# Temperature-dependent bursting pattern analysis by modified Plant model

- Nam Gyu Hyun
^{1}, - Kwang-Ho Hyun
^{2}, - Kwang-Beom Hyun
^{3}and - Kyungmin Lee
^{4}Email author

**Received: **28 May 2014

**Accepted: **28 June 2014

**Published: **22 July 2014

## Abstract

Many electrophysiological properties of neuron including firing rates and rhythmicaloscillation change in response to a temperature variation, but the mechanismunderlying these correlations remains unverified. In this study, we analyzed variousaction potential (AP) parameters of bursting pacemaker neurons in the abdominalganglion of *Aplysia juliana* to examine whether or not bursting patterns arealtered in response to temperature change. Here we found that the inter-burstinterval, burst duration, and number of spike during burst decreased as temperatureincreased. On the other hand, the numbers of bursts per minute and numbers of spikesper minute increased and then decreased, but interspike interval during burst firstlydecreased and then increased. We also tested the reproducibility oftemperature-dependent changes in bursting patterns and AP parameters. Finally weperformed computational simulations of these phenomena by using a modified Plantmodel composed of equations with temperature-dependent scaling factors tomathematically clarify the temperature-dependent changes of bursting patterns inburst-firing neurons. Taken together, we found that the modified Plant model couldtrace the ionic mechanism underlying the temperature-dependent change in burstingpattern from experiments with bursting pacemaker neurons in the abdominal ganglia of*Aplysia juliana*.

## Keywords

## Introduction

To date, researchers have investigated the effect of temperature on the electricalactivity and firing patterns in neurons from many animals, including *Aplysiajuliana*, crabs, crayfish, frogs, lobsters, locusts, snails, and squids [[1]-[9]]. Especially the functions and properties of bursting pacemaker neuron R15 inthe abdominal ganglion of *Aplysia* have been extensively studied [[10]-[12]] and mathematical simulation of bursting activity has been successfullyperformed [[13]-[19]]. However, few studies on the temperature dependence of action potential (AP)parameters in the R15 bursting pacemaker neuron have been reported [[20],[21]]. They analyzed typical changes of AP parameters in burst-firing neurons byinvestigating the effect of heat on R15 bursting pacemaker neuron activity as thetemperature increased and reported temperature-dependent changes in inter-burstinterval, burst duration, number of spike per burst, intra-burst spike broadening andspike height [[21]]. However, the reproducible properties and mechanism of temperature-dependentchanges of AP parameters remain unknown yet.

Changes in temperature can produce numerous effects on the neural tissue of mostorganisms. Indeed it has been reported that hyperthermic temperature may inducedepolarization and spontaneous firing of pyramidal neurons leading to enhancedexcitability of hippocampus [[22],[23]]. On the other hand, a body of evidence indicating a therapeutic effect ofhypothermia has accumulated in several conditions. Orlowski and colleagues publishedthat in refractory status epilepticus unresponsive to conventional treatment, systemichypothermia (30-31°C) was an effective therapeutic method leading to burstsuppression on electroencephalography (EEG) [[24]]. Despite a lot of works aiming at demonstrating the neural effect oftemperature, the mechanism of temperature-dependent electrophysiological changecontaining alteration of bursting and firing pattern in neuron remains unclear. Here, weexamined the effects of temperature changes on the neuronal activity and burstingpatterns during several consecutive heating − cooling cycles by usingbursting pacemaker neurons which are a proper specimen with capability of long-lastingrecording for mathematical modeling. Next, we sought to identify the mechanismunderlying temperature-dependent bursting patterns of these neurons by analyzing andcomparing the experimental data to computational simulation data calculated by modifiedPlant equations with temperature-dependent scaling factors, ρ(T) and ϕ(T).

## Materials and methods

### Animals and dissection

Animals (*A. juliana*) were collected locally in Seogwipo, South Korea and allexperimental procedures were approved by the Jeju National University Animal Care andUse Committee. These animals were dissected to observe the temperature-dependency ofbursting patterns generated by pacemaker neurons R15 in the abdominal ganglia of*A. juliana* as described in previously published paper [[1]]. Briefly, the animals were anesthetized with an injection of 0.38 MMgCl_{2} amounting to half of each specimen’s weight before theabdominal ganglia were removed. Each abdominal ganglion was incubated at 34°Cfor 40 minute in a solution containing equal volumes of artificial sea water(ASW; in mM: 460 NaCl, 10 KCl, 11 CaCl_{2} , 55 MgCl_{2} , and 10HEPES; pH 7.6) and isotonic Leibovitz’s L-15 media (Cat. No. L-4386;Sigma) containing 1% protease (type IX; Sigma) (hereafter, ASW:L-15(1:1)). They werethen washed several times with ASW and were placed in a low-temperature incubator(VS-1203PIN; Hanback Co., Daejeon, Korea) at 18°C. At last they were removedonto Petri dishes (50x9 mm), pinned down on Sylgard plates (Dow Corning, USA) filledwith ASW:L-15(1:1), and desheathed.

### Data acquisition and analysis

*Aplysia*soaked in ASW:L-15 (1:1, v/v) to measure the medium temperature, which could beincreased or decreased by activating the temperature controller system (HMN 3940,Acetec Co., Korea). We used a low flow rate peristaltic pump (BJ100-2 J; BaodingLonger Precision Pump Co., China) to maintain a viable solution with ASW:L-15 (1:1)media. The flow rate and the speed were 0.14 mL/min and 1.0 rpm,respectively. Intracellular recordings of bursting pacemaker neurons were performedto measure the membrane potential. The glass intracellular electrodes were filledwith 3 M KCl and the membrane potentials recorded were simultaneously savedusing a DAQ card (NI PCI-6221, National Instruments) and the Labview program(National Instruments). The electrical signals of the APs were identified using adigital oscilloscope (54622A; Agilent, Colorado Springs, Colo., USA). These data wererecorded at a rate of 3 kHz to reproduce the APs on the computer because thebursting cells generated APs at a rate of 0–4 Hz; each component of thisdata is composed of 180,000 pairs of temperature and membrane potential values withunique file names, and the dataset was composed of 1,713 files as shown inTable 1. With this selected dataset, the average valuesof each of the AP parameters of the burst-firing neuron could be calculated usingOrigin 6.0 (Microcal Software, Inc.) and a computer program we designed. For eachexperiment, the bursting neuron was held at room temperature for one hour as shown inTable 2 and then changed with continuous ramp fromabout 16°C to 30°C. Then, the data recorded by increments (or decrements)of 2°C from about 16°C to 30°C (16-18-20-22-24-26-28-30°C) wereaveraged over. To reduce experimental variability, in each experiment the burstingneuron was incubated at least 5 min to adapt to a new steady-state temperaturebefore recording rhythmic change.

