Persistent pain alters AMPA receptor subunit levels in the nucleus accumbens
© Su et al. 2015
Received: 22 May 2015
Accepted: 2 August 2015
Published: 12 August 2015
A variety of pain conditions have been found to be associated with depressed mood in clinical studies. Depression-like behaviors have also been described in animal models of persistent or chronic pain. In rodent chronic neuropathic pain models, elevated levels of GluA1 subunits of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) have been found to inhibit depressive symptoms. However, the effect of reversible post-surgical pain or inflammatory pain on affective behaviors such as depression has not been well characterized in animal models. Neither is it known what time frame is required to elicit AMPA receptor subunit changes in the NAc in various pain conditions.
In this study, we compared behavioral and biochemical changes in three pain models: the paw incision (PI) model for post-incisional pain, the Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) model for persistent but reversible inflammatory pain, and the spared nerve injury (SNI) model for chronic postoperative neuropathic pain. In all three models, rats developed depressive symptoms that were concurrent with the presentation of sensory allodynia. GluA1 levels at the synapses of the NAc, however, differed in these three models. The level of GluA1 subunits of AMPA-type receptors at NAc synapses was not altered in the PI model. GluA1 levels were elevated in the CFA model after a period (7 d) of persistent pain, leading to the formation of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors. As pain symptoms began to resolve, however, GluA1 levels returned to baseline. Meanwhile, in the SNI model, in which pain persisted beyond 14 days, GluA1 levels began to rise after pain became persistent and remained elevated. In addition, we found that blocking GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors in the NAc further decreased the depressive symptoms only in persistent pain models.
Our study shows that while both short-term and persistent pain can trigger depression-like behaviors, GluA1 upregulation in the NAc likely represents a unique adaptive response to minimize depressive symptoms in persistent pain states.
Depression affects up to 100 % of chronic pain patients, and numerous studies suggest that depressed mood accompanies postoperative pain as well [1–7]. Depression leads to additional emotional and cognitive deficits, further impairing recovery and rehabilitation from surgery or injury . While there is evidence that depression alters the threshold of pain, only a limited number of studies have examined whether depression is an integral affective component of the pain experience [9–14]. Pain and depression often co-exist in patients, making it difficult to distinguish a causal relationship. Animal studies provide an opportunity to detect the causal relationship between pain and depressive symptoms and to dissect the molecular mechanisms that regulate this relationship. In rodents, depression-like behaviors can be assessed using the classic sucrose preference test (SPT) , and a number of studies have begun to demonstrate that chronic pain in rats leads to depression-like behaviors [16–20].
Imaging studies have shown that pain activates the nucleus accumbens (NAc) [21–23], a brain region well-known to mediate reward-driven behaviors [24, 25]. At the circuit level, the NAc forms reciprocal projections with the amygdala, prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus – critical regions for pain and depression [18, 20, 26–29]. Recently, neurotrophic, metabolic, transcriptional and epigenetic signaling mechanisms in the NAc have been discovered to regulate depressive behaviors in animal studies [30–34]. Given its established role in depression and its circuit connection to other affective pain centers, the NAc may be expected to contribute to the regulation of pain-induced depression. Molecular changes within the NAc, however, are still not well-defined in pain states.
A previous study shows that the trafficking of GluA1 subunits of the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor in the NAc represents a critical synaptic mechanism in the regulation of chronic neuropathic pain . AMPA receptors, which are the main excitatory postsynaptic receptors for glutamate, are comprised of four distinct subunits, GluA1-4, and subunit composition is crucial to receptor function. Changes in GluA1 subunits at the synapses, specifically, have been shown to strongly regulate depression-like behaviors in a number of animal models [32, 35–39]. GluA1 and 2 subunits are the predominant subunit types in the NAc. Chronic neuropathic pain has been shown to increase GluA1 levels at the NAc synapses, without a concurrent change in GluA2 levels. This selective increase in GluA1 levels leads to the formation of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors [40–42]. Transmission through these GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors in the NAc, in turn, reduces the depressive symptoms of pain . Thus, AMPA receptor trafficking and signaling dynamics represent a powerful endogenous mechanism to help maintain normal hedonic response in the context of neuropathic pain, likely as an adaptive response to pain. It is not clear, however, whether GluA1 upregulation in the NAc represents a unique synaptic adaptation to neuropathic pain. Neither is it known if this form of synaptic plasticity is also found with transient or reversible pain conditions. The answer to these questions can enhance our understanding of chronic pain at the synaptic and circuit level in the brain.
In the current study, we compare sensory and affective symptoms of three different pain models in rats. We use the paw incision (PI) model to mimic short-term post-incisional pain . We use the Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) model to mimic persistent but reversible inflammatory pain, and the spared nerve injury (SNI) model to mimic chronic or long-lasting neuropathic pain. We find that in all three pain models, depression-like behaviors develop concurrently with sensory allodynia, suggesting that depressive and sensory symptoms of pain co-exist. GluA1 upregulation, however, is only found with persistent or chronic pain, as it is not found in the PI model. Furthermore, as pain begins to resolve in the CFA model, GluA1 level also returns to baseline. In contrast, in the SNI model, where pain persists for at least 14 days, GluA1 level remains elevated. In addition, a blockade of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors in the NAc has no effect on the pain behaviors in the PI model, but it further decreases the depressive symptoms in the CFA and SNI models. These results suggest that GluA1 elevation represents a unique dynamic synaptic adaptation to the persistence of pain. This dynamic response provides insight into the role the brain’s reward system plays in chronic pain, and it can potentially serve as a useful molecular marker for the chronicity of pain.
