Skip to main content
Download PDF

5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A but not 5-HTR1A antagonism impairs the cross-modal reactivation of deprived visual cortex in adulthood

Molecular Brain volume 11, Article number: 65 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Visual cortical areas show enhanced tactile responses in blind individuals, resulting in improved behavioral performance. Induction of unilateral vision loss in adult mice, by monocular enucleation (ME), is a validated model for such cross-modal brain plasticity. A delayed whisker-driven take-over of the medial monocular zone of the visual cortex is preceded by so-called unimodal plasticity, involving the potentiation of the spared-eye inputs in the binocular cortical territory. Full reactivation of the sensory-deprived contralateral visual cortex is accomplished by 7 weeks post-injury. Serotonin (5-HT) is known to modulate sensory information processing and integration, but its impact on cortical reorganization after sensory loss, remains largely unexplored. To address this issue, we assessed the involvement of 5-HT in ME-induced cross-modal plasticity and the 5-HT receptor (5-HTR) subtype used. We first focused on establishing the impact of ME on the total 5-HT concentration measured in the visual cortex and in the somatosensory barrel field. Next, the changes in expression as a function of post-ME recovery time of the monoamine transporter 2 (vMAT2), which loads 5-HT into presynaptic vesicles, and of the 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A were assessed, in order to link these temporal expression profiles to the different types of cortical plasticity induced by ME. In order to accurately pinpoint which 5-HTR exactly mediates ME-induced cross-modal plasticity, we pharmacologically antagonized the 5-HTR1A, 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A subtypes. This study reveals brain region-specific alterations in total 5-HT concentration, time-dependent modulations in vMAT2, 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A protein expression and 5-HTR antagonist-specific effects on the post-ME plasticity phenomena. Together, our results confirm a role for 5-HTR1A in the early phase of binocular visual cortex plasticity and suggest an involvement of 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A but not 5-HTR1A during the late cross-modal recruitment of the medial monocular visual cortex. These insights contribute to the general understanding of 5-HT function in cortical plasticity and may encourage the search for improved rehabilitation strategies to compensate for sensory loss.

Introduction

Even though the mammalian brain is most susceptible to changes in sensory inputs during so-called critical periods early in life [1,2,3,4], it retains the intrinsic capacity to recover from sensory deprivation well into adulthood [1, 5,6,7]. In human patients, for example, late-onset vision loss triggers two types of cross-modal brain plasticity [8]: ‘compensatory plasticity’ is the result of experience-dependent refinement of the spared senses, whereas ‘cross-modal recruitment’ involves the take-over of the deprived visual cortical territory for the active processing of non-visual information, leading to enhanced sound localization abilities or improved tactile acuity as with Braille reading [9,10,11,12,13].

In an animal model of one-eyed vision, due to monocular enucleation (ME) in adult (P120) mice, we could previously establish extensive neuronal reactivation of both the binocular zone (Bz) and the medial monocular zone (Mmz) of the deprived contralateral visual cortex within a 7 week recovery period (7wME) (Fig. 1a, b). This functional recovery not only relied on the expected unimodal potentiation of spared-eye inputs occurring in the Bz during the first 3 weeks post-ME, but also on an ensuing tactile whisker-related reactivation of especially the Mmz from week four onwards [14,15,16]. This cross-modal effect was most pronounced in the infragranular layers of the Mmz [15]. The level of neuronal activity reached in the Mmz 7 weeks post-ME could be experimentally manipulated by reducing or intensifying whisker inputs, respectively by means of whisker removal or via natural whisker stimulation during exploration of a new, enriched cage environment in complete darkness. These observations confirmed the manifestation of the cross-modal recruitment of the medial monocular cortical territory by the whiskers [15]. The post-ME recovery period is thus characterized by the recruitment of the deprived visual areas by the spared senses in adult mice just as in human patients.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic overview of the different cortical plasticity phases occurring in the adult ME-mouse model and illustration of the experimental setup. a Timeline indicating the early unimodal plasticity phase (week 1–3 post-ME) and the subsequent cross-modal plasticity phase (week 4–7 post-ME). b Overview of the ISH zif268-based reactivation pattern of the uni-and cross-modal plasticity phase in adult mice upon ME. Whisker deprivation and 5-HTR antagonism specifically suppress reactivation of the Mmz. c Illustration of the anatomical delineation of the visual cortex regions on a Nissl-stained coronal section which are then overlaid on the matching ISH zif268 section. The delineated visual cortical areas are indicated between large arrowheads: V2L, V1, V2M and RM with the distinction between monocular (m) and binocular (b) segments. The binocular zone (Bz) comprises V2Lb-V1b while the medial monocular zone (Mmz) includes V1m-V2M. The different cortical layers are indicated with Roman numbers: I-VI. d All animals had normal vision up to the age of P120 or in case of the non-deprived age-matched control mice (AMC), up to P169 (white bars). Mice that underwent monocular enucleation (ME, light gray bars) at P120 recovered under standard housing conditions during 1 week (1wME, n = 5; representing ongoing open-eye potentiation), 3 weeks (3wME, n = 5, representing the end of the open-eye potentiation phase), 5 weeks (5wME, n = 5; representing ongoing cross-modal plasticity phase) or 7 weeks (7wME, n = 11; representing the end of the cross-modal plasticity phase). All drug-treated ME mice recovered for 7 weeks and received daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of either saline (n = 6), 5-HTR1A antagonist (WAY-100635, n = 3), 5-HTR2A antagonist (ketanserin, n = 3) or 5-HTR3A antagonist (ondansetron, n = 3) during the last 3 weeks of the 7 weeks post-ME period (dark gray bar, representing the time window of whisker-driven cross-modal plasticity). The number of animals (n) is represented in the bars

Full size image

Despite the current understanding of molecular and cellular aspects of visual cortex plasticity [12, 17,18,19,20,21,22] and the well-described role of neuromodulators in brain plasticity [19, 23,24,25,26,27], only little is known about sensory deprivation-induced alterations in serotonin (5-HT) signaling across sensory areas or, in concreto, about how 5-HT is involved in the different types of cortical plasticity in the context of acquired blindness. A wide range of axonal projections, originating from the serotonergic Raphe Nucleus in the brain stem [28], reach the different sensory cortices, where 5-HT and several of the 14 identified mammalian 5-HT receptor subtypes are involved in the integration of neuronal signals and in the processing of sensory information [29,30,31,32,33,34,35].

Of particular interest to the field of cortical plasticity are the serotonergic G-protein coupled receptors 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR2A, and ion channel 5-HTR3A. These receptors are most abundantly expressed in the mammalian neocortex, predominantly on excitatory, excitatory and inhibitory, and exclusively on inhibitory neurons respectively. In addition, 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR2A have already been implicated in either unimodal or cross-modal plasticity [18, 27, 32, 36,40,41]. On the one hand, administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine during a period of visual deprivation via eyelid suture reinstated juvenile-like unimodal ocular dominance plasticity in adulthood. This extraordinary phenomenon was found to be mediated through, amongst others, changes in 5-HTR1A receptor function leading to an experience-dependent shift in the cortical excitation/inhibition balance (E/I) [26, 27, 36, 42, 43]. On the other hand, 2 days of visual deprivation in young rats mediated a 5-HTR2A/2C-dependent delivery of AMPAR1 specifically at layer IV-II/III synapses of the primary somatosensory barrel cortex (S1BF), ultimately leading to compensatory plasticity in the form of a sharpened whisker-barrel map and more fine-tuned barrel neuron responses to primary whisker stimulation [32].

Adult cortical plasticity in response to sensory deprivation was further found to involve the activation of dis-inhibitory cortical circuits including the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)-positive interneurons [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. VIP cells are a type of 5-HTR3A expressing interneurons, which account for approximately 1/3rd of the entire interneuron population [52]. We discovered before that GABAARα1-mediated intracortical inhibition elicits a pivotal role in the different response of the Bz and the Mmz to ME [53]. Since 5-HT and the 5-HT receptors are considered important regulators of the cortical E/I balance [37, 54, 55], they may well exert a major impact on the excitability of the specific brain circuits involved in different types of cortical plasticity.

All these findings indicate that 5-HT may indeed elicit a very important role in the cortical response to sensory loss. We therefore initiated a set of experiments to elucidate if and how exactly 5-HT or one of the three above described 5-HT receptor subtypes, take part in ME-induced plasticity in adult mice. HPLC analysis was performed on whole-tissue homogenates of the visual cortex and S1BF to study the long-term impact of ME on the total 5-HT concentration in these two sensory cortices, known to functionally adapt upon vision loss [15]. Western blotting experiments were conducted to investigate the longitudinal effect of ME on the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (vMAT2), 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A protein expression levels. Different time-points post-ME were chosen to enable distinction between the earlier effects occurring in the Bz, during the unimodal open-eye potentiation phase, and those occurring in the Mmz, during the subsequent cross-modal phase. We pharmacologically antagonized 5-HTR1A, 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A receptor function, to pinpoint via which of these receptors 5-HT mediates ME-induced cross-modal plasticity in the visual cortex and in S1BF. As before, we relied on in situ hybridization for the neuronal activity reporter gene zif268 as a high-throughput read-out to differentiate the distinct post-ME plasticity phases (Fig. 1c, d). We demonstrate brain region-specific and time-dependent alterations in pre- and postsynaptic aspects of 5-HT neurotransmission in the adult brain upon ME. A role for 5-HTR1A in unimodal open-eye potentiation was confirmed and we provide evidence for the involvement of 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A but not 5-HTR1A in ME-induced cross-modal plasticity. The potential of a defined pharmacological and spatiotemporal control on cross-modal plasticity holds promise towards future refinements of rehabilitation strategies to treat acquired sensory loss.

Methods

Animals

In total 54 C57Bl/6 J mice (Janvier Elevage, Le Genest-St-Isle, France) of either sex (32 male/22 female) were used in this study. All mice were housed under standard laboratory conditions with constant room temperature and humidity, an 10/14-h dark/light cycle with food and water available ad libitum. All experiments have been approved by the Ethical Research Committee of KU Leuven and were in strict accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of 22 September 2010 (2010/63/EU) and with the Belgian legislation (KB of 29 May 2013). Every effort was made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental manipulations and the number of mice used per condition (Fig. 1b, d). The different phases of cortical plasticity under study have been determined previously based on the impact of either visual stimulation via the spared eye, or somatosensory deprivation/stimulation based on whisker clipping/natural whisker use during the exploration of new toys in complete darkness, on neuronal activity in the visual cortex of adult ME mice [15]. Specifically, 1 week post-ME (1wME) mice are in an ongoing unimodal open-eye potentiation phase. Mice with a 3 week post-ME recovery period (3wME) are at the end of the open-eye potentiation phase, which restores normal visually driven activity levels in an extended binocular zone (Bz). 5 weeks post-ME (5wME) mice are in an ongoing cross-modal phase whereas mice with a 7 week post-ME recovery period (7wME) have undergone maximal cross-modal visual cortex reactivation in which normal activity levels are restored in the monocular zone of the visual cortex, especially medial to the Bz (Mmz), only now relying on whisker inputs. Cortical regions of interest therefore are the visual cortex, Bz and Mmz, and the primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF).