**Animal weights and electrophysiological properties of signals generated byeight R15 bursting pacemaker neurons in**
A. juliana
**specimens**

Exp. | Animal weight (g) | Data selected for analysis | Total number of spikes | Total recording time (min) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Range of temperature change (°C) | Time interval for analysis (min) | Number of tem. change cycle | Number of spikes | ||||

A | 150 | 16.5-30.0 | 231 | 2(8) | 7,861 | 31,890 | 980 |

B | 130 | 16.7-29.8 | 230 | 2(6) | 9,030 | 25,890 | 794 |

C | 190 | 14.5-30.8 | 210 | 2(3) | 3,640 | 6,230 | 491 |

D | 210 | 14.4-29.5 | 137 | 1(1) | 4,776 | 9,121 | 292 |

E | 290 | 13.5-30.3 | 225 | 2(4) | 6,670 | 18,668 | 623 |

F | 255 | 17.3-32.5 | 228 | 2(5) | 3,613 | 10,500 | 674 |

G | 310 | 14.4-30.9 | 225 | 2(4) | 3,884 | 10,168 | 570 |

H | 280 | 15.8-30.0 | 227 | 2(3) | 3,994 | 7,848 | 433 |

Total | - | - | 1,713 | 15(33) | 43,468 | 120,315 | 4,857 |

Average | 226 | 15.3-30.4 | 214 | 2(4) | 5,433 | 15,039 | 607 |

**Temperature and selected AP parameters in bursting pacemaker neuronsmaintained for 30 min**

Experiments | Temperature | Number of bursts/min | Number of spikes/burst | Interbust interval(s) | Burst duration(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

A | 21.48 ± 0.03 | 4.86 ± 0.31 | 9.49 ± 0.80 | 8.72 ± 0.88 | 2.77 ± 0.20 |

B | 22.61 ± 0.01 | 6.33 ± 0.36 | 8.23 ± 0.53 | 5.96 ± 0.66 | 3.10 ± 0.16 |

C | 19.45 ± 0.00 | 2.33 ± 0.08 | 9.10 ± 0.17 | 19.46 ± 0.47 | 2.01 ± 0.03 |

D | 16.34 ± 0.03 | 4.63 ± 0.19 | 7.71 ± 0.31 | 9.07 ± 0.33 | 2.95 ± 0.08 |

E | 19.11 ± 0.02 | 4.16 ± 0.17 | 20.82 ± 0.71 | 8.68 ± 0.65 | 5.01 ± 0.10 |

F | 22.20 ± 0.04 | 3.13 ± 0.22 | 6.02 ± 0.38 | 14.47 ± 0.96 | 3.56 ± 0.16 |

G | 18.22 ± 0.03 | 2.43 ± 0.13 | 8.64 ± 0.19 | 18.79 ± 0.63 | 2.37 ± 0.05 |

H | 18.86 ± 0.02 | 5.90 ± 0.38 | 5.28 ± 0.22 | 8.54 ± 0.73 | 1.73 ± 0.07 |

Average | 19.78 ± 0.76 | 4.22 ± 0.53 | 9.41 ± 1.70 | 11.71 ± 1.82 | 2.93 ± 0.36 |

## Results

### Definition of AP parameters in burst-firing neuron

*Aplysia*bursting pacemaker neuron.The intraburst interspike interval, interburst interval, and burst duration arerepresented by symbols (1), (2), and (3), respectively. The membrane potentials atthe positive peak, V

_{pp}(mV), and negative peak, V

_{np}(mV), aredefined as the values of membrane potentials at points T and B shown inFigure 1B, respectively. The definition of the firsthalf of the rising phase of AP, Δt

_{r1}(ms), and the following APparameters are very similar to those defined in our previous study [[1]]. The last half of the rising phase of AP, Δt

_{r2}(ms) andthe first half of the falling phase of AP, Δt

_{f1}(ms) are timeintervals shown in Figure 1B. The last half of the fallingphase Δt

_{f2}(ms) is defined as the values of the time interval betweentwo points H2 and B shown in Figure 1B. The AP half-widthduration, Δt

_{AP, 1/2}(ms), is defined asΔt

_{r2}+ Δt

_{f1}(ms). The interspikeinterval, ISI (ms), is defined as Δt

_{r1}+ Δt

_{AP,1/2}+ Δt

_{f2}. The spontaneous firing frequency,simply referred to as Frequency (s

^{−1}), is defined asISI

^{−1}(s

^{−1}). For convenience, the average anglesθ

_{1}and θ

_{2}are defined to compare the slope of thesecond half of the rising phase of the AP with that of the first half of the fallingphase. The angle θ

_{1}is defined as the inverse tangent of the ratio ofhalf A

_{AP}to Δt

_{r2}, and the angle θ

_{2}is alsodefined as the inverse tangent of the ratio of half A

_{AP}toΔt

_{f1}: ${\mathrm{\theta}}_{1}\equiv \mathrm{Arctan}\phantom{\rule{0.12em}{0ex}}\left[\frac{\mathrm{V}\left({\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)\u2010\mathrm{V}\left({\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{H}1}\right)}{{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{T}}\u2010{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{H}1}}\right]$ and ${\mathrm{\theta}}_{2}\equiv \mathrm{Arctan}\phantom{\rule{0.12em}{0ex}}\left[\frac{\mathrm{V}\left({\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)\u2010\mathrm{V}\left({\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{H}2}\right)}{{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{H}2}\u2010{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{T}}}\right]$. Although angles are usually defined as dimensionless quantities,these angles are defined differently for convenience. The AP amplitude,A

_{AP}(mV), is defined as the absolute value of difference between thetwo values of membrane potentials at points T and B, respectively. More detailedanalytical techniques regarding the definition and computational analysis of APparameters and others were described previously [[1],[25]]. Data were processed using the scientific data analysis tools,C

^{++}, Origin 6.0, and Mathematica 5.1, and the resulting data werepresented as mean ± SE (standard error).

### Structure of the selected dataset for AP parameter analysis

Eight experiments (A − H) were conducted using *A. juliana*specimens, and Table 1 shows the animal weights, selecteddata for analysis, total number of spike, and total recording time.

Animal weights were between 130 and 310 g, and the average weight was226 g. The average total number of spike and average total recording time ofeach experiment were 15,039 spikes and 607 min, respectively. It was necessaryto select the middle portion of each recorded dataset for analysis. The averagevalues of time intervals for analysis, numbers of cycles of temperature change, andnumber of spike selected for analysis of these selected data were 214 min,2 cycles, and 5,433 spikes, respectively. The dataset gathered for analysis wascomposed of these selected data from each experiment. The total time interval foranalysis and the total number of spike of this dataset were 1,713 minutes and43,468 spikes, respectively. The numbers written in parentheses in the middle columnof Table 1 represent the total number of cycles oftemperature change for each experiment.