Post-incisional pain causes depression-like behaviors in rats
Next, we measured sucrose preference in rats that experienced PI vs. control rats. Sucrose preference test (SPT) is a classic test for depression-like behaviors in rodents . Specifically, a decrease in rats’ preference for sucrose, a natural reward, indicates anhedonia, a hallmark feature for depression that is pathognomonic in human patients. Compared to control rats, rats in the PI group demonstrated a significant decrease in sucrose preference on day 1 and 2 after incision (Fig. 1b, p < 0.05). This level of decrease in sucrose preference is very similar to what has been previously reported for chronic neuropathic pain models . This decrease in sucrose preference was not due to changes in the PI-treated rats’ ability to drink, as there was no statistically significant difference between the control and PI groups in the volume of total fluid consumption (Fig. 1c, p > 0.05). The PI group consumed a smaller volume of sucrose solution than control, and these rats drank more water during the test (Fig. 1d, e, p > 0.05). These changes were not statistically significant. Together, however, decreased sucrose consumption and increased water consumption result in a statistically significant decrease in sucrose preference in the PI group, suggesting the symptom of pain-induced depression .
From a kinetic standpoint, sucrose preference was depressed for two days and returned to control levels 7 days after PI (Fig. 1b). This time-course of decline and return to normal sucrose preference is remarkably consistent with the development and subsequent resolution of mechanical allodynia (Fig. 1a). These results suggest that post-incisional pain can trigger short-term reversible depression-like behaviors.
Persistent inflammatory pain causes depression-like behaviors in rats
We assessed depressive symptoms of inflammatory pain using the SPT. Compared to control rats, the CFA group demonstrated a significantly decreased sucrose preference on day 1, 2 and 7 after CFA injections (Fig. 2b, p < 0.05). Again, total fluid consumption was not different in these two groups of rats (Fig. 2c, p > 0.05), suggesting that the difference in sucrose preference was not due to altered ability of CFA-treated rats to consume fluid. Instead, this difference was due to the fact that the CFA group consumed less volume of sucrose solution than control (Fig. 2d, p > 0.05), and they drank statistically more water during the test (Fig. 2e, p < 0.05).
14 days after CFA injection, sensory pain symptoms began to resolve, as indicated by a significant increase in mechanical threshold (Fig. 2a). On the SPT, meanwhile, the difference in sucrose preference between these two groups completely disappeared 14 days after CFA administration (Fig. 2b, p > 0.05). Qualitatively, these results indicate that both sensory and depressive symptoms of pain begin to resolve after 14 days.
Persistent neuropathic pain causes depression-like behaviors in rats
Next, we measured sucrose preference after sham or SNI procedures. We found that both sham and SNI-treated rats showed a decreased preference for sucrose 1 day after surgery (Fig. 3b). In the case of sham-treated rats, incisional pain from sham surgery likely caused this short-term decrease in sucrose preference, similar to what we found with PI-treated rats (Fig. 1b). Sham-treated rats, however, quickly recovered their normal sucrose preference starting on postoperative day 2, likely because these rats began to recover from incisional pain. In contrast, sucrose preference decreased further in the SNI group over the next 7–14 days, as neuropathic pain from nerve injury worsened and became persistent or chronic (Fig. 3b). As the result, there were significant differences in sucrose preference on postoperative day 7 and 14 between these the sham and SNI groups (Fig. 3b, p < 0.05). These differences on SPT were due to decreased consumption of sucrose and increased consumption of water by the SNI group (Fig. 3d, e, p < 0.05). The total fluid consumption was not statistically different, however, in these two groups of rats (Fig. 3c).
Post-incisional pain does not increase GluA1 levels at NAc synapses
Inflammatory pain reversibly increases GluA1 levels at NAc synapses
Neuropathic pain causes persistent increases in GluA1 levels at NAc synapses
Persistent pain increases the trafficking of GluA1 to NAc synapses
GluA2-lacking receptors in the NAc regulates depression-like behaviors associated with persistent pain
Most AMPA receptors contain GluA2 subunits. A selective increase in the synaptic level of GluA1 subunits without a concurrent change in the GluA2 level, however, has been shown to lead to the formation of GluA1 homomers, which are GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors [17, 40–42]. GluA2-lacking receptors display unique biophysical properties including Ca2+ permeability and high single unit conductance, and these receptors have been shown to regulate a host of behaviors [40–42], including the relief of depressive symptoms of persistent neuropathic pain in the SNI model .
Next, we examined the effect of Naspm on behavioral responses to persistent inflammatory pain. Our biochemical data suggest that 7 days after the onset of pain, GluA1 levels are selectively increased, allowing the formation of GluA2-lacking receptors at the NAc synapse (Figs. 5c, 6). We found that Naspm infusion into the NAc did not alter mechanical hypersensitivity 7 days after CFA injection (Fig. 9g, p > 0.05), suggesting that increased GluA1 subunits do not play a dominant role in regulating the sensory transmission of the pain signal. However, glutamate signaling is known to play an important role in depression [50–52], and increased transmission through AMPA receptors have been shown to confer antidepressant effects [16, 53–55]. Therefore, we next examined the effect of blocking GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors in the NAc on depression-like behaviors induced by persistent inflammatory pain using the SPT. Sucrose preference was decreased in CFA-treated rats compared with saline-treated rats (Fig. 2b). When we measured sucrose preference in the presence of Naspm treatment (vs. saline) in CFA-treated rats, however, we found that it was substantially further reduced (Fig. 9h, p < 0.05). Thus, blocking GluA2-lacking receptors in the NAc worsened anhedonia, a key feature of depression-like behaviors in CFA-treated rats. These results in the inflammatory pain model have two important implications. First, they confirm our biochemical and electrophysiological results (Figs. 5c and 6) and indicate that GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors are formed in response to persistent pain. Second, these results are similar to previously reported results in the SNI model , and together, these findings suggest that, in vivo, GluA1 subunits are trafficked to the NAc synapse to provide protection against depressive symptoms, possibly as an adaptive mechanism to persistent pain, regardless of the peripheral etiology of pain.
