation/storage can improve memory of a reference memory task of object recognition or object placement memory (tasks that can involve the dorsal hippocampus) 24-48 h after 17β-estradiol exposure [115,116,117, 119, 122]. Other studies examining performance in the spatial working reference/memory version or working memory win-shift version of the radial arm maze (hippocampus-dependent tasks) show facilitated acquisition at lower doses of EB or impaired acquisition at higher doses of EB [118, 137]. Performance in other spatial memory tasks show a similar dose response in performance with 17β-estradiol in both humans [138] and rodents [139,140,141]. In addition, systemic or intrahippocampal administration of 17β-estradiol 15 minutes prior to training in an object, social, or place recognition task facilitated performance when tested 40 minutes later in OVX female mice [74,75,76]. It is clear that 17β-estradiol can facilitate or impair various aspects of working and reference memory dependent on dose, course of treatment, when during encoding, consolidation, and/or retrieval 17β-estradiol is given, and the type of task (e.g. what brain areas are recruited during the task). Task performance may be influenced by 17β-estradiol’s effects on synaptic plasticity, including influence on dendritic spines, the putative structural and integral compartments of learning/memory within the synapse.

Estrogens and “two-step wiring plasticity”

The combination of 17β-estradiol increasing spines and enhancing memory suggested the idea of “two-step wiring plasticity” (also known as “sample and hold” theory [142]; see [66] for a thorough explanation). Briefly, in Step 1, acute application of 17β-estradiol to cultured cortical neurons from embryonic day 18 rats (mixed sex [personal communications]) led to a rapid, transient increase in the density of dendritic spines in an extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK)-dependent manner, along with the presence of silent synapses (i.e. synapses where the postsynaptic membrane contains few alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors) [112]. Following this, in Step 2, when N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors were activated, the increases in dendritic spine density and silent synapse number persisted up to 24 hours [112]. NMDA receptor activation was necessary for dendritic spine increases to persist. While this effect was investigated in cultured embryonic cortical neurons, rapid “two-step wiring plasticity” may be a mechanism by which estrogens can exert their enhancing effects on learning in other brain regions in adults (e.g. [114]). That is, estrogens may affect learning by priming neurons to form lasting connections by first creating silent synapses and increasing dendritic spine density (Step 1) – likely through actin cytoskeleton dynamics [66] and de novo protein synthesis [106, 143,144,145] – followed by stimulation (Step 2), leading these neurons to undergo long-term potentiation (LTP) [146, 147]. In this way, novel synapses are formed selectivel by exposure to estrogens. Only when silent synapses are present and when the neuron is activated (receives stimulation) do those synapses that get utilized in the neuron’s activity develop into their fully functioning forms (Fig. 3). However, other potential explanations exist for the mechanisms behind the effects of estrogens on learning, including those that may or may not involve changes to dendritic spine density (e.g. glutamate receptor shuttling and/or stabilization [148]). Through what mechanisms estrogens affect learning and memory, and whether novel dendritic spines and/or LTP are involved, requires further investigation.

Fig. 3

Suggested non-genomic, intracellular mechanisms driving dendritic spine changes and neurogenesis by estrogens. We hypothesize that estrogens bind to estrogen receptors (membrane bound or intracellular) which go on to activate cell signalling pathways, including, but not limited to the ERK, PI3K, JNK, and/or mTOR pathways. Cross-talk between these pathways is common. These have downstream effects on a number of intracellular mechanisms, including protein synthesis and actin polymerization. Through actin polymerization and protein synthesis, novel spines or “silent” synapses are created, which can become mature synapses following neuronal activity. If unused, the novel spines do not mature and are instead re-internalized. Other intracellular mechanisms, such as epigenetic or post-translational protein modifications and mediation of neurotransmitters and/or receptors, are likely also involved. The contributions of cell signalling pathways and other intracellular mechanisms in the effects of estrogens on neurogenesis remain to be explored

Estrogens do not always improve memory or LTP

As noted above, estrogens do not always enhance learning and memory. OVX female mice given 17β-estradiol via drinking water for 5 weeks improved object recognition memory but impaired spatial reference memory at the middle physiological dose [149]. Similarly, chronic treatment with high doses of EB impaired (whereas low doses facilitated) spatial working memory in radial arm maze [118] and conditioned place-preference [150] in OVX female rats. Further, acute administration of high doses of 17β-estradiol and progesterone can also impair performance in the standard reference memory version of Morris water maze [151]. There is agreement in the human literature as well, with high endogenous levels of 17β-estradiol associated with poorer performance on spatial tasks [138] and cognitive function (assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale [152]) and high exogenous 17β-estradiol impairing recognition memory [94]. It is important to acknowledge that estradiol leads to curvilinear influence on hippocampal-dependent performance, with low and high levels impairing but a medium dose improving performance on a variety of tasks.

Estradiol also can have dramatically different effects on LTP as well, dependent on dose and region. For example, proestrus was associated with increased hippocampal LTP in the Schaffer collateral-stratum radiatum (CA1) pathway in adult female rats [153]. A recent study shows that in ex vivo hippocampal slices from adult female mice, 17β-estradiol (15 minutes) reduced CA1 miniature excitatory postsynaptic current frequency and firing in response to AMPA [76]. However, when EB is given in longer timelines (2 in vivo injections, 24 hours apart), in ex vivo hippocampal slices from OVX female rats, excitatory synaptic transmission in the CA1 was potentiated through increases in presynaptic vesicular glutamate release [154]. These findings collectively suggest that 17β-estradiol can transiently decrease excitation in the CA1 but increase excitation over longer timeframes. Differences in timing (rapid [15 min] vs longer-term [48 h]), route of administration (subcutaneous injection, implant, intercranial infusion, in vitro bath application, etc.), and experimental model (species, sex, in vivo, ex vivo, in vitro, etc.) between studies may underlie these, and other, between-study differences. For instance, in the above electrophysiology experiments, decreased firing resulted from application of estradiol to ex vivo hippocampal slices concurrent to measurement [76, 102], whereas in vivo treatment with EB 2 days prior to sacrifice and measurement resulted in an increase in synaptic transmission [154]. Here, differences in timing and/or model may underlie the opposing effects. Similarly, the rapid effects of estrogens involve intracellular signalling which may or may not lead to genomic products [33], whereas longer-term actions of estrogens, such as those in studies using chronic hormone treatments, may involve both genomic actions of estrogens (classical and non-classical) and ongoing, non-genomic, rapid effects. It is important to consider these factors as they may make comparing the results of different studies difficult.

There are important considerations when observing the effects of estrogens on LTP and LTD. Finding an appropriate tetanus can be difficult, as hippocampal excitability and seizure threshold increase with high 17β-estradiol. For example, the hippocampus is more prone to seizure during proestrus (high circulating estrogens [153, 155]) or following chronic high-dose 17β-estradiol replacement (dorsal, but not ventral hippocampal seizures [156]). Furthermore, the hippocampus can be hyperexcitable following systemic administration of EB [157] and there are dose-dependent seizure risk associations found in women with epilepsy [158]. Additionally, there has been much discussion about the lack of statistical power in many neuroscience studies [159]. Contradictory findings in similar experiments could be driven by inadequate sample sizes. Researchers are urged to consider statistical power when planning future experiments, especially when sex or hormonal differences are involved, for example, often estrous cycle analyses are underpowered due to subdividing an already small sample size [1, 2]. However, it is equally important is to consider all the variables in the experiment (see [160]), given that tetanus, region of the hippocampus, age, and experience matter for LTP outcomes. As such, all aspects must be considered and the LTP and estrogens story must not be generalized when multiple areas or stimulation paradigms are used. Careful control of experimental parameters (e.g. consistency and control of experimental conditions, such as cue choice in spatial tasks) is adequate to maintain statistical power in neuroscience research [160].

As suggested earlier, the effects of estrogens on behaviour are often dose dependent and follow an inverted U-shape dose response curve with intermediate doses showing the greatest effects [161] (e.g. [76, 77, 94, 114, 149, 162]). Similar dose response curves have been observed in the rapid effects of estrogens on dendritic spines [74, 76]. As such, investigations into the effects of estrogens on either behaviour or cellular morphology should take dose response into consideration. Furthermore, longer term exposure to estrogens can similarly have dose dependent responses on learning and memory, with low levels of 17β-estradiol enhancing spatial working memory and high levels of estradiol impairing spatial working and reference memory [150, 163, 164]. Studies have also shown that, whereas there is dose dependent facilitation in contextual fear conditioning by 17β- and 17α-estradiol, estrone results in dose dependent impairments in contextual fear conditioning [165]. Thus, it is important to keep in mind that the number of injections, dose, and type of estrogen(s) utilized along with the type of memory task investigated and when during acquisition or retrieval estrogens are given, are critical to the learning outcomes.