In each experiment, the temperature was maintained at room temperature for the firstone hour. As shown in Table 2, average values oftemperature and four AP parameters of burst-firing neurons were calculated using theselected dataset saved by intracellular recordings during maintaining at roomtemperature for 30 minutes; all data were selected after 5 to 10 minutesfrom temperature change onset. Because the standard errors of the values of theseparameters were low, the bursting patterns of these experiments might be consideredas regular while the temperatures were held constant at room temperature.

### Temperature dependence of AP parameters in burst-firing neurons

_{r1}decreased and then increased as the temperature wasraised, but frequency shown in Figure 4B rose and thenfell as the temperature increased. Figure 4D, E and G showthat the parameters Δt

_{f2}, Δt

_{1/2},Δt

_{r2}, Δt

_{f1}, and V

_{np,ave}decreased as thetemperature was raised with small standard errors for each value. On the other hand,the values of angles shown in Figure 4F increased as thetemperature was raised, and the values of angle θ

_{1}were larger thanthose of θ

_{2.}In addition, both A

_{AP, max}and A

_{AP,ave}shown in Figure 4H increased and thendecreased as the temperature was raised. These temperature dependencies of APparameters (except A

_{AP, max}, A

_{AP, ave}, and angles) were similarto the case of those analyzed using a dataset obtained from beating cells: in thatcase, A

_{AP,ave}decreased as the temperature was raised between 16°Cand 28°C, but A

_{AP, ave}, and angles were not shown [[1]].

### Temperature dependence of bursting patterns in burst-firing neurons

However, since these six burst parameters were not independent parameters, someequations representing an interrelationship between these parameters of burst-firingneurons could be driven; number of spike during burst = (burstduration)/(inter spike interval during burst), number of spike perminute = (number of spike during burst) × (number of burst perminute), and number of burst per minute = 60/(interburstinterval + burst duration).

Thus, each mean value of functional forms of reproducible temperature-dependentbursting parameters in Figures 5 and 6 could be calculated by using these dataset and the computer program wedesigned. It was shown that these six bursting parameters changed in response totemperature variation, but the mechanism underlying these correlations remainsunverified. So, it was suggested that performing computational simulations of thesephenomena by using a modified Plant model which were composed of equations withtemperature-dependent scaling factors was necessary to mathematically clarify thetemperature-dependent changes of bursting patterns in burst-firing neurons.

### Simulation of temperature-dependent bursting patterns

In order to simulate various temperature-dependent spiking patterns of burstingpacemaker neuron, we set up nonlinear differential equations by modifying the Plantmodel [[15]] with temperature-dependent scaling factors [[25]-[27]]. The Plant model studied by Rinzel and Lee was designed to assessparabolic bursters by analyzing the fast and slow processes to show how spikeactivities were generated by their mutual interaction [[16]].

_{Na}, and potassium channels underlying a fast potassiumcurrent, I

_{K}. The slow processes include the slow inward calcium current,I

_{Ca}, and the slow changes in intracellular free calcium concentration,Ca. The accumulation of calcium turns on outward calcium-activated potassium current,I

_{K(Ca)}, and undermines the slow inward calcium current, and finallybrings to an end of bursting activity. This system also contains a leak current,I

_{L}.

Where ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{Na}}$, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{Ca}}$, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{K}}$, and ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{L}}$ are maximal conductances for the Na^{+}, Ca^{2+},K^{+}, and Cl^{−} currents, respectively, andV_{Na}, V_{Ca}, V_{K}, and V_{L} are the reversalpotentials for the respective currents: ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{K}\left(\mathrm{Ca}\right)}$ is maximal conductance for calcium-activated potassium current.Here, voltage, V indicates membrane potential (mV).

The voltage-dependent activation and inactivation variables for sodium channels are*m* and *h* respectively, and the activation variable for potassiumchannels is *n*. A slowly activating conductance for calcium current isdenoted by χ, and a slow change in intracellular free calcium concentration Ca,is treated as parameters. The maximal relaxation time constants of h and n aredefined as $\frac{1}{\mathrm{\lambda}}$. It is taken that ρ^{−1} is an estimate for thetime-constant of the Ca-equation. The temperature-dependent scaling factors,ρ(T) and ϕ(T), are defined as $\mathrm{\rho}\left(\mathrm{T}\right)\equiv {1.3}^{\frac{{\mathrm{T}\u2010\mathrm{T}}_{0}}{10\phantom{\rule{0.24em}{0ex}}\xb0\mathrm{C}}}$ and $\mathrm{\varphi}\left(\mathrm{T}\right)\equiv {3}^{\frac{\mathrm{T}-{\mathrm{T}}_{0}}{10\xb0\mathrm{C}}}$, respectively [[25]]. The steady-state values of activation or inactivation variablesm_{∞}, h_{∞}, χ_{∞}, andn_{∞} are functions of voltage. The relaxation time constants arerepresented by τ_{h}, τ_{χ}, andτ_{n}.

### Comparison of experimental and simulation results

**Comparison of experimental and simulation results**

Exp | Parameters of modified Plant model | Burst parameters and percent error | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Number of burst per minute | Number of spike during burst | Interburst interval (s) | Burst duration (s) | Interspike interval during burst (ms) | ||||||||||||||

ρ | τ | T (°C) | Ex | Si | Err (%) | Ex | Si | Err (%) | Ex | Si | Err (%) | Ex | Si | Err (%) | Ex | Si | Err (%) | |

A | 0.000074 | 1500 | 18.1 | 20 | 20 | 0.0 | 21.0 | 13.0 | 38.0 | 22.5 | 23.5 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 34.6 | 247 | 261 | 5.6 |

22.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 12.0 | 25.0 | 15.5 | 17.3 | 11.6 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 200 | 258 | 29.0 | |||

29.2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 40.0 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 46.1 | 260 | 271 | 4.2 | |||

B | 0.00015 | 9000 | 16.7 | 20 | 20 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 13.0 | 18.1 | 32.0 | 31.6 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 12.5 | 436 | 323 | 25.9 |

21.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 18.9 | 18.1 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 17.9 | 354 | 290 | 18.0 | |||

28.6 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 40.0 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 21.7 | 460 | 400 | 13.0 | |||

C | 0.00006 | 790 | 19.3 | 20 | 20 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 13.0 | 18.1 | 31.7 | 23.3 | 26.4 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 23.0 | 236 | 246 | 4.2 |

23.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 11.0 | 37.5 | 13.8 | 15.9 | 15.2 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 26.3 | 237 | 218 | 8.0 | |||

