- Open Access
PAK1 regulates cortical development via promoting neuronal migration and progenitor cell proliferation
Molecular Brain volume 8, Article number: 36 (2015)
p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) is a serine/threonine kinase known to be activated by the Rho family small GTPases and to play a key role in cytoskeletal reorganization, spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. PAK1 is also implicated in a number of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases, including autism, intellectual disability and Alzheimer’s disease. However, the role of PAK1 in early brain development remains unknown.
In this study, we employed genetic manipulations to investigate the role of PAK1 in the cerebral cortical development in mice. We showed that compared to the wild type littermates, PAK1 knockout mice have a reduction in the number of pyramidal neurons in several layers of the cerebral cortex, which is associated with a smaller pool of neural progenitor cells and impaired neuronal migration.
These results suggest that PAK1 regulates cortical development by promoting the proliferation of neural progenitor cells and facilitating the migration of these neurons to specific regions of the cortex.
In the mammalian CNS, the cerebral cortex is a key region that dictates brain volume and overall organization. Cortical defects are associated with many neurological and mental disorders, including epilepsy, schizophrenia, autism and intellectual disability [1–4]. The development of the cerebral cortex requires a series of highly complex and regulated events that include the amplification of radial glia cells (RGCs), generation of neurons at the subventricular zone, their migration to specified cortical regions, and finally their differentiation and maturation into functioning cells [3–5]. Ample studies have shown that neurogenesis (i.e. generation of neurons) is the predominant determinant for cortical growth and organization. Thus, a number of proteins (e.g. LIS and Nde) that are important for mitotic cell division and survival have been shown to be critical for normal cortical formation and organization . Similarly, proteins required for neuronal migration, particularly those involved in the Reelin and CDK5 protein kinase signal transduction pathways, are equally important for normal cortical development [4, 5]. Exactly how these molecules regulate neuronal migration and what cellular processes are required remain unknown. Given the importance of the actin cytoskeleton in the regulation of cell morphology and motility, it has long been suggested that Reelin/CDK5 may control neuronal migration through actin reorganization [4, 5], but the molecules that are responsible for linking Reelin/CDK5 to actin remain elusive.
p21 activated kinases (PAKs) are a family of serine/threonine proteins kinases known to be involved in multiple cellular processes, including actin reorganization, cell proliferation, cell morphology, motility and structural remodeling [6–9]. In neurons, we and others have shown that PAKs are important for neurite outgrowth, spine morphology, synaptic plasticity and learning and memory [9–22]. However, most of these studies have been focused on cultured cell lines or adult animals, and therefore whether or not PAKs play a role in the developing brain remains unknown. However, a number of studies exist that support this possibility. First, PAKs are highly expressed in the developing brain, including neurons [7, 21, 23]. Second, the kinase activity of PAKs can be regulated by CDK5 and Rreelin [6, 7, 24], both of which are critically involved in cortical development. Third, studies in lower invertebrates indicate the involvement of PAKs in neuronal development [25–28]. Finally, PAK gene mutations are closely linked to human cortical malformations such as microcephaly [29, 30]. Indeed, a recent study using shRNA to knockdown PAK1 suggests that PAK1 is required for neuronal migration, but whether it is also involved in progenitor cell proliferation remains unknown . In this study, we used a genetic approach to investigate the role of PAK1, the predominant member of the PAK family expressed in the brain. We demonstrate that PAK1 plays a key role in both progenitor cell proliferation and neuronal migration during cerebral cortical development.
PAK1 is expressed in both mitotic and post-mitotic neurons in the developing cortex
In order to investigate the role of PAK1 in cortical development, we first analyzed the expression of PAK1 in developing brain using antibodies specific to PAK1 through immunohistochemistry. Three developmental stages, embryonic day (E) 14.5, postnatal day (P) 0 and P28 were examined. During early development (E14.5) of the telencephalon (Fig. 1A, B and E-H), PAK1 was detected in all the areas, of which the intermediate zone (IZ) has the highest expression level, followed by the cortical plate (CP) and the ventricular zone (VZ)/subventricular zone (SVZ). The high level of expression of PAK1 in post-mitotic neurons in IZ and CP are consistent with its demonstrated roles in regulating the morphology and migratory properties of the neurons . In addition, strong signals were detected in the VZ/SVZ layers where the neuronal precursor cells reside, suggesting that PAK1 may also play an important role in the proliferation and differentiation of these cells. Similarly, at P0 (Fig. 1C, D), PAK1 was found to be highly expressed in VZ and IZ but a lower level was detected in the CP area. In the cerebral cortex of the mature mouse (P28, Fig. 1I, J), PAK1 expression was detectable in all cortical layers, reflecting its roles in synaptic transmission and plasticity. The PAK1 antibodies were highly specific because no immunostaining signals were detected in PAK1 KO mice (Fig. 1K, L). The widespread expression of PAK1 in all cortical layers in early embryonic stages suggests that PAK1 may play multiple roles during cortical development.