Molecular mechanisms of spine changes

The contributions of the different subtypes of ERs to the modulation of dendritic spines are not yet fully understood. Increases in apical and basal pyramidal neuron spine density were found within 2 hours of administration of ERα agonist PPT in the CA1 hippocampus of male rats, while ERβ agonist DPN did not produce such effects [101]. Twenty-four hours following treatment with mixed agonist-antagonist selective estrogen receptor modulators, raloxifene and tamoxifen, male rats had higher CA1 dendritic spine densities than vehicle treated controls [166]. Tamoxifen increased thin- and stubby-type spines over controls and mushroom-type spines over both vehicle and raloxifene treated males, whereas raloxifene treated males showed increases in thin-, stubby-, and wide-type spines over control males [166]. Within 40 minutes of systemic administration, 17β-estradiol [75], PPT [74], or GPER1 agonist G-1 [77] in young adult OVX female mice increased dendritic spine density in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 hippocampus, with PPT also increasing dendritic spine density in the lacunosum-moleculare [74]. In all, ERα and the GPER1 seem to drive the effects of estrogens in this region, whereas other regions show more involvement from ERβ (e.g. the cortex [112] and the medial amygdala [114]).

While the link between changes in dendritic spines and behaviour has not been causally demonstrated in these studies, many of the same doses of these estrogens and ER agonists that increased dendritic spine density also facilitated short-term social recognition, social learning, object recognition, and/or object placement memory in a separate group of OVX female mice in the same timeline (40-45 minutes) as spine changes [33, 34, 74,75,76,77, 114, 167]. Conversely, systemic administration of DPN impaired social recognition, facilitated object placement, did not affect object recognition performance in OVX female mice, and decreased dendritic spine density and length in the lacunosum-moleculare [74]. In ex vivo hippocampal slices, 17β-estradiol and PPT, but not DPN, rapidly increased spine density in the stratum radiatum and stratum oriens subregions of the CA1 [76]. Female OVX mice administered a memory-improving dose of 17β-estradiol into the dorsal hippocampus had increased basal and apical dendritic spine density in CA1 pyramidal neurons 30 minutes and 2 hours following hormone treatment [78]. Furthermore, a memory-improving dose of intracerebroventricular 17β-estradiol similarly increased basal and apical dendritic spine density in CA1 pyramidal neurons within 2 hours in an ERK- and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent fashion [78]. Further study is required to conclusively determine the involvement of estrogen-facilitated dendritic spine changes in learning and memory.

The majority of studies have utilized behaviourally-naïve animals when examining spinogenesis. Interestingly, behavioural training (Morris Water Maze) interfered with EB-facilitated increases in CA1 spine density [109]. Similarly, more recent investigations have found a lack of CA1 dendritic spine density increases in animals treated with 17β-estradiol prior to acquisition in a rapid short-term social recognition memory testing (Sheppard & Choleris, unpublished results). One potential explanation is that estradiol treatment is increasing overall spine number, but, upon activation or experience, only a subset of spines, perhaps those involved in the learning, persists. Further investigation into whether novel spines produced following 17β-estradiol treatment remain, mature, or are utilized in behaviour is required.

Intriguingly, in the CA3 region of the hippocampus, there are distinct spines called thorny excrescences that are the postsynaptic synapses from the mossy fiber inputs from granule cells in the dentate gyrus [168]. In hippocampal slices from adult male rats, 1nM 17β-estradiol for 2h decreased CA3 excrescence thorns [169]. This decrease was blocked by AMPAR, but not NMDAR, antagonism and MAPK signalling inhibition [169]. ERα is believed to drive this decrease as PPT, but not DPN produced a similar effect and ERα was present at CA3 mossy fibre terminals [169]. Notably, CA3 dendritic spine density does not vary across the estrous cycle [54, 55]. Ovariectomized female rats had decreased dendritic spine density in proximal, medial, and distal regions of the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the CA1, whereas the CA3 had decreases in proximal and distal regions only, when compared with gonadally intact females in proestrus, a high 17β-estradiol phase of the estrous cycle [68]. Females in metestrus also had reduced spine density in the medial region of the CA1 when compared to those in proestrus [68]. Interestingly, orchidectomy in males significantly increased dendritic branching in the CA3 whereas OVX in females had minimal effects on the dendritic arbor [68]. Although the CA1 is more often studied, there are clearly sex differences in the effects of sex hormones on CA3 dendritic spines and arborization that require further investigation.

Of particular interest in dendritic spine modulation is the actin cytoskeleton [67] – a dynamic network of actin protein filaments and associated actin binding proteins – which is highly plastic and serves structural roles in many cell types [67]. A number of studies have found the actin cytoskeleton to be pivotal in the formation, elimination, motility, stability, size, and shape of dendritic spines (e.g. [170,171,172,173]). Estrogens have been found to affect the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton (Fig. 3) by rapidly stimulating the RhoA/ROCK (RhoA kinase) pathway and activating Rac/p21-activated kinase (PAK) signalling in neurons [174,175,176,177]. Furthermore, intrahippocampal administration of latrunculin A, an inhibitor of actin polymerization (the process by which globular actin [G-actin] units combine to form filamentous actin [F-actin]), blocked the rapid GPER1-mediated enhancements of long-term object and spatial memory consolidation in OVX mice [178]. As such, effects on the pathways affecting the actin cytoskeleton dynamics within dendrites are a potential mechanism by which estrogens facilitate learning and memory on a rapid timescale.

In addition to remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, protein synthesis has been implicated as a critical factor in changes to dendritic spine morphology [143, 179], as well as in learning and memory (e.g. [180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189]). The enlargement and stabilization of dendritic spines requires synthesis of new proteins, and specific subsets of mRNAs are actively transported to and stored in neuronal dendrites in order for local protein synthesis to be synapse- or spine-specific [143]. It has been known since the 1960s that estrogens increase protein synthesis [190, 191]. Through their classical, genomic actions, estrogens, via dimerized ERs binding to estrogen response elements on target genes, regulate gene transcription and subsequent protein synthesis [192]. Additionally, recent evidence suggests that local protein synthesis (i.e. the synthesis of novel proteins from mRNA stored in the dendrites, independent of gene transcription) may underlie many of the effects of estrogens on dendritic spines, both long-term and rapidly [34, 193, 194].

In the hippocampus and in cultured hippocampal pyramidal neurons, estradiol (either EB [195,196,197] or 17β-estradiol [174, 194, 198]) alters synaptic protein expression in vivo [195,196,197] and in vitro [174, 194, 197]. In the CA1 dorsal hippocampus of male rats, EB, PPT, and DPN increased post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) – a post-synaptic scaffolding protein – and AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunit GluR1, with DPN also increasing GluR2 and decreasing GluR3 [195]. Following 2 days of EB treatment in OVX female rats, pre-synaptic markers synaptophysin (vesicular protein) and syntaxin (pre-synaptic membrane-bound protein) and post-synaptic marker spinophilin (spine homeostasis protein) were significantly increased in the CA1 [196]. Interestingly, OVX female rats show an increase in spinophilin 2 days following EB treatment, whereas levels are decreased in gonadectomized males [198]. OVX female rats injected twice daily with 10μg of EB had increased CA1 dendritic spine density at 3 days, but not 10 days, with increases of synaptophysin expression at both timepoints [199]. Similarly, spinophilin was increased in primary hippocampal cultures from embryonic day 18 rat embryos (sex not discussed) 24 hours following EB treatment in a CaMKII-dependent manner [197]. In the CA3 of OVX female rats, synaptophysin was increased in response to high and middle doses of estrone (10 and 1μg, respectively) and low dose 17β-estradiol (0.3μg) in conjunction with contextual fear conditioning, without these increases in synaptophysin correlating with cognition [165].