27.4 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 14.2 | 9.6 | 10.1 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 41.6 | 171 | 212 | 23.9 | |||

D | 0.00028 | 13000 | 17.0 | 20 | 20 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | 23.0 | 29.0 | 28.0 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 261 | 320 | 22.6 |

21.6 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 8.0 | 13.9 | 13.0 | 15.2 | 16.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 13.6 | 236 | 312 | 32.2 | |||

27.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 46.1 | 270 | 380 | 40.7 | |||

E | 0.00015 | 15000 | 17.0 | 20 | 20 | 0.0 | 27.0 | 15.0 | 44.4 | 27.9 | 38.8 | 39.0 | 7.7 | 4.9 | 36.3 | 285 | 326 | 14.3 |

24.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 11.0 | 38.8 | 11.6 | 16.5 | 42.2 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 22.2 | 250 | 318 | 27.2 | |||

27.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 8.2 | 34.4 | 8.8 | 10.4 | 18.1 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 272 | 402 | 47.7 | |||

F | 0.00016 | 27000 | 17.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 0.0 | (69.3) | (50.9) | (26.5) | 7.3 | 6.0 | 17.8 | 405 | 333 | 17.7 |

24.3 | 20 | 20 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 10.0 | 19.7 | 18 | 8.6 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 390 | 354 | 9.2 | |||

27.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 12.6 | 10.0 | 20.6 | 10.4 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 293 | 380 | 29.6 | |||

G | 0.00022 | 7000 | 18.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 9.0 | 14.2 | 15.3 | 18.8 | 22.8 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 10.0 | 285 | 300 | 5.2 |

21.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 13.3 | 8.0 | 39.8 | 10.0 | 14.4 | 44 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 24.2 | 248 | 312 | 25.8 | |||

27.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 16.6 | 5.9 | 6.6 | 11.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 250 | 320 | 28.0 | |||

H | 0.00028 | 7000 | 17.6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 14.2 | 17.6 | 18.7 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 19.0 | 300 | 312 | 4.0 |

21.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 31.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 23.0 | 216 | 266 | 23.1 | |||

25.6 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 40.0 | 200 | 280 | 40.0 |

Finally, numerical values of each of the 24 parameters involved in equations (1) to(4) would be fixed: C_{m} = 1 μF/cm^{2}, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{KCa}}=0.018\phantom{\rule{0.24em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mmho}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{Na}}=4.0\phantom{\rule{0.24em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mmho}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{Ca}}=0.007\phantom{\rule{0.24em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mmho}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{K}}=0.60\phantom{\rule{0.12em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mmho}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, ${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{L}}=0.017\phantom{\rule{0.24em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mmho}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, V_{Na} = 40 mV,V_{Ca} = 140 mV,V_{K} = −75 mV,V_{L} = −40 mV, λ = 0.18,ρ = 0.000074 ms^{−1},τ_{χ} = 1, 500,K_{c} = 0.0275 mV^{−1},α = 127/105, β = 8265/105,γ = 0.3, δ = −18,μ_{m} = 0.1, μ_{h} = 0.08,μ_{n} = 0.016, ν_{n} = 0.1, ${\overline{\mathrm{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{n}}=1$, T_{0} = 23.0°C. Here, we took a value of23°C as the reference temperature T_{0} because bursts are usuallyactivated from 22°C to 25°C, and this represented the middle value oftemperature range of the experiment A; from 16.0°C to 30.0°C.

To simulate the other figures shown in Figure 7, it wasnecessary to fix the same numerical values of each of the 22 parameters as those usedin experiment A, except the values of ρ and τ_{x}. And then,computer simulation should be carried out by changing parameter values ρ andτ_{x} until percentage errors of all parameters had to be calculatedbelow 50%: interburst interval, burst duration, and number of spike per burst wereincreased (number of burst per minute decreased) as ρ, and τ_{x}increased. The results of these calculations were shown from 4th row to the last rowin Table 3: the values of all calculated percentage errorswere between 0 and 47.7%. Here, the results about the number of spike per minuteamong burst parameters was excluded from Table 3, becauseall percentage errors in the number of burst per minute were 0.0 and then the valuesof number of spike during burst would be the same as the values of number of spikeper minute.

The results of computer simulation with the values of temperature shown on each panelin Figure 7 are represented as the time series of burstingactivity. Although the results of simulation (red solid line) of AP amplitude werenot completely optimal, simulation data for number of burst per minute, number ofspike during burst, inter-burst interval, burst duration, and interspike intervalduring burst were well reflected by modified Plant model when these simulationresults were compared to the experimental results (blue dotted line).

Therefore, analysis and simulation of the experimental data by our equation modelmight be helpful for understanding the mechanisms underlying the change oftemperature-dependent bursting activity in neurons*.*

## Discussion

In the previous study we analyzed the temperature-dependent change of 14 AP parameters(such as the AP amplitude, membrane potential at the positive peak, ISI, first half andlast half of the temperature rising phase, first half and last half of the temperaturefalling phase, absolute value of the membrane potential at negative peak, absolute valueof the maximum slope of the AP during the temperature rising and falling phases, andspiking frequency) in *Aplysia* neurons [[1]]. With these findings, in this study we tried to examine thetemperature-dependent change of bursting patterns in pacemaker neuron at abdominalganglion of *Aplysia juliana.* Furthermore, we attempted to identify themechanism underlying the temperature dependence of busting by developing an equationmodel predicting neuronal electrophysiological activity with a function oftemperature.

### Temperature-dependent change of bursting patterns

Firstly we conducted real experiments with bursting pacemaker neurons in order toexplore the functional relation between temperature and bursting patterns as well asAP parameters. We examined the temperature-dependent activity of bursting pacemakerneurons during several consecutive heating − cooling cycles. Wetested the temperature dependencies of AP parameters in bursting pacemaker neurons inthe temperature range of 16–30°C. The temperature-dependent properties ofAP parameters were analyzed with the selected data shown in Table 1 by using techniques similar to those described in Hyun et al. [[1]].