Monocular enucleation paradigm and tissue preparation

The removal of the right eye, or monocular enucleation (ME), was performed as described previously [14]. Briefly, adult (P120) mice were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (75 mg/kg, Dechra Veterinary Products, Eurovet) and medetomidine hydrochloride (1 mg/kg Orion Corporation, Janssen Animal Health). Eye ointment (Tobrex, Alcon) was administered to the left eye to prevent dehydration. The right eye was carefully removed and the orbit was filled with hemostatic cotton wool (Qualiphar, Bornem, Belgium) in case of bleeding. Analgesics were injected subcutaneously (Metacam, 2 mg/kg, 0.1 mL) and atipamezol hydrochloride was administered to reverse anaesthesia (1 mg/kg i.p., Orion Corporation, Elanco Animal Health). Following ME, the mice were housed in their home cages under standard laboratory conditions for a 1 to 7 week recovery period. Control mice are age-matched (AMC) to the 7 week ME mice, the time point of maximal recovery of neuronal activity [56]. At the end of the ME period, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. For HPLC-based determination of the total 5-HT concentration in visual and somatosensory tissue samples, the brains were rapidly extracted and immediately frozen in 2-methylbutane (Merck, Overijse, Belgium) at a temperature of − 40 °C. All brains were stored at − 80 °C until sectioning. A tissue blotting device (Model PA 002 Mouse Brain Blocker, 1 mm, David KOPF instruments, California) was used to prepare approximately 1 mm-thick coronal slices to subsequently isolate the whole visual cortex and the primary somatosensory cortex (S1BF) with sterile scalpels. Separate analysis of medial monocular and binocular cortex was technically impossible with this method. For Western blotting experiments, 100 μm-thick coronal cryosections were collected on baked glass slides and stored at − 80 °C. Specifically for radioactive in situ hybridization (ISH) experiments, the mice were placed overnight in their home cages in a dark room to reduce zif268-expression to basal levels. The following day, the mice were placed in a high-lit environment to upregulate sensory driven zif268-mRNA expression. After 45 min, at peak zif268-mRNA expression levels, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The brains were rapidly removed, immersed in 2-methylbutane at a temperature of − 40 °C (Merck, Overijse, Belgium) and stored at − 80 °C until sectioning. Serial sections with a thickness of 25 μm were prepared on a cryostat (HM 500 OM, Microm, Thermo Scientific, Walldorf, Germany), mounted on 0.1% poly-L-Lysine-coated (Sigma-Aldrich) slides, and stored at − 20 °C until further processing.

Quantification of the total serotonin content in mouse brain homogenates

The total serotonin (5-HT) content in the visual and barrel cortex (HPLC total n = 15, AMC: n = 9; 7wME: n = 6) was measured based on previously reported methods [57,58,59]. In summary, after weighing cortical tissue, 190 μL of an antioxidant solution (0.1 M acetic acid, 3.3 mM L-cysteine, 0.27 mM Na2EDTA and 0.0125 mM ascorbic acid) and 10 μL of an internal standard solution (3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine solution 1 μg/mL in antioxidant) were added to the tissue. After homogenization, the samples were centrifuged (20 min, 9500 g, 4 °C). The supernatant was diluted 5-fold in 0.5 M acetic acid and 20 μL was injected automatically on a reversed phase liquid chromatography system (autosampler ASI-100 and HPLC pump P680 A HPG/2, Dionex, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) with electrochemical detection (potential = + 700 mV) (Amperometric Detector LC-4C, BAS, Indiana, USA). With this liquid chromatography method, we are able to measure within one run the monoamines noradrenaline, dopamine and 5-HT, some of their major metabolites (such as 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid; homovanillic acid) as well as the internal standard 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine (Fig. 2). The separation between the different compounds was achieved using a narrowbore C18 column (Alltech®, Alltima™, 5 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm, Grace, Deerfield, IL, USA). The mobile phase buffer contained 0.1 M sodium acetate, 20 mM citric acid, 1 mM sodium octane sulfonic acid, 1 mM dibutylamine and 0.1 mM Na2EDTA adjusted to pH 3.7 (mobile phase composition: 97 buffer / 3 methanol (v/v)). For this study, we specifically quantified the 5-HT content of the different samples. Tissue concentration was expressed as ng 5-HT /g wet tissue (ng/g).

Fig. 2
figure2

ME-induced decrease in total 5-HT concentration in the adult visual cortex. a, b HPLC chromatogram of respectively the standard and a cortical sample. The peaks were numbered from 1 to 7 and represent noradrenaline; 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine; 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; dopamine; 5-hydroxy-indoleacetic acid; homovanillic acid and serotonin (5-HT). c In the visual cortex (VC) of 7wME mice (n = 6), a significantly decreased total 5-HT concentration was observed compared to AMC mice (n = 9, p = 0.018, Mann-Whitney test). d The primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF) did not show a significant difference (p = 0.114, Mann-Whitney test). These results indicate an ME-induced effect on 5-HT signaling in sensory deprived cortex. The number of animals (n) is represented in the bars. *P < 0.05

Full size image

Western analysis

Western blotting (WB) was used to investigate the changes in relative expression of pre- and postsynaptic proteins involved in serotonergic neurotransmission. Time-course samples were prepared to separately examine the protein expression in the Mmz, Bz and S1BF over a 7-week period. The experimental conditions included: 1, 3, 5, 7 weeks post-ME. For each of the experimental conditions, as well as for the control mice age-matched to the 7wME mice (AMC), at least 4 mice were included (Figs. 3 and 4, WB total n = 24, AMC: n = 4; 1wME: n = 5; 3wME: n = 5; 5wME: n = 5; 7wME: n = 5). All ME samples were analyzed relative to the AMC samples (absolute OD-values measured in the Mmz, Bz or S1BF of the AMC as mean ± SEM for vMAT2 (Mmz: 2.824 ± 0.483; Bz: 0.691 ± 0.044; S1BF: 0.953 ± 0.130), 5-HTR1A (Mmz: 0.855 ± 0.126; Bz: 0.667 ± 0.076; S1BF: 0.700 ± 0.073) and 5-HTR3A (Mmz: 0.955 ± 0.087; Bz: 0.854 ± 0.138; S1BF: 0.764 ± 0.273)). We chose to analyze vMAT2 protein expression levels since they provide information on the presynaptic loading of vesicles with 5-HT and because vMAT2 expression levels positively correlate with the total 5-HT concentration present in a given brain region of interest [60,61,62].

Fig. 3
figure3

Time-dependent effect of ME on cortical area-specific vMAT2 expression levels. Western blot OD values are illustrated as the ratio of the expression levels of each ME group relative to the expression of the AMC group to judge the effect of post-ME recovery time. Below each graph, representative Western blot bands are depicted, as well as the expected molecular weight (~ 75 kDa) and an example total protein stain. The different conditions are indicated with numbers above the respective bands: 1 = 3wME, 2 = 5wME, 3 = AMC, 4 = 7wME and P = region-specific tissue sample pool. a At 1 week post-ME (1wME), the expression of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (vMAT2) in the medial monocular zone (Mmz) was significantly reduced compared to the AMC mice (dashed line) and the vMAT2 expression levels remain low, even after 7 weeks. b In the binocular zone (Bz), a significant ME-effect was detected in 1wME and 3wME mice, showing increased vMAT2 expression levels immediately after ME. c In the primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF), vMAT2 expression was increased in 1wME mice compared to AMCs, and was significantly higher in 1wME and 3wME mice compared to 5wME mice. The number of animals (n) is represented in the bars. Significant pair-wise differences between ME mice and the AMC group are indicated with a ‘*’ within the corresponding bar. Differences between ME conditions due to post-ME recovery time are indicated as a ‘*’ above the respective ME conditions. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure4

Time-dependent effect of ME on cortical area-specific 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A expression levels. a, b Analysis of the Western blot OD values, illustrated as the ratio of the expression level of each ME group relative to the expression of the age-matched control group (AMC, dashed line) to judge the effect of post-lesion recovery time, revealed no significant impact of ME on 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A receptor expression, and also no time-dependent modulations in the medial monocular zone (Mmz) of the visual cortex of ME mice. c In the binocular zone (Bz), post-ME 5-HTR1A expression levels were increased in 1wME and 3wME mice and gradually decreased over time, reaching AMC levels in 5wME and 7wME mice. d The 5-HTR3A receptor levels in the Bz, were significantly higher in 3wME mice compared to AMCs and decreased gradually over time to reach AMC levels at 5 and 7 weeks post-ME. e In the primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF), the 5-HTR1A expression was increased in 1wME and 3wME mice, decreased over time to reach its lowest expression levels at 5 weeks post-ME (5wME) and again increased at 7 weeks post-ME. f Although similar ME-induced and time-dependent modulations in 5-HTR3A expression were observed in S1BF, they did not reach statistical difference, possibly due to larger inter-individual variation. The number of animals (n) is represented in the bars. Significant pair-wise differences between ME mice and the AMC group are indicated with a ‘*’ within the corresponding bar. Differences between ME conditions due to post-ME recovery time are indicated as a ‘*’ above the respective ME conditions. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Protein extraction from tissue slices

Based on the mouse brain atlas of Paxinos and Franklin (2013) [63], the primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF: 0.5-(− 2); 3–4.5; 1, relative to Bregma in A-P; M-L; D), the medial monocular zone (Mmz, comprising monocular V1 and V2M: − 2.7-(− 4.7); 1–2.5; 1, relative to Bregma and the binocular zone (Bz, comprising binocular V2L and V1: − 2.7-(− 4.7); 2.5–4; 1, relative to Bregma) were microscopically excised and collected separately from 100 μm-thick coronal cryosections (Fig. 1c). Tissue was collected in a mix of 4 μL of complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH) and 100 μL ice-cold lysis buffer (2% SDS, 65 mM Tris-HCl in MQ) optimized for the enrichment of membrane (−associated) proteins [64, 65]. Proteins were extracted from the tissue by mechanical homogenization using drill-driven, sterile disposable pestles (Argos Technologies), sonication (5 × 10 s), incubation at 70 °C (5 min) and centrifugation (15 min, 13000 rpm, 4 °C). The supernatant was collected and the total protein concentration was determined using the Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen). Samples were stored at − 80 °C.

Immunoblotting

To obtain the optimal primary antibody working concentration, a protein dilution series ranging from 5 to 30 μg was analyzed. A concentration within the linear range of the detection system that resulted in a good signal to noise ratio was chosen for monocular, binocular and somatosensory samples separately. For vMAT2, 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A analysis, this resulted in 15 μg for samples of all three regions. 5-HTR2A was excluded from the analyses due to the lack of a specific antibody. Reference sample (pool) consisting of a mixture of equal amounts of each prepared tissue sample was run for monocular, binocular and somatosensory cortex, with the same optimal amount of protein on each gel to gauge blot-to-blot variability. After the addition of 5 μl reducing agent (10×, Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom) and 2 μl LDS sample buffer (4×, Invitrogen), the samples were denatured (10 min, 70 °C). The protein samples were separated on 4–12% Bis-Tris Midi-gels in the XCell4 SureLock Midi-Cell (Invitrogen). The Spectra™ Multicolor Broad range protein ladder (ThermoScientific) was used as molecular weight standard. Subsequently, the samples were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. After 1–2 h incubation in a 5% ECL blocking agent (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) in Tris-saline (0.01 M Tris, 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% TX-100, pH 7.6), the membrane was incubated overnight with a primary antibody rabbit anti-vMAT2 (1:1000, R&D Systems, Novus Biologicals), with rabbit anti-5-HTR1A (1:200, Alomone Labs), with rabbit anti-5-HTR3A (1:200, Alomone Labs). The next day, the blots were successively washed in Tris-saline (4 × 5 min), 30 min incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1:50.000, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), rinsed in Tris-saline (5 × 5 min) and Tris-stock (1 × 5 min) (0.05 M Tris, pH 7.6). The immunoreactive bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent reaction (1 × 5 min, Super Signal West Dura, ThermoScientific, Pierce) combined with the BIO-RAD ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System. In order to correct for intra- and inter-gel variability and to normalize the concentration of the specific detected proteins to the total amount of protein present, we performed a total protein stain (TPS) with Swift Membrane Stain (G-Biosciences) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Immediately after the staining, blots were scanned with the BIO-RAD ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System.

Semi-quantitative Western analysis

The immunostained protein bands were semi-quantitatively evaluated by densitometry (Image Lab™ software) separately for monocular, binocular and somatosensory cortex samples (Figs. 3 and 4). First, to account for intra-gel and inter-gel variability including loading differences or incomplete transfer onto the membrane, a TPS was employed rather than the use of a single reference protein [53, 66, 67]. For each protein of interest, the optical density value per mouse was normalized to its corresponding TPS. Also, to compare samples between different gels, normalized data were expressed relative to the region-specific reference sample (pool).

Pharmacology

ME mice (pharmacology total n = 15, saline: n = 6; WAY-100635: n = 3; ketanserin: n = 3; ondansetron: n = 3) received daily injections (i.p.), at 2 pm exactly, of a specific 5-HT receptor antagonist at a dose based on prior literature, and specifically during the 3-week period of cross-modal plasticity from week 5 to 7 post-ME (Fig. 1d). Systemic drug delivery was chosen because a long-term treatment with a locally implanted slow release system (e.g. Alzet minipump) would lead to cortical tissue damage and scar formation, potentially influencing the local neuromodulator levels [68]. Drugs used were the 5-HTR1A antagonist WAY-100635 maleate (Abcam Ab120550, 1 mg/kg, 0.2 mL i.p.) [37, 36, 69, 70], the 5-HTR2A antagonist ketanserin tartrate (R&D Systems, Tocris Bioscience, 5 mg/kg, 0.2 mL i.p.) [71,72,73,74] and the 5-HTR3A antagonist ondansetron hydrochloride (R&D Systems, Tocris Bioscience, 5 mg/kg, 0.2 mL i.p.) [75]. Control animals were housed under the same standard conditions and received saline injections (0.9%, i.p.) following the same injection regimen. All animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Brains were rapidly removed and stored as described above.

In situ hybridization for zif268-mRNA

High-throughput radioactive ISH experiments were performed on series of coronal brain sections between Bregma levels − 1.5 mm and − 5 mm and changes in the mRNA expression level of the immediate early gene (IEG) zif268, a proven excellent activity reporter gene in the mammalian brain, were quantified (mouse: [15, 16, 51, 53, 56, 76,77,78], cat: [79,80,81,82]. As such, the spatial extent and the exact anatomical location of experience-induced, predominantly excitatory [6, 83,84,85,86,87], neuronal activity changes were analyzed and compared throughout all cortical layers of the visual and somatosensory neocortex. This high-throughput approach allows the molecular visualization of cortical reactivation patterns in response to ME. ISH for zif268-mRNA was performed with a mouse-specific synthetic oligonucleotide probe (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) with sequence 5′-ccgttgctcagcagcatcatctcctccagtttggggtagttgtcc-3′. As described previously [51, 53, 77, 88], each probe was 3′-end labeled with [33P] dATP using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Unincorporated nucleotides were separated from the labeled probe by means of miniQuick Spin Oligo Columns (Roche Diagnostics, Vilvoorde, Belgium). The cryostat sections were fixed, dehydrated and delipidated. The radioactively labeled probes were added to a hybridization cocktail (50% (v/v) formamide, 4× standard SSC buffer, 1× Denhardt’s solution, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 100 μg/ml herring sperm DNA, 250 μg/ml tRNA, 60 mM dithiothreitol, 1% (w/v) N-lauroyl sarcosine, and 20 mM NaHPO4, pH 7.4) and applied to the cryostat sections (106 cpm/section). After an overnight incubation at 37 °C in a humid chamber, the sections were rinsed in 1× standard SSC buffer at 42 °C, dehydrated, air-dried and exposed to an autoradiographic film (Biomax MR; Kodak, Rochester, NY). After 7 days, the films were developed in EMS replacement for Kodak developer D-19 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield) and fixed in Rapid fixer (Ilford Hypam; Kodak). Autoradiographic images of adjacent sections per examined cortical area per mouse were scanned at 1200 dpi (CanoScan LIDE 600F; Canon, Tokyo, Japan), and all images were similarly adjusted for brightness and contrast in Adobe Photoshop Elements 2018 (version 16.0, × 64, Adobe Systems Incorporated).

Histology and localization of visual and somatosensory areal boundaries with Nissl patterns

Upon ISH, the cryostat sections were Nissl-counterstained (1% cresyl violet; Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich) according to standard procedures to visualize cortical boundaries between different visual and somatosensory areas and to aid the interpretation of the zif268-activity patterns (Fig. 1c). Images of the stained coronal sections were obtained at 5× (NA: 0.16) with a light microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager Z1) equipped with an AxioCam MRm camera (1388 × 1040 pixels) using the software program Zen (Zen Pro 2012, Carl Zeiss, Benelux). Comparisons were made with the stereotaxic mouse brain atlas [63] to delineate visual and somatosensory cortical borders as described previously [53, 56]. In all figures illustrating visual or somatosensory cortex, large arrowheads indicate the total extent of the cortex, whereas small arrowheads indicate the interareal borders. In the visual cortex, five subregions can be distinguished from lateral to medial (Figs. 1c, 5): the lateral extrastriate cortex (V2L), which is subdivided into a monocular (V2Lm, segments 1–4) and binocular region (V2Lb, segments 4–8), the primary visual cortex (V1) which is subdivided further into a binocular (V1b, segments 8–15) and monocular region (V1 m, segments 15–21), and the medial extrastriate cortex (V2M, segments 21–24) [51, 53, 56, 89]. For the zif268 analysis, we focused specifically on the Bz (V2Lb-V1b) and the Mmz (V1 m-V2M) as these regions undergo open-eye potentiation and cross-modal plasticity respectively. In the somatosensory cortex, we distinguished the primary somatosensory barrel field (S1BF) from the more lateral secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) and the more medial primary somatosensory cortex (S1), as the primary receiver of whisker inputs (Fig. 6) [63].

Fig. 5
figure5

5-HTR antagonist treatment from week 5–7 post-ME affects neuronal activity levels in Mmz and Bz. a-d Images of 3 adjacent sections (− 3.5-(− 3.7); 1–4; 1, relative to Bregma) from adult 7wME mice, drug or sham-treated during the last 3 weeks of the 7wME recovery period: (a) saline, (b) 5-HTR1A-antagonist WAY-100635, (c) 5-HTR2A-antagonist ketanserin, (d) 5-HTR3A-antagonist ondansetron. Corresponding pseudocolor representations are displayed next to their respective ISH sections. e Line graphs illustrating relative zif268-mRNA expression levels, measured as the average OD-value/segment, for saline-injected 7wME mice. For supra- and granular layers II/III-IV (e, left panel, dark gray line) and for infragranular layers V-VI (e, right panel, light gray line) the expression levels are displayed along the 5 predefined visual subdivisions (black arrowheads are in accordance with the small arrowheads in a-d, including the subdivision between monocular zones m and binocular zones b in V2L and V1). Error bars represent the SEM of the mean OD value in each segment. Relative zif268-mRNA expression levels are shown as OD-values averaged over the binocular zone Bz and the medial monocular zone Mmz for supra- and granular layers (f-h, left panel) and infragranular layers (f-h, right panel). Bz comprises V2Lb-V1b (dark gray marking), Mmz includes V1 m-V2M (light gray marking) as illustrated in e. Comparison of the OD-values of saline-injected (light gray bars) and WAY-100635-injected 7wME mice (orange bars) indicates decreased reactivation levels in the upper layers of the Bz (f, left panel). Comparison of the OD-values of saline-injected (light-gray bars) and ketanserin-treated 7wME mice (green bars) indicates decreased reactivation levels across all layers of the Mmz (g). Comparison of the OD-values of saline-injected (light-gray bars) and ondansetron-treated 7wME mice (blue bars) indicates decreased reactivation in the upper layers of the Mmz (h, left panel). The number of animals (n) is shown in the bars. *P < 0.05

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

5-HTR antagonist treatment from week 5–7 post-ME affects neuronal activity levels in S1BF. a-d Images of 3 adjacent sections (− 1.7-(− 1.9); 2.5–4; 1, relative to Bregma) from adult 7wME mice, injected during the last 3 weeks of the 7wME recovery period with (a) saline, (b) 5-HTR1A antagonist WAY-100635, (c) 5-HTR2A antagonist ketanserin, (d) 5-HTR3A antagonist ondansetron. Corresponding pseudocolor representations are displayed next to their respective ISH sections. e Line graphs illustrating the relative zif268-mRNA expression level, measured as the average OD-value/segment, for saline-injected 7wME mice. For supra- and granular layers II/III-IV (e, left panel, dark gray line) and for infragranular layers V-VI (e, right panel, light gray line) the expression levels are displayed along the 3 predefined somatosensory subdivisions (black arrowheads are in accordance with the small arrowheads in a-d). Error bars represent the SEM of the mean OD value in each segment. Relative zif268-mRNA expression levels are shown as OD-values averaged over the primary somatosensory barrel cortex (S1BF) for supra- and granular layers (f-h, left panel) and infragranular layers (f-h, right panel). Comparison of the OD-values of saline-injected (light gray bars) and WAY-100635-injected 7wME mice (orange bars) indicates no post-ME changes in neuronal activity in S1BF due to long-term i.p. injection of 5-HTR1A antagonist (f). Comparison of the OD-values of saline-injected (light-gray bars) and ketanserin-treated 7wME mice (green bars) indicates increased neuronal activity across all layers of the S1BF (g). Comparison of the OD-values of saline-injected (light-gray bars) and ondansetron-treated 7wME mice (blue bars) indicates increased neuronal activity across all layers of the S1BF (h). The number of animals (n) is represented in the bars. *P < 0.05

Full size image

Quantitative analysis of ISH results

To quantify the optical density (OD; mean gray value per pixel) of the ISH autoradiograms, a custom-made Matlab (Matlab R2017a; Mathworks) script was used as described previously [51, 53]. We analyzed at least three mice per condition. Per mouse, three ISH sections with an inter-distance of 100 μm were investigated (for visual cortex: − 3.5-(− 3.7); 1–4; 1, relative to Bregma; for somatosensory cortex: − 1.7-(− 1.9); 2.5–4; 1, relative to Bregma). The region of interest in the left hemisphere was demarcated by determining the top edge of the cortex, the boundary between the supra-and granular layers (II-III and IV) and the infragranular layers (V and VI), and the border between the infragranular layers and the corpus callosum. The region of interest was then divided equally into 24 segments from lateral to medial to create two lattices of 24 quadrangles, corresponding to the upper (II-IV) and lower (V-VI) layers. To compensate for possible variation in brain size and morphology, the lattices were translated on each autoradiogram over the cortical curvature, fixing the border of a specific segment to an areal border (border segment 20/21 is the area border V1 m/V2M). For each segment created this way, the relative OD was calculated as the mean gray value of all pixels contained within a particular quadrangle and was normalized to the mean gray value of a square measured in the corpus callosum (a defined region with no zif268-mRNA expression above background) in order to compare autoradiograms across experiments. Relative neuronal activity was expressed in percentages based on the following formula: 1 – (cortical zif268/background) × 100. Results are presented as profiles of neuronal activity per brain area and are illustrated in subregion-specific bar graphs. Pseudo-color maps were generated through a second custom-made Matlab script (Matlab R2017a; Mathworks, Natick, MA) and represent a false color coding of the gray values ranging from black (0) to white (225); high gray values are represented in white/yellow on the false color scale bar (0–50), medium high gray values are represented in red (50–100) or blue (100–150) and low gray values are represented in green/black (150–255).

Statistics

All HPLC results, Western blotting data and relative OD-values in ISH-sections were presented as mean ± SEM. Normal distribution and in parallel, equal variance between groups was tested. A non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney) was applied for pairwise comparison. A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test was used to determine the recovery time-dependent modulations of protein expression levels upon ME. For all tests, a probability level (α level was set to 0.05) of < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc).

Results

Reduced visual cortex 5-HT concentration in response to monocular enucleation

To investigate if 5-HT is involved in adult ME-induced cross-modal plasticity and to better understand its role therein, we first examined whether the total 5-HT concentration was affected in the two cortices that functionally adapt upon ME. The total 5-HT concentration was analyzed with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) on whole tissue homogenates of the visual cortex and S1BF 7 weeks after performing ME in adult mice (7wME) (Fig. 2a, b). At this 7wME endpoint, when the cross-modal recruitment of the initially deprived visual cortex is completed [15], we observed a decreased 5-HT concentration in the visual cortex (mean ± SEM, AMC: 82.54 ± 4.77; 7wME: 65.50 ± 4.77, Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.018, Fig. 2c). In S1BF, the cortical area in which compensatory plasticity is triggered by vision loss, no significant difference was reached (AMC: 113.40 ± 8.06; 7wME: 86.41 ± 10.49; Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.114, Fig. 2d). These results suggest brain region-specific modulations of total 5-HT content in response to visual deprivation.

ME induces pre- and postsynaptic changes in proteins related to 5-HT signaling

Parallel to the ME-induced decrease in total 5-HT concentration in the visual cortex, the impact of partial vision loss might manifest at the level of 5-HT loading into readily releasable vesicles or at the level of 5-HT receptors. To investigate possible brain region-specific expression changes in these pre- and postsynaptic proteins involved in 5-HT signaling, we performed Western blotting experiments on time-course samples from the visual Mmz and Bz separately and from S1BF. Post-ME recovery periods of respectively 1 week (1wME: ongoing open-eye potentiation phase), 3 weeks (3wME: end of the open-eye potentiation phase) and 5 weeks (5wME: ongoing cross-modal phase) were chosen as intermediate time points towards the time point of maximal visual cortex reactivation (7wME) for the evaluation of possible post-ME recovery time-dependent modulations in protein expression in addition to endpoint evaluation (Fig. 1) [15].

We chose to analyze vMAT2 protein expression levels since they provide information on the presynaptic loading of vesicles with 5-HT and because vMAT2 expression levels positively correlate with the total 5-HT concentration present in a given brain region of interest [60,61,62]. vMAT2 expression levels were significantly decreased in the Mmz in 1wME, 5wME and 7wME mice (represented as * within the bar, bar graphs in Figs. 3 and 4) compared to AMC (represented as a dashed line in Figs. 3 and 4, mean ± SEM, 1wME: 0.34 ± 0.08, p = 0.0159; 3wME: 0.80 ± 0.56, p = 0.4127; 5wME: 0.45 ± 0.02, p = 0.0159; 7wME: 0.53 ± 0.28, p = 0.0317, Mann-Whitney test). No statistically significant modulations occurred as a function of post-ME recovery time (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.0159, with no statistical difference in the Dunn’s post-hoc test for pairwise comparison) (Fig. 3a). Western analysis of the vMAT2 expression in the Bz indicated increased vMAT2 expression in 1wME and 3wME mice compared to AMC mice (mean ± SEM, 1wME: 1.87 ± 0.19, p = 0.0317; 3wME: 1.45 ± 0.06, p = 0.0159; 5wME: 1.07 ± 0.07, p = 0.4127; 7wME: 1.01 ± 0.04, p = 0.7302, Mann-Whitney test). As for the Mmz, also for the Bz no significant recovery time-dependent changes were observed (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.0095, with no statistical differences in the Dunn’s post-hoc test for pairwise comparison). In this case, however, a trend of decreasing vMAT2 expression was observed over the 1w to 7w post-ME time course (Fig. 3b). In S1BF, vMAT2 expression was significantly increased in 1wME mice compared to AMC (mean ± SEM, 1wME: 1.58 ± 0.11, p = 0.0317; 3wME: 1.50 ± 0.10, p = 0.0635; 5wME: 0.77 ± 0.09, p = 0.1905; 7wME: 1.29 ± 0.11, p = 0.4127, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 3c). Furthermore, in 1wME and 3wME mice, the vMAT2 expression levels were higher compared to 5wME mice (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.0081). These results point towards a return to baseline vMAT2 expression levels specifically at the time when the cross-modal whisker take-over of the deprived visual cortex starts to occur [15].

To define the impact of ME on the serotonergic modulation of cortical inhibition through specific 5-HT receptors, we performed Western blotting experiments for 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A. Besides their role in different types of visual cortex plasticity, reasons supporting these receptor choices, are the fact that the 5-HTR1A receptor is expressed both on pre-and postsynaptic neurons, respectively acting as an autoreceptor and a Gi-coupled GPCR mediating inhibitory neurotransmission upon ligand binding [90], while 5-HTR3A is a Na+/K+/Ca2+ permeable ion channel exclusively expressed on the 5-HTR3A expressing inhibitory interneurons [91]. We did not observe any ME-induced or recovery time-dependent changes in the expression of 5-HTR1A or 5-HTR3A in the Mmz (mean ± SEM, 5-HTR1A, 1wME: 1.48 ± 0.21, p = 0.2857; 3wME: 0.93 ± 0.15, p = 0.7302; 5wME: 1.00 ± 0.07, p = 0.7302; 7wME: 0.83 ± 0.06, p = 0.7302, 5-HTR3A, 1wME: 1.29 ± 0.17, p = 0.2857; 3wME: 1.03 ± 0.13, p = 0.9048; 5wME: 0.98 ± 0.08, p = 1.000; 7wME: 0.78 ± 0.06, p = 0.1905, Mann-Whitney test; Kruskal-Wallis test, 5-HTR1A: p = 0.2493; 5-HTR3A: p = 0.1395, Fig. 4a, b). In the Bz on the other hand, 1wME and 3wME mice showed increased 5-HTR1A expression levels (mean ± SEM, 5-HTR1A, 1wME: 1.69 ± 0.12, p = 0.0317; 3wME: 1.44 ± 0.06, p = 0.0317; 5wME: 1.12 ± 0.06, p = 0.2857; 7wME: 0.99 ± 0.02, p = 0.9048, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 4c) and a gradual decrease in 5-HTR1A expression between 1wME and 7wME mice (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.0039). In addition, 5-HTR3A expression levels were significantly increased in the Bz of the 3wME mice compared to the AMCs (mean ± SEM, 5-HTR3A, 1wME: 1.59 ± 0.17, p = 0.1111; 3wME: 2.10 ± 0.13, p = 0.0159; 5wME: 1.45 ± 0.13, p = 0.1111; 7wME: 0.87 ± 0.08, p = 0.5556, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 4d) and decreased over time to reach the AMC level at 7 weeks post-ME (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.0038). In S1BF, 5-HTR1A expression was increased in 1wME and 3wME mice, gradually decreased to reach the AMC level at 5 weeks post-ME (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.0039), and was again increased at 7 weeks post-ME (mean ± SEM, 5-HTR1A, 1wME: 1.84 ± 0.09, p = 0.0159; 3wME: 1.56 ± 0.08, p = 0.0159; 5wME: 1.17 ± 0.07, p = 0.4127; 7wME: 1.60 ± 0.12, p = 0.0317, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 4e). We did not observe significant modulations of 5-HTR3A protein expression in S1BF (mean ± SEM, 5-HTR3A, 1wME: 1.88 ± 0.19, p = 0.1905; 3wME: 2.13 ± 0.34, p = 0.1111; 5wME: 1.28 ± 0.13, p = 0.5556; 7wME: 2.26 ± 0.43, p = 0.1111, Mann-Whitney test; Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.1325, Fig. 4f). Taken together, these observations indicate brain region-specific alterations in vMAT2-mediated presynaptic monoamine vesicle loading, as well as post-ME recovery time-dependent modulations in 5-HTR1A and 5-HTR3A expression levels specifically in the Bz and in S1BF but not in the Mmz.

5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A but not 5-HTR1A antagonists suppress ME-induced cross-modal plasticity

We hypothesized that, in case 5-HT receptor function is involved in the whisker-mediated reactivation of the deprived visual cortex, the ME-induced cross-modal recruitment could be suppressed by systemic administration of the 5-HTR1A antagonist WAY-100635 maleate, the 5-HTR2A antagonist ketanserin tartrate, or the 5-HTR3A antagonist ondansetron hydrochloride during the last 3 weeks of recovery of the Mmz in ME mice (Fig. 5a-e). As the 5-HT receptors influence the excitability of brain circuits by modulating excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission and thus by mediating the cortical E/I balance, we expected to observe effects of these drugs on cortical activity, and ultimately on cortical plasticity [36, 54, 55]. Because it was previously established that the most pronounced impact of whisker inputs on neuronal activity involves the infragranular layers of the visual cortex, as based on the expression of neuronal activity reporter gene zif268, these layers were interrogated separately from the supra- and granular layers.

Suppression of the 5-HTR1A receptor function by long-term administration of WAY-100635 from week 5 to 7 post-ME did not alter the neuronal activity levels reached throughout the Mmz of 7wME mice, compared to saline-injected age-matched control ME mice (Mmz, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.9048, infragranular layers: p = 0.9048, Bz, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.0476, infragranular layers: p = 0.2619, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 5f). However, it did decrease the neuronal activity in the supra- and granular layers of the Bz (Mean ± SEM, supra- and granular layers, saline, Bz: 71.58 ± 1.26; Mmz: 60.14 ± 1.48, WAY-100635, Bz: 65.73 ± 1.58; Mmz: 57.95 ± 3.77, infragranular layers, saline, Bz: 71.31 ± 1.57; Mmz: 56.97 ± 1.84, WAY-100635, Bz: 67.72 ± 3.35; Mmz: 55.96 ± 2.12, Fig. 5f), indicative of Bz-specific 5-HTR1A expression changes during the preceding open-eye potentiation phase.

Blocking 5-HTR2A receptor function by ketanserin administration from week 5 to 7 post-ME significantly decreased the neuronal activity across all layers of the Mmz (Mmz, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.0476, infragranular layers: p = 0.0238; Bz, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.0952, infragranular layers: p = 0.2619, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 5g) but did not induce any change in neuronal activity in the Bz (Mean ± SEM, supra- and granular layers, saline, Bz: 71.58 ± 1.26; Mmz: 60.14 ± 1.48, ketanserin, Bz: 66.15 ± 2.83, Mmz: 51.18 ± 3.25, infragranular layers, saline, Bz: 71.31 ± 1.57; Mmz: 56.97 ± 1.84, ketanserin, Bz: 66.18 ± 3.05; Mmz: 48.85 ± 1.46, Fig. 5g). Suppression of the 5-HTR3A receptor function by administration of ondansetron only reduced the neuronal activity specifically in the supra- and granular layers of the Mmz (Mmz, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.0476, infragranular: p = 0.5476; Bz, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.7143, infragranular layers: p = 0.5476, Mann-Whitney test; Mean ± SEM, supra- and granular layers, saline, Bz: 71.58 ± 1.26; Mmz: 60.14 ± 1.48, ondansetron, Bz: 71.63 ± 1.40, Mmz: 51.95 ± 2.04, infragranular layers, saline, Bz: 71.31 ± 1.57; Mmz: 56.97 ± 1.84, ondansetron, Bz: 72.64 ± 0.94; Mmz: 54.70 ± 0.40, Fig. 5h). Taken together, these results point out that modulation of the 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A receptor function, influences the late cortical response to ME, suggesting that these receptors play an important role in the cross-modal reactivation phase of the visual cortex following ME.

Previous work has shown that ME induces increased neuronal activity in the spared sensory brain areas adjacent to the deprived visual cortex. For somatosensory cortex, the zif268-mRNA expression levels were found to be significantly higher in adult 7wME mice compared to AMC mice [16, 53]. In order to assess the impact of pharmacological modulation of serotonergic neurotransmission on S1BF neuronal activity, next to mapping the extent of visual cortex reactivation, we compared S1BF activity levels between saline-injected 7wME mice and 7wME mice that were treated with the specific 5-HTR1A, 5-HTR2A or 5-HTR3A antagonists.

Analysis of the zif268-mRNA expression levels (− 1.7-(− 1.9); 2.5–4; 1, relative to Bregma) (Fig. 6a-e) indicated that the neuronal activity levels in S1BF of WAY-100635 treated 7wME mice remained unaltered across all cortical layers compared to the saline-injected 7wME mice (S1BF, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.9048, infragranular layers: p = 0.7143, Mann-Whitney test, Fig. 6f). The mice thus displayed the expected ME-induced increase in S1BF activity, despite a suppressed 5-HTR1A receptor function (Mean ± SEM, supra- and granular layers, saline: 64.94 ± 0.49; WAY-100635: 64.90 ± 1.76, infragranular layers, saline: 65.17 ± 0.66; WAY-100635: 66.19 ± 1.67, Fig. 6f). Treatment of 7wME mice with ketanserin (Mean ± SEM, supra- and granular layers, saline: 64.94 ± 0.49; ketanserin: 69.77 ± 1.13, infragranular layers, saline: 65.17 ± 0.66; ketanserin: 68.68 ± 1.63, Fig. 6g) and similarly, with ondansetron (Mean ± SEM, supra- and granular layers, saline: 64.94 ± 0.49; ondansetron: 69.35 ± 1.11, infragranular layers, saline: 65.17 ± 0.66; ondansetron: 71.78 ± 2.38, Fig. 6h), also did not prevent the normal ME-induced increase in S1BF activity. On the contrary, it even induced higher neuronal activity across all cortical layers of S1BF, as the zif268-mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in ketanserin and ondansetron treated 7wME mice compared to the saline-injected control group (ketanserin, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.0238, infragranular layers: p = 0.0476; ondansetron, supra- and granular layers: p = 0.0238, infragranular layers: p = 0.0476, Mann-Whitney test). Thus, S1BF activation seems preserved in the drug-treated mice, and even intensified as visualized with 5-HTR2A antagonist ketanserin and 5-HT3A antagonist ondansetron.

Discussion

In humans, dysfunction of 5-HT signaling in the brain, is best described in mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety disorders [30, 92]. Drugs that target the serotonergic system, for instance the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are amongst the most-often prescribed first-line treatments, predominantly because low 5-HT levels in the brain were considered to be the main cause of such diseases [93]. However, the observed low efficacy and only very late-onset mood and behavioral improvements suggest large scale, functional and structural neuroplastic changes in the brain, rather than immediate, direct effects of those drugs on their targets [94,95,96,97,98]. Neuropsychological illnesses thus seem more complex than first considered and may in fact be neurological disorders with an underlying plasticity deficit. From research using sensory deprivation models, it is known that monoamine system-targeting drugs like SSRIs elicit plastic adaptations in the mammalian cortex [26, 99, 100]. Evidence for such cortical plasticity brought about by long-term treatment with an SSRI was already provided ten years ago and is based upon the discovery that fluoxetine can reinstate juvenile-like ocular dominance plasticity in the rodent adult visual cortex [26]. Genes involved in synaptic plasticity and chromatin structure remodeling, excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmission, transcription factors and proteolytic enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix were found to underlie this type of plasticity [101]. It is likely that similar plastic changes occur in human patients in order to be relieved from their neuropsychological illness and to again express a positive mood and behavior.

Late-onset ME modulates 5-HT and vMAT2 levels in adult visual cortex

Our HPLC data imply a lowered whole tissue 5-HT concentration specifically in the visual cortex of long-term ME mice. Since 5-HT release is triggered by neuronal activity in the sensory cortex, the observed decrease in 5-HT concentration in the visual cortex of 7wME mice is possibly due to the ME-induced loss of visual input in the Mmz [102]. A similar decrease in total 5-HT levels was also observed in the deprived visual cortex of adult cats in response to retinal lesions, an animal model for age-related macular degeneration [59]. For more in depth interpretation of brain region-specific alterations in 5-HT signaling, we still depend on new methodological developments that would allow reliable longitudinal analysis of the true local 5-HT release from only 1 mm thick cortical tissue, such as the Bz or the Mmz in our mouse model. For now, predictions based on longitudinal vMAT2 expression changes allow to formulate some possibilities. Tong et al., (2011) indeed already showed that vMAT2 levels are positively correlated with the tissue concentrations of total monoamines (5-HT, dopamine and noradrenaline), as measured in human tissue by means of HPLC analysis [62]. By deduction, the significantly decreased vMAT2 protein expression already shortly after the introduction of ME, may indicate decreased 5-HT concentrations in the Mmz immediately upon the loss of all its visual input. Opposite to the Mmz, the Bz displayed only a temporary increase in vMAT2 expression from week 1 to 3 weeks post-ME, at a time when its remaining open-eye inputs become potentiated. Spared cortical territory seems to share such an early 5-HT mediated response, in relation to compensating for the sensory deficit. Indeed, a similar pattern of early increased vMAT2 expression in S1BF, could go hand in hand with a fast, initial increase in 5-HT concentration and might indicate a compensatory, cortical plasticity mechanism similar to the one described by Jitsuki et al., (2011) after only 2 days of visual deprivation in S1BF of young rats [32]. Once a new functional cortical balance is established for the spared sense, it may be able to subsequently recruit nearby sensory deprived cortical territory. In our model of acquired blindness, somatosensation indeed seems to be capable of recruiting the Mmz once fine-tuned whisker-information processing has been established in S1BF.

5-HTR1A mediates unimodal open-eye potentiation in the Bz of the visual cortex

Cortical plasticity depends on both excitation and inhibition levels, which is determined by the distribution of excitatory and inhibitory receptors. An established E/I balance defines the stability and efficacy of neuronal circuits and is therefore required for proper processing of sensory information [36, 43, 103, 104]. A study, investigating the serotonergic regulation of the two predominant types of inhibition, respectively the short intermittent bursts of phasic inhibition and the constant long-lasting tonic inhibition, aside from its effect on the pyramidal neurons in the rat visual cortex, showed that 5-HT suppressed tonic inhibition through the 5-HTR1A receptor and Protein Kinase A signaling while phasic inhibition was enhanced through 5-HTR2A receptor function and CaM Kinase II [105, 106]. Clearly, alterations in 5-HT receptor expression and function can exert a major impact on the excitability of brain circuits involved in brain plasticity, as this would influence the inhibitory neurotransmission and the regulation of the cortical E/I balance [36, 54, 55].

Our observations indicate ME-induced increases in 5-HTR1A receptor expression in the spared cortices, the Bz and S1BF, confirming a regionally restricted and modulatory role in maintaining cortical excitability immediately upon insult. In the Bz, the increase in 5-HTR1A expression occurred at the start of the open-eye potentiation phase, pointing towards an early involvement of 5-HTR1A-mediated tonic inhibition, which implies the consistent activation of extra- and perisynaptic GABAARδ1 receptors on pyramidal and inhibitory neurons by ambient GABA, to regulate the overall cortical excitability during this thalamocortical plasticity process [107]. Of note, such enhanced tonic inhibition also triggers ocular dominance plasticity in the mouse visual cortex during the critical period early in life [108].

Many studies previously reported on 5-HT-mediated induction of unimodal brain plasticity in adulthood. For example, adult rats were again susceptible for monocular deprivation-induced ocular dominance plasticity after cortical infusion of 5-HT directly into the visual cortex [37]. Also in rodents, treatment with the SSRI fluoxetine, was found to induce both hippocampal synaptic plasticity and unimodal ocular dominance plasticity in the visual cortex [26, 37, 109, 110]. In line with this, in the human visual system, long-term systemic treatment with the SSRI sertraline was shown to induce synaptic plasticity by increasing the amplitude of stimulus-induced visually evoked potentials [111]. Fluoxetine even emerged as a possible treatment for persistent amblyopia, or lazy eye, in adult humans [112, 113]. Maya-Vetencourt et al., (2011) could previously also show that the ocular dominance shift, normally occurring in the Bz shortly after monocular deprivation, can be prevented by blocking this receptor with WAY-100635 [37]. Furthermore, local application of this same selective 5-HTR1A antagonist in V1 by means of reverse-phase microdialysis was found to facilitate long-term potentiation (LTP) after theta-burst stimulation (TBS) in adult rats, while LTP was inhibited in juvenile rats, confirming an age-dependent role for 5-HTR1A in gating V1 plasticity [27].

We were not surprised by the observation that 5-HTR1A expression levels remained close to the AMC level in the Mmz, as our lab previously described that well-defined levels of GABAARα1-mediated phasic inhibition, but not GABAARδ1-mediated tonic inhibition, are crucial for the establishment of the cross-modal reactivation of the Mmz in adult ME mice [53]. Our interpretation, that 5-HTR1A is of central importance to ME-induced open-eye potentiation in the Bz but not to the late cross-modal plasticity phase in the Mmz, is further supported by the observed downregulation of 5-HTR1A receptors in the Bz from the moment that open-eye potentiation is completed, and by the absence of suppressive drug-effects in the Mmz itself during the cross-modal phase. Indeed, the normal zif268-mRNA expression levels observed across the upper and lower cortical layers of the Mmz argue against a substantial contribution of this receptor subtype to the cross-modal take-over of the deprived cortical territory.

Antagonism of 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A to spatiotemporally control cross-modal brain plasticity

In this study, next to WAY-100635, we also chronically injected ketanserin or ondansetron to respectively block 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A receptor function during the entire time window of cross-modal plasticity, and following a normal period of open-eye potentiation. Although applying a local slow drug-release approach might have allowed a better discrimination of true cortical events from for example subcortical contributions to the observed plasticity phenomena, we still chose the i.p. injection approach because this systemic approach holds a greater prediction value with regards to human clinical trials than an invasive cortical infusion system. Also, long-term cannula implantation may have led to cortical tissue damage and glial scar formation. Such side-effects would have influenced the local neuromodulator levels [63] hampering the read-out as well as the interpretation of the results.

By blocking the 5-HTR2A receptor with ketanserin, we successfully suppressed adult cross-modal visual cortex reactivation across all layers of the Mmz. This observation accords with literature describing a role for 5-HTR2A in compensatory cross-modal plasticity [32] and with our previous observations, that post-ME cross-modal reactivation of the Mmz only occurs under well-defined levels of GABAARα1-mediated phasic inhibition [53], which is considered to be strictly regulated by upstream 5-HTR2A function [105].

5-HTR3A interneurons constitute a heterogenous population. One type of interneurons dependent on 5-HT signaling are the Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP)-expressing 5-HTR3A interneurons. VIP-mediated disinhibition is a well-described mechanism in which VIP interneurons inhibit somatostatin and parvalbumin expressing interneurons and may underlie ME-induced cortical plasticity [44, 46,47,48, 114, 115]. VIP interneurons exert an important function in controlling sensory processing and are target cells of long-range projections that integrate sensory information originating from different brain regions [116, 117]. This interneuron type thus constitutes an ideal candidate for 5-HT to shape cross-modal brain circuits and plasticity patterns via the 5-HTR3A receptor. In a recent study [4], convergence of sensory and neuromodulatory information onto 5-HTR3A cells was shown to vastly contribute to the shaping of critical period plasticity in the primary auditory cortex of the mouse. This research group discovered that a topographic map is formed already early in life, regulated by the non-VIP expressing 5-HTR3A cell population in cortical layer I. As predicted based on the 5-HTR3A cortical distribution pattern, which is predominantly in L1 of the cortex [4], our results indeed indicate that 5-HTR3A receptor antagonism with ondansetron during the cross-modal reactivation phase, specifically suppressed the neuronal activity in the upper layers of the Mmz. It will be interesting to further investigate how and to what extent both the VIP and non-VIP 5-HTR3A cells can spatiotemporally regulate adult cross-modal plasticity as this may enable steering brain plasticity towards the desired outcome as a future therapy, being complete functional recovery of the lost primary sense. Ex-vivo and in vivo electrophysiology and fast-scan voltammetry, should allow dissecting the local molecular cascade and cellular circuit involved in the different cortical plasticity phenomena.

A possible strategy to improve the success rate of bionic implants

The success of bionic implants in restoring sensory function depends on our understanding of how the brain responds to sensory loss. Often, by the time the neuro-electric device is implanted, the brain has already compensated for the loss of sensory input through mechanisms of cross-modal plasticity, thereby possibly impairing the cortical translation of inputs, transmitted by the device, into meaningful sensory information [118]. During the last decades, the attempt to fully restore primary sensory function received much attention, giving rise to very promising neurobionics such as the cochlear implants to restore auditory function [119,120,121], visual prostheses [122,123,124,125,126] and brain-computer interfaces [127,128,129]. In addition, patients suffering from progressive vision loss, as caused by the neurodegenerative diseases Retinitis pigmentosa or age-related macular degeneration, can nowadays benefit from the recently developed, fully organic, subretinal prosthesis [130], which tackles some of the common mechanical, manufacturing and technical difficulties generally occurring in epiretinal [131], subretinal [132] and suprachoroidal [133] prosthetics.

Given the fact that 5-HT modulates sensory information processing and integration [134] and based on our findings that chronic, systemic administration of the 5-HTR2A antagonist ketanserin and 5-HTR3A antagonist ondansetron can suppress the cross-modal reorganization after partial vision loss in a cortical brain region- and layer-specific manner, we predict that a pharmacological monoamine-oriented strategy in combination with a bionic implant may significantly increase their success rate, as this approach would better allow to spatiotemporally control different forms of cortical plasticity that precede and co-occur with its functional integration.

Conclusions

We report ME-induced molecular and functional adaptations in the visual and somatosensory cortex of adult mice. We observed brain region-specific changes in 5-HT levels, presynaptic vMAT2 expression and postsynaptic 5-HT receptor levels in function of post-ME recovery time. We showed that 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A are involved in the cross-modal reactivation of the deprived visual cortex, as pharmacological antagonism of the 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A but not 5-HTR1A receptor function hampered this plasticity process, specifically at the time when whiskers normally recruit the Mmz in adult ME mice. Our findings significantly add to the current understanding of the brain plasticity phenomena, occurring in response to chronic treatment with 5-HT-system targeting drugs. In future, promising strategies to restore primary sensory functions, might become spatiotemporally controllable through 5-HT-assisted neurobionics.

Abbreviations

5-HT:

5-Hydroxytryptamine, serotonin

5-HTR:

serotonin receptor

7wME:

7 weeks post-ME

AMC:

age-matched control

AMPAR1:

alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor

BDNF:

brain derived neurotrophic factor

Bz:

binocular zone

E/I:

excitation/inhibition balance

GABAARα1 :

Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha 1

HPLC:

high performance liquid chromatography

i.p.:

intraperitoneal

ISH:

in situ hybridization

LTP:

long-term potentiation

ME:

monocular enucleation

Mmz:

medial monocular zone

S1BF:

primary somatosensory barrel field

SSRI:

selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

TBS:

theta-burst stimulation

TPS:

total protein stain

VIP:

vasoactive intestinal peptide

vMAT2:

vesicular monoamine transporter 2

WB:

Western blotting

References

  1. 1.

    Hensch TK. Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:877–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Levelt CN, Hübener M. Critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:309–30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113813.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tucker DM, Poulsen C, Luu P. Critical periods for the neurodevelopmental processes of externalizing and internalizing. Dev Psychopathol. 2015;27:321–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Takesian AE, Bogart LJ, Lichtman JW, Hensch TK. Inhibitory circuit gating of auditory critical-period plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:218–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bavelier D, Levi DM, Li RW, Dan Y, Hensch TK. Removing brakes on adult brain plasticity: from molecular to behavioral interventions. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14964–71. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4812-10.2010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mataga N, Fujishima S, Condie BG, Hensch TK. Experience-dependent plasticity of mouse visual cortex in the absence of the neuronal activity-dependent marker egr1/zif268. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9724–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hübener M, Bonhoeffer T. Neuronal plasticity: beyond the critical period. Cell. 2014;159:727–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Keck T, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Vaz Afonso M, Eysel UT, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Massive restructuring of neuronal circuits during functional reorganization of adult visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(10):1162–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Voss P, Lassonde M, Gougoux F, Fortin M, Guillemot JP, Lepore F. Early- and late-onset blind individuals show supra-normal auditory abilities in far-space. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1734–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fieger A, Röder B, Teder-Sälejärvi W, Hillyard SA, Neville HJ. Auditory spatial tuning in late-onset blindness in humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(2):149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Norman JF, Bartholomew AN. Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination. Attention Perception Psychophys. 2011;73(7):2323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Burton H. Visual cortex activity in early and late blind people. J Neurosci. 2003;23:4005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cohen LG, Celnik P, Pascual-Leone A, Corwell B, Faiz L, Dambrosia J, et al. Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature. 1997;389:180–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Aerts J, Nys J, Arckens L. A highly reproducible and straightforward method to perform in vivo ocular enucleation in the mouse after eye opening. J Vis Exp. 2014;92:e51936. https://doi.org/10.3791/51936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Van Brussel L, Gerits A, Arckens L. Evidence for cross-modal plasticity in adult mouse visual cortex following monocular enucleation. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:2133–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nys J, Aerts J, Ytebrouck E, Vreysen S, Laeremans A, Arckens L. The cross-modal aspect of mouse visual cortex plasticity induced by monocular enucleation is age dependent. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:950–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gilbert CD, Li W. Adult visual cortical plasticity. Neuron. 2012;75:250–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bavelier D, Neville HJ. Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:443–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gu Q. Neuromodulatory transmitter systems in the cortex and their role in cortical plasticity. Neuroscience. 2002;111:815–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kondo M. Molecular mechanisms of experience-dependent structural and functional plasticity in the brain. Anat Sci Int. 2017;92:1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Berardi N, Pizzorusso T, Ratto GM, Maffei L. Molecular basis of plasticity in the visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:369–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rabinowitch I, Bai J. The foundations of cross-modal plasticity. Commun Integr Biol. 2016;9:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Morishita H, Miwa JM, Heintz N, Hensch TK. Lynx1, a cholinergic brake, limits plasticity in adult visual cortex. Science. 2010;330:1238–40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195320.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bear M, Singer W. Modulation of visual cortical plasticity by acetylcholine and noradrenaline. Nature. 1986;320:172–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/320172a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kasamatsu T, Pettigrew JD, Ary M. Restoration of visual cortical plasticity by local microperfusion of norepinephrine. J Comp Neurol. 1979;185:163–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Maya-Vetencourt JF, Sale A, Viegi A, Baroncelli L, De Pasquale R, O’Leary OF, et al. The antidepressant fluoxetine restores plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science. 2008;320:385–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gagolewicz PJ, Dringenberg HC. Age-dependent switch of the role of serotonergic 5-HT1A receptors in gating long-term potentiation in rat visual cortex in vivo. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6404082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dahlström A, Fuxe K. Localization of monoamines in the lower brain stem. Experientia. 1964;20:398–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lidov HGW, Grzanna R, Molliver ME. The serotonin innervation of the cerebral cortex in the rat—an immunohistochemical analysis. Neuroscience. 1980;5:207–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(80)90099-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Juckel G, Gallinat J, Riedel M, Sokullu S, Schulz C, Möller HJ, et al. Serotonergic dysfunction in schizophrenia assessed by the loudness dependence measure of primary auditory cortex evoked activity. Schizophr Res. 2003;64:115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ji W, Suga N. Serotonergic modulation of plasticity of the auditory cortex elicited by fear conditioning. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4910–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jitsuki S, Takemoto K, Kawasaki T, Tada H, Takahashi A, Becamel C, et al. Serotonin mediates cross-modal reorganization of cortical circuits. Neuron. 2011;69:780–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stutzmann GE, McEwen BS, LeDoux JE. Serotonin modulation of sensory inputs to the lateral amygdala: dependency on corticosterone. J Neurosci. 1998;18:9529–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dugué GP, Mainen ZF. How serotonin gates olfactory information flow. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:673–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Palacios JM. Serotonin receptors in brain revisited. Brain Res. 1645;2016:46–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Moreau AW, Amar M, Callebert J, Fossier P. Serotonergic modulation of LTP at excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the developing rat visual cortex. Neuroscience. 2013;238:148–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Maya-Vetencourt JF, Tiraboschi E, Spolidoro M, Castrén E, Maffei L. Serotonin triggers a transient epigenetic mechanism that reinstates adult visual cortex plasticity in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Baroncelli L, Sale A, Viegi A, Maya-Vetencourt JF, De Pasquale R, Baldini S, et al. Experience-dependent reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Exp Neurol. 2010;226:100–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Takahashi TT. Serotonin as a mediator of cross-modal cortical reorganization. Commun Integr Biol. 2011;4:459–61. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.4.15470.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lee H, Whitt J. Cross-modal synaptic plasticity in adult primary sensory cortices. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;35:119–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Petrus E, Isaiah A, Jones AP, Li D, Wang H, Lee HK, et al. Crossmodal induction of Thalamocortical potentiation leads to enhanced information processing in the auditory cortex. Neuron. 2014;81:664–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jang H-J, Cho K-H, Park S-W, Kim M-J, Yoon SH, Rhie D-J. Effects of serotonin on the induction of long-term depression in the rat visual cortex. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010;14:337–43. https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2010.14.5.337.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Maya-Vetencourt JF, Pizzorusso T. Molecular mechanisms at the basis of plasticity in the developing visual cortex: epigenetic processes and gene programs. J Exp Neurosci. 2013;7:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kuhlman SJ, Olivas ND, Tring E, Ikrar T, Xu X, Trachtenberg JT. A disinhibitory microcircuit initiates critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex. Nature. 2013;501:543–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12485.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Fu Y, Kaneko M, Tang Y, Alvarez-Buylla A, Stryker MP. A cortical disinhibitory circuit for enhancing adult plasticity. elife. 2015;4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05558.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Li L, Gainey MA, Goldbeck JE, Feldman DE. Rapid homeostasis by disinhibition during whisker map plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:1616–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312455111.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lee S, Kruglikov I, Huang ZJ, Fishell G, Rudy B. A disinhibitory circuit mediates motor integration in the somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1662–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3544.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pfeffer CK. Inhibitory neurons: Vip cells hit the brake on inhibition. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R18–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.001Dispatch.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jiang X, Wang G, Lee AJ, Stornetta RL, Zhu JJ. The organization of two new cortical interneuronal circuits. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:210–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lee S, Hjerling-Leffler J, Zagha E, Fishell G, Rudy B. The largest group of superficial neocortical GABAergic interneurons expresses ionotropic serotonin receptors. J Neurosci. 2010;30:16796–808. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1869-10.2010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Scheyltjens I, Vreysen S, van Den Haute C, Sabanov V, Balschun D, Baekelandt V, et al. Transient and localized optogenetic activation of somatostatin-interneurons in mouse visual cortex abolishes long-term cortical plasticity due to vision loss. Brain Structure and Function. 2018;223:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rudy B, Fishell G, Lee S, Hjerling-Leffler J. Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Dev Neurobiol. 2011;71:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20853.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Nys J, Smolders K, Laramée M-E, Hofman I, Hu T-T, Arckens L. Regional specificity of GABAergic regulation of cross-modal plasticity in mouse visual cortex after unilateral enucleation. J Neurosci. 2015;35:11174–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lambe EK, Fillman SG, Webster MJ, Shannon WC. Serotonin receptor expression in human prefrontal cortex: balancing excitation and inhibition across postnatal development. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022799.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Moreau WA, Amar M, Le Roux N, Morel N, Fossier P. Serotoninergic fine-tuning of the excitation-inhibition balance in rat visual cortical networks. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:456–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Van Brussel L, Gerits A, Arckens L. Identification and localization of functional subdivisions in the visual cortex of the adult mouse. J Comp Neurol. 2009;514:107–16.

  57. 57.

    El Arfani A, Bentea E, Aourz N, Ampe B, De Deurwaerdère P, Van Eeckhaut A, et al. NMDA receptor antagonism potentiates the l-DOPA-induced extracellular dopamine release in the subthalamic nucleus of hemi-parkinson rats. Neuropharmacology. 2014;85:198–205.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Jardí F, Laurent MR, Kim N, Khalil R, De Bundel D, Van Eeckhaut A, et al. Testosterone boosts physical activity in male mice via dopaminergic pathways. Sci Rep. 2018;8:957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Qu Y, Eysel UT, Vandesande F, Arckens L. Effect of partial sensory deprivation on monoaminergic neuromodulators in striate cortex of adult cat. Neuroscience. 2000;101:863–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Cliburn RA, Dunn AR, Stout KA, Hoffman CA, Lohr KM, Bernstein AI, et al. Immunochemical localization of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) in mouse brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2017;83–84:82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schafer MKH, Weihe E, Eiden LE. Localization and expression of vmat2 aross mammalian species. A translational guide for its visualization and targeting in health and disease. Adv Pharmacol. 2013;68:319–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tong J, Boileau I, Furukawa Y, Chang L-J, Wilson AA, Houle S, et al. Distribution of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 protein in human brain: implications for brain imaging studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:2065–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2011.63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Paxinos, G and Franklin KBJ. Paxinos and Franklin’s the mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2012. https://www.elsevier.com/books/paxinos-and-franklins-the-mouse-brain-in-stereotaxic-coordinates/paxinos/978-0-12-391057-8.

  64. 64.

    Wakabayashi K, Narisawa-Saito M, Iwakura Y, Arai T, Ikeda K, Takahashi H, et al. Phenotypic down-regulation of glutamate receptor subunit GluR1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1999;20:287–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Van Damme K, Massie A, Vandesande F, Arckens L. Distribution of the AMPA2 glutamate receptor subunit in adult cat visual cortex. Brain Res. 2003;960:1–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Aldridge GM, Podrebarac DM, Greenough WT, Weiler IJ. The use of total protein stains as loading controls: an alternative to high-abundance single-protein controls in semi-quantitative immunoblotting. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;172:250–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Hu TT, Van Den Bergh G, Thorrez L, Heylen K, Eysel UT, Arckens L. Recovery from retinal lesions: molecular plasticity mechanisms in visual cortex far beyond the deprived zone. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:2883–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kasamatsu T, Schmidt EK. Continuous and direct infusion of drug solutions in the brain of awake animals: implementation, strengths and pitfalls. Brain Res Protocol. 1997;1(1):57–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Dawson LA, Nguyen HQ, Smith DL, Schechter LE. Effect of chronic fluoxetine and WAY-100635 treatment on serotonergic neurotransmission in the frontal cortex. J Psychopharmacol. 2002;16:145–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/026988110201600205.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Abbas SY, Nogueira MI, Azmitia EC. Antagonist-induced increase in 5-HT1A-receptor expression in adult rat hippocampus and cortex. Synapse. 2007;61:531–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Persson B, Heykants J, Hedner T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of Ketanserin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991;20:263–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gu Q, Singer W. Involvement of serotonin in developmental plasticity of kitten visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 1995;7:1146–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lakoski JM, Aghajanian GK. Effects of ketanserin on neuronal responses to serotonin in the prefrontal cortex, lateral geniculate and dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuropharmacology. 1985;24:265–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Jha S, Rajendran R, Fernandes KA, Vaidya VA. 5-HT2A/2C receptor blockade regulates progenitor cell proliferation in the adult rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett. 2008;441:210–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Ye J-H, Ponnudurai R, Schaefer R. Ondansetron: a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and its applications in CNS-related disorders. CNS Drug Rev. 2006;7:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00195.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Woolley DG, Laeremans A, Gantois I, Mantini D, Vermaercke B, Op de Beeck HP, et al. Homologous involvement of striatum and prefrontal cortex in rodent and human water maze learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:3131–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217832110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Smolders K, Vreysen S, Laramée ME, Cuyvers A, Hu TT, Van Brussel L, et al. Retinal lesions induce fast intrinsic cortical plasticity in adult mouse visual system. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;44:2165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Imbrosci B, Wang Y, Arckens L, Mittmann T. Neuronal mechanisms underlying transhemispheric diaschisis following focal cortical injuries. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220:1649–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Arckens L, Van Der GE, Eysel UT, Orban GA, Vandesande F. Investigation of cortical reorganization in area 17 and nine extrastriate visual areas through the detection of changes in immediate early gene expression as induced by retinal lesions. JComp Neurol. 2000;425:531–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Qu Y, Massie A, Van Der Gucht E, Cnops L, Vandenbussche E, Eysel UT, et al. Retinal lesions affect extracellular glutamate levels in sensory-deprived and remote non-deprived regions of cat area 17 as revealed by in vivo microdialysis. Brain Res. 2003;962:199–206.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Massie A, Cnops L, Jacobs S, Van Damme K, Vandenbussche E, Eysel UT, et al. Glutamate levels and transport in cat (Felis catus) area 17 during cortical reorganization following binocular retinal lesions. J Neurochem. 2003;84:1387–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Leysen I, Van Der Gucht E, Eysel UT, Huybrechts R, Vandesande F, Arckens L. Time-dependent changes in the expression of the MEF2 transcription factor family during topographic map reorganization in mammalian visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:769–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Saffen DW, Cole AJ, Worley PF, Christy BA, Ryder K, Baraban JM. Convulsant-induced increase in transcription factor messenger RNAs in rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:7795–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.20.7795.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Worley PF, Christy BA, Nakabeppu Y, Bhat RV, Cole AJ, Baraban JM. Constitutive expression of zif268 in neocortex is regulated by synaptic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991;88:5106–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.12.5106.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Cole AJ, Saffen DW, Baraban JM, Worley PF. Rapid increase of an immediate early gene messenger RNA in hippocampal neurons by synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Nature. 1989;340:474–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/340474a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Chaudhuri A, Matsubara JA, Cynader MS. Neuronal activity in primate visual cortex assessed by immunostaining for the transcription factor Zif268. Vis Neurosci. 1995;12:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095252380000729X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Kaczmarek L, Chaudhuri A. Sensory regulation of immediate-early gene expression in mammalian visual cortex: implications for functional mapping and neural plasticity. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997;23:237–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Arckens L, Zhang F, Vanduffel W, Mailleux P, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Orban GA, et al. Localization of the two protein kinase C beta-mRNA subtypes in cat visual system. J Chem Neuroanat. 1995;8:117–24. 7598812.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Van Der Gucht E, Hof PR, Van Brussel L, Burnat K, Arckens L. Neurofilament protein and neuronal activity markers define regional architectonic parcellation in the mouse visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:2805–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Giulietti M, Vivenzio V, Piva F, Principato G, Bellantuono C, Nardi B. How much do we know about the coupling of G-proteins to serotonin receptors? Molecular Brain. 2014;7:49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Derkach V, Surprenant A, North RA. 5-HT3 receptors are membrane ion channels. Nature. 1989;339:706–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Albert PR, Vahid-Ansari F, Luckhart C. Serotonin-prefrontal cortical circuitry in anxiety and depression phenotypes: pivotal role of pre- and post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptor expression. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00199.

  93. 93.

    Leonard BE. Serotonin receptors and their function in sleep, anxiety disorders and depression. Psychother Psychosom. 1996;65:66–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Andrews PW, Bharwani A, Lee KR, Fox M, Thomson JA. Is serotonin an upper or a downer? The evolution of the serotonergic system and its role in depression and the antidepressant response. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;51:164–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Wainwright SR, Galea LAM. The neural plasticity theory of depression: assessing the roles of adult neurogenesis and psa-ncam within the hippocampus. Neural Plasticity. 2013;2013:805497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Liu W, Ge T, Leng Y, Pan Z, Fan J, Yang W, et al. The role of neural plasticity in depression: from Hippocampus to prefrontal cortex. Neural Plasticity. 2017;2017:6871089.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Castrén E. Is mood chemistry? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:241–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1629.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Krishnan V, Nestler EJ. The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature. 2008;455:894–902.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Ruiz-Perera L, Muniz M, Vierci G, Bornia N, Baroncelli L, Sale A, et al. Fluoxetine increases plasticity and modulates the proteomic profile in the adult mouse visual cortex. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12517.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Guirado R, Perez-Rando M, Sanchez-Matarredona D, Castrén E, Nacher J. Chronic fluoxetine treatment alters the structure, connectivity and plasticity of cortical interneurons. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:1635–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145714000406.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Tiraboschi E, Guirado R, Greco D, Auvinen P, Maya-Vetencourt JF, Maffei L, et al. Gene expression patterns underlying the reinstatement of plasticity in the adult visual system. Neural Plast. 2013;2013:605079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Héry F, Ternaux JP. Regulation of release processes in central serotoninergic neurons. J Physiol Paris. 1981;77:287–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Fagiolini M, Hensch TK. Inhibitory threshold for critical-period activation in primary visual cortex. Nature. 2000;404:183–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Turrigiano GG. The self-tuning neuron: synaptic scaling of excitatory synapses. Cell. 2008;135:422–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Jang HJ, Cho KH, Joo K, Kim MJ, Rhie DJ. Differential modulation of phasic and tonic inhibition underlies serotonergic suppression of long-term potentiation in the rat visual cortex. Neuroscience. 2015;301:351–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Joo K, Yoon SH, Rhie DJ, Jang HJ. Phasic and tonic inhibition are maintained respectively by CaMKII and PKA in the rat visual cortex. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;18:517–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Connelly WM, Fyson SJ, Errington AC, McCafferty CP, Cope DW, Di Giovanni G, et al. GABAB Receptors Regulate Extrasynaptic GABAA Receptors. J Neurosci. 2013;33:3780–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Iwai Y, Fagiolini M, Obata K, Hensch TK. Rapid critical period induction by tonic inhibition in visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6695–702.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Wang J-W, David DJ, Monckton JE, Battaglia F, Hen R. Chronic fluoxetine stimulates maturation and synaptic plasticity of adult-born hippocampal granule cells. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1374–84. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3632-07.2008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Mcavoy K, Russo C, Kim S, Rankin G, Sahay A. Fluoxetine induces input-specific hippocampal dendritic spine remodeling along the septotemporal axis in adulthood and middle age. Hippocampus. 2015;25:1429–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Normann C, Schmitz D, Fürmaier A, Döing C, Bach M. Long-term plasticity of visually evoked potentials in humans is altered in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Gore C, Wu C. Medical therapies of amblyopia: translational research to expand our treatment armamentarium. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016;31:155–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/08820538.2015.1114851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Beshara S, Beston BR, Pinto JGA, Murphy KM. Effects of fluoxetine and visual experience on glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic proteins in adult rat visual cortex. eNeuro. 2016;2. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0126-15.2015.

  114. 114.

    Fu Y, Kaneko M, Tang Y, Alvarez-Buylla A, Stryker MP. A cortical disinhibitory circuit for enhancing adult plasticity. elife. 2015;2015:e05558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Pi H-J, Hangya B, Kvitsiani D, Sanders JI, Huang ZJ, Kepecs A. Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control. Nature. 2013;503:521–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12676.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Acsády L, Görcs TJ, Freund TF. Different populations of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-immunoreactive interneurons are specialized to control pyramidal cells or interneurons in the hippocampus. Neuroscience. 1996;73:317–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Dávid C, Schleicher A, Zuschratter W, Staiger JF. The innervation of parvalbumin-containing interneurons by VIP-immunopositive interneurons in the primary somatosensory cortex of the adult rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:2329–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Heimler B, Weisz N, Collignon O. Revisiting the adaptive and maladaptive effects of crossmodal plasticity. Neuroscience. 2014;283:44–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, Kim SK, Kim JW, Chung JK, et al. Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature. 2001;409:149–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/35051653.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Stropahl M, Debener S. Auditory cross-modal reorganization in cochlear implant users indicates audio-visual integration. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;16:514–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Lee HJ, Giraud AL, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Kim CS, et al. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(4):909–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Lewis PM, Ackland HM, Lowery AJ, Rosenfeld JV. Restoration of vision in blind individuals using bionic devices: a review with a focus on cortical visual prostheses. Brain Res. 2014;1595:51–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Girvin JP. Artificial Vision for the Blind: Electrical Stimulation of Visual Cortex Offers Hope for a Functional Prosthesis. Science. 1974;183:440–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4123.440.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Walter P. Visual prostheses. Ophthalmologe. 2016;113:175–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-015-0202-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Shepherd RK, Shivdasani MN, Nayagam DAX, Williams CE, Blamey PJ. Visual prostheses for the blind. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:562–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Margalit E, Maia M, Weiland JD, Greenberg RJ, Fujii GY, Torres G, et al. Retinal prosthesis for the blind. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:335–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Dobkin BH. Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. In: J Physiol. 2007;579:p. 637–642.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Grosse-Wentrup M, Mattia D, Oweiss K. Using brain-computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function. In: J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Rossini PM, Noris Ferilli MA, Ferreri F. Cortical plasticity and brain computer interface. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:307–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Maya-Vetencourt JF, Ghezzi D, Antognazza MR, Colombo E, Mete M, Feyen P, et al. A fully organic retinal prosthesis restores vision in a rat model of degenerative blindness. Nat Mater. 2017;16(6):681–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Gerding H, Benner FP, Taneri S. Experimental implantation of epiretinal retina implants (EPI-RET) with an IOL-type receiver unit. J Neural Eng. 2007;4(1):S38–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Mathieson K, Loudin J, Goetz G, Huie P, Wang L, Kamins TI, et al. Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density. Nat Photonics. 2012;6(6):391–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Ayton LN, Blamey PJ, Guymer RH, Luu CD, Nayagam DAX, Sinclair NC, et al. First-in-human trial of a novel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Jacob SN, Nienborg H. Monoaminergic Neuromodulation of Sensory Processing. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:51.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Marijke Christiaens for helping with the creation of the figures, and prof. dr. Roger Huybrechts and drs. Jolien Van Houcke for careful reading of the manuscript during revision and especially for their helpful comments and suggestions. The syringe icon in Fig. 1 was designed by Freepik and adapted from https://www.flaticon.com.

Funding

This work was supported by the KU Leuven Research Council (C14/16/048) and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)-Vlaanderen, Belgium (Research Project and PhD fellowship to SG).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Neuroplasticity and Neuroproteomics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, Box 2467, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Nathalie Lombaert, Maroussia Hennes, Sara Gilissen, Giel Schevenels, Laetitia Aerts, Ria Vanlaer, Lieve Geenen, Julie Nys & Lutgarde Arckens

  2. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Drug Analysis and Drug Information, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Ann Van Eeckhaut & Ilse Smolders

  3. Present Address: Laboratory of Synapse Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research, O&N IV, Herestraat 49, box 602, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Julie Nys

Authors
  1. Nathalie Lombaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maroussia Hennes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Gilissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giel Schevenels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laetitia Aerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ria Vanlaer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lieve Geenen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ann Van Eeckhaut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ilse Smolders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Julie Nys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lutgarde Arckens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: NL, JN and LA*. Study supervision: LA*. HPLC, WB and ISH sample preparation: NL, JN, RV, LG, LA and GS. HPLC analysis: AV and IS. Analysis and interpretation of data: NL, JN, LA, GS, SG, MH and LA*. Statistical analysis: NL, JN, LA and GS. Drafting of the manuscript: NL and LA*. Critical revision of the manuscript: JN, AV, IS, SG, MH and LA*. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutgarde Arckens.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments have been approved by the Ethical Research Committee of KU Leuven and were in strict accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of 22 September 2010 (2010/63/EU) and with the Belgian legislation (KB of 29 May 2013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lombaert, N., Hennes, M., Gilissen, S. et al. 5-HTR2A and 5-HTR3A but not 5-HTR1A antagonism impairs the cross-modal reactivation of deprived visual cortex in adulthood. Mol Brain 11, 65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-018-0404-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Brain plasticity
  • Visual cortex
  • Adult mice
  • Monocular enucleation
  • Neuromodulator
  • Serotonin

Molecular Brain

ISSN: 1756-6606