In a well-established in vitro model system of differentiated NG108-15 neurons, Akama & McEwen [200] found that PSD-95 protein, but not mRNA, levels were increased rapidly following 17β-estradiol treatment in an Akt-dependent manner suggesting that, in these cells, 17β-estradiol was eliciting an increase in translation, which was independent of DNA transcription. Enhanced consolidation of longer-term object recognition memory (tested 48h post-training) by intrahippocampal administration of 17β-estradiol may require local synthesis of proteins as mTOR is rapidly activated by ERK and Akt signalling cascades leading to phosphorylation of translation initiation proteins eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein (4E-BP1) and p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (S6K) and is required for 17β-estradiol-facilitated memory enhancements [117]. Similarly, mTOR is rapidly activated (phosphorylated) in a calpain-dependent manner 15 minutes following acute 17β-estradiol treatment to ex vivo hippocampal slices [174]. Expression of activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), a protein known to be rapidly translated in response to activity, was also up-regulated in these slices and these effects may depend upon GPER1 signalling and not ERα or β [174]. Collectively, this evidence suggests that increases in spine density and synapse formation in the hippocampus may involve a 17β-estradiol-triggered protein synthesis, often in a dendrite-localized fashion (Fig. 3). However, novel protein synthesis is not required for the rapid 17β-estradiol-facilitated formation of new dendritic spines in cultured cortical neurons (from embryonic day 18 rats; mixed sex [personal communications]) [112]. It is unclear whether protein synthesis, mediated by a mTOR pathway, is required for the maturation and stabilization of novel spines in this region or whether experiment model (in vitro vs. in vivo) accounts for differences in results [106, 113, 194]. Thus, further investigation into whether protein synthesis is necessary for increases in hippocampal dendritic spine number, either rapidly or over longer timeframes, is warranted (Fig. 3).

Estrogens and neurogenesis

Estrogens not only modulate dendritic spines but also the birth and survival of new neurons in the dentate gyrus (for review, see [35]). There have been a few reviews specifically on this topic and the reader is directed to these reviews for a more in-depth discussion [31, 35, 201]. Briefly, the process of neurogenesis involves a number of steps leading to mature neurons (Fig. 1c). First, neural progenitor cells that reside in the subgranular zone in the dentate gyrus undergo asymmetrical proliferation. The daughter cells then can differentiate into neurons, glia, or progenitor cell types. If the cell fate is that of a neuronal phenotype, the cell migrates a small distance into the granule cell layer. Eventually, the new neuron will express mature neuronal proteins (~2-3 weeks in rats and ~4 weeks in mice), establish synaptic connections with CA3 neurons (and within the DG), and become electrophysiologically active [202, 203]. Estrogens can influence neurogenesis by acting on any of these processes, resulting in either a net increase or decrease in levels of new mature neurons.

It bears mentioning that there are some studies that question the extent of adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of humans. A recent paper by Sorrells and colleagues [204] cast doubt on the presence of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans, although claims of near-absent neurogenesis in humans [205, 206] and non-human primates [207, 208] have been made before. This was followed shortly thereafter by a paper by Boldrini and colleagues [209] which reached the opposite conclusions. Using multiple methods – bromodeoxyuridine [210], doublecortin [211], and 14C dating [212] – numerous studies show evidence for hippocampal neurogenesis in humans, but, as in rodents, there are precipitous declines in levels of neurogenesis with age [213]. Flaws in the design of the Sorrells et al study have been discussed [214], but, briefly, the actual numbers of DCX+PSA-NCAM cells are not given and PSA-NCAM is not exclusive to the dentate gyrus or to new neurons [214]. The majority of studies observe low, but detectable, levels of neurogenesis in adult humans [214]. Other studies have suggested immunohistological methods underestimate the numbers of new neurons in human hippocampus [209, 214] and the data using 14C dating suggests much greater levels of neurogenesis exist in the human brain than was previously believed. As our review focuses on experimental animal studies, we direct readers to these papers for discussion on the existence and extent of adult hippocampal neurogenesis [204, 209, 214,215,216,217]).

Research indicates that estrogens rapidly upregulate cell proliferation within 30 minutes [218] a time-frame similar to that observed for the rapid increase in dendritic spines. However, with prolonged exposure to EB (48 h), a decrease in cell proliferation is observed [219, 220]. This biphasic effect is most likely due to the homeostatic nature of neurogenesis [221, 222] but also to the ability of 17β-estradiol to upregulate adrenal steroids, as adrenalectomy eliminates the downregulation of cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus 48 h later [223]. ERα and ERβ agonists upregulate cell proliferation in adult female rats [224]; however, the ability of 17β-estradiol to increase cell proliferation is not dependent on GPER1 or NMDAR activation [224,225,226]. The upregulation of neurogenesis with ovarian hormones is also seen across the estrous cycle, with female rats showing the highest levels of cell proliferation during proestrus [227, 228] (but see [229]). Estrogens do not appear to alter cell fate/differentiation but do influence survival of new neurons, although this latter effect depends upon the type of estrogen, whether estrogens are administered throughout the survival period, and/or whether animals perform a cognitive task [230,231,232]. In short, 15 days of EB can decrease survival of new neurons independent of the influence on cell proliferation [232]. However, if 17β-estradiol is given right before administration of bromodeoxyuridine – a thymidine analog used to identify proliferating cells – an increase in survival of new neurons is seen in rats that have also undergone water maze training [231]. In contrast, rats given estrone showed a decrease in survival of new neurons [231]. These findings indicate that not all estrogens increase neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Intriguingly, spatial training and age influence how Premarin, a hormone therapy comprised of 50% estrone sulphate and 0.1% estradiol sulphate, increases neurogenesis [230, 233]. Premarin increases survival of new neurons in radial-maze trained rats but not in cage controls [230]. In middle-aged nulliparous or primiparous rats (i.e. rats who have never given birth to a litter and rats who have had one litter, respectively), lower doses of Premarin decreased survival of new neurons in rats that were also trained in the Morris Water Maze [233]. Recent work also suggests that long-term exposure to estradiol, but not DPN or PPT, increases survival of new neurons in the hippocampus of female mice [234], suggesting either the involvement of other ERs (e.g. GPER1) or ER-independent effects of estrogens to influence neurogenesis under chronic conditions.

Much of the work in this area has been conducted in young adult female rodents [218,219,220, 223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234], but there are a few studies examining middle-age and older females. Curiously, in middle-aged nulliparous females, estrogens lose their ability to increase cell proliferation, but estrone, 17α- and 17β-estradiol all increase cell proliferation in multiparous middle-aged female rats [235]. More work is needed to determine how age and parity affect estrogens’ abilities to modulate neurogenesis.

A few studies conducted in males so far suggest that estradiol does not influence the survival of new neurons, but that both testosterone and dihydrotestosterone increase survival of new neurons [97, 100] via interactions with the androgen receptor [236]. The ability of dihydrotestosterone to enhance hippocampal neurogenesis in males depends on age, as the effect is seen in young, but not middle-aged, males [98]. However, Ormerod and colleagues [220] showed that 5 days of exposure to estradiol increased survival of new neurons in male meadow voles, at a time when new neurons are extending their axons in both cage control and voles trained in the Morris Water Maze. This suggests that estradiol can have survival promoting effects in males at specific time points during maturation of new neurons, but more work needs to be done in this area and/or explore species differences. One field that has been neglected is the trajectory of spine formation on new neurons in the dentate gyrus and/or in the CA3 region, the synaptic target of the new neurons. This is a field ripe for investigation.


The plasticity of the hippocampus that allows for changes and adaptability also makes the hippocampus susceptible to disease and disorder [28]. The literature we review here demonstrates that estrogens can modulate structural plasticity within the hippocampus. A variety of factors, including sex, age, dose, hormonal state, and reproductive history, can influence the effects of estrogens on hippocampal plasticity. Understanding the complex interplay of these factors and estrogens in healthy brains is essential to determining how dysregulation occurs, progresses, and manifests in disease states. A preponderance of research has examined how estrogens affect structural plasticity in female rodents. It is crucial that future studies investigate both sexes, and do so appropriately [1, 2, 237], as many brain disorders show marked sex differences [2]. Additionally, more studies are needed that study estrogens’ effects across age and experience, with the understanding that experiences in one sex may be very different than the other (i.e. motherhood, lactation). Only by understanding the complex, multi-faceted nature of estrogens on hippocampal plasticity can we hope to develop targeted therapies to combat disorders affecting the hippocampus and improve quality of life for those afflicted.



Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein


Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid




Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II




Estradiol benzoate


Estrogen receptor


Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase




G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1


Long term depression


Long term potentiation


Mammalian target of rapamycin






p21-activated kinase


Propyl pyrazole triol


Rho-associated protein kinase


  1. 1.