Loss of PAK1 reduces the number of pyramidal neurons, particularly in the upper layers of the cortex
Having established the expression pattern of PAK1 in the developing cerebral cortex, we next investigated whether the absence of PAK1 affects the cortical organization by comparing PAK1 KO mice and their wild type (WT) littermates. Since neuronal migration ensures that the correct number and types of neurons are deposited in the appropriate cortical layer, we used layer specific markers (e.g. transcription factors specifically expressed in each layer) to examine the cortical distribution at P7. At this time point, neurons are known to have already migrated to their final destinations within the cortex. we found that the overall laminar organization of the cortex is normal in PAK1 KO mice. However, a detailed analysis of each cortical layer revealed a significant reduction (about 24 %) in the number of neurons in the superficial layer (identified by CDP and Brn2 staining) in PAK1 KO mice (0.759 ± 0.039; n = 3 pairs of littermates, p < 0.001) compared to their WT littermates (Fig. 2A, B and a). A significant reduction (about 21 %) in the number of neurons in layer V (by Ctip2 staining) was also found in PAK1 KO mice (Fig. 2C, D and b; KO: 0.790 ± .041; n = 3 pairs of littermates, p < 0.001). Interestingly, the number of layer VI neurons (by Tbr1 staining) remained the same between the WT and KO mice (Fig. 2E, F and c; KO: 0.942 ± .029; n = 3 pairs of littermates, p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained for the P0 brains where the Brn2 and CDP positive neurons were clearly reduced in PAK1 KO mice (data not shown). These results suggest that PAK1 is critical for neuronal proliferation, differentiation and/or migration during early cortical development.
PAK1 is required for normal neuronal migration to the upper cortical layers
Cortical pyramidal neurons migrate in an “inside- out” manner, with the early born neurons targeting to the deep layers and the late born neurons migrating mainly to the upper more superficial layers [4, 5]. Thus, the reduced neuronal number in the upper layers in PAK1 KO mice suggests a deficit in neurons born around E14.5, in their proliferation/differentiation/survival and/or migration. To investigate whether the reduced CDP+ cell numbers were caused by a migration deficit, we utilized the BrdU injection assay. The pregnant mice were injected with BrdU at E14.5, and the number of BrdU+/CDP+ and BrdU+/Tbr1+ (positive for both BrdU and CDP or Tbr1) neurons of the somatosensory cortex were analyzed at P7. As shown in Fig. 3A-H and Q, the number of BrdU+/CDP+ neurons was clearly decreased in PAK1 KO compared to WT mice (WT: 155.800 ± 11.015; KO: 114.750 ± 8.350; n = 2 pairs of littermates, p < 0.03). In contrast, the number of BrdU+/Tbr1+ neurons was increased in the KO mice (Fig. 3I-P and R; WT: 6.429 ± 1.288; KO: 21.400 ± 2.372; n = 2 pairs of littermates, p < 0.001). These results suggest a delayed migration of E14.5 BrdU labeled neurons. To quantify the migration path, we divided the neocortex equally into 10 bins and analyzed the percentage of BrdU positive cells in each bin to obtain a distribution pattern of the neurons (Fig. 4). In WT mice, approximately 66 ± 3.1 % BrdU+ cells migrated to the upper layers, whereas only 50 ± 1.1 % BrdU+ cells migrated to the same area in the KO mice. These results together indicate that PAK1 is required for promoting neuronal migration of the late born neurons to their destinations.
PAK1 acts as a positive regulator of apical progenitor cell proliferation
One possibility that may also result in reduced pyramidal neurons in PAK1 KO mice is that the KO mice have enhanced cell death. Therefore, we examined the degree of apoptotic cell death by performing immunostaining using the apoptotic cell death marker, the active form of caspase 3, but found no differences between PAK1 KO and WT mice (Fig. 5A-C; KO: 1.032 ± 0.147; n = 3 pairs of littermates, p > 0.05), suggesting that the cell death is not likely a significant factor contributing to the reduced neuronal number in the KO mice. Another possibility is that PAK1 KO mice may have less neurons generated in the first place due to impaired cell proliferation, given that PAK1 is expressed in the proliferating VZ/ SVZ zones (Fig. 1A, B and G, H). To address this possibility, we analyzed the apical neuronal progenitor cells in the dorsal VZ of the E14.5 brain using the RGC marker Pax6. An approximately 19 % decrease in the number of the apical progenitors was observed in PAK1 KO embryos compared to their WT controls (Fig. 5D-H; WT: 619.500 ± 24.592; KO: 499.750 ± 19.104; n = 4 pairs of littermates, p < 0.001). To determine whether the reduced progenitor cells were related to impaired cell division, we again injected the pregnant mice at E14.5 with a higher concentration of BrdU (200 mg/kg) for a brief period of time (2 h). The proliferating progenitor cells during the 2 h incubation period were labeled with BrdU. The embryos were then dissected and the BrdU+ cells were analyzed. We found a 15 % decrease in BrdU+ cells in the dorsal VZ in PAK1 KO compared to their WT littermate embryos (Fig. 6; WT: 181.182 ± 7.298; KO: 154.000 ± 8.452; n = 4 pairs of littermates, p < 0.02). Taken together, these results indicate that PAK1 is also an important positive regulator for cell proliferation of the apical progenitor cells.
PAK1 regulates cell cycle progression
To further investigate whether an altered cell cycle state (active or inactive) may contribute to the reduced pool of proliferating progenitor cells in PAK1 KO mice, we examined the expression of Ki67, a marker for all the active phases of the cell cycle. We injected the pregnant mice at E13.5 with a low concentration of BrdU (50 mg/kg) and 24 h later, the embryos were dissected and stained with antibodies against BrdU and Ki67 (Fig. 7). We found that the number of BrdU+/Ki67+ cells was significantly reduced by 23 % in PAK1 KO embryos compared to their WT littermate controls (Fig. 7G; WT: 0.374 ± 0.012; KO: 0.284 ± 0.013; n = 4 pairs of littermates, p < 0.001). In addition, the total number of Ki67+ cells was also reduced by 32 % in the KO embryos (Fig. 7I; WT: 480.750 ± 42.343; KO: 324.250 ± 28.142; n = 4 pairs of littermates, p < 0.01). These results indicate that a fewer number of cells in PAK1 KO mice were maintained in the active phases of the cell cycle. Consistent with this finding, the number of cells exiting the cell cycle (i.e. BrdU+/Ki67- cells) was increased by 13 % (Fig. 7H; WT: 0.626 ± 0.013; KO: 0.718 ± 0.014; n = 4 pairs of littermates, p < 0.001). Therefore, PAK1 is important for maintaining the apical progenitor cells in a proliferative state.
Abundant evidence indicates PAK1 is a critically involved in postnatal neuronal development, synaptic plasticity and cognitive processes [6–9], but little is known about its role in early brain development. In this study, we utilized genetically altered mice lacking PAK1 to specifically probe its role in the development of the cerebral cortex. We show that PAK1 plays a key role in ensuring proper number and type of pyramidal neurons in the cortex likely through maintaining an active pool of proliferative progenitor cells and facilitating neuronal migration. This conclusion is based on following lines of evidence.
First, we show that PAK1 is expressed in all cortical layers from E14.5 to P0. This is an important finding because although the expression of PAK1 in mature neurons and adult brain are well documented, its expression in mitotic cells during early brain development is unclear. Using PAK1 KO mice as a control for the specificity of the PAK1 antibodies used in this study, we conclusively demonstrate that PAK1 is expressed across all cortical layers, including VZ/SVZ zones where the proliferating progenitor cells reside. The widespread neuronal expression of PAK1 suggests that PAK1 may be involved in multiple stages of cortical neuronal development from the birth of the neurons to their migration to the final destination within the cortex.
Second, we demonstrate that PAK1 is required for normal neuronal migration to the upper layers of the cortex. In PAK1 KO mice, the distribution of BrdU positive neurons labeled at E14.5 is significantly shifted to the deep layers, indicating that migration of these neurons is impaired in the KO mice. These results are consistent with an early study in rats where downregulation of PAK1 by using viral expression of a shRNA against PAK1 delays neuronal migration and decreases neuronal number in layers II-IV . This confirms that PAK1 is a key regulator for proper neuronal migration in the mammalian cortex. The mechanisms by which PAK1 regulates neuronal migration are unclear although the shRNA study suggests that PAK1 may be important for regulating the morphology of the migratory cells [8, 13]. Therefore, it would be important to see whether the morphology of the RGC or migratory cells are altered in PAK1 KO mice. Given the importance of PAK1 in cytoskeletal regulation, it is not surprising that cell morphology mediated by PAK1 may play a key role in the migration process. In addition, how PAK1 interacts with other molecules known to be involved in neuronal migration remains unknown. Of particular interest are CDC42, N-cadherin and Cdk5, all of which are shown to regulate PAK1 activity biochemically [6, 7, 24]. For example, PAK1 can be directly phosphorylated by Cdk5, a key player in morphological dynamics of migratory neurons and cortical development . It is possible that PAK1 may act as a common effector of these molecules by regulating cytoskeletal reorganization and neuronal morphology during the migration and differentiation of cortical neurons.
Finally, we have revealed that PAK1 is also involved in the proliferation of early progenitor cells. In PAK1 KO mice, there is a smaller pool of Pax6 positive cells at E14.5 accompanied by no changes in the degree of apoptotic cell death. In addition, the number of cells labeled with brief BrdU injections at E13.5 is also reduced in the KO mice. These results are consistent with the notion that PAK1 is important for the proliferation of the progenitor cells during neurogenesis. This is an important finding because most of the early studies have been focused on post-mitotic neurons in the adult brain [8, 9]. However, it is known that in fibroblasts cell cycle arrest can be induced by manipulating PAK1 and that PAK1 can regulate cell cycle proteins such as cyclin D1 and D2 . Therefore, the present study has extended previous in vitro results to mouse models, establishing PAK1 as an important in vivo regulator of neuronal proliferation
In summary, we show here that PAK1 KO mice are significantly impaired in progenitor cell proliferation and neuronal migration. These results indicate that PAK1 is critical for cortical development by promoting proper cell division and neuronal migration.
The generation and initial characterization of PAK1 KO mice were described previously [10, 18]. To minimize the effect of genetic background, all the pups and embryos used in this study were PAK1 KO and their WT littermates from heterozygous PAK1+/− breeders. All the procedures were in accordance with animal regulations in the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and Southeast University in China.
Tissue processing and Immunohistochemistry
Standard procedures for brain processing and immunohistochemistry were described previously . Briefly, postnatal day or E14.5 pregnant mice were anaesthetized with 10 % chloral hydrate or hypothermia and then subjected to cardiac perfusion with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) dissolved in 0.1 M PBS. Brains were removed and post-fixed in 4 % PFA for 8–12 h for prenatal day mice and 12–24 h for postnatal day mice, and then replaced with 30 % sucrose dissolved in 0.1 M PBS at 4 °C until the brains were saturated. The brains were then embedded in Tissue-Tek® O.C.T. Compound and frozen by liquid nitrogen before being cut into coronal sections of 8 μm for prenatal day brains and 16 μm for postnatal day brains using a Leica CM 1950 cryostat.
For immunohistochemistry, brain sections were washed in 0.1 M PBS for 5 min, permeabilized with 0.2 % Triton X-100 dissolved in 0.1 M PBS (PBT), and then blocked with 10 % fetal bovine serum and 0.2 % Triton X-100 dissolved in 0.1 M PBS for 2 h before being incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, sections were washed in 0.2 % PBT and incubated in appropriate secondary antibodies for 2 h at 37 °C. The primary antibodies used in this study included: rabbit anti-Ki67 (Abcam, 1:500), rabbit anti-Tbr1 (Proteintech Group, 1:500), rabbit anti-Ctip2 (Abcam, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Pax6 (Proteintech Group, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Pak1 (Abcam, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:200), rabbit anti-Brn2 (Santa Cruz, 1:50), rabbit anti-CDP (Santa Cruz, 1:200), and rat anti-BrdU (Abcam, 1:1000). The secondary antibodies used here are Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, 1:300), Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, 1:300), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 1:300), Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-rat IgG (Proteintech Group, 1:300). Nuclei were counterstained with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Cayman Chemical).
Immunostaining images were collected using confocal laser microscopes (LSM 700 and LSM710, Carl Zeiss) or a light microscope (CTR 5000; Leica). The images were then analyzed with a Zeiss Aim Image Browser software or an Image-pro Plus software.
BrdU was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and dissolved in high pressure sterilized physiological saline solution at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. For the cell division experiment, the pregnant mice at E14.5 were injected intraperitoneally with BrdU at a concentration of 200 mg/kg for 2 h, during which time the progenitors in the S phase were labeled. For cell cycle analysis, the pregnant mice were intraperitoneally injected at E13.5 with BrdU at 50 mg/kg for 24 h, a time period required for cells to complete the entire cell cycle. Following injections, embryos were processed for immunohistochemistry as described above, except that the sections were treated with 2 M hydrochloric acid for 15 min at 45 °C for efficient BrdU staining.
Cell count and statistical analysis
For embryonic studies, greater than 2 independent litters and 4 pairs of brains were used for immunostaining experiments. At least 3 sections of the medial cortex from each brain were analyzed for cell counts. For each section, an area of 300–400 μm wide with a length spanning either VZ/SVZ or the entire middle regions of the E14.5 telencephalon was used.
For postnatal brain analysis, greater than 3 littermates of each genotype were used for the experiment. And at least 3 discontinuous coronal sections from somatosensory cortex were counted. For the migration study, BrdU+ cells were measured in vertical strips with a 400 μm width and a length across the six-layered cortex and the strips were equally divided into ten bins throughout the six layers. The length of the cortex was identified by layer specific markers and the DAPI staining.
Student’s t test was used to evaluate the data statistically, and when P < 0.05, the differences were considered significant. And all data were presented as means ± standard errors of the means (SEM).
Central nervous system
Radial glia cells
Intermediate progenitor cells
P21-activated kinase 1
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5
CUX1 (cut-like homeobox 1)
Pou3f2 (POU domain, class 3, transcription factor 2)
Bcl11b (B cell leukemia/lymphoma 11 B)
T-box, brain 1
Paired box 6
Mochida GH, Walsh CA. Molecular genetics of human microcephaly. Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14:151–6.
Woods CG. Human microcephaly. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:112–7.
Cox J, Jackson AP, Bond J, Woods CG. What primary microcephaly can tell us about brain growth. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12:358–66.
Su SC, Tsai L-H. Cyclin-dependent kinases in brain development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:465–91.
Ayala R, Shu T, Tsai L-H. Trekking across the brain: the journey of neuronal migration. Cell. 2007;128:29–43.
Bokoch GM. Biology of the p21-activated kinases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:743–81.
Z-s Z, Manser E. PAK and other Rho-associated kinases-effectors with surprisingly diverse mechanisms of regulation. Biochem J. 2005;386:201–14.
Nikolić M. The Pak1 kinase: an important regulator of neuronal morphology and function in the developing forebrain. Mol Neurobiol. 2008;37:187–202.
Kreis P, Barnier J-V. PAK signalling in neuronal physiology. Cell Signal. 2009;21:384–93.
Asrar S, Meng Y, Zhou Z, Todorovski Z, Huang WW, Jia Z. Regulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation by p21-activated protein kinase 1 (PAK1). Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:73–80.
Boda B, Alberi S, Nikonenko I, Node-Langlois R, Jourdain P, Moosmayer M, et al. The mental retardation protein PAK3 contributes to synapse formation and plasticity in hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10816–25.
Boda B, Jourdain L, Muller D. Distinct, but compensatory roles of PAK1 and PAK3 in spine morphogenesis. Hippocampus. 2008;18:857–61.
Causeret F, Terao M, Jacobs T, Nishimura YV, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, et al. The p21-activated kinase is required for neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:861–75.
Daniels RH, Hall PS, Bokoch GM. Membrane targeting of p21‐activated kinase 1 (PAK1) induces neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells. EMBO J. 1998;17:754–64.
Hayashi K, Ohshima T, Hashimoto M, Mikoshiba K. Pak1 regulates dendritic branching and spine formation. Dev Neurobiol. 2007;67:655–69.
Hayashi K, Ohshima T, Mikoshiba K. Pak1 is involved in dendrite initiation as a downstream effector of Rac1 in cortical neurons. Molecular Cellular Neurosci. 2002;20:579–94.
Hayashi ML, Choi S-Y, Rao BS, Jung H-Y, Lee H-K, Zhang D, et al. Altered cortical synaptic morphology and impaired memory consolidation in forebrain-specific dominant-negative PAK transgenic mice. Neuron. 2004;42:773–87.
Huang W, Zhou Z, Asrar S, Henkelman M, Xie W, Jia Z. p21-Activated kinases 1 and 3 control brain size through coordinating neuronal complexity and synaptic properties. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:388–403.
Jacobs T, Causeret F, Nishimura YV, Terao M, Norman A, Hoshino M, et al. Localized activation of p21-activated kinase controls neuronal polarity and morphology. J Neurosci. 2007;27:8604–15.
Marler KJ, Kozma R, Ahmed S, Dong J-M, Hall C, Lim L. Outgrowth of neurites from NIE-115 neuroblastoma cells is prevented on repulsive substrates through the action of PAK. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:5226–41.
Meng J, Meng Y, Hanna A, Janus C, Jia Z. Abnormal long-lasting synaptic plasticity and cognition in mice lacking the mental retardation gene Pak3. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6641–50.
Zhang H, Webb DJ, Asmussen H, Niu S, Horwitz AF. A GIT1/PIX/Rac/PAK signaling module regulates spine morphogenesis and synapse formation through MLC. J Neurosci. 2005;25:3379–88.
Ong W, Wang X, Manser E. Differential distribution of α and β isoforms of p21-activated kinase in the monkey cerebral neocortex and hippocampus. Exp Brain Res. 2002;144:189–99.
Nikolic M, Chou MM, Lu W, Mayer BJ, Tsai L-H. The p35/Cdk5 kinase is a neuron-specific Rac effector that inhibits Pak1 activity. Nature. 1998;395:194–8.
Ang L-H, Kim J, Stepensky V, Hing H. Dock and Pak regulate olfactory axon pathfinding in Drosophila. Development. 2003;130:1307–16.
Souopgui J, Sölter M, Pieler T. XPak3 promotes cell cycle withdrawal during primary neurogenesis in Xenopus laevis. EMBO J. 2002;21:6429–39.
Hing H, Xiao J, Harden N, Lim L, Zipursky SL. Pak functions downstream of Dock to regulate photoreceptor axon guidance in Drosophila. Cell. 1999;97:853–63.
Hu H, Marton TF, Goodman CS. Plexin B mediates axon guidance in Drosophila by simultaneously inhibiting active Rac and enhancing RhoA signaling. Neuron. 2001;32:39–51.
Allen KM, Gleeson JG, Bagrodia S, Partington MW, MacMillan JC, Cerione RA, et al. PAK3 mutation in nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation. Nat Genet. 1998;20:25–30.
Peippo M, Koivisto AM, Särkämö T, Sipponen M, von Koskull H, Ylisaukko‐oja T, et al. PAK3 related mental disability: further characterization of the phenotype. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143:2406–16.
Thullberg M, Gad A, Beeser A, Chernoff J, Strömblad S. The kinase-inhibitory domain of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) inhibits cell cycle progression independent of PAK1 kinase activity. Oncogene. 2007;26:1820–8.
Meng Y, Zhang Y, Tregoubov V, Janus C, Cruz L, Jackson M, et al. Abnormal spine morphology and enhanced LTP in LIMK-1 knockout mice. Neuron. 2002;35:121–33.
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, MOP119421, ZPJ), Canadian Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC, RGPIN341498, ZPJ), the China National Basic Research Program (China 973 Program 2012CB517903, WX and ZPJ), Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31200805, ZZ), and NSFC and CIHR Joint Health Research Initiative Program (81161120543, WX and CCI117959, ZPJ). We are grateful to all members of Jia and Xie labs for their technical assistance and comments on the manuscript, and to Xiao Han and He Chen from Zhao lab for many helpful discussions on the BrdU experiments.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ZJ and WX designed the study; XP, XC, CL, FC and ZZ performed the experiments. XP and ZZ analyzed the data, XP and ZJ wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
XP and XC are Master students in the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Diseases, MOE, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. ZZ is an Associate Professor in the Life Science Institute, Southeast University. WX is a Professor and Director of the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Diseases, MOE, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. CL and FC are Ph.D students in the Department of Physiology, University of Toronto. ZJ is a Professor and Senior Scientist in the Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, and Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, the Hospital for Sick Children.