Pain is well-known to cause depressed mood [5–7]. The causal relationship between pain and depression, however, has not been completely established. In this study, we have found that in three different animal pain models, pain can cause depression-like behaviors in a time course that is compatible with the development of sensory allodynia. More importantly, we have found that GluA1 subunits of the AMPA receptors are selectively increased at the synapses of NAc only after pain has become persistent, and that increased GluA1 levels function to relieve depressive symptoms of pain.
Previous studies have shown that chronic neuropathic pain and inflammatory pain both cause depression-like behaviors [16–20], but this is the first report that post-incisional pain, which presents a comparably shorter duration of pain, also causes a similar depressive phenotype. Interestingly, the time course of the development of depressive symptoms closely mirrors that of sensory allodynia in the PI model. In this model, anhedonic symptoms developed and resolved at the same time point when allodynic symptoms developed and resolved.
In the persistent inflammatory pain (CFA) model, anhedonia also developed concurrently with allodynia. In this pain model, anhedonic symptoms resolved after 7 days, when allodynic symptoms also began to resolve. Qualitatively, these results indicate that both sensory and depressive symptoms of pain resolve after a period of time. Quantitatively, however, these data suggest that the affective symptoms of pain resolve more completely than the sensory symptoms of pain early in the process of recovery from peripheral inflammatory insult. Such findings are in fact compatible with what has been reported in the clinical literature on acute and chronic pain, where affective indices for pain have been suggested to normalize earlier than reports of sensory pain scores [1, 6, 56, 57].
In the chronic neuropathic pain (SNI) model, due to the initial incisional pain caused by sham surgery, the sham group also developed reversible anhedonic symptoms. Therefore, the difference in sucrose preference between the SNI and sham groups was not pronounced for the first two days. After two days, however, sham-treated rats recovered their normal hedonic response, just like PI-treated rats. SNI-treated rats, in contrast, continued to display anhedonic symptoms.
Overall, results from these three distinct rat models suggest that depressive symptoms consistently accompany sensory symptoms of pain. These results indicate that depression is caused by pain, and that depressive symptoms are an integral component of the pain experience. There is a growing interest in understanding the mechanisms regulating the affective component of pain, including depressed mood [19, 58, 59]. Our results here validate the use of rat models for the study of depressive pain symptoms.
An alternative explanation for our data is that depression and pain developed independently. However, this is unlikely in our study. In the current study, the time course of depression-like behaviors as shown by anhedonia on the SPT closely mirrors the time course of sensory allodynia in all three pain models. As soon as allodynia begins to diminish, signaling the resolution of post-incisional or inflammatory pain, the hedonic response of rats also returns to normal. Thus, the most likely explanation of our data is that pain directly causes depression-like behaviors. This explanation is also compatible with clinical observations [5, 7].
Prior imaging studies have identified the NAc as a brain region that undergoes changes in morphology and connectivity in response to both acute and chronic pain [21–23, 60]. The changes in the NAc that occur at the molecular and synaptic levels, however, are less well characterized in the context of pain. Chronic neuropathic pain has been shown to selectively increase GluA1 subunit levels at the NAc synapses, leading to the formation of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors . An important contribution in the current study is to define the exact time course of this crucial synaptic event. In the broader context, our work on glutamate signaling complements previous studies demonstrating the roles, within the NAc, of opioid signaling and dopamine signaling in regulating descending inhibition, stress-induced hyperalgesia, and negative reinforcement from pain-relief [61–64].
The synaptic incorporation of GluA1 subunits requires a series of highly regulated signaling steps involving sequential phosphorylation at a number of key residues [49, 65–68]. Thus, the synaptic incorporation of these receptors tends to be found under unique behavioral conditions such as repeated consumption of cocaine or sucrose, prolonged cocaine withdrawal, fear conditioning, and stress [32, 39, 45, 69–72]. Chronic neuropathic pain has been shown to selectively increase GluA1 subunit levels at the NAc synapses, leading to the formation of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors . Our results here suggest that this form of synaptic plasticity is not seen in acute pain and is thus specific to persistent or chronic pain states. Such synaptic plasticity, however, is not unique to neuropathic pain, as persistent inflammatory pain can also cause GluA1 upregulation. Furthermore, our data suggests that phosphorylation of Ser845 may be an important mechanism in the trafficking of GluA1 to the NAc synapse in the inflammatory pain model, similar to previous findings demonstrating the involvement of Ser845 phosphorylation in the synaptic targeting of GluA1 in the SNI model . Thus, phosphorylation of Ser845 plays an important role in delivering GluA1 to the NAc synapses in the presence of persistent pain.
Our results in CFA and SNI models suggest that at least 7 days of persistent pain are required to increase GluA1 AMPA receptor subunits in the NAc. Interestingly, this time frame is almost identical to the amount of time required to increase GluA1 subunits in the NAc in the context of repeated consumption of a natural reward . Natural rewards and pain represent opposite valence in the reward-aversion valuation spectrum. Indeed, GluA1 upregulation has been reported in a number of studies on rewards [45, 70, 73]. Interpreted in this context, our results suggest that rewards and pain provide similar stimuli to trigger AMPA receptor plasticity in the NAc. There is increasing evidence that the NAc codes both the salience and the valence of a stimulus [74–77]. Thus, it is not surprising that similar synaptic changes occur in response to both pain and rewards.