    Choleris E, Galea LAM, Sohrabji F, Frick KM. Sex differences in the brain: implications for behavioral and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;85:126–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Galea LAM, Frick KM, Hampson E, Sohrabji F, Choleris E. Why estrogens matter for behavior and health. Neurosci Behav Rev. 2017;76(B):363–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Angst J, Gamma A, Gastpar M, Lépine JP, Mendlewicz J, Tylee A. Gender differences in depression. Epidemiological findings from the European DEPRES I and II studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;252:201–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Barnes LL, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Schneider JA, Evans DA, Bennett DA. Sex differences in the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer disease pathology. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):685–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ferri SL, Abel T, Brodkin ES. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(2):9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Irvine K, Laws KR, Gale TM, Kondel TK. Greater cognitive deterioration in women than men with Alzheimer’s disease: a meta analysis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34:989–98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mendrek A, Mancini-Marïe A. Sex/gender differences in the brain and cognition in schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;67:57–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gutiérrez-Lobos K, Scherer M, Anderer P, Katschnig H. The influence of age on the female/male ratio of treated incidence rates in depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2002;2:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kornstein SG, Sloan DM, Thase ME. Gender-specific differences in depression and treatment response. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2002;36(4):99–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kornstein SG, Sloan DM. Gender differences in depression and response to antidepressant treatment. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003;26(3):581–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Keers R, Aitchison KJ. Gender differences in antidepressant drug response. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):485–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baum LW. Sex, hormones, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(6):736–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bloch M, Daly RC, Rubinow DR. Endocrine factors in the etiology of postpartum depression. Compr Psychiatry. 2003;44(3):234–46.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rosario ER, Chang L, Head EH, Stanczyk FZ, Pike CJ. Brain levels of sex steroid hormones in men and women during normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(4):604–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cui J, Shen Y, Li R. Estrogen synthesis and signaling pathways during aging: from periphery to brain. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19(3):197–209.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Maki PM. The critical window hypothesis of hormone therapy and cognition: a scientific update on clinical studies. Menopause. 2013;20:695–709.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rubinow DR, Johnson SL, Schmidt PJ, Girdler S, Gaynes B. Efficacy of estradiol in perimenopausal depression: so much promise and so few answers. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(8):539–49.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lindamer LA, Buse DC, Lohr JB, Jeste DV. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with schizophrenia: positive effect on negative symptoms? Biol Psychiatry. 2001;49(1):47–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hogervorst E, Bandelow S, Moffat SD. Increasing testosterone levels and effects on cognitive functions in elderly men and women: a review. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2005;4(5):531–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hogervorst E, Williams J, Budge M, Riedel W, Jolles J. The nature of the effect of female gonadal hormone replacement therapy on cognitive function in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience. 2000;101(3):485–512.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cha J, Greenberg T, Song I, Simpson HB, Posner J, Mujica-Parodi LR. Abnormal hippocampal structure and function in clinical anxiety and comorbid depression. Hippocampus. 2016;26(5):545–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Finke C, Bruehl H, Düzel E, Heekeren HR, Ploner CJ. Neural correlates of short-term memory reorganization in humans with hippocampal damage. J Neuroscience. 2013;33(27):11061–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cooper RA, Richter FR, Bays PM, Plaisted-Grant KC, Baron-Cohen S, Simons JS. Reduced hippocampal functional connectivity during episodic memory retrieval in autism. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(2):888–902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lieberman JA, Girgis RR, Brucato G, Moore H, Provenzano F, Kegeles L, et al. Hippocampal dysfunction in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: a selective review and hypothesis for early detection and intervention. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(8):1764–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    McKinnon MC, Yucel K, Nazarov A, MacQueen GM. A meta-analysis examining clinical predictors of hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009;34(1):41–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sheline YI. Depression and the hippocampus: cause or effect? Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(4):308–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    MacQueen G, Frodl T. The hippocampus in major depression: evidence for the convergence of the bench and bedside in psychiatric research? Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16(3):252–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Leuner B, Gould E. Structural plasticity and hippocampal function. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:111–C3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wharton W, Gleason CE, Sandra O, Carlsson CM, Asthana S. Neurobiological underpinnings of the estrogen-mood relationship. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2012;8(3):247–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Girijala RL, Sohrabji F, Bush RL. Sex differences in stroke: review of current knowledge and evidence. Vasc Med. 2017;22(2):135–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Duarte-Guterman P, Yagi S, Chow C, Galea LAM. Hippocampal learning, memory, and neurogenesis: effects of sex, and estrogens across the lifespan in adults. Horm Behav. 2015;74:37–52.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Frankfurt M, Luine V. The evolving role of dendritic spines and memory: interaction(s) with estradiol. Horm Behav. 2015;74:28–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sheppard PAS, Koss WA, Frick KM, Choleris E. Rapid actions of oestrogens and their receptors on memory acquisition and consolidation in females. J Neuroendocrinol. 2018;30(2):e12485.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Paletta P, Sheppard PAS, Matta R, Ervin KSJ, Choleris E. Rapid effects of estrogens on short-term memory: possible mechanisms. Horm Behav. 2018;104:88–99.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mahmoud R, Wainwright SR, Galea LA. Sex hormones and hippocampal neurogenesis: regulation, implications, and potential mechanisms. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2016;41:129–52.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nugent BM, Tobet SA, Lara HE, Lucion AB, Wilson ME, Recabarren SE, et al. Hormonal programming across the lifespan. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44(8):577–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vannuccini S, Bocchi C, Severi FM, Challis JR, Petraglia F. Endocrinology of human parturition. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2016;77(2):105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Windham GC, Elkin E, Fenster L, Waller K, Anderson M, Mitchell PR, et al. Ovarian hormones in premenopausal women: variation by demographic, reproductive and menstrual cycle characteristics. Epidemiology. 2002;13(6):675–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mitra SW, Hoskin E, Yudkovitz J, Pear L, Wilkinson HA, Hayashi S, et al. Immunolocalization of estrogen receptor beta in the mouse brain: comparison with estrogen receptor alpha. Endocrinology. 2003;144:2055–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hazell GGJ, Yao ST, Roper JA, Prossnitz ER, O’Carroll AM, Lolait SJ. Localisation of GPR30, a novel G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor, suggests multiple functions in the rodent brain and peripheral tissues. J Endocrinol. 2009;202(2):223–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Brailoiu E, Dun SL, Brailoiu GC, Mizuo K, Sklar LA, Oprea TI, et al. Distribution and characterization of estrogen receptor G protein-coupled receptor 30 in the rat central nervous system. J Endocrinol. 2007;193(2):311–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nelson LR, Bulun SE. Estrogen production and action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(3 Suppl):S116–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Burger HG. Androgen production in women. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rannevik G, Jeppsson S, Johnell O, Bjerre B, Laurell-Borulf Y, Svanberg L. A longitudinal study of the perimenopausal transition: altered profiles of steroid and pituitary hormones, SHBG, and bone mineral density. Maturitas. 1995;21:103–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Budziszewska B, Leskiewicz M, Kubera M, Jaworska-Feil L, Kajta M, Lason W. Estrone, but not 17 beta-estradiol, attenuates kainate-induced seizures and toxicity in male mice. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001;109:168–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bhavnani BR, Berco M, Binkley J. Equine estrogens differentially prevent neuronal cell death induced by glutamate. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003;10:302–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Soldan SS, Alvarez-Retuerto AI, Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR. Immune modulation in multiple sclerosis patients treated with the pregnancy hormone estriol. J Immunol. 2003;171(11):6267–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gatson JW, Liu M-M, Abdelfattah K, Wigginton JG, Smith S, Wolf S, et al. Estrone is neuroprotective in rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(12):2209–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ziehn MO, Avedisian AA, Dervin SM, O’Dell TJ, Voskuhl RR. Estriol preserves synaptic transmission in the hippocampus during autoimmune demyelinating disease. Lab Invest. 2012;92(8):1234–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Falah N, Torday J, Quinney SK, Haas DM. Estriol review: clinical applications and potential biomedical importance. Clin Res Trials. 2015;1(2):29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gruber CJ, Tschugguel W, Schneeberger C, Huber JC. Production and actions of estrogens. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(5):340–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chen J-R, Yan Y-T, Wang T-J, Chen L-J, Wang Y-J, Tseng G-F. Gonadal hormones modulate the dendritic spine densities of primary cortical pyramidal neurons in adult female rat. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2719–27.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kinsley CH, Trainer R, Stafisso-Sandoz G, Quadros P, Marcus LK, Hearon C, et al. Motherhood and the hormones of pregnancy modify concentrations of hippocampal neuronal dendritic spines. Horm Behav. 2006;49(2):131–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gould E, Woolley CS, Frankfurt M, McEwen BS. Gonadal steroids regulate dendritic spine density in hippocampal pyramidal cells in adulthood. J Neurosci. 1990;10(4):1286–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Woolley CS, Gould E, Frankfurt M, McEwen BS. Naturally occurring fluctuation in dendritic spine density on adult hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 1990;10:4035–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wallace M, Luine V, Arellano A, Frankfurt M. Ovariectomized rats show decreased recognition memory and spine density in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Brain Res. 2006;1126:176–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Luine V, Attalla S, Mohan G, Costa A, Frankfurt M. Dietary phytoestrogens enhance spatial memory and spine density in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of ovariectomized rats. Brain Res. 2006;1126:183–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Leranth C, Hajszan T, Szigeti-Buck K, Bober J, MacLusky NJ. Bisphenol A prevents the synaptogenic response to estradiol in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of ovariectomized nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2008;105:14187–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Eilam-Stock T, Serrano P, Frankfurt M, Luine V. Bisphenol-A impairs memory and reduces dendritic spine density in adult male rats. Behav Neurosci. 2012;126:175–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Inagaki T, Frankfurt M, Luine V. Estrogen-induced memory enhancements are blocked by acute bisphenol A in adult female rats: role of dendritic spines. Endocrinology. 2012;53:3357–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bowman RE, Luine V, Khandaker H, Villafane JJ, Frankfurt M. Adolescent bisphenol-A exposure decreases dendritic spine density: role of sex and age. Synapse. 2014;68:498–507.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bowman RE, Luine V, Weinstein SD, Khandaker H, DeWolf S, Frankfurt M. Bisphenol-A exposure during adolescence leads to enduring alterations in cognition and dendritic spine density in adult male and female rats. Horm Behav. 2015;69:89–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Dong Y, Jiang A, Yang H, Chen H, Wang Y. Phytoestrogen α-zearalanol improves memory impairment and hippocampal neurogenesis in ovariectomized mice. Sci World J. 2014;2014:862019.

  64. 64.

    Harris KM, Kater SB. Dendritic spines: cellular specializations imparting both stability and flexibility to synaptic function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1994;17:341–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Alvarez VA, Sabatini BL. Anatomical and physiological plasticity of dendritic spines. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:79–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Srivastava DP. Two-step wiring plasticity: a mechanism for estrogen-induced rewiring of cortical neurons. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;131(1-2):17–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Hotulainen P, Hoogenraad CC. Actin in dendritic spines: connecting dynamics to function. J Cell Biol. 2010;189(4):619–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mendell AL, Atwi S, Bailey CD, McCloskey D, Scharfman HE, MacLusky NJ. Expansion of mossy fibers and CA3 apical dendritic length accompanies the fall in dendritic spine density after gonadectomy in male, but not female, rats. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222(1):587–601.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Shors TJ, Chua C, Falduto J. Sex differences and opposite effects of stress on dendritic spine density in the male versus female hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2001;21(16):6292–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Rochefort NL, Konnerth A. Dendritic spines: from structure to in vivo function. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(8):699–708.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Lee KFH, Soares C, Béïque J-C. Examining form and function of dendritic spines. Neural Plast. 2012;2012:704103.

  72. 72.

    Bailey CH, Kandel ER, Harris KM. Structural components of synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(7):a021758.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Bourne J, Harris KM. Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember? Curr Op Neurobiol. 2007;17(3):381–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Phan A, Lancaster KE, Armstrong JN, MacLusky NJ, Choleris E. Rapid effects of estrogen receptor alpha and beta selective agonists on learning and dendritic spines in female mice. Endocrinology. 2011;152(4):1492–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Phan A, Gabor CS, Favaro KJ, Kaschack S, Armstrong JN, Maclusky NJ, et al. Low doses of 17β-estradiol rapidly improve learning and increase hippocampal dendritic spines. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(10):2299–309.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Phan A, Suschkov S, Molinaro L, Reynolds K, Lymer JM, Bailey CDC, et al. Rapid increases in immature synapses parallel estrogen-induced hippocampal learning enhancements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2015;112(52):16018–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Gabor CS, Lymer J, Phan A, Choleris E. Rapid effects of the G-protein coupled oestrogen receptor (GPER) on learning and dorsal hippocampus dendritic spines in female mice. Physiol Behav. 2015;149(1):53–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Tuscher JJ, Luine V, Frankfurt M, Frick KM. Estradiol-mediated spine changes in the dorsal hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex of ovariectomized female mice depend on ERK and mTOR activation in the dorsal hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2016;36(5):1483–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Tang Y, Janssen WG, Hao J, Roberts JA, McKay H, Lasley B, et al. Estrogen replacement increases spinophilin-immunoreactive spine number in the prefrontal cortex of female rhesus monkeys. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:215–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Khan MM, Dhandapani KM, Zhang Q, Brann DW. Estrogen regulation of spine density and excitatory synapses in rat prefrontal and somatosensory cerebral cortex. Steroids. 2013;78:614–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Frankfurt M, Gould E, Woolley CS, McEwen BS. Gonadal steroids modify dendritic spine density ventromedial hypothalamic neurons: a Golgi study in the adult rat. Neuroendocrinology. 1990;51:530–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    de Castilhos J, Forti CD, Achaval M, Rasia-Filho AA. Dendritic spine density of posterodorsal medial amygdala neurons can be affected by gonadectomy and sex steroid manipulations in adult rats: a Golgi study. Brain Res. 2008;1240:73–81.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Rasia-Filho AA, Dalpian F, Menezes IC, Brusco J, Moreira JE, Cohen RS. Dendritic spines of the medial amygdala: plasticity, density, shape, and subcellular modulation by sex steroids. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:985–1011.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Woolley CS, McEwen BS. Estradiol mediates fluctuation in hippocampal synapse density during the estrous cycle in the adult rat. J Neurosci. 1992;25:49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Woolley CS, McEwen BS. Roles of estradiol and progesterone in regulation of hippocampal dendritic spine density during the estrous cycle in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1993;336(2):293–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Protopopescu X, Butler T, Pan H, Root J, Alternus M, Polanecsky M, et al. Hippocampal structural changes across the menstrual cycle. Hippocampus. 2008;18:985–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Pletzer B, Kronbichler M, Aichhorn M, Bergmann J, Ladurner G, Kerschbaum MM. Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use modulate human brain structure. Brain Res. 2010;1348:55–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Lisofsky N, Mårtensson J, Eckert A, Lindenberger U, Gallinat J, Kühn S. Hippocampal volume and functional connectivity changes during the female menstrual cycle. NeuroImage. 2015;118:154–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Pletzer B, Harris TA, Hidalgo-Lopez E. Subcortical structural changes along the menstrual cycle: beyond the hippocampus. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16042.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Qiu LR, Germann J, Spring S, Alm C, Vousden DA, Palmert MR, et al. Hippocampal volumes differ across the mouse estrous cycle, can change within 24 hours, and associate with cognitive strategies. Neuroimage. 2013;83:593–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Blume SR, Freedberg M, Vantrease JE, Chan R, Padival M, Record MJ, et al. Sex- and estrus-dependent differences in rat basolateral amygdala. J Neurosci. 2017;37(44):10567–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Dietrich T, Krings T, Neulen J, Willmes K, Erberich S, Thron A, et al. Effects of blood estrogen level on cortical activation patterns during cognitive activation as measured by functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2001;13(3):425–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Zhu X, Kelly TH, Curry TE Jr, Lal C, Joseph JE. Altered functional brain asymmetry for mental rotation: effect of estradiol changes across the menstrual cycle. Neuroreport. 2015;26(14):814–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Bayer J, Gläscher J, Finsterbusch J, Schulte LH, Sommer T. Linear and inverted U-shaped dose-response functions describe estrogen effects on hippocampal activity in young women. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1220.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Leranth C, Petnehazy O, MacLusky NJ. Gonadal hormones affect spine synaptic density in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of male rats. J Neurosci. 2003;23(5):1588–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    MacLusky NJ, Hajszan T, Leranth C. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and flutamide on hippocampal CA1 spine synapse density in male and female rats: implications for the role of androgens in maintenance of hippocampal structure. Endocrinology. 2004;145:4154–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Spritzer MD, Galea LAM. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, but not estradiol, enhance survival of new hippocampal neurons in adult male rats. Devel Neurobiol. 2007;67(10):1321–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Duarte-Guterman P, Hamson D, Wainwright S, Chow C, Chaiton J, Lieblich SE, et al. Androgens enhance adult hippocampal neurogenesis in males but not females in an age-dependent manner. bioRxiv. 2019;539296.

  99. 99.

    MacLusky NJ, Hajszan T, Johansen JA, Jordan CL, Leranth C. Androgen effects on hippocampal CA1 spine synapse numbers are retained in Tfm male rats with defective androgen receptors. Endocrinology. 2006;147(5):2392–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Hatanaka Y, Hojo Y, Mukai H, Murakami G, Komatsuzaki Y, Kim J, et al. Rapid increases of spines by dihydrotestosterone and testosterone in hippocampal neurons: dependence on synaptic androgen receptor and kinase networks. Brain Res. 2015;1621:121–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Murakami G, Tsurugizawa T, Hatanaka Y, Komatsuzaki Y, Tanabe N, Mukai H, et al. Comparison between basal and apical dendritic spines in estrogen-induced spinogenesis in CA1 principal neurons in adult hippocampus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;351:553–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Mukai H, Tsurugizawa T, Murakami G, Kominami S, Ishii H, Ogiue-Ikeda M, et al. Rapid modulation of long-term depression and spinogenesis via synaptic estrogen receptors in hippocampal principal neurons. J Neurochem. 2007;100(4):950–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Jacome LF, Barateli K, Buitrago D, Lema F, Frankfurt M, Luine VN. Gonadal hormones rapidly enhance spatial memory and increase hippocampal spine density in male rats. Endocrinology. 2016;157(4):1357–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Kow L-M, Pfaff DW. Rapid estrogen actions on ion channels: a survey in search for mechanisms. Steroids. 2016;111:46–53.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Laredo SA, Landeros RV, Trainor BC. Rapid effects of estrogens on behavior: environmental modulation and molecular mechanisms. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35(4):447–58.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Srivastava DP, Woolfrey KM, Penzes P. Insights into rapid modulation of neuroplasticity by brain estrogens. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65:1318–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    MacLusky NJ, Luine VN, Hajszan T, Leranth C. The 17alpha and 17beta isomers of estradiol both induce rapid spine synapse formation in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of ovariectomized female rats. Endocrinology. 2005;146(1):287–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Luine VN, Jacome LF, Maclusky NJ. Rapid enhancement of visual and place memory by estrogens in rats. Endocrinology. 2003;144(7):2836–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Frick KM, Fernandez SM, Bennett JC, Prange-Kiel J, MacLusky NJ, Leranth C. Behavioral training interferes with the ability of gonadal hormones to increase CA1 spine synapse density in ovariectomized female rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;18(11):3026–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Chu X, Gagnidze K, Pfaff D, Ågmo A. Estrogens, androgens and generalized behavioral arousal in gonadectomized female and male C57BL/6 mice. Physiol Behav. 2015;147:255–63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Balthazart J, Choleris E, Remage-Healey L. Steroids and the brain: 50 years of research, conceptual shifts and the ascent of non-classical and membrane-initiated actions. Horm Behav. 2018;99:1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Srivastava DP, Woolfrey KM, Jones KA, Shum CY, Lash LL, Swanson GT, et al. Rapid enhancement of two-step wiring plasticity by estrogen and NMDA receptor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2008;105(38):14650–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Sellers KJ, Erli F, Raval P, Watson IA, Chen D, Srivastava DP. Rapid modulation of synaptogenesis and spinogenesis by 17β-estradiol in primary cortical neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:137.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Lymer JM, Sheppard PAS, Kuun T, Blackman A, Jani N, Mahbub S, et al. Estrogens and their receptors in the medial amygdala facilitate social recognition in female mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;89:30–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Fan L, Zhao Z, Orr PT, Chambers CH, Lewis MC, Frick KM. Estradiol-induced object memory consolidation in middle-aged female mice requires dorsal hippocampal extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4390–400.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Fernandez SM, Lewis MC, Pechenino AS, Harburger LL, Orr PT, Gresack JE, et al. Estradiol-induced enhancement of object memory consolidation involves hippocampal ERK activation and membrane-bound estrogen receptors. J Neurosci. 2008;28(35):8660–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Fortress AM, Fan L, Orr PT, Zhao Z, Frick KM. Estradiol-induced object recognition memory consolidation is dependent on activation of mTOR signaling in the dorsal hippocampus. Learn Mem. 2013;20(3):147–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Holmes MM, Wide JK, Galea LA. Low levels of estradiol facilitate, whereas high levels of estradiol impair, working memory performance on the radial arm maze. Behav Neurosci. 2002;116(5):928–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Lewis MC, Kerr KM, Orr PT, Frick KM. Estradiol-induced enhancement of object memory consolidation involves NMDA receptors and protein kinase A in the dorsal hippocampus of female C57BL/6 mice. Behav Neurosci. 2008;122(3):716–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Packard MG, Teather LA. Intra-hippocampal estradiol infusion enhances memory in ovariectomized rats. Neuroreport. 1997;8(14):3009–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Packard MG, Teather LA. Posttraining estradiol injections enhance memory in ovariectomized rats: cholinergic blockade and synergism. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1997;68(2):172–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Zhao ZR, Fan L, Frick KM. Epigenetic alterations regulate estradiol-induced enhancement of memory consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2010;107(12):5605–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Stuchlik A. Dynamic learning and memory, synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis: an update. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Cowan N. What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:323–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Kandel ER, Dudai Y, Mayford MR. The molecular and systems biology of memory. Cell. 2014;157(1):163–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Olton DS, Becker J, Handelmann GE. Hippocampus, space, and memory. Behav Brain Sci. 1979;2(3):313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv. 1974;8:47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Bizon JL, LaSarge CL, Montgomery KS, McDermott AN, Setlow B, Griffith WH. Spatial reference and working memory across the lifespan of male Fischer 344 rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(4):646–55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Moser E, Moser MB, Andersen P. Spatial learning impairment parallels the magnitude of dorsal hippocampal lesions, but is hardly present following ventral lesions. J Neurosci. 1993;13:3916–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Kjelstrup KG, Tuvnes FA, Steffenach H-A, Murison R, Moser EI, Moser M-B. Reduced fear expression after lesions of the ventral hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2002;99:10825–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Nott A, Levin ED. Dorsal hippocampal α7 and α4β2 nicotinic receptors and memory. Brain Res. 2006;1081:72–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Yagi S, Chow C, Lieblich SE, Galea LAM. Sex and strategy use matters for pattern separation, adult neurogenesis, and immediate early gene expression in the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2016;26(1):87–101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Eichenbaum H, Dudchenko P, Wood E, Shapiro M, Tanila H. The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron. 1999;23(2):209–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus. 2007;17(9):898–908.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Bird CM, Burgess N. The hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:182–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Moscovitch M, Cabeza R, Winocur G, Nadel L. Episodic memory and beyond: the hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:105–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Wide JK, Hanratty K, Ting J, Galea LA. High level estradiol impairs and low level estradiol facilitates non-spatial working memory. Behav Brain Res. 2004;155(1):45–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Hampson E. Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1990;15(2):97–111.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Frye C. Estrus-associated decrements in water maze task are limited to acquisition. Physiol Behav. 1995;57:5–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Jacome LF, Gautreaux C, Inagaki T, Mohan G, Alves S, Lubbers LS, et al. Estradiol and ERβ agonists enhance recognition memory, and DPN, an ERβ agonist, alters brain monoamines. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010;94(4):488–98.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Warren SG, Juraska JM. Spatial and nonspatial learning across the rat estrous cycle. Behav Neurosci. 1997;111(2):259–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Holtmaat AJ, Trachtenberg JT, Wilbrecht L, Shepherd GM, Zhang X, Knott GW, et al. Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo. Neuron. 2005;45(2):279–91.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Lai K-O, Jordan BA, Ma X-M, Srivastava DP, Tolias KF. Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine development and plasticity. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:2078121.

  144. 144.

    Lai K-O, Ip NY. Structural plasticity of dendritic spines: the underlying mechanisms and its dysregulation in brain disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta, Mol Basis Dis. 2013;1832(12):2257–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Dent EW, Merriam EB, Hu X. The dynamic cytoskeleton: backbone of dendritic plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21(1):175–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361(6407):31–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Cooke SF, Bliss TV. Plasticity in the human central nervous system. Brain. 2006;129(7):1659–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Barabás K, Godó S, Lengyel F, Ernszt D, Pál J, Ábrahám IM. Rapid non-classical effects of steroids on the membrane receptor dynamics and downstream signaling in neurons. Horm Behav. 2018;104:183–91.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Fernandez SM, Frick KM. Chronic oral estrogen affects memory and neurochemistry in middle-aged female mice. Behav Neurosci. 2004;118(6):1340–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Galea LA, Wide JK, Paine TA, Holmes MM, Ormerod BK, Floresco SB. High levels of estradiol disrupt conditioned place preference learning, stimulus response learning and reference memory but have limited effects on working memory. Behav Brain Res. 2001;126(1-2):115–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Chesler EJ, Juraska JM. Acute administration of estrogen and progesterone impairs the acquisition of the spatial Morris water maze in ovariectomized rats. Horm Behav. 2000;38(4):234–42.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Gholizadeh S, Sadatmahalleh SJ, Ziaei S. The association between estradiol levels and cognitive function in postmenopausal women. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2018;16(7):455–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Warren SG, Humphreys AG, Juraska JM, Greenough WT. LTP varies across the estrous cycle: enhanced synaptic plasticity in proestrus rats. Brain Res. 1995;703:26–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Smejkalova T, Woolley CS. Estradiol acutely potentiates hippocampal excitatory synaptic transmission through a presynaptic mechanism. J Neurosci. 2010;30(48):16137–48.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Terasawa E, Timiras PS. Electrical activity during the estrous cycle of the rat: cyclic changes in limbic structures. Endocrinology. 1968;83(2):207–16.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Buterbaugh GG, Hudson GM. Estradiol replacement to female rats facilitates dorsal hippocampal but not ventral hippocampal kindled seizure acquisition. Exp Neurol. 1991;111(1):55-64.

  157. 157.

    Wong M, Moss RL. Long-term and short-term electrophysiological effects of on the synaptic properties of hippocampal CA1 neurons. J Neurosci. 1992;12(8):3217–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Verrotti A, D’Egidio C, Agostinelli S, Verrotti C, Pavone P. Diagnosis and management of catamenial seizures: a review. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:535–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:365–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Yagi S, Galea LAM. Sex differences in hippocampal cognition and neurogenesis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:200–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Luine VN. Estradiol and cognitive function: past, present and future. Horm Behav. 2014;66(4):602–18.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Inagaki T, Gautreaux C, Luine V. Acute estrogen treatment facilitates recognition memory consolidation and alters monoamine levels in memory-related brain areas. Horm Behav. 2010;58(3):415–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Galea LAM, Kavaliers M, Ossenkopp K-P, Hampson E. Gonadal hormone levels and spatial learning performance in Morris water maze in male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Horm Behav. 1995;29(1):106–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Galea LAM, Ormerod BK, Sampath S, Kostaras X, Wilkie DM, Phelps MT. Spatial working memory and hippocampal size across pregnancy in rats. Horm Behav. 2000;37:86–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Barha CK, Dalton GL, Galea LA. Low doses of 17α-estradiol and 17β-estradiol facilitate, whereas higher doses of estrone and 17α- and 17β-estradiol impair, contextual fear conditioning in adult female rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(2):547–59.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    González-Burgos I, Riviera-Cervantes MC, Velázquez-Zamora DA, Feria-Velasco A, Garcia-Segura LM. Selective estrogen receptor modulators regulate dendritic spine plasticity in the hippocampus of male rats. Neural Plast. 2012;2012:309494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Ervin KS, Mulvale E, Gallagher N, Roussel V, Choleris E. Activation of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, but not estrogen receptor α or β, rapidly enhances social learning. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;58:51–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Gonzales RB, DeLeon Galvan CJ, Rangel YM, Claiborne BJ. Distribution of thorny excrescences on CA3 pyramidal neurons in the rat hippocampus. J Comp Neurol. 2001;430(3):357–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Tsurugizawa T, Mukai H, Tanabe N, Murakami G, Hojo Y, Kominami S, et al. Estrogen induces rapid decrease in dendritic thorns in CA3 pyramidal neurons in adult male rat hippocampus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;337:1345–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Ethell IM, Pasquale EB. Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine development and remodeling. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;75:161–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Halpain S. Actin and the agile spine: how and why do dendritic spines dance? Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:141–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Rudy JW. Actin dynamics and the evolution of the memory trace. Brain Res. 2015;1621:17–28.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Schubert V, Dotti CG. Transmitting on actin: synaptic control of dendritic architecture. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:205–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Briz V, Baudry M. Estrogen regulates protein synthesis and actin polymerization in hippocampal neurons through different molecular mechanisms. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Flamini MI, Sanchez AM, Goglia L, Tosi V, Genazzani AR, Simoncini T. Differential actions of estrogen and SERMs in regulation of the actin cytoskeleton of endometrial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15(10):675–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Kramár EA, Chen LY, Brandon NJ, Rex CS, Liu F, Gall CM, et al. Cytoskeletal changes underlie estrogen’s acute effects on synaptic transmission and plasticity. J Neurosci. 2009;29(41):12982–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Kumar V, Zhang MX, Swank MW, Kunz J, Wu GY. Regulation of dendritic morphogenesis Ras-PI3K-Akt-mTOR and Ras-MAPK signaling pathways. J Neurosci. 2005;25(49):11288–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Kim J, Schalk JC, Koss WA, Frick KM. The role of actin polymerization in GPER-mediated hippocampal memory enhancement in female mice. Neuroscience 2017 Abstracts. 2017;159.04.

  179. 179.

    Bramham CR, Wells DG. Dendritic mRNA: transport, translation and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:776–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Bourtchouladze R, Abel T, Berman N, Gordon R, Lapidus K, Kandel ER. Different training procedures recruit either one or two critical periods for contextual memory consolidation, each of which requires protein synthesis and PKA. Learn Mem. 1998;5:365–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Schafe GE, Ledoux JE. Memory consolidation of auditory Pavlovian fear conditioning requires protein synthesis and protein kinase A in the amygdala. J Neurosci. 2000;20:RC96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Quevado J, Vianna MRM, Martins MR, Barichello T, Medina JH, Roesler R, et al. Protein synthesis, PKA, and MAP kinase are differentially involved in short- and long-term memory in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2004;154(2):339–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Rossato JI, Bevilaqua LRM, Myskiw JC, Medina JH, Izquierdo I, Cammarota M. On the role of hippocampal protein synthesis in the consolidation and reconsolidation of object recognition memory. Learn Mem. 2007;14:36–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Artinian J, McGauran AM, De Jaeger X, Mouledous L, Frances B, Roullet P. Protein degradation, as with protein synthesis, is required during not only long-term spatial memory consolidation but also reconsolidation. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:3009–19.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Moguel-Gonzalez M, Gomez-Palacio-Schjetnan A, Escobar ML. BDNF reverses the CTA memory deficits produced by inhibition of protein synthesis. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;90:584–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Kwapis JL, Jarome TJ, Schiff JC, Helmstetter FJ. Memory consolidation in both trace and delay fear conditioning is disrupted by intra-amygdala infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin. Learn Mem. 2011;18:728–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Sutton MA, Schuman EM. Dendritic protein synthesis, synaptic plasticity, and memory. Cell. 2006;127:49–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Abraham WC, William JM. LTP maintenance and its protein synthesis-dependence. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;89:260–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Jarome TJ, Helmstetter FJ. Protein degradation and protein synthesis in long-term memory formation. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7:61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Noteboom WD, Gorski J. An early effect of estrogen on protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1963;50(2):250–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Gorski J, Deangelo AB, Barnea A. Estrogen action: the role of specific RNA and protein synthesis. In: McKerns KW, editor. The sex steroids: molecular mechanisms. New York: Meredith; 1971. p. 181–95.

    Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Nilsson S, Mäkelä S, Treuter E, Tujague M, Thomsen J, Andersson G, et al. Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(4):1535–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Sarkar SN, Smith LT, Logan SM, Simpkins JW. Estrogen-induced activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling triggers dendritic resident mRNA translation. Neuroscience. 2010;170(4):1080–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Sellers K, Raval P, Srivastava DP. Molecular signature of rapid estrogen regulation of synaptic connectivity and cognition. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2015;36:72–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Waters EM, Mitterling K, Spencer JL, Mazid S, McEwen BS, Milner TA. Estrogen receptor alpha and beta specific agonists regulate expression of synaptic protein in rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2009;1290:1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Brake WG, Alves SE, Dunlop JC, Lee SJ, Bulloch K, Allen PB, et al. Novel target sites for estrogen action in the dorsal hippocampus: an examination of synaptic proteins. Endocrinology. 2001;142:1284–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Lee SJ, Romeo RD, Svenningsson P, Campomanes CR, Allen PB, Greengard P, et al. Estradiol affects spinophilin protein differently in gonadectomized males and females. Neuroscience. 2004;127:983–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Lee SJ, Campomanes CR, Sikat PT, Greenfield AT, Allen PB, McEwen BS. Estrogen induces phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element binding (pCREB) in primary hippocampal cells in a time-dependent manner. Neuroscience. 2004;124:549–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Velázquez-Zamora DA, González-Tapia D, González-Ramírez MM, Flores-Soto ME, Vázquez-Valls E, Cervantes M, et al. Plastic changes in dendritic spines of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons from ovariectomized rats after estradiol treatment. Brain Res. 2012;1470:1–10.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Akama KT, McEwen BS. Estrogen stimulates postsynaptic density-95 synthesis via the Akt/protein kinase B pathway. J Neurosci. 2003;23(6):2333–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Galea LA. Gonadal hormone modulation of neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult male and female rodents. Brain Res Rev. 2008;57(2):332–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    van Praag H, Schinder AF, Christie BR, Toni N, Palmer TD, Gage FH. Functional neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Nature. 2002;415:1030–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Snyder JS, Kee N, Wojtowicz JM. Effects of adult neurogenesis on synaptic plasticity in the rat dentate gyrus. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(6):2423–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Sorrells SF, Paredes MF, Cebrian-Silla A, Sandoval K, Qi D, Kelley KW, et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. Nature. 2018;555:377–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Dennis CV, Suh LS, Rodriguez ML, Kril JJ, Sutherland GT. Human adult neurogenesis across the ages: an immunohistochemical study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2016;42:621–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Knoth R, Singec I, Ditter M, Pantazis G, Capetian P, Meyer RP, et al. Murine features of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus across the lifespan from 0 to 100 years. PloS One. 2010;5(1):e8809.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Kornack DR, Rakic P. Continuation of neurogenesis in the hippocampus of the adult macaque monkey. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1999;96:5768–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Eckenhoff MF, Rakic P. Nature and fate of proliferative cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus during the life span of the rhesus monkey. J Neurosci. 1988;8:2729–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, Simeon LR, Pavlova I, Poposka V, et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(4):589–99.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, Alborn AM, Nordborg C, Peterson DA, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med. 1998;4(11):1313–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Epp JR, Beasley CL, Galea LAM. Increased hippocampal neurogenesis and p21 expression in depression: dependent on antidepressants, sex, age, and antipsychotic exposure. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(11):2297–306.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Spalding KL, Bergmann O, Alkass K, Bernard S, Salehpour M, Huttner HB, et al. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell. 2013;153(6):1219–27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    Kuhn HG, Dickinson-Anson H, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J Neurosci. 1996;16(6):2027–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    Kempermann G, Gage FH, Aigner L, Song H, Curtis MA, Thuret S, et al. Human adult neurogenesis: evidence and remaining questions. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(1):25–30.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    Tartt AN, Fulmore CA, Liu Y, Rosoklija GB, Dwork AJ, Arango V, et al. Considerations for assessing the extent of hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult and aging human brain. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(6):782–3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    Paredes MF, Sorrells SF, Cebrian-Silla A, Sandoval K, Qi D, Kelley KW, et al. Does adult neurogenesis persist in the human hippocampus? Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(6):780–1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Snyder JS. Recalibrating the relevance of adult neurogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 2019;1479:1–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Barha CK, Lieblich SE, Galea LAM. Different forms of oestrogen rapidly upregulate cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus of adult female rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 2009;21:155–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Ormerod BK, Galea LA. Reproductive status influences cell proliferation and cell survival in the dentate gyrus of adult female meadow voles: a possible regulatory role for estradiol. Neuroscience. 2001;102(2):369–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Ormerod BK, Lee TT, Galea LA. Estradiol enhances neurogenesis in the dentate gyri of adult male meadow voles by increasing the survival of young granule neurons. Neuroscience. 2004;128(3):645–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Meltzer LA, Yabaluri R, Deisseroth K. A role for circuit homeostasis in adult neurogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 2004;28(12):653–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    Kuipers SD, Bramham CR, Cameron HA, Fitzsimons CP, Korosi A, Lucassen PJ. Environmental control of adult neurogenesis: from hippocampal homeostasis to behavior and disease. Neural Plast. 2014;2014:808643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Ormerod BK, Lee TT, Galea LA. Estradiol initially enhances but subsequently suppresses (via adrenal steroids) granule cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus of adult female rats. J Neurobiol. 2003;55(2):247–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Mazzucco CA, Lieblich SE, Bingham BI, Williamson MA, Viau V, Galea LA. Both estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta agonists enhance cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus of adult female rats. Neuroscience. 2006;141(4):1793–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Ormerod BK, Falconer EM, Galea LA. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity and estradiol: separate regulation of cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus of adult female meadow vole. J Endocrinol. 2003;179(2):155–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Duarte-Guterman P, Lieblich SE, Chow C, Galea LA. Estradiol and GPER activation differentially affect cell proliferation but not GPER expression in the hippocampus of adult female rats. PloS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0129880.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    Tanapat P, Hastings NB, Reeves AJ, Gould E. Estrogen stimulates a transient increase in the number of new neurons in the dentate gyrus of the adult female rat. J Neurosci. 1999;19(14):5792–801.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    Rummel J, Epp JR, Galea LA. Estradiol does not influence strategy choice but place strategy choice is associated with increased cell proliferation in the hippocampus of female rats. Horm Behav. 2010;58(4):582–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Lagace DC, Fischer SJ, Eisch AJ. Gender and endogenous levels of estradiol do not influence adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Hippocampus. 2007;17(3):175–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Barha CK, Galea LAM. The hormone therapy, Premarin, impairs hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory and reduces activation of new granule neurons in response to memory in female rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:986–1004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    McClure RE, Barha CK, Galea LA. 17β-Estradiol, but not estrone, increases the survival and activation of new neurons in the hippocampus in response to spatial memory in adult female rats. Horm Behav. 2013;63(1):144–57.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Barker JM, Galea LA. Repeated estradiol administration alters different aspects of neurogenesis and cell death in the hippocampus of female, but not male, rats. Neuroscience. 2008;152(4):888–902.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Galea LAM, Roes MM, Diemech CJ, Chow C, Mahmoud R, Lieblich SE, et al. Premarin has opposing effects on spatial learning, neural activation, and serum cytokine levels in middle-aged female rats depending on reproductive history. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;70:291–307.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Mahmoud R, Duarte-Guterman P, Lieblich SE, Wong SJ, Chaiton JA, Chow C, et al. Neuroplastic and neuroimmune correlates of chronic stress exposure in female mice: modulatory roles of estrogen receptor subtypes. Neuroscience 2018 Abstracts. 2018;234.04.

  235. 235.

    Barha CK, Galea LA. Motherhood alters the cellular response to estrogens in the hippocampus later in life. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(11):2091–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Hamson DK, Wainwright SR, Taylor JR, Jones BA, Watson NV, Galea LA. Androgens increase survival of adult-born neurons in the dentate gyrus by an androgen receptor-dependent mechanism in male rats. Endocrinology. 2013;154(9):3294–304.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Gobinath A, Choleris E, Galea LAM. Sex, hormones, and genotype interact to influence psychiatric disease, treatment and behavioral research. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:50–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


The writing of this review was supported by the University of British Columbia Faculty of Arts and the University of Guelph College of Social and Applied Human Sciences. The authors’ empirical work described was supported by grants to LAMG from Canadian Institutes for Health Research (MOP102568) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (203596-13) and to EC from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (400212).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information




Primary draft by PASS. Neurogenesis section by LAMG. Revisions by PASS, LAMG, and EC, amended by PASS. All authors have read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liisa A. M. Galea.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheppard, P.A.S., Choleris, E. & Galea, L.A.M. Structural plasticity of the hippocampus in response to estrogens in female rodents. Mol Brain 12, 22 (2019).

Download citation


  • Neurogenesis
  • dendritic spines
  • sex differences
  • memory
  • depression
  • stress
  • aging
  • pregnancy
  • parity