The values of inter-burst interval, burst duration, and number of spike during burstdecreased as the temperature increased, and it was possible to confirm functionalproperties of temperature dependencies in six burst parameters. When compared to datareported by other research group, Fletcher and Ram analyzed changes of AP parametersof burst-firing neurons during heating by investigating *Aplysia* R15pacemaker neuron activity in the temperature range of 23 – 37°C; theyfound that interburst interval, burst duration, and number of spike per burst alldecreased within the temperature range of 23 to 32°C [[21]]. We found that our data are consistent with results reported by Fletcherand Ram [[21]] within the temperature range of 23 to 30°C. Furthermore, the presentstudy revealed that the values of ISI and Δt_{r1} decreased and thenincreased, frequency increased and then decreased, and the parametersΔt_{f2}, Δt_{1/2}, Δt_{r2},Δtf_{1}, and V_{np} all decreased as the temperature wasraised. These results were similar to those shown in previously published paper [[1]]. Fletcher and Ram also showed that intra-burst spike broadening and spikeheight decreased as temperature increased [[21]]. These results were also in good accordance with our experimental resultswithin the temperature range of 23 to 30°C. Because Δt _{1/2} andA_{AP,ave} decreased as temperature increased in the temperature range of23 to 30°C, as shown in Figure 4D and H: twoparameters, spike-broadening and spike height, could be compared with two APparameters, Δt_{AP,1/2} and A_{AP,ave}, respectively. Moreoverthe present study generated quantitative data regarding the temperature-dependentproperties of the other three AP parameters of burst-firing neurons (ISI duringburst, number of burst per minute, and number of spike per minute) and nine other APparameters (ISI, Δt_{r1}, Δt_{r2}, Δt_{f1},Δt_{f2}, θ_{1}, θ2, V_{np}, and A_{AP,max}).

### Mechanism underlying the temperature dependence of busting: choice of themodel

Numerous revised model of bursting in R15 [[17]-[19],[28]] have been developed since the mid-1980s. Canavier et al. [[17]] developed the model of bursting in R15 with 10 currents and 11 staticvariables; 10 currents (the fast Na^{+}-current I_{Na}, the fastCa^{2+}-current I_{Ca,} the delayed rectifierK^{+}-current I_{K}, the slow inward Ca^{2+}-currentI_{SI}, the nonspecific cation current I_{NS}, the anomalousrectifier current I_{R}, the leak current I_{L},K^{+}-current I_{K}, the Na^{+}-Ca^{2+} exchangercurrent I_{NaCa}, the Na^{+}-K^{+} pump currentI_{NaK}, and the Ca^{2+} pump current I_{CaP}), and 11static variables (membrane potential V, intracellular concentration ofCa^{2+} [Ca]_{i}, the occupancy of the intracellularCa^{2+}-buffer O_{c}, and eight voltage-dependent state-variables(m, h, d, f, n, l, s, b)). The parabolic bursting pattern results from two competingprocesses, the slow voltage-dependent activation of the slow inwardCa^{2+}-current (I_{SI}), and the still more slower calcium-dependentinactivation of this same current. Butera et al. [[19]] also developed the models of bursting in R15 with 10 currents and 12static variables; 10 currents (the fast Na^{+}-current I_{Na}, thefast Ca^{2+}-current I_{Ca,} the delayed rectifierK^{+}-current I_{K}, the slow inward C^{2+}-currentI_{SI}, the nonspecific cation current I_{NS}, the anomalousrectifier current I_{R}, the leak current I_{L},K^{+}-current I_{K}, the Na^{+}-Ca^{2+} exchangercurrent I_{NaCa}, the Na^{+}-K^{+} pump currentI_{NaK}, and the Ca^{2+} pump current I_{CaP}), and 12static variables (membrane potential V, intracellular concentration ofCa^{2+} [Ca^{2+}]_{i}, intracellular concentration of cAMP[cAMP], the occupancy of the intracellular Ca^{2+}-buffer O_{c}, andeight voltage-dependent state-variables (m, h, d, f, n, l, s, b)). The slow inwardCa^{2+} current (I_{SI}) in this model is the key currentresponsible for leading to bursting phenomena.

In addition to these models, Bertram [[18],[29]] developed a mathematical model of bursting neuron R15 including 8currents and 11 static variables; 8 currents (excitatory sodium currentI_{Na}, excitatory calcium current I_{Ca}, inhibitory potassiumcurrent I_{K1} and I_{K2} , small leakage current I_{L},calcium current which initiate the burst I_{NSR}, and cation-nonspecificcurrent I_{D}, and a potassium current which is activated only near thepotassium equilibrium potential I_{R'}) and 11 static variables (membranepotential V, intracellular concentration of Ca^{2+} c, and ninevoltage-dependent state-variables (m, h, n, j, q, y, μ, r, x)). Two subthresholdburst currents, the calcium current which initiate the burst I_{NSR} and thecation-nonspecific current I_{D}, induce the busting oscillation.

To mathematically clarify the temperature-dependent changes of bursting patterns inburst-firing neurons, it was suggested to perform computational simulations of thesephenomena by using a proper model composed of equations with temperature-dependentscaling factors.

_{j}were multiplied by temperature-like scaling factor for ionickinetics ${\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{j}}\left(\left(1/{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{j}}\right)\times \mathrm{\varphi}\left(\mathrm{T}\right)\right.=\left(1/{\mathrm{\tau}}_{\mathrm{j}}\right)\times {3}^{\frac{{\mathrm{T}\u2010\mathrm{T}}_{0}}{10\xb0\mathrm{C}}}$, j = m, h, d, f, n, l, s, b). In order to obtaincomputer simulation of temperature-dependent bursting patterns, it was necessary toselect three good data files obtained from experiment A at different temperatures;18.1°C, 22.1°C, and 27.9°C. The figures drawn by using these datafiles were expressed by symbols L1, M1 and H1, respectively, shown on the panels atFigure 8A and B. After temperature values shown onthese panels should be substituted for T in the temperature-dependent scalingfactors, ρ(T) and ϕ(T) involved in these modified models(T

_{0}= 23°C), we could get these figures drawn in redsolid lines and these were shown on these panels. In the results of simulations withthese modified models, it could be found that burst duration and number of spikeduring burst increased as temperature increased. But these results were notconsistent with our experimental results. So, although the model presented byCanavier et al. [[17]] and Butera et al. [[19]] were based on experimental data to a great extent, it might be thoughtthat these models are not appropriate for investigation about the ionic mechanismunderlying the temperature-dependent change in bursting pattern from experiments withbursting pacemaker neurons in the abdominal ganglia of

*Aplysia juliana*.

In a similar way, we could get three figures shown on Figure 8C by simulation using the modified models that were developed by Bertram [[18]]. Although the fact that the values of burst duration and number of spikeduring burst that were obtained from simulation by using this modified modeldecreased as temperature increased was consistent with our experimental results in asmall temperature range, it was very difficult to simulate the temperature-dependentchanges of bursting patterns in a large temperature range; from 18.1°C to27.9°C. So we tried to simulate temperature-dependent bursting patterns in asmall temperature range from 22.2°C to 25.8°C and the results were shown onFigure 8D. But these results were also not consistentwith our experimental results. Namely, the values of interspike interval during burstobtained from simulations were larger than those got from experiments, and thesevalues could not be reduced: the values of the other bursting parameters might begiven rise to inconsistencies with our experimental results. Thus, it might bethought that this model was not also appropriate for investigation about that.

Any way, it was shown that that I_{K(Ca)} is not involved in bursttermination in *Aplysia* bursting neurons Kramer and Zucker [[30]]. Even though calcium-activated potassium channels are located in the somaof R15 neuron, it was not necessarily proved that this channel was important forbursting pattern. Next, we have to discuss on the following question: are there anyother experimental evidences suggesting that I_{K(Ca)} is involved inbursting pattern of *Aplysia* neurons, particularly R15 neuron? Although wedidn’t yet find any one of research papers that were published after year 1985,it might be necessary to discuss whether the figures that we have suggested in thispaper could be given us any chance to run back over the experimental evidence onit.

_{SI}) simulated by usingthe equation of slow inward calcium current based on the model developed by Canavieret al. [[17]] at temperature values 18°C, 23°C, and 28°C are showntogether in blue lines (L), black lines (M), and red lines (H), respectively on panelA in Figure 9. Those (ρ(T)∙I

_{SI}) and(ρ(T)∙(I

_{Ca}+ I

_{K(Ca)})) obtained fromsimulation data by using the model made by Butera et al. [[19]] and Plant [[15]] at the same temperature values are shown together on panel B and D inFigure 9, respectively. Those(I

_{D}+ ρ(T)∙I

_{NSR}) taken fromsimulation data calculated by using the model made by Bertram [[18]] at temperature values 22.3°C, 23°C, and 23.7°C are showntogether on panel C in Figure 9. Next, it might be wantedto calculate the maximum values of temperature-dependent burst currents underlyingthe hyperpolarization of the inter-burst intervals, and then compare the values thatwere calculated by using Plant developed model with those by using the other models.The maximum values of these calculated by using Plant model at temperature values18°C, 23°C, and 28°C were 0.28 μA, 0.12 μA, and0.081 μA, respectively. The maximum values calculated by using Canavier etal. (Butera et al.) developed model at the same temperature values were−1.62 nA, −0.9 nA, and −0.75 nA (−1.5 nA,−1.1 nA, and −0.77 nA), respectively. The maximum valuescalculated by using the model that Bertram developed at the temperature values22.3°C, 23°C, and 23.7°C were −0.18 nA,−0.38 nA, and −0.58 nA, respectively. These absolute maximumvalues calculated by using the models that Plant, Canavier, and Butera developeddecreased as temperature increased, but those calculated by Bertram developed modelincreased as temperature increased. But more detailed analysis of these data remainedas a challenge for future study.

Anyway, these facts might show that it was hard to clarify mathematically thetemperature-dependent changes of bursting patterns at burst-firing neurons of*Aplysia juliana* with these three models involving many currents and alarge number of static variables. So, it was necessary to investigate much simplermodel with small number of currents and static variables such as Plant model.

At this stage, it might be useful to remind that temperature-dependent impulsepatterns of mammalian cold receptors could be well simulated by using nonlineardifferential equations involving I_{K(Ca)}. Different types of impulsepatterns of mammalian cold receptors can be observed as a function of skintemperature: irregular and less frequent burst discharges, regular and frequentbursting patterns, and irregular single spike patterns are observed from low to hightemperatures. These patterns could be simulated by Braun et al., and the Huber-Brauncold receptor model has been described in detail with 5 currents and 5 staticvariables (membrane potential and four voltage-dependent state-variables) [[26],[27],[31]-[36]]. This model consisted of two minimal sets of ionic conductances operatingat different voltage levels with different delays and the leakage current. The firsttwo voltage-dependent currents that generate the action potentials mean depolarizingcurrent I_{Na} and repolarizing current I_{K}. The next twovoltage-dependent slow currents that generate subthreshold potential oscillationswere slow depolarizing noninactivating Na^{+}-current I_{Nap} andslow repolarizing Ca^{2+}-dependent K^{+}-current I_{K(Ca)}with voltage dependent activation of Ca^{2+}-current. The temperaturedependences were given by temperature-like scaling factors for the maximumconductances and the time constants, with reference temperatureT_{0} = 25°C. Q_{10} of 3.0 for the activationvariable and Q_{10} of 1.3 for temperature dependences of maximumconductances were chosen.

Now, it would be necessary to look into another simple model to investigate themechanisms of temperature-dependent changes of bursting patterns which share a fewsimilarities with mammalian cold receptors. Plant model consisted of 5 currents and 6static variables: 5 currents (fast sodium current I_{Na}, fast potassiumcurrent I_{K}, inward calcium current I_{Ca}, calcium-activatedpotassium current I_{K(Ca)}, and leakage current, I_{L}) and 6 staticvariables (membrane potential, intracellular concentration of Ca^{2+}, andfour voltage-dependent state-variables). There are two fast and slow processes inthis model. The fast process had three components: the activation and inactivationvariables for Na^{+} channels “m” and “h”,respectively, and the activation of K^{+} channels n. The slow process hadtwo components: a slow conductance for Ca^{2+}-current “X”, andintracellular free calcium concentration “Ca”. Not only Plant model had asimple structure, but also theoretical analyses of Plant’s model were performedalready [[16],[37],[38]].

However, it is not easy to justify the reason of our choice of Plant model, becausesome papers excluded I_{K(Ca)} as a key bursting current in R15 and focusedon the inward current with slow activating and inactivating components. Plant modelwas based on the works of Gorman and Thomas [[39]], who demonstrated that I_{K(Ca)} was linearly dependent onincreasing concentration of intracellular calcium ions (Ca^{2+}) injectedinto the cytoplasm and expected to be activated during a burst. Chay [[40]] constructed mathematical model applicable to the *Aplysia*bursting neurons with involving the properties of Ca^{2+}-activatedK^{+} channel: intracellular Ca^{2+} concentration increasesgradually during activity to levels where it activates the I_{K(Ca)} [[10]]. Although Kramer and Zucker [[30]] concluded that I_{K(Ca)} did not play a role in burst terminationin bursting neurons of *Aplysia*, Adams and Levitan [[41]] did not exclude a role for I_{K(Ca)} in the repolarization ofaction potential. But they asked the question: why a long-lasting I_{K(Ca)}did not be activated by action potential? The plausible answer was the amount ofcalcium ions that entered into the cell during the activity of action potential wasinsufficient to generate it. Even if Canavier et al. [[17]] developed the model without I_{K(Ca),} it was suggested as alimitations of this model that more experimental data of I_{K(Ca)} wererequired for further investigation. Bertram [[18]] revised the model with I_{K(Ca)} conductance depended only on theconstant calcium concentration of the soma. Besides this, it has been known that thecalcium activated potassium channels are located in R_{15} soma [[42]] and electrode was inserted into the soma of the cell in the abdominalganglion of *A. juliana* to measure the membrane potentials in ourexperiments. Thus, we cannot underestimate the impact of I_{K(Ca),} but wedid not here want to claim the quantitative application of Plant model, rather, weused it fr understanding the mechanism underlying the temperature dependence ofbusting patterns by computer simulations: it might be challenging to work later witha Rinzel and Lee’s model based on the hypothesis that it is necessary for burstgeneration to consider an inward current which slowly inactivates as Ca^{2+}accumulates during the burst to the exclusion of I_{K(Ca)} [[16]]. By making a comparison between experimental data and simulation resultscalculated with modified Plant equations, it was suggested that the mechanismunderlying temperature-dependent bursting patterns of bursting pacemaker neurons atabdominal ganglion of *Aplysia juliana* might be derived from temperature-likescaling factors ρ(T) and ϕ(T) for the maximum conductances and the timeconstants, respectively; together with reference temperatureT_{0} = 23°C, Q_{10} of 3.0 for the activationvariable, and Q_{10} of 1.3 for temperature dependences of maximumconductances.

Taken together, it was suggested that a modified Plant model could be used tosimulate the temperature-dependent bursting activity of bursting pacemaker neurons inthe abdominal ganglia of *Aplysia juliana* and to unravel the mechanism oftemperature dependence in bursting patterns.

### Nomenclature

A_{AP}, action potential amplitude

A_{AP, ave}, averaged action potential amplitude

A_{AP, max}, maximum action potential amplitude

Ca, slow change in intracellular free calcium concentration

Frequency, spontaneous firing frequency (=1/ISI)

ISI, interspike interval (=Δt_{r1} + Δt_{AP,1/2} + Δt_{f2})

I_{Ca}, slow inward calcium current

I_{K}, fast potassium current

I_{K(Ca)}, calcium-activated potassium current

I_{L}, leak current

I_{Na}, fast sodium current

T_{0}, reference temperature (=23°C)

V, membrane potential

V_{Ca}, reversal potential for calcium current

V_{K}, reversal potential for potassium current

V_{L}, reversal potential for leak current

V_{Na}, reversal potential for sodium current

V_{np}, membrane potential at the negative peak

V_{pp}, membrane potential at the positive peak

Δt_{r1}, first half of the rising phase of AP

Δt_{r2}, last half of the rising phase of AP

Δt_{f1}, first half of the falling phase of AP

Δt_{f2}, last half of the falling phase of AP

Δt_{AP, 1/2}, AP half-width duration(=Δt_{r2} + Δt_{f1})

θ_{1,} inverse tangent of the ratio of half A_{AP} toΔt_{r2}

θ_{2}, inverse tangent of the ratio of half A_{AP} toΔt_{f1}

${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{Ca}}$, maximal conductance for calcium ion current

${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{K}}$, maximal conductance for potassium ion current

${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{L}}$, maximal conductance for leak current

${\overline{\mathrm{g}}}_{\mathrm{Na}}$, maximal conductance for sodium ion current

*h,* voltage-dependent inactivation variable for sodium channel;h_{∞} = steady state value of inactivation h

*m,* voltage-dependent activation variable for sodium channel;m_{∞} = steady state value of activation m

*n,* activation variable for potassium channel;n_{∞} = steady state value of activation n

μ_{m}, constant value involved in the defining equation form_{∞}

μ_{h}, constant value involved in the defining equation forh_{∞}

μ_{n}, *v*_{n}, constant values involved in the defining equation forn_{∞}

α, β, γ, δ, constant values involved in the defining equation forsteady state values of activation (inactivation) variables and relaxationconstants

1/λ, maximal relaxation time constant of h and n

${\overline{\mathrm{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{n}}$, maximal relaxation time constant of n

τ_{h,} relaxation constant of h

τ_{χ,} relaxation constant of χ

τ_{n,} relaxation constant of n

χ, slowly activating conductance for calcium current;χ_{∞} = steady state value of activation χ

ρ^{−1}, estimation for the time-constant of the Ca-equation

ρ(T), temperature-dependent scaling factor; $\rho \left(\mathrm{T}\right)\equiv {1.3}^{\frac{{\mathrm{T}\u2010\mathrm{T}}_{0}}{{10}^{\xb0\mathrm{C}}}}$

ϕ(T), temperature-dependent scaling factor; $\varphi \left(\mathrm{T}\right)\equiv {3}^{\frac{{\mathrm{T}\u2010\mathrm{T}}_{0}}{{10}^{\xb0\mathrm{C}}}}$

I_{SI,} slow inward Ca^{2+}-current

I_{NS,} nonspecific cation current

I_{R,} anomalous rectifier current

I_{NaCa,} Na^{+}-Ca^{2+} exchanger current

I_{NaK,} Na^{+}-K^{+} pump current

I_{CaP,} Ca^{2+} pump current

I_{K1,} inhibitory potassium current

I_{NSR,} calcium current which initiate the burst

I_{D,} cation-nonspecific current

I_{R,} potassium current which is activated only near the potassiumequilibrium potential

I_{Nap,} slow depolarizing noninactivating Na^{+}-current

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a research grant from the Sochun Academic Research Fund ofJeju National University in 2012. K.L. was supported by Basic Science ResearchProgram NRF-2013R1A1A3010216 and NRF-2013R1A3A1072702 funded by the Ministry ofEducation, Science and Technology.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Hyun NG, Hyun KH, Lee K, Kaang BK: Temperature dependence of action potential parameters in Aplysia neurons. Neurosignals. 2012, 20: 252-264. 10.1159/000334960.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray RW: The effect of temperature on the membrane properties of neurons in the visceralganglion of Aplysia. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1966, 18: 291-303. 10.1016/0010-406X(66)90188-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stephens PJ, Frascella PA, Mindrebo N: Effects of ethanol and temperature on a crab axon action potentials: a possiblemechanism for peripheral spike generation. J Exp Biol. 1983, 103: 289-301.Google Scholar
- Heitler WJ, Edwards DH: Effect of temperature on a voltage-sensitive electrical synapse in crayfish. J Exp Biol. 1998, 201: 503-513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frankenhaeuser B, Moore LE: The effect of temperature on the sodium and potassium permeability changes inmyelinated nerve fibres of
*Xenopus laevis*. J Physiol. 1963, 169: 431-437.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dalton JC, Hendrix DE: Effects of temperature on membrane potentials of lobster giant axon. Am J Physiol. 1962, 202: 491-494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burrows M: Effects of temperature on a central synapse between identified motor neurons inlocust. J Comp Physiol A. 1989, 165: 687-695. 10.1007/BF00611000.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerkut GA, Ridge RM: The effect of temperature changes on the activity of the neurons of the snailHelix aspersa. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1962, 5: 283-295. 10.1016/0010-406X(62)90057-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hodgkin AL, Katz B: The effect of temperature on the electrical activity of the giant axon of thesquid. J Physiol. 1949, 109: 240-249.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gorman ALF, Hermann A, Thomas MV: Ionic requirements for membrane oscillations and their dependence on the calciumconcentration in a molluscan pace-maker neurone. J Physiol. 1982, 327: 185-217.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adams WB: Slow depolarizing and hyperpolarizing currents which mediate bursting in Aplysianeuron R15. J Physiol. 1985, 360: 51-68.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adams WB, Benson JA: The generation and modulation of endogenous rhythmicity in the Aplysia burstingpacemaker neuron R15. Prog Biophys molec Biol. 1985, 46: 1-49. 10.1016/0079-6107(85)90011-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plant RE, Kim M: On the mechanism underlying bursting in the Aplysia abdominal ganglion R15cell. Math Biosci. 1975, 26: 357-375. 10.1016/0025-5564(75)90022-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plant RE, Kim M: Mathematical description of a bursting pacemaker neuron by a modification of theHodgkin-Huxley equations. Biophys J. 1976, 16: 227-224. 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85683-4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plant RE: Bifurcation and resonance in a model for bursting nerve cells. J Math Biology. 1981, 11: 15-32. 10.1007/BF00275821.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rinzel J, Lee YS: Dissection of a model for neuronal parabolic bursting. J Math Biol. 1987, 25: 653-675. 10.1007/BF00275501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canavier CC, Clark JW, Byrne JH: Simulation of the bursting activity of Neuron R15 in Aplysia: role of ioniccurrents, calcium balance, and modulatory transmitters. J Neurophysiol. 1991, 66: 2107-2124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertram R: A computational study of the effects of serotonin on a molluscan neuron. Biol Cybern. 1993, 69: 257-269. 10.1007/BF00198966.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butera RJ, Clark JW, Canavier CC, Baxter DA, Byrne JH: Analysis of the effects of modulatory agents on a modeled bursting neuron: dynamicinteractions between voltage and calcium dependent systems. J Comput Neurosci. 1995, 2: 19-44. 10.1007/BF00962706.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carpenter DO: Temperature effects on pacemaker generation, membrane potential, and criticalfiring threshold in Aplysia neurons. J Gen Physiol. 1967, 50: 1469-1484. 10.1085/jgp.50.6.1469.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher SD, Ram JL: High temperature induces reversible silence in Aplysia R15 bursting pacemakerneuron. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 1991, 98: 399-405. 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90422-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Fisher RS: Hyperthermic spreading depressions in the immature rat hippocampal slice. J Neurophysiol. 2000, 84: 1355-1360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JA, Connors BW: High temperatures alter physiological proper-ties of pyramidal cells andinhibitory interneurons in hippocampus. Front Cell Neurosci. 2012, 6: 27-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Orlowski JP, Erenberg G, Lueders H, Cruse RP: Hypothermia and barbiturate coma for refractory status epilepticus. Crit Care Med. 1984, 12: 367-372. 10.1097/00003246-198404000-00006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hyun NG, Hyun KH, Hyun KB, Han JH, Lee K, Kaang BK: A computational model of the temperature-dependent changes in firing patterns inAplysia neurons. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011, 15: 371-382. 10.4196/kjpp.2011.15.6.371.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun HA, Huber MT, Dewald M, Schäfer K, Voigt K: Computer simulation of neural signal transduction: the role of nonlinear dynamicsand noise. Int J Bifur Chaos. 1998, 8: 881-889. 10.1142/S0218127498000681.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Finke C, Freund JA, Rosa E, Braun HA, Feudel U: On the role of subthreshold currents in the Huber-Braun cold receptor model. Chaos. 2010, 20: 045107–045107–10-10.1063/1.3527989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chay TR, Cook DL: Endogenous bursting patterns in excitable cells. Math Biosci. 1988, 90: 139-1530. 10.1016/0025-5564(88)90062-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bertram R: Reduced-system analysis of the effects of serotonin on a molluscan bursterneuron. Biol Cybern. 1994, 70: 359-368. 10.1007/BF00200333.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kramer RH, Zucker RS: Calcium-induced inactivation of calcium current causes the inter-bursthyperpolarization of Aplysia bursting neurons. J Physiol. 1985, 362: 131-160.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun W, Eckhardt B, Braun HA, Huber M: Phase-space structure of thermoreceptor. Phys Rev E. 2000, 62: 6352-6360. 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun HA, Huber MT, Anthes N, Voigt K, Neiman A, Pei X, Moss F: Interaction between slow and fast conductances in the Huber/Braun model ofcold-receptor discharges. Neurocomputing. 2000, 32–33: 51-59. 10.1016/S0925-2312(00)00143-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun HA, Huber MT, Anthes N, Voigt K, Neiman A, Pei X, Moss F: Noise-induced impulse pattern modifications at different dynamical period-onesituations in a computer model of temperature encoding. BioSystems. 2001, 62: 99-112. 10.1016/S0303-2647(01)00140-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braun H, Vogit K, Huber M: Oscillations, resonances and noise: basis of flexible neuronal patterngeneration. BioSystems. 2003, 71: 39-50. 10.1016/S0303-2647(03)00108-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feudel U, Neiman A, Pei X, Wojtenek W, Braun H, Huber M, Moss F: Homoclinic bifurcation in a Hodgkin-Huxley model of thermally sensitiveneurons. Chaos. 2000, 10: 231-239. 10.1063/1.166488.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mosekilde E, Sosnovtseva OV, Postnov D, Braun H, Huber MT: Noise-activated and noise-induced rhythms in neural systems. Nonlin Stud. 2004, 11: 449-467.Google Scholar
- Honerkamp J, Mutschler G, Seitz R: Coupling of a slow and a fast oscillator can generate bursting. Bull Math Biol. 1985, 47: 1-21. 10.1007/BF02459643.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soto-Trevino C, Kopell N, Watson D: Parabolic bursting revisited. J Math Biol. 1996, 35: 114-128. 10.1007/s002850050046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gorman ALF, Thomas MV: Potassium conductance and internal calcium accumulation in a molluscan neuron. J Physiol. 1980, 308: 287-313.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chay TR: Electrical bursting and intracellular Ca
^{2+}oscillations in excitablecell models. Biol Cybern. 1990, 63: 15-23. 10.1007/BF00202449.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Adams WB, Levitan IB: Voltage and ion dependences of the slow currents which mediate bursting in Aplysianeuron R15. J Physiol. 1985, 360: 69-93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewis DV: Calcium-activated inward spike after-current in bursting neuron R15 of Aplysia. J Physiol Lond. 1988, 395: 285-302.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), whichpermits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiverhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ applies to the data madeavailable in this article, unless otherwise stated.