The comparison between the CFA and SNI models reveals that GluA1 upregulation is not permanent. Pain in the CFA model begins to resolve after 14 days. GluA1 levels at the synapse also return to normal at the same time. The level of GluA1 subunits at the NAc synapse remains elevated, however, in the SNI model, because pain also remains persistent 14 days after SNI. This comparison suggests that AMPA receptor signaling not only codes the intensity of an aversive stimulus, but it also codes the duration of this stimulus.
A selective increase in GluA1 subunits without alterations in GluA2 levels leads to the synaptic incorporation of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors [40–42]. Delayed GluA1 upregulation has been described in the NAc with repeated consumption of natural rewards or drugs of addiction [70, 78], similar to AMPA receptor changes identified with prolonged disturbances of sensory systems . In these models, homeostatic plasticity has been posited as a potential mechanism for the formation of GluA2-lacking receptors to regulate behavior. The length of time required to increase GluA1 levels in persistent pain states found in our study is compatible with the time course found in these other behavioral models. This similarity raises the intriguing possibility that the synaptic modification observed in persistent pain states may also represent a form of homeostatic plasticity in the reward system.
Our pharmacological experiments suggest that increased GluA1 levels in the NAc constrain the depressive symptoms of persistent inflammatory pain. Previous studies have identified a similar role for GluA1 in neuropathic pain states . Thus, AMPA receptors play a key role in the regulation of depressive symptoms of pain regardless of the etiology of pain. In a broader sense, these results suggest that glutamate signaling in the NAc may be an important mechanism that links persistent pain with depression. The NAc receives glutamatergic inputs from the PFC, hippocampus, amygdala, and the thalamus . Glutamate signaling in the PFC, amygdala and hippocampus has been studied in the regulation of depression [26–28, 35–37]. Interestingly, altered synaptic activities within these regions have also been demonstrated to regulate cognitive and affective responses to pain [81–85]. Thus, a glutamatergic circuit that involves the PFC, amygdala, hippocampus and NAc may form an important basis for understanding the connection between pain and depression. Future studies to further define the role of AMPA receptor signaling within these interconnected regions will likely result in the precise mapping of an affective pain circuit.
Our study shows that in rats, post-incisional, inflammatory as well as neuropathic pain all can cause depression-like behaviors. However, GluA1 upregulation at the synapses of NAc signals an adaptive response only to persistent pain. Thus, AMPA receptor trafficking dynamics in the brain’s reward system plays an important role in the regulation of chronic pain, and GluA1 levels in the NAc can additionally serve as a molecular marker for the chronicity of pain.
Materials and methods
All procedures in this study were approved by the New York University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) as consistent with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (publication number 85–23) to ensure minimal animal use and discomfort. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were purchased from Taconic Farms, Albany, NY and kept at Mispro Biotech Services Facility in Alexandria Center for Life Science, with controlled humidity, room temperature, and 12-h (6:00 AM to 6:00 PM) light–dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum. Animals arrived to the animal facility at 250 to 300 g and were given on average 7 days to adjust to the new environment prior to the onset of any experiments.
Animal surgeries and procedures
Paw Incisional (PI) surgery
The paw incisional surgery was performed as previously described , with a few minor modifications. Briefly, rats were anaesthetized with Isoflurane anesthesia (1.5–2 %), and the plantar surface of the right hind paw was sterilized and prepared. A 1.5 cm longitudinal incision was cut with a number 10 scalpel, through skin and fascia of the right plantar aspect of the paw. The incision started 0.5 cm from the proximal end of the heel and extended to the middle of the paw. The plantaris muscle was elevated and incised longitudinally. Gentle pressure was applied in order to cease bleeding and the wound was opposed with three single sutures using 5–0 nylon. The animals were allowed to recover in their home cages. Control rats only received Isoflurane anesthesia.
Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) administration
To produce inflammatory pain, CFA (mycobacterium tuberculosis, Sigma-Aldrich [St. Louis, MO], 0.1 ml) was suspended in an oil-saline (1:1) emulsion and injected subcutaneously into the plantar aspect of the hind paw. Control rats received an equal volume of saline injection.
Spared Nerve Injury (SNI) surgery
The spared nerve injury (SNI) surgery has been previously described in detail . Briefly, under Isoflurane anesthesia (1.5–2 %), the skin on the lateral surface of the right thigh of the rat was incised and the biceps femoris muscle was dissected in order to expose three branches of the sciatic nerve: sural, common peroneal, and tibial. The common peroneal and tibial nerves were tied with non-absorbent 5.0 silk sutures at the point of trifurcation. The nerves were then cut distal to the knot, and about 3 to 5 mm of the distal ends were removed. In sham surgeries (control), the nerves mentioned above were dissected but not cut. Muscle and skin layers were then sutured closed in distinct layers.
Cannula implantation and intracranial injections
For cannula implantation, as described previously , rats were anesthetized with isofluorane (1.5–2 %). Rats were stereotaxically implanted with two 26-gauge guide cannulas (PlasticsOne, Roanoke, VA) bilaterally in the NAc core with coordinates: 1.6 mm anterior to bregma; 2.9 mm lateral to the sagittal suture, tips angled 8° toward the midline, 5.6 mm ventral to skull surface. Cannulas were held in place by dental acrylic and patency was maintained with occlusion stylets. For intracranial injections, solutions were loaded into two 30 cm lengths of PE-50 tubing attached at one end to 10-μl Hamilton syringes filled with distilled water and at the other end to 33-gauge injector cannula, which extended 2.0 mm beyond the implanted guides. Injection of solution then delivered bilaterally 0.5 ul of injection volume over a period of 100 s. Injector cannulas were kept in place for another 60 s prior to removal from guides to allow diffusion of solution into the brain. Following the removal of injector cannulas from cannula guides, stylets were replaced, and animals were subject for behavior tests. Behavior tests were done 15 min after intracranial injections. Following animal sacrifice, cryogenic brain sections were collected with thickness of 20 um using Microm HM525 Cryostat and analyzed for cannula localization with histological staining; animals with improper cannula placements were excluded from the study.
1-naphthyl acetyl spermine/N-acetyl-spermine (Naspm) was purchased from Sigma. Naspm was resuspended in saline to a concentration of 80 ug/ul. We injected 0.5 ul in each side. Intracranial injections were given at least 7 days after cannula implantation and were followed by behavioral tests. Equal volume of saline was injected as control.
Animal Behavioral Tests
Mechanical hypersensitivity test
A traditional Dixon up-down method with von Frey filaments was used to measure mechanical hypersensitivity as described previously [16, 87, 88]. In brief, rats were individually placed into plexiglass chambers over a mesh table and acclimated for 20 min before the onset of examination. Beginning with 2.55 g, von Frey filaments in a set with logarithmically incremental stiffness (0.45, 0.75, 1.20, 2.55, 4.40, 6.10, 10.50, 15.10 g) were applied vertically to the plantar surface of the right paw, adjacent to the wound of rats after PI. For SNI and sham group, von Frey filaments were applied to the lateral 1/3 of right paws (in the distribution of the sural nerve) of rats after SNI or sham surgery. Similar tests were done on CFA- or saline-treated rats. 50 % withdrawal threshold was calculated as described previously .
Sucrose preference test
As described previously , animals were acclimated to the test room for at least 20 min. Two bottles (1 % sucrose solution vs. water) were presented to each animal for 1 h. At the end of each test, sucrose preference was calculated as volume of sucrose consumed divided by total liquid consumption for each rat. Rats were allowed to eat ad libitum prior the test.
Subcellular fractionation and Western blotting
Rats were anesthetized with Isoflurane (1.5-2 %) and decapitated immediately. Brains were quickly removed and NAcs were collected on ice. The NAcs were dissected from 1.08 to 2.52 mm anterior to Bregma, with average sample weight of 40 mg. Synaptosome fractions were prepared as described previously [89, 90]. To prepare synaptoneurosome fractions, nucleus accumbens samples were homogenized in an ice-cold solution A (0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM PMSF and 1x Complete Protease Inhibitors; Roche Applied Science). Homogenates were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and the pellet rehomogenized in solution A and centrifuged again at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Combined supernatants were subjected to a second centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Supernatants were then spun at 14,000 rpm for 30 min. Pellet was resuspended in solution B (0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM NaHCO3) and homogenized. Homogenate was layered on top of a 5 mL 1 M sucrose and 1.2 M sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 30,000 rpm for 2 h. Purified synaptosomes were collected at the 1 M and 1.2 M sucrose interface, suspended in solution B and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 45 min. Synaptosomal pellets were resuspended in 25 mM TRIS with 4 % SDS. Equal amounts of fractions were loaded on SDS-PAGE gels and analyzed by Western blot as previously described previously [89, 90]. The following antibodies were used: GluA1 (1:1000, Millipore), phospho-Ser845GluA1 (1:1000, Millipore), GluA2 (1:1000, Millipore) and tubulin (1:30,000, Sigma-Aldrich).
Rats were deeply anesthetized with isofluorane (2 %) and decapitated immediately. Brains were quickly removed into dissection buffer consisted of the following (in mM): 75 sucrose, 87 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgCl2 6 H2O, 25 NaHCO3, 10 dextrose, bubbled with 95 % O2/5 % CO2 (pH 7.4). Coronal slices (300 μm thick) containing the NAc were cut in ice-cold dissection buffer using a vibrotome (Leica, VT1200S). The slices were then transferred to an incubation chamber containing warm dissection buffer for <30mins, and then moved into a warm ACSF (ACSF, in mM: 124 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.5 MgSO4 7H2O, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 dextrose) solution and allowed to return to room temperature for at least 1 h to allow for recovery. Slices were transferred to the recording chamber and perfused (2.0–2.5 ml min − 1) with oxygenated ACSF at 33-35 °C containing 25 μm APV and 10 μm picrotoxin to isolate EPSCs. Somatic whole-cell recordings were made from NAc core region medium spiny neurons in voltage-clamp with a Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices) using IR-DIC video microscopy. Patch pipettes (4–6 MΩ) were filled with intracellular solution (in mM: 125 Cs-gluconate, 2 CsCl, 5 TEA-Cl, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 GTP, 10 phosphocreatine, 10 HEPES, 0.5 EGTA, 100 μM spermine, and 3.5 QX-314). Data were filtered at 2 kHz, digitized at 10 kHz, and analyzed with Clampfit 10 (Molecular Devices). Extracellular stimulation (0.01-1 ms, 5–150 μA) was applied with a small glass bipolar electrode 0.05-0.5 mm from the recording electrode. EPSC amplitude was measured at holding potentials of −70, −50, −30, 0, +20, +40 and +60 mV. The rectification index (ir) was calculated by correcting any potential shifts in reversal potential and computed from the following equation: ir = (I−70/ 70)/(I+40 / 40), where I-70 and I + 40 are the EPSC amplitudes recorded at −70 mV and +40 mV, respectively .
Data analysis and statistics
Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by post hoc multiple pair-wise comparison Bonferroni test was used to compare the 50 % withdrawal threshold of PI vs. control rats; CFA vs. saline-treated rats and SNI vs. sham rats. SPT was also analyzed using the two-way ANOVA test with repeated measures and post hoc multiple pair-wise comparison Bonferroni test. For total fluid consumption, sucrose consumption and water consumption on the SPT, an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to analyze performances of PI vs. control group; CFA vs. saline-treated group and SNI vs. sham group. For Western blots, two-way ANOVA with post hoc multiple pair-wise comparison Bonferroni test was also used to compare the proteins levels of GluA1 and GluA2 in PI vs. control animals; CFA vs. saline-treated animals and SNI vs. sham animals. An unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to analyze the level of phospho-Ser845GluA1 in CFA vs. saline and SNI vs. sham rats. For electrophysiology experiments, difference in rectification index between CFA and control group was analyzed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. An unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare results on the SPT between Naspm and saline treatment in PI- and CFA-treated rats. For all tests, a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism Version 6 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA).
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (K08GM102691, R01GM115384 to JW, R01NS061920 to EZ), the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (MRTG-BS-02/15/2010), the Anesthesia Research Fund of the New York University Department of Anesthesiology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81172546) and the China Scholarship Council.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Dworkin RH, Gitlin MJ. Clinical aspects of depression in chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain. 1991;7(2):79–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller LR, Cano A. Comorbid chronic pain and depression: who is at risk? J Pain. 2009;10(6):619–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohayon MM, Schatzberg AF. Using chronic pain to predict depressive morbidity in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(1):39–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Romano JM, Turner JA. Chronic pain and depression: does the evidence support a relationship? Psychol Bull. 1985;97(1):18–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(9):1253–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edwards RR, Haythornthwaite JA, Smith MT, Klick B, Katz JN. Catastrophizing and depressive symptoms as prospective predictors of outcomes following total knee replacement. Pain Res Manag. 2009;14(4):307–11.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Max MB, Wu T, Atlas SJ, Edwards RR, Haythornthwaite JA, Bollettino AF, et al. A clinical genetic method to identify mechanisms by which pain causes depression and anxiety. Mol Pain. 2006;2:14.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baune BT, Miller R, McAfoose J, Johnson M, Quirk F, Mitchell D. The role of cognitive impairment in general functioning in major depression. Psychiatry Res. 2010;176(2–3):183–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.12.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dickens C, McGowan L, Dale S. Impact of depression on experimental pain perception: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2003;65(3):369–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lautenbacher S, Spernal J, Schreiber W, Krieg JC. Relationship between clinical pain complaints and pain sensitivity in patients with depression and panic disorder. Psychosom Med. 1999;61(6):822–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwier C, Kliem A, Boettger MK, Bar KJ. Increased cold-pain thresholds in major depression. J Pain. 2010;11(3):287–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loggia ML, Mogil JS, Bushnell MC. Experimentally induced mood changes preferentially affect pain unpleasantness. J Pain. 2008;9(9):784–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.03.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi M, Wang JY, Luo F. Depression shows divergent effects on evoked and spontaneous pain behaviors in rats. J Pain. 2010;11(3):219–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ang DC, Chakr R, France CR, Mazzuca SA, Stump TE, Hilligoss J, et al. Association of nociceptive responsivity with clinical pain and the moderating effect of depression. J Pain. 2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.09.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nestler EJ, Hyman SE. Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(10):1161–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2647.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Goffer Y, Xu D, Tukey DS, Shamir DB, Eberle SE, et al. A single subanesthetic dose of ketamine relieves depression-like behaviors induced by neuropathic pain in rats. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(4):812–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822f16ae.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goffer Y, Xu D, Eberle SE, D’Amour J, Lee M, Tukey D, et al. Calcium-permeable AMPA receptors in the nucleus accumbens regulate depression-like behaviors in the chronic neuropathic pain state. J Neurosci. 2013;33(48):19034–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2454-13.2013.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goncalves L, Silva R, Pinto-Ribeiro F, Pego JM, Bessa JM, Pertovaara A, et al. Neuropathic pain is associated with depressive behaviour and induces neuroplasticity in the amygdala of the rat. Exp Neurol. 2008;213(1):48–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.043.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu B, Doods H, Treede RD, Ceci A. Depression-like behaviour in rats with mononeuropathy is reduced by the CB2-selective agonist GW405833. Pain. 2009;143(3):206–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim H, Chen L, Lim G, Sung B, Wang S, McCabe MF, et al. Brain indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase contributes to the comorbidity of pain and depression. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(8):2940–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI61884.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Becerra L, Borsook D. Signal valence in the nucleus accumbens to pain onset and offset. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(7):866–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.007.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baliki MN, Geha PY, Fields HL, Apkarian AV. Predicting value of pain and analgesia: nucleus accumbens response to noxious stimuli changes in the presence of chronic pain. Neuron. 2010;66(1):149–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baliki MN, Petre B, Torbey S, Herrmann KM, Huang L, Schnitzer TJ, et al. Corticostriatal functional connectivity predicts transition to chronic back pain. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(8):1117–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3153.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fields HL. Understanding how opioids contribute to reward and analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(3):242–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.01.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(8):1403–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ressler KJ, Mayberg HS. Targeting abnormal neural circuits in mood and anxiety disorders: from the laboratory to the clinic. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(9):1116–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1944.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pezawas L, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Drabant EM, Verchinski BA, Munoz KE, Kolachana BS, et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(6):828–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1463.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacQueen G, Frodl T. The hippocampus in major depression: evidence for the convergence of the bench and bedside in psychiatric research? Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16(3):252–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bar KJ, Wagner G, Koschke M, Boettger S, Boettger MK, Schlosser R, et al. Increased prefrontal activation during pain perception in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(11):1281–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.02.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nestler EJ, Carlezon Jr WA. The mesolimbic dopamine reward circuit in depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(12):1151–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park SK, Nguyen MD, Fischer A, Luke MP, el Affar B, Dieffenbach PB, et al. Par-4 links dopamine signaling and depression. Cell. 2005;122(2):275–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.031.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim BK, Huang KW, Grueter BA, Rothwell PE, Malenka RC. Anhedonia requires MC4R-mediated synaptic adaptations in nucleus accumbens. Nature. 2012;487(7406):183–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11160.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berton O, McClung CA, Dileone RJ, Krishnan V, Renthal W, Russo SJ, et al. Essential role of BDNF in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway in social defeat stress. Science. 2006;311(5762):864–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120972.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Golden SA, Christoffel DJ, Heshmati M, Hodes GE, Magida J, Davis K, et al. Epigenetic regulation of RAC1 induces synaptic remodeling in stress disorders and depression. Nat Med. 2013;19(3):337–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3090.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chandran A, Iyo AH, Jernigan CS, Legutko B, Austin MC, Karolewicz B. Reduced phosphorylation of the mTOR signaling pathway components in the amygdala of rats exposed to chronic stress. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.08.001.Google Scholar
- Duric V, Banasr M, Stockmeier CA, Simen AA, Newton SS, Overholser JC et al. Altered expression of synapse and glutamate related genes in post-mortem hippocampus of depressed subjects. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012:1–14. doi:10.1017/S1461145712000016.Google Scholar
- Yuen EY, Wei J, Liu W, Zhong P, Li X, Yan Z. Repeated stress causes cognitive impairment by suppressing glutamate receptor expression and function in prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2012;73(5):962–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.033.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chourbaji S, Vogt MA, Fumagalli F, Sohr R, Frasca A, Brandwein C, et al. AMPA receptor subunit 1 (GluR-A) knockout mice model the glutamate hypothesis of depression. FASEB J. 2008;22(9):3129–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-106450.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vialou V, Robison AJ, Laplant QC, Covington 3rd HE, Dietz DM, Ohnishi YN, et al. DeltaFosB in brain reward circuits mediates resilience to stress and antidepressant responses. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(6):745–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2551.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu SJ, Zukin RS. Ca2 + −permeable AMPA receptors in synaptic plasticity and neuronal death. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(3):126–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cull-Candy S, Kelly L, Farrant M. Regulation of Ca2 + −permeable AMPA receptors: synaptic plasticity and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16(3):288–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Isaac JT, Ashby MC, McBain CJ. The role of the GluR2 subunit in AMPA receptor function and synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2007;54(6):859–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brennan TJ, Vandermeulen EP, Gebhart GF. Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. Pain. 1996;64(3):493–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zahn PK, Brennan TJ. Primary and secondary hyperalgesia in a rat model for human postoperative pain. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(3):863–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conrad KL, Tseng KY, Uejima JL, Reimers JM, Heng LJ, Shaham Y, et al. Formation of accumbens GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors mediates incubation of cocaine craving. Nature. 2008;454(7200):118–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06995.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Decosterd I, Woolf CJ. Spared nerve injury: an animal model of persistent peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain. 2000;87(2):149–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barry MF, Ziff EB. Receptor trafficking and the plasticity of excitatory synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12(3):279–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greger IH, Ziff EB, Penn AC. Molecular determinants of AMPA receptor subunit assembly. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(8):407–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Serulle Y, Zhang S, Ninan I, Puzzo D, McCarthy M, Khatri L, et al. A GluR1-cGKII interaction regulates AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron. 2007;56(4):670–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.016.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hashimoto K. Emerging role of glutamate in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. Brain Res Rev. 2009;61(2):105–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.05.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanacora G, Treccani G, Popoli M. Towards a glutamate hypothesis of depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for mood disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62(1):63–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.036.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skolnick P, Popik P, Trullas R. Glutamate-based antidepressants: 20 years on. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30(11):563–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2009.09.002.
- Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, Banasr M, Dwyer JM, Iwata M, et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science. 2010;329(5994):959–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190287.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machado-Vieira R, Salvadore G, Diazgranados N, Zarate Jr CA. Ketamine and the next generation of antidepressants with a rapid onset of action. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;123(2):143–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.010.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skolnick P. AMPA receptors: a target for novel antidepressants? Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(4):347–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brummett CM, Janda AM, Schueller CM, Tsodikov A, Morris M, Williams DA, et al. Survey criteria for fibromyalgia independently predict increased postoperative opioid consumption after lower-extremity joint arthroplasty: a prospective, observational cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(6):1434–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a8eb1f.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruce J, Thornton AJ, Powell R, Johnston M, Wells M, Heys SD, et al. Psychological, surgical, and sociodemographic predictors of pain outcomes after breast cancer surgery: a population-based cohort study. Pain. 2014;155(2):232–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- King T, Vera-Portocarrero L, Gutierrez T, Vanderah TW, Dussor G, Lai J, et al. Unmasking the tonic-aversive state in neuropathic pain. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(11):1364–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2407.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Felice M, Eyde N, Dodick D, Dussor GO, Ossipov MH, Fields HL, et al. Capturing the aversive state of cephalic pain preclinically. Ann Neurol. 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23922.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Geha PY, Baliki MN, Harden RN, Bauer WR, Parrish TB, Apkarian AV. The brain in chronic CRPS pain: abnormal gray-white matter interactions in emotional and autonomic regions. Neuron. 2008;60(4):570–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.022.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scott DJ, Stohler CS, Egnatuk CM, Wang H, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK. Placebo and nocebo effects are defined by opposite opioid and dopaminergic responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(2):220–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mickey BJ, Sanford BJ, Love TM, Shen PH, Hodgkinson CA, Stohler CS, et al. Striatal dopamine release and genetic variation of the serotonin 2C receptor in humans. J Neurosci. 2012;32(27):9344–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1260-12.2012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gear RW, Aley KO, Levine JD. Pain-induced analgesia mediated by mesolimbic reward circuits. J Neurosci. 1999;19(16):7175–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Navratilova E, Xie JY, Okun A, Qu C, Eyde N, Ci S, et al. Pain relief produces negative reinforcement through activation of mesolimbic reward-valuation circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(50):20709–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214605109.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Esteban JA, Shi SH, Wilson C, Nuriya M, Huganir RL, Malinow R. PKA phosphorylation of AMPA receptor subunits controls synaptic trafficking underlying plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(2):136–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn997.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun X, Zhao Y, Wolf ME. Dopamine receptor stimulation modulates AMPA receptor synaptic insertion in prefrontal cortex neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25(32):7342–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4603-04.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boehm J, Kang MG, Johnson RC, Esteban J, Huganir RL, Malinow R. Synaptic incorporation of AMPA receptors during LTP is controlled by a PKC phosphorylation site on GluR1. Neuron. 2006;51(2):213–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim S, Ziff EB. Calcineurin mediates synaptic scaling via synaptic trafficking of Ca2 + −permeable AMPA receptors. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(7), e1001900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001900.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Argilli E, Sibley DR, Malenka RC, England PM, Bonci A. Mechanism and time course of cocaine-induced long-term potentiation in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 2008;28(37):9092–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1001-08.2008.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tukey DS, Ferreira JM, Antoine SO, D’Amour JA, Ninan I, Cabeza de Vaca S, et al. Sucrose ingestion induces rapid AMPA receptor trafficking. J Neurosci. 2013;33(14):6123–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4806-12.2013.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clem RL, Huganir RL. Calcium-permeable AMPA receptor dynamics mediate fear memory erasure. Science. 2010;330(6007):1108–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195298.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Churchill L, Swanson CJ, Urbina M, Kalivas PW. Repeated cocaine alters glutamate receptor subunit levels in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rats that develop behavioral sensitization. J Neurochem. 1999;72(6):2397–403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boudreau AC, Wolf ME. Behavioral sensitization to cocaine is associated with increased AMPA receptor surface expression in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2005;25(40):9144–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2252-05.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cooper JC, Knutson B. Valence and salience contribute to nucleus accumbens activation. Neuroimage. 2008;39(1):538–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.009.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murty VP, Stanek JK, Heusser AC. Representations of distinct salience signals in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2013;33(39):15319–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3002-13.2013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Tomasi D, Telang F. Addiction: beyond dopamine reward circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(37):15037–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010654108.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiu J, Zhang Q, Zhou T, Zhou TT, Chen Y, Hu H. Visualizing an emotional valence map in the limbic forebrain by TAI-FISH. Nat Neurosci. 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reimers JM, Loweth JA, Wolf ME. BDNF contributes to both rapid and homeostatic alterations in AMPA receptor surface expression in nucleus accumbens medium spiny neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39(7):1159–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12422.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maffei A, Nataraj K, Nelson SB, Turrigiano GG. Potentiation of cortical inhibition by visual deprivation. Nature. 2006;443(7107):81–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05079.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sesack SR, Grace AA. Cortico-Basal Ganglia reward network: microcircuitry. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):27–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.93.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cardoso-Cruz H, Lima D, Galhardo V. Impaired spatial memory performance in a rat model of neuropathic pain is associated with reduced hippocampus-prefrontal cortex connectivity. J Neurosci. 2013;33(6):2465–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5197-12.2013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ji G, Neugebauer V. Pain-related deactivation of medial prefrontal cortical neurons involves mGluR1 and GABA(A) receptors. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(5):2642–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00461.2011.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mutso AA, Radzicki D, Baliki MN, Huang L, Banisadr G, Centeno MV, et al. Abnormalities in hippocampal functioning with persistent pain. J Neurosci. 2012;32(17):5747–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0587-12.2012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ji G, Sun H, Fu Y, Li Z, Pais-Vieira M, Galhardo V, et al. Cognitive impairment in pain through amygdala-driven prefrontal cortical deactivation. J Neurosci. 2010;30(15):5451–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0225-10.2010.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li XY, Ko HG, Chen T, Descalzi G, Koga K, Wang H, et al. Alleviating neuropathic pain hypersensitivity by inhibiting PKMzeta in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science. 2010;330(6009):1400–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191792.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carr KD, Chau LS, Cabeza de Vaca S, Gustafson K, Stouffer M, Tukey DS, et al. AMPA receptor subunit GluR1 downstream of D-1 dopamine receptor stimulation in nucleus accumbens shell mediates increased drug reward magnitude in food-restricted rats. Neuroscience. 2010;165(4):1074–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.015.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;53(1):55–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bourquin AF, Suveges M, Pertin M, Gilliard N, Sardy S, Davison AC, et al. Assessment and analysis of mechanical allodynia-like behavior induced by spared nerve injury (SNI) in the mouse. Pain. 2006;122(1–2):14 e1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.036.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jordan BA, Fernholz BD, Boussac M, Xu C, Grigorean G, Ziff EB, et al. Identification and verification of novel rodent postsynaptic density proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(9):857–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M400045-MCP200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Restituito S, Khatri L, Ninan I, Mathews PM, Liu X, Weinberg RJ, et al. Synaptic autoregulation by metalloproteases and gamma-secretase. J Neurosci. 2011;31(34):12083–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-11.2011.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar