Open Access

Postnatal maintenance of the 5-Ht1a-Pet1 autoregulatory loop by serotonin in the raphe nuclei of the brainstem

Molecular Brain20147:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-7-48

Received: 14 April 2014

Accepted: 24 June 2014

Published: 28 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Despite the importance of 5-HT1A as a major target for the action of several anxiolytics/antidepressant drugs, little is known about its regulation in central serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) neurons.

Results

We report that expression of 5-HT1A and the transcription factor Pet1 was impaired in the rostral raphe nuclei of mice lacking tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (Tph2) after birth. The downregulation of Pet1 was recapitulated in 5-Ht1a -/- mice. Using an explant culture system, we show that reduction of Pet1 and 5-HT1A was rescued in Tph2 -/- brainstem by exogenous 5-HT. In contrast, 5-HT failed to rescue reduced expression of Pet1 in 5-Ht1a -/- brainstem explant culture.

Conclusions

These results suggest a causal relationship between 5-HT1A and Pet1, and reveal a potential mechanism by which 5-HT1A-Pet1 autoregulatory loop is maintained by 5-HT in a spatiotemporal-specific manner during postnatal development. Our results are relevant to understanding the pathophysiology of certain psychiatric and developmental disorders.

Keywords

Mouse Serotonin 5-HT1A Pet1 Tph2 Development Autoregulatory loop

Background

Central serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) neurons are composed of a cluster of nine groups (B1-9) located in the raphe nuclei and in the reticular formation of the brainstem: The caudal serotoninergic neurons (B1-3) project to the spinal cord and modulate sensory transmission, whereas the rostral serotonergic neurons (B4-9) project to the brain and modulate a wide spectrum of behaviors [1, 2]. The development of the central 5-HT system in rodents is subjected to a highly coordinated regulation of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors [3, 4]. After the establishment of the central serotonergic system, a matured neurotransmitter phenotype manifested by the persistent expression of a myriad of transcription factors, enzymes, and synaptic proteins is maintained through mechanisms that are yet to be elucidated. Conceivably, an impaired maintenance of 5-HT neuronal phenotype may contribute to abnormal physiologic function and the etiology of psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety and schizophrenia [59].

Molecular and genetic studies of mouse mutants have identified several transcription factors important for the specification and acquisition of the central 5-HT neuronal phenotype [1012]. In postmitotic serotoninergic neurons, Pet1, Gata3 and Lmx1b have been shown to regulate differentiation and survival of central 5-HT neurons because their deletion invariably results in a loss of 5-HT and the failure of 5-HT neurons to survive, either completely or partially [1315]. On the other hand, the persistent expression of these transcription factors in serotonergic neurons during postnatal stages raises the possibility that they may be necessary for maintaining the 5-HT neurotransmitter phenotype during postnatal stage.

Serotonin exerts its function through a complex 5-HT receptor system comprised of at least 14 receptors, including several autoreceptors [1618]. Many of 5-HT receptors show distinct spatiotemporal expression patterns in the brain, and the function of a 5-HT receptor may vary depending on where and when it is expressed. For example, 5-HT1A mediates anxiety behavior through its expression in the cortex during the early postnatal life rather than in adult stage [19, 20]. A recent study has shown that altered expression of 5-HT1A autoreceptor without changing postsynaptic 5-HT1A has major impacts in physiological processes and animal behaviors [21]. Although overwhelming studies have been focused on 5-HT heteroreceptors, the role of 5-HT and its autoreceptors in the development and maintenance of central 5-HT neurons is poorly understood. We previously generated Lmx1b f/f/p conditional knockout mice in which Lmx1b is specifically deleted in cells expressing transcription factor Pet1, a transcription factor exclusively expressed in central 5-HT neurons [22, 23]. LMX1B is a LIM homoeodomain-containing transcription factor, which is required for the development of all central serotonergic neurons during embryogenesis [13, 24]. Because loss of Lmx1b results in the loss of 5-HT as well as all central 5-HT neurons in Lmx1b f/f/p mice at later stage [22], it is impossible to examine the requirement for 5-HT in the development of 5-HT neurons. To circumvent this problem, we have generated and analyzed mice lacking tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2), an enzyme essential for synthesizing 5-HT in the brain [25]. Although 5-HT appears to be dispensable for the development of central 5-HT neurons during embryogenesis, we found that it is important for maintaining the differentiated 5-HT neurotransmitter phenotype after birth.

Results

Normal generation and migration of presumptive central serotonergic neurons in Tph2 -/- mice

To generate Tph2 -/- mice, two loxP sites were inserted to flank the exon 5 that encodes eukaryotic tryptophan hydroxylase domain essential for 5-HT synthesis (Figure 1A). The deletion of the Tph2 exon 5 would generate a truncated non-functional protein. After electroporation with the targeting vector, several targeted ES cell clones were identified, and the germline transmission was obtained (Figure 1B). Actb cre mice were mated with Tph2 f/+ mice to inactivate Tph2 in the germline, and Tph2 +/- and Tph2 -/- mice were born at the expected mendelian ratio. Tph2 -/- mice showed decreased body weight and size relative to wild-type littermates beginning at postnatal day 6 (P6) and by 6 weeks of age all mutant mice showed normal body weight (Figure 1C). The body weight increase profile of our mutant mice is consistent with a recent study [26], but different from another report [27]. All Tph2 -/- mice in C57BL/6/129 background survived to the adulthood. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed no presence of 5-HT in the raphe nuclei and spinal cord of Tph2 -/- mice, whereas expression of 5-HT in the peripheral tissues was normal (Figure 1D). The absence of Tph2 expression in Tph2 -/- mice was confirmed (Figure 1E). These data demonstrated that Tph2 is the sole enzyme responsible for 5-HT synthesis in the brain, consistent with other reports [2830]. To determine whether a loss of 5-HT may impair 5-HT neuronal differentiation, several molecular markers were examined in wild-type and Tph2 -/- mice. In situ hybridization studies of serotonin transporter (Sert) [31] revealed neither the expression pattern nor the number of Sert + cells in the rostral raphe nuclei in Tph2 -/- mice was affected by the absence of 5-HT (Figure 1E). Expression of the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene (AADC) and vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) was also comparable between wild-type and Tph2 -/- hindbrain (Figure 1E). These results indicated the normal presence of presumptive 5-HT neurons in Tph2 -/- mice, and 5-HT is required neither for the migration nor for the survival of central 5-HT neurons, in line with recent findings that showed normal expression of differentiation markers in Tph2 -/- mice [27].
Figure 1

Generation and characterization of Tph2 -/- mice. (A) Top: Schematic diagram of the genomic locus for the Tph2 gene. Middle: the gene-targeting construct. Bottom: targeted Tph2 allele. The black box denotes the coding exon. (B) Southern blot analysis of wild-type (Tph2+/+) and targeted ES clone (Tph2 f/+ ). Predicted size of the genomic fragments was detected. (C) Growing curve of male and female Tph2+/+ and Tph2 -/- mice from P1 to 8-week. (D) Anti-5-HT immunoreactivity in the dorsal raphe (left), spinal cord (middle) and intestine (right) of Tph2+/+ mice (upper row) and Tph2 -/- mice (lower row). (E) Images (left) and quantified data (right) to show in situ hybridization of Tph2, Sert, AADC and VMAT2 in Tph2+/+ and Tph2 -/- mice. Error bars represent SEM. n = 5. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Downregulation of Pet1 and Gata3 expression in the rostral raphe nulcei of Tph2 -/- mice

To further analyze the differentiation phenotype of presumptive 5-HT neurons, we examined the expression of transcription factors in the raphe nuclei of adult Tph2 -/- mice during embryonic and early postnatal development. At E17.5, Pet1 and Gata3 expression was indistinguishable between wild-type and Tph2 -/- hindbrain (Figures 2A, B, E17.5). Beginning at P0 the expression of Pet1 and Gata3 was significantly reduced in the rostral raphe nuclei of Tph2 -/- mice compared with wild-type mice (Figures 2A, B, P0), which persisted at adult stage (Figure 2A, B, 8-week). The expression of Pet1 and Gata3 remains unchanged in the caudal raphe nuclei (B1-3) of Tph2 -/- mice (Figure 2A, B). The expression pattern of LMX1B and the number of LMX1B+ cells were similar between wild-type and Tph2 -/- mice (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

The expression of Pet1 and Gata3 , but not LMX1B was decreased in the dorsal raphe nuclei of Tph2 -/- mice. (A and B) Expression of Pet1 (A) and Gata3 (B) detected by in situ hybridization in the dorsal and caudal raphe nuclei of Tph2+/+ mice and Tph2 -/- mice at embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5), postnatal day 0 (P0) and adult stages. (C) Immunohistochemistry images and quantified data to show LMX1B expression in the dorsal and caudal raphe nuclei of adult Tph2+/+ mice and Tph2 -/- mice. Error bars represent SEM. n = 6. *P < 0.05, versus Tph2+/+, unpaired t test. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Reduced expression of Pet1 but not Gata3 in 5-Ht1a -/- mice

The downregulation of Pet1 and Gata3 in Tph2 -/- mice suggests that their normal expression may be maintained by 5-HT via 5-HT autoreceptors. To examine this possibility, we first compared expression level of three 5-HT autoreceptors, 5-Ht1a, 5-Ht1b and 5-Ht1d, in the hindbrain of Tph2 +/+ mice and Tph2 -/- mice using real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). 5-Ht1a expression was significantly reduced in Tph2 -/- hindbrain relative to the control, while the expression of 5-Ht1b and 5-Ht1d was unaltered (Figure 3A). Immunostaining of 5-HT1A showed a reduction in the number of 5-HT1A+ cells (~25.7%) in B7-8 nuclei of Tph2 -/- mice compared with wild-type mice (Figure 3B, C). The expression of 5-HT1A was not affected in other brain regions of the Tph2 -/- mice (Figure 3B). These results suggest that 5-HT is involved in the regulation of 5-HT1A expression in a highly specific manner.
Figure 3

5-HT1A expression was decreased in the dorsal raphe nuclei of Tph2 -/- mice. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of 5Ht1a, 5Ht1b and 5Ht1d in Tph2+/+ and Tph2 -/- hindbrain. Tph2 mRNA level in the Tph2 -/- hindbrain was used as a negative control. Relative expression was quantified using 18S rRNA as reference gene. (B) Immunostaining of 5-HT1A in the dorsal raphe nucleus, cortex, polymorph layer dentate gyrus (PoDG), inferior colliculus central nucleus (ICc) and superior colliculus (SC) of Tph2+/+ mice and Tph2 -/- mice. (C) Quantification of 5-HT1A+ neurons in B7-8 raphe nucleus. Error bars represent SEM. n = 6. *P < 0.05, versus Tph2+/+, unpaired t test. Scale bars, 100 μm.

We next asked whether the maintenance of Pet1 and Gata3 expression depends on 5-HT1A by examining their expression in 5-Ht1a -/- mice [32]. Pet1 was significantly diminished in 5-Ht1a -/- mice relative to wild-type mice at P0 (approximately ~29.8% loss of Pet1 in B7-B8 nuclei) (Figure 4). Interestingly, Gata3 expression was normal in the raphe nuclei of 5-Ht1a -/- mice (Figure 4), and so were Tph2, AADC, VMAT2 and LMX1B (Figure 4A). These findings suggest that 5-HT can regulate Pet1, but not Gata3, through 5-Ht1a in the rostral raphe nuclei.
Figure 4

The expression of Pet1 but not Gata3 was decreased in 5Ht1a -/- mice. (A) In situ hybridization images to show the expression of Pet1, Gata3, Tph2, AADC and VMAT2 and immunostaining of LMX1B in the dorsal raphe nuclei of 5-Ht1a +/+ mice (upper row) and 5-Ht1a -/- mice (lower row). (B) Quantification of positive cells for Pet1 and Gata3 in B7-8 raphe nuclei. Error bars represent SEM. n = 6. *P < 0.05, versus 5-Ht1a +/+ , unpaired t test. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Exogenous 5-HT rescued the expression of Pet1 and 5-Ht1a in Tph2 -/- brainstem

To further test this possibility, we asked whether the downregulation of Pet1 in Tph2 -/- hindbrain would be rescued by 5-HT in Tph2 -/- mice, and if so, whether this rescue could be blocked by the 5-HT1A antagonist. Indeed, qRT-PCR analysis of Pet1 expression showed that the reduced expression of Pet1 was partially rescued in Tph2 -/- hindbrain explants by 5-HT (Figure 5A). Importantly, this rescued effect was abolished with the treatment of WAY-100635, a potent selective 5-HT1A antagonist [33]. In contrast, in 5-Ht1a -/- hindbrain explants, the expression level of Pet1 was neither significantly altered by 5-HT nor by a combined treatment of 5-HT and WAY-100635 (Figure 5A). Together, these results provide further evidence suggesting that 5-HT regulates Pet1 expression via 5-Ht1a.
Figure 5

The regulation of Pet1 and 5-Ht1a expression by 5-HT in brainstem explants. (A and B) The hindbrain explants of Tph2 -/- mice, 5-Ht1a -/- mice and their littermates wild-type mice were treated with 5-HT either alone or in combination with WAY-100635, and the expression level of Pet1 (A) and 5-Ht1a (B) was measured using qRT-PCR. Relative expression was quantified using 18S rRNA as reference gene. Error bars represent SEM. n = 5. *P < 0.05, versus Saline and #P < 0.05, versus 5-HT, one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis. (C) Diagram to show a 5-HT-dependent 5-Ht1a/Pet1 auto regulatory feedback loop.

We next assessed whether downregulation of 5-Ht1a expression in Tph2 -/- mice could be rescued by 5-HT using the explant culture. qRT-PCR analysis showed a significant increase in 5-Ht1a expression in Tph2 -/- hindbrain explants after treatment with 5-HT compared with the saline treatment (Figure 5B). Our data thus support the role of 5-HT in regulating 5-Ht1a expression.

Discussion

5-HT has long been postulated as an important signaling molecule necessary for regulating multiple developmental processes such as neurogenesis, differentiation, and survival of central 5-HT neurons [34, 35]. Although several recent studies have reported the physiological and developmental consequences resulting from an ablation of central serotonin by genetic deletion of Tph2 gene [2730], definite in vivo evidence for a developmental role of 5-HT is still lacking. In this study, we found that mice lacking central 5-HT exhibited normal position and numbers of presumptive 5-HT neurons in the raphe nuclei, indicating that 5-HT is dispensable for their migration and survival. Nonetheless, the early postnatal expression of Pet1, Gata3 and 5-Ht1a was significantly impaired in the mutants. Our studies thus for the first time uncover an important function of 5-HT in the maintenance of differentiation program of central 5-HT neurons.

Which receptor mediates the function of 5-HT to maintain the differentiated 5-HT neuronal phenotype? Several observations indicate that 5-HT functions via 5-HT1A to regulates Pet1, which in turn may control an appropriate expression of 5-HT1A in 5-HT neurons. First, Pet1 is significantly reduced in the rostral raphe nuclei of Tph2 -/- mice, and 5-Ht1a -/- mice recapitulate this phenotype. Second, decreased expression of Pet1 in Tph2 -/- mice was rescued by 5-HT treatment, whereas the same treatment failed to rescue Pet1 reduction in 5-Ht1a -/- mice. Third, previous studies identified at least one Pet1 binding site in the regulatory regions of both human and mouse 5-Ht1a[23, 36], suggesting that Pet1 can also act upstream of 5-Ht1a. It will be interesting to examine whether 5-Ht1a expression is regulated by Pet1 using Pet1 mutant mice. However, addressing this issue would be complicated by the possibility that Pet1 may regulate Tph2 (thus 5-HT level) and 5-Ht1a simultaneously. Our results are different from several recent studies which showed that expression of 5-Ht1a autoreceptor in dorsal raphe nuclei was slightly increased in Tph2 -/- mice [27] or remained the same [37]. Several factors may contribute to the discrepancies. First, different methods that have been employed (quantitative autoradiography vs. ISH and qRT-PCR). Second, different lines of Tph2 knockout mice may vary due to different genetic backgrounds. The postnatal growth profile of our Tph2 -/- mice is reminiscent of the one generated by another lab [30], with a catch-up in body weight at adult stage. In contrast, another line of Tph2 -/- mice exhibited lean body weight, even at the adult stage [27]. Finally, conditional Tph2 -/- mice showed low level of 5-HT due to incomplete deletion of Tph2[37]. Our Tph2 -/- mice completely lack 5-HT in the brainstem. In light of these differences, behavioral phenotype of various lines of Tph2 mutant mice ought to be carefully interpreted, given that expression of 5-ht1a autoreceptor is very sensitive to the 5-HT level. The normal growth of Tph2 -/- mice affords distinct advantage because exogenous administration of 5-HTP could fully restore a behavioral phenotype [38], thereby attributing the phenotype to lack of 5-HT instead of developmental changes. Recent analysis of these mutant mice also shed light on the role of 5-HT in the reward system [39]. Nevertheless, the present data provide the genetic, molecular and pharmacological evidence suggesting that 5-Ht1a and Pet1 may act in an autoregulatory feedback pathway, whose integrity is dependent on 5-HT (Figure 5C).

One notable finding is that the 5-HT-dependent maintenance program exhibits a highly regulated spatiotemporal specificity: its requirement is restricted only to postnatal rostral raphe nuclei. Given that distinct genetic mechanisms are likely to be recruited to coordinate spatiotemporal development of different subtypes of 5-HT neurons [40], the observation that the requirement for 5-HT-mediated transcriptional regulation is restricted to rostral raphe nuclei may underlie the heterogeneity of central 5-HT neurons. Our results suggest that the maintenance of the maturation and differentiation of 5-HT neurons invoke 5-HT-dependent and -independent molecular machineries. This heterogeneity is also manifested at transcriptional level. For example, we show that postnatal maintenance of Lmx1b is independent of Pet1 and Gata3, whereas Gata3 expression is independent of Pet1 in the rostral raphe nuclei. It is surprising that an impaired expression of Pet1 in postnatal 5-Ht1a -/- mice did not affect expression of several Pet1 binding site-containing terminal differentiation genes (e.g. Sert and VMAT2) which were downregulated in Pet1 -/- mice [14]. Perhaps other transcription factors such as Lmx1b may be required. Alternatively, a complete rather than a partial elimination of Pet1 may be necessary to reveal a full transcriptional requirement in the regulation of downstream effectors. The finding that Gata3 is down-regulated by the absence of 5-HT but not by 5-HT1A also suggests that several 5-HT autoreceptors coordinate to regulate transcription factor expression.

5-HT1A has emerged as a major target for pharmacological intervention against a wide spectrum of psychiatric diseases [4143]. In addition to its postsynaptic action, activation of 5-HT1A on the soma and dendrites of 5-HT neurons has been shown to inhibit the release of 5-HT as well as the firing rate of 5-HT neurons [44, 45]; Conversely, blockage or desensitization of 5-HT1A in 5-HT neurons enhances the firing rate of 5-HT neurons and/or the 5-HT signaling, a mechanism suggested to be partly underlie the actions of anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs [4648]. Importantly, a recent study showed that about 30% decrease of 5-HT1A in the raphe nuclei increased the firing rate of 5-HT neurons and subsequently impacted several aspects of animal behaviors including the responses of animals to antidepressants [21]. Our studies suggest that a normal 5-HT homeostasis is necessary for a full expression of 5-HT1A in the rostral raphe nuclei of the brainstem. An altered 5-Ht1a/Pet1 expression and regulation may impact other 5-HT autoreceptors and thereby contribute to the development of mood disorders (e.g. major depressive disorder, aggression and anxiety) [21, 42, 46, 47, 49, 50]. In this context, the identification of a 5-HT-dependent 5-Ht1a/Pet1 autoregulatory feedback loop (Figure 5C) required for maintaining appropriate 5-HT signaling and homeostasis in postnatal raphe nuclei is of important clinical implications for designing target-specific therapeutic intervention of these disorders.

Methods

Animals

5-Ht1a KO mice and Actb-cre mice were genotyped as previously described [32, 51]. Experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with policies of the National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Animal Studies Committee at Washington University School of Medicine.

Generation and genotyping of Tph2 -/- mice

Tph2 targeting vector was generated by bacterial recombineering approach as previously described [52]. Mouse genomic 129/SvJ DNA was obtained from Sanger Institute (UK). The PGK-neomycin-resistance (neo) and thymidine kinase (TK) cassette was inserted as a positive and negative drug selection marker. The linearized targeting plasmid was electroporated into AB1 ES cells. Correctly targeted ES cell clones identified by Southern blot analysis using external probes were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to generate chimeric mice. Male chimeras were mated with wild-type females to produce heterozygous mice. The primers used for PCR genotyping were 5′-GCAGCCAGTAGACGTCTCTTAC-3′, 5′-ACCACATTGACATACGGGTC-3′ and 5′-TGGGGCCTGCCGATAGTAACAC-3′ and 420 bp wild-type and 640 bp mutant bands were produced, respectively.

Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization

Immunohistochemical staining and in situ hybridization were performed as previously described [22]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with an overdose of ketamine, and fixed by intracardiac perfusion with cold PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. The brain, spinal cord and small intestine were immediately removed, postfixed in the same fixative overnight at 4°C and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose solution. Frozen tissue was sectioned at 20 μm thickness using a cryostat. Free-floating sections were blocked in a solution containing 2% donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were incubated with rabbit anti-5-HT (1:5,000, Immunostar), rabbit anti-5-HT1A (1:200, Santa Cruz) or rabbit anti-LMX1B (1:1,000,) antibodies overnight at 4°C followed by Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch). For the in situ hybridization study, a digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probe was used as described earlier [22]. Images were taken using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U microscope. Images of wild-type and knock-out mice were overlaid with the same plate and box of identical size was centered on a template image of the comparable rostrocaudal levels using the ventricle and midline nuclei as the reference point. All clearly visible cells with positive signals within this box were quantified using image J software. Four tissue sections per B nucleus were analyzed in each mouse.

qRT-PCR analysis

qRT-PCR was performed as previously described [53]. The defined area of the hindbrain was dissected out, and total RNA was isolated and genomic DNA was removed in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions (RNeasy plus mini kit; QIAGEN). Single strand cDNA was synthesized from RNA samples (2 μg) using SuperScriptII RT-PCR kit (Life Technologies) in reverse transcription reaction. Gene expression was determined by real-time PCR (StepOnePlus; Applied Biosystems). The primers used are:

Tph2 (NM_173391.3): 5′- GAGCTTGATGCCGACCAT-3′; 5′- TGGCCACATCCACAAAATAC-3′; amplicon size: 76 nt.

5-Ht1a (NM_008308.4): 5′-GCCCTGGAAGCAACACCTAA-3′; 5′-CTGCAAAAAGCACTGTCCCC -3′; amplicon size: 115 nt.

5-Ht1b (NM_010482.1): 5′-TCGTTGCCACCCTTCTTCTG-3′; 5′-CGTGGTCGGTGTTCACAAAG-3′; amplicon size: 76 nt.

5-Ht1d (NM_008309.4): 5′-GGGTCAATTCATCAAGAACACA-3′; 5′-GCTTGGAAGCTCTGAGGTGT-3′; amplicon size: 93 nt.

18S rRNA (NR_003278.3): 5′-AAACGGCTACCACATCCAAG -3′; 5′-CCTCCAATGGATCCTCGTTA -3′; amplicon size: 155 nt.

Real-time PCR was carried out with FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche Applied Science). All samples (0.1 μl) were assayed in duplicates. Thermal cycling was initiated with denaturation at 95°C for 10 min. After this initial step, 40 cycles of PCR (heating at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s) were performed. Data were analyzed using Comparative CT Method (StepOne Software v2.2.2.) and the expression of target mRNA was normalized to the expression of 18S rRNA.

Hindbrain explant culture

Hindbrain explant culture was performed as described [54]. Briefly, hindbrains from wild-type and knock-out mice at P0 were dissected out in cold Leibovitz’s medium (L15; Invitrogen) with 5% calf serum (Life Technologies). The explants were cultured for 1 h at 37°C in Neurobasal medium (Life Technologies) containing 1% calf-serum (Life Technologies), 0.5% B27 supplement (Life Technologies), 2 mM glutamine (Sigma) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies). Subsequently, the medium was replaced with serum-free medium and the explants were treated with 10 μM of 5-HT or 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 for 6 h. For the use of combination of WAY-100635 and 5-HT, the explants were pre-treated with WAY-100635 for 2 h before addition of 5-HT. 5-HT and WAY-100635 were dissolved in saline and the group with the saline treatment was used as the vehicle control.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as mean ± SEM and analyses were performed using Prism (version 5.03 GraphPad Software, Inc). Experimental groups were compared by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA of variance with post hoc analysis. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Abbreviations

5-HT: 

5-Hydroxytryptamine

TPH2: 

Tryptophan hydroxylase 2

SERT: 

Serotonin transporter

AADC: 

Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene

VMAT2: 

Vesicular monoamine transporter

qRT-PCR: 

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

TK: 

Thymidine kinase.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Yin for PCR genotyping, We are grateful for L. Tecott for providing us with 5-Ht1a KO mice and K. Tanaka for 5-Ht1a probe. The project was supported by a NIH grant to Z.F. Chen.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for the Study of Itch, Washington University School of Medicine
(2)
Departments of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine
(3)
Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine
(4)
Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine

References

  1. Jacobs BL, Azmitia EC: Structure and function of the brain serotonin system. Physiol Rev. 1992, 72 (1): 165-229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Azmitia ECW-A P: Anatomy, cell biology and plasticity of the serotonergic system. Psychopharmacology, The Fourth Generation of Progress. Edited by: Bloom FEaK D. 1995, New York: Raven Press, 443-449.Google Scholar
  3. Goridis C, Rohrer H: Specification of catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002, 3 (7): 531-541.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wylie CJ, Hendricks TJ, Zhang B, Wang L, Lu P, Leahy P, Fox S, Maeno H, Deneris ES: Distinct transcriptomes define rostral and caudal serotonin neurons. J Neurosci. 2010, 30 (2): 670-684.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger M, Gray JA, Roth BL: The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu Rev Med. 2009, 60: 355-366.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nemeroff CB, Owens MJ: The role of serotonin in the pathophysiology of depression: as important as ever. Clin Chem. 2009, 55 (8): 1578-1579.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrell D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet. 2004, 363 (9418): 1341-1345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobsen JP, Medvedev IO, Caron MG: The 5-HT deficiency theory of depression: perspectives from a naturalistic 5-HT deficiency model, the tryptophan hydroxylase 2Arg439His knockin mouse. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012, 367 (1601): 2444-2459.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lesch KP, Araragi N, Waider J, van den Hove D, Gutknecht L: Targeting brain serotonin synthesis: insights into neurodevelopmental disorders with long-term outcomes related to negative emotionality, aggression and antisocial behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012, 367 (1601): 2426-2443.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Alenina N, Bashammakh S, Bader M: Specification and differentiation of serotonergic neurons. Stem Cell Rev. 2006, 2 (1): 5-10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaspar P, Cases O, Maroteaux L: The developmental role of serotonin: news from mouse molecular genetics. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003, 4 (12): 1002-1012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacob J, Storm R, Castro DS, Milton C, Pla P, Guillemot F, Birchmeier C, Briscoe J: Insm1 (IA-1) is an essential component of the regulatory network that specifies monoaminergic neuronal phenotypes in the vertebrate hindbrain. Development. 2009, 136 (14): 2477-2485.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng L, Chen CL, Luo P, Tan M, Qiu M, Johnson R, Ma Q: Lmx1b, Pet-1, and Nkx2.2 coordinately specify serotonergic neurotransmitter phenotype. J Neurosci. 2003, 23 (31): 9961-9967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendricks TJ, Fyodorov DV, Wegman LJ, Lelutiu NB, Pehek EA, Yamamoto B, Silver J, Weeber EJ, Sweatt JD, Deneris ES: Pet-1 ETS gene plays a critical role in 5-HT neuron development and is required for normal anxiety-like and aggressive behavior. Neuron. 2003, 37 (2): 233-247.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pata I, Studer M, van Doorninck JH, Briscoe J, Kuuse S, Engel JD, Grosveld F, Karis A: The transcription factor GATA3 is a downstream effector of Hoxb1 specification in rhombomere 4. Development. 1999, 126 (23): 5523-5531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoyer D, Hannon JP, Martin GR: Molecular, pharmacological and functional diversity of 5-HT receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002, 71 (4): 533-554.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Raymond JR, Mukhin YV, Gelasco A, Turner J, Collinsworth G, Gettys TW, Grewal JS, Garnovskaya MN: Multiplicity of mechanisms of serotonin receptor signal transduction. Pharmacol Ther. 2001, 92 (2–3): 179-212.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Barnes NM, Sharp T: A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology. 1999, 38 (8): 1083-1152.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gross C, Zhuang X, Stark K, Ramboz S, Oosting R, Kirby L, Santarelli L, Beck S, Hen R: Serotonin1A receptor acts during development to establish normal anxiety-like behaviour in the adult. Nature. 2002, 416 (6879): 396-400.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Vinkers CH, Oosting RS, van Bogaert MJ, Olivier B, Groenink L: Early-life blockade of 5-HT (1A) receptors alters adult anxiety behavior and benzodiazepine sensitivity. Biol Psychiatry. 2010, 67 (4): 309-316.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Richardson-Jones JW, Craige CP, Guiard BP, Stephen A, Metzger KL, Kung HF, Gardier AM, Dranovsky A, David DJ, Beck SG, Hen R, Leonardo ED: 5-HT1A autoreceptor levels determine vulnerability to stress and response to antidepressants. Neuron. 2010, 65 (1): 40-52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao ZQ, Scott M, Chiechio S, Wang JS, Renner KJ, Gereau RW, Johnson RL, Deneris ES, Chen ZF: Lmx1b is required for maintenance of central serotonergic neurons and mice lacking central serotonergic system exhibit normal locomotor activity. J Neurosci. 2006, 26 (49): 12781-12788.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendricks T, Francis N, Fyodorov D, Deneris ES: The ETS domain factor Pet-1 is an early and precise marker of central serotonin neurons and interacts with a conserved element in serotonergic genes. J Neurosci. 1999, 19 (23): 10348-10356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ding YQ, Marklund U, Yuan W, Yin J, Wegman L, Ericson J, Deneris E, Johnson RL, Chen ZF: Lmx1b is essential for the development of serotonergic neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2003, 6 (9): 933-938.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Walther DJ, Peter JU, Bashammakh S, Hortnagl H, Voits M, Fink H, Bader M: Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science. 2003, 299 (5603): 76-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Narboux-Neme N, Angenard G, Mosienko V, Klempin F, Pitychoutis PM, Deneris E, Bader M, Giros B, Alenina N, Gaspar P: Postnatal growth defects in mice with constitutive depletion of central serotonin. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013, 4 (1): 171-181.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gutknecht L, Araragi N, Merker S, Waider J, Sommerlandt FM, Mlinar B, Baccini G, Mayer U, Proft F, Hamon M, Schmitt AG, Corradetti R, Lanfumey L, Lesch KP: Impacts of brain serotonin deficiency following Tph2 inactivation on development and raphe neuron serotonergic specification. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e43157-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Savelieva KV, Zhao S, Pogorelov VM, Rajan I, Yang Q, Cullinan E, Lanthorn TH: Genetic disruption of both tryptophan hydroxylase genes dramatically reduces serotonin and affects behavior in models sensitive to antidepressants. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (10): e3301-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutknecht L, Kriegebaum C, Waider J, Schmitt A, Lesch KP: Spatio-temporal expression of tryptophan hydroxylase isoforms in murine and human brain: convergent data from Tph2 knockout mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 19 (4): 266-282.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Alenina N, Kikic D, Todiras M, Mosienko V, Qadri F, Plehm R, Boye P, Vilianovitch L, Sohr R, Tenner K, Hortnagl H, Bader M: Growth retardation and altered autonomic control in mice lacking brain serotonin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106 (25): 10332-10337.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Blakely RD, Berson HE, Fremeau RT, Caron MG, Peek MM, Prince HK, Bradley CC: Cloning and expression of a functional serotonin transporter from rat brain. Nature. 1991, 354 (6348): 66-70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Heisler LK, Chu HM, Brennan TJ, Danao JA, Bajwa P, Parsons LH, Tecott LH: Elevated anxiety and antidepressant-like responses in serotonin 5-HT1A receptor mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (25): 15049-15054.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Fletcher A, Forster EA, Bill DJ, Brown G, Cliffe IA, Hartley JE, Jones DE, McLenachan A, Stanhope KJ, Critchley DJ, Childs KJ, Middlefell VC, Lanfumey L, Corradetti R, Laporte AM, Gozlan H, Hamon M, Dourish CT: Electrophysiological, biochemical, neurohormonal and behavioural studies with WAY-100635, a potent, selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist. Behav Brain Res. 1996, 73 (1–2): 337-353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Azmitia EC: Modern views on an ancient chemical: serotonin effects on cell proliferation, maturation, and apoptosis. Brain Res Bull. 2001, 56 (5): 413-424.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lauder JM, Krebs H: Serotonin as a differentiation signal in early neurogenesis. Dev Neurosci. 1978, 1 (1): 15-30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fyodorov D, Nelson T, Deneris E: Pet-1, a novel ETS domain factor that can activate neuronal nAchR gene transcription. J Neurobiol. 1998, 34 (2): 151-163.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kriegebaum C, Song NN, Gutknecht L, Huang Y, Schmitt A, Reif A, Ding YQ, Lesch KP: Brain-specific conditional and time-specific inducible Tph2 knockout mice possess normal serotonergic gene expression in the absence of serotonin during adult life. Neurochem Int. 2010, 57 (5): 512-517.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu Y, Jiang Y, Si Y, Kim JY, Chen ZF, Rao Y: Molecular regulation of sexual preference revealed by genetic studies of 5-HT in the brains of male mice. Nature. 2011, 472 (7341): 95-99.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu Z, Zhou J, Li Y, Hu F, Lu Y, Ma M, Feng Q, Zhang JE, Wang D, Zeng J, Bao J, Kim JY, Chen ZF, El Mestikawy S, Luo M: Dorsal Raphe neurons signal reward through 5-HT and Glutamate. Neuron. 2014, 81 (6): 1360-1374.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Craven SE, Lim KC, Ye W, Engel JD, de Sauvage F, Rosenthal A: Gata2 specifies serotonergic neurons downstream of sonic hedgehog. Development. 2004, 131 (5): 1165-1173.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Julius D: Serotonin receptor knockouts: a moody subject. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (26): 15153-15154.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Blier P, Ward NM: Is there a role for 5-HT1A agonists in the treatment of depression?. Biol Psychiatry. 2003, 53 (3): 193-203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Celada P, Bortolozzi A, Artigas F: Serotonin 5-HT1A receptors as targets for agents to treat psychiatric disorders: rationale and current status of research. CNS Drugs. 2013, 27 (9): 703-716.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Artigas F, Romero L, de Montigny C, Blier P: Acceleration of the effect of selected antidepressant drugs in major depression by 5-HT1A antagonists. Trends Neurosci. 1996, 19 (9): 378-383.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Rueter LE, Fornal CA, Jacobs BL: A critical review of 5-HT brain microdialysis and behavior. Rev Neurosci. 1997, 8 (2): 117-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Blier P, Bouchard C: Modulation of 5-HT release in the guinea-pig brain following long-term administration of antidepressant drugs. Br J Pharmacol. 1994, 113 (2): 485-495.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. De Vry J: 5-HT1A receptor agonists: recent developments and controversial issues. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995, 121 (1): 1-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Richer M, Hen R, Blier P: Modification of serotonin neuron properties in mice lacking 5-HT1A receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002, 435 (2–3): 195-203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Albert PR: Transcriptional regulation of the 5-HT1A receptor: implications for mental illness. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012, 367 (1601): 2402-2415.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wellman CL, Camp M, Jones VM, MacPherson KP, Ihne J, Fitzgerald P, Maroun M, Drabant E, Bogdan R, Hariri AR, Holmes A: Convergent effects of mouse Pet-1 deletion and human PET-1 variation on amygdala fear and threat processing. Exp Neurol. 2013, 250: 260-269.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott MM, Deneris ES: Making and breaking serotonin neurons and autism. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005, 23 (2–3): 277-285.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu P, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res. 2003, 13 (3): 476-484.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu XY, Wan L, Huo FQ, Barry D, Li H, Zhao ZQ, Chen ZF: B-type natriuretic peptide is neither itch-specific nor functions upstream of the GRP-GRPR signaling pathway. Mol Pain. 2014, 10 (1): 4-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Petit A, Kennedy TE, Bagnard D, Doucet G: Membrane-associated guidance cues direct the innervation of forebrain and midbrain by dorsal raphe-derived serotonergic axons. Eur J Neurosci. 2005, 22 (3): 552-